home.social

Search

176 results for “andrecatta”

  1. La vittoria di Wout alla #parigiroubaix La cosa più emozionante dello sport del decennio per me
    #parisroubaix #cycling

  2. La vittoria di Wout alla #parigiroubaix La cosa più emozionante dello sport del decennio per me
    #parisroubaix #cycling

  3. La vittoria di Wout alla La cosa più emozionante dello sport del decennio per me

  4. La vittoria di Wout alla #parigiroubaix La cosa più emozionante dello sport del decennio per me
    #parisroubaix #cycling

  5. La vittoria di Wout alla #parigiroubaix La cosa più emozionante dello sport del decennio per me
    #parisroubaix #cycling

  6. Design's most distinctive cognitive contribution — abductive reasoning — remains largely confined to the studio, the workshop, the project timeline. We theorize it extensively (Kolko, Zingale, Dorst), we recognize it as the engine of design synthesis, the mechanism through which incomplete observations become structured hypotheses, through which uncertainty generates possibilities.
    Yet when it comes to collective contexts — communities navigating complex territorial challenges — abduction stays trapped in episodic formats, limited by the well-known pathologies of participation: who gets to be in the room, for how long, with what resources, and whose complexity gets actually processed.

    This is the gap we explored in the paper presented at the Italian Design Society last June with Michele Zannoni and Flaviano Celaschi. The Systemic Relational Insight (SRI) framework, born from my doctoral research at the University of Bologna, proposes a hybrid intelligence process — community and machine — designed to scale the abductive dimension of sensemaking across broader publics, longer timeframes, and thicker layers of data and knowledge.
    The core idea: integrate qualitative knowledge from situated workshops with quantitative data and scientific references, generate candidate insights and submit them to community validation (bringing scale in the formula to reach who didn't attend). An insight here is never a single statement delivered by an algorithm. It's a cluster containing multiple versions, each traceable to its genealogy of sessions, voices, and contexts, each carrying different degrees of community consensus, data support, and scientific consistency.
    That simple.

    1/2

    #DesignResearch #AbductiveThinking #Sensemaking #SystemicDesign #CommunityIntelligence #HybridIntelligence #PluralDesign

  7. Design's most distinctive cognitive contribution — abductive reasoning — remains largely confined to the studio, the workshop, the project timeline. We theorize it extensively (Kolko, Zingale, Dorst), we recognize it as the engine of design synthesis, the mechanism through which incomplete observations become structured hypotheses, through which uncertainty generates possibilities.
    Yet when it comes to collective contexts — communities navigating complex territorial challenges — abduction stays trapped in episodic formats, limited by the well-known pathologies of participation: who gets to be in the room, for how long, with what resources, and whose complexity gets actually processed.

    This is the gap we explored in the paper presented at the Italian Design Society last June with Michele Zannoni and Flaviano Celaschi. The Systemic Relational Insight (SRI) framework, born from my doctoral research at the University of Bologna, proposes a hybrid intelligence process — community and machine — designed to scale the abductive dimension of sensemaking across broader publics, longer timeframes, and thicker layers of data and knowledge.
    The core idea: integrate qualitative knowledge from situated workshops with quantitative data and scientific references, generate candidate insights and submit them to community validation (bringing scale in the formula to reach who didn't attend). An insight here is never a single statement delivered by an algorithm. It's a cluster containing multiple versions, each traceable to its genealogy of sessions, voices, and contexts, each carrying different degrees of community consensus, data support, and scientific consistency.
    That simple.

    1/2

    #DesignResearch #AbductiveThinking #Sensemaking #SystemicDesign #CommunityIntelligence #HybridIntelligence #PluralDesign

  8. Design's most distinctive cognitive contribution — abductive reasoning — remains largely confined to the studio, the workshop, the project timeline. We theorize it extensively (Kolko, Zingale, Dorst), we recognize it as the engine of design synthesis, the mechanism through which incomplete observations become structured hypotheses, through which uncertainty generates possibilities.
    Yet when it comes to collective contexts — communities navigating complex territorial challenges — abduction stays trapped in episodic formats, limited by the well-known pathologies of participation: who gets to be in the room, for how long, with what resources, and whose complexity gets actually processed.

    This is the gap we explored in the paper presented at the Italian Design Society last June with Michele Zannoni and Flaviano Celaschi. The Systemic Relational Insight (SRI) framework, born from my doctoral research at the University of Bologna, proposes a hybrid intelligence process — community and machine — designed to scale the abductive dimension of sensemaking across broader publics, longer timeframes, and thicker layers of data and knowledge.
    The core idea: integrate qualitative knowledge from situated workshops with quantitative data and scientific references, generate candidate insights and submit them to community validation (bringing scale in the formula to reach who didn't attend). An insight here is never a single statement delivered by an algorithm. It's a cluster containing multiple versions, each traceable to its genealogy of sessions, voices, and contexts, each carrying different degrees of community consensus, data support, and scientific consistency.
    That simple.

    1/2

  9. Design's most distinctive cognitive contribution — abductive reasoning — remains largely confined to the studio, the workshop, the project timeline. We theorize it extensively (Kolko, Zingale, Dorst), we recognize it as the engine of design synthesis, the mechanism through which incomplete observations become structured hypotheses, through which uncertainty generates possibilities.
    Yet when it comes to collective contexts — communities navigating complex territorial challenges — abduction stays trapped in episodic formats, limited by the well-known pathologies of participation: who gets to be in the room, for how long, with what resources, and whose complexity gets actually processed.

    This is the gap we explored in the paper presented at the Italian Design Society last June with Michele Zannoni and Flaviano Celaschi. The Systemic Relational Insight (SRI) framework, born from my doctoral research at the University of Bologna, proposes a hybrid intelligence process — community and machine — designed to scale the abductive dimension of sensemaking across broader publics, longer timeframes, and thicker layers of data and knowledge.
    The core idea: integrate qualitative knowledge from situated workshops with quantitative data and scientific references, generate candidate insights and submit them to community validation (bringing scale in the formula to reach who didn't attend). An insight here is never a single statement delivered by an algorithm. It's a cluster containing multiple versions, each traceable to its genealogy of sessions, voices, and contexts, each carrying different degrees of community consensus, data support, and scientific consistency.
    That simple.

    1/2

    #DesignResearch #AbductiveThinking #Sensemaking #SystemicDesign #CommunityIntelligence #HybridIntelligence #PluralDesign

  10. Design's most distinctive cognitive contribution — abductive reasoning — remains largely confined to the studio, the workshop, the project timeline. We theorize it extensively (Kolko, Zingale, Dorst), we recognize it as the engine of design synthesis, the mechanism through which incomplete observations become structured hypotheses, through which uncertainty generates possibilities.
    Yet when it comes to collective contexts — communities navigating complex territorial challenges — abduction stays trapped in episodic formats, limited by the well-known pathologies of participation: who gets to be in the room, for how long, with what resources, and whose complexity gets actually processed.

    This is the gap we explored in the paper presented at the Italian Design Society last June with Michele Zannoni and Flaviano Celaschi. The Systemic Relational Insight (SRI) framework, born from my doctoral research at the University of Bologna, proposes a hybrid intelligence process — community and machine — designed to scale the abductive dimension of sensemaking across broader publics, longer timeframes, and thicker layers of data and knowledge.
    The core idea: integrate qualitative knowledge from situated workshops with quantitative data and scientific references, generate candidate insights and submit them to community validation (bringing scale in the formula to reach who didn't attend). An insight here is never a single statement delivered by an algorithm. It's a cluster containing multiple versions, each traceable to its genealogy of sessions, voices, and contexts, each carrying different degrees of community consensus, data support, and scientific consistency.
    That simple.

    1/2

    #DesignResearch #AbductiveThinking #Sensemaking #SystemicDesign #CommunityIntelligence #HybridIntelligence #PluralDesign

  11. For those who haven't realized yet, the perpetual battle for power is always about knowledge manipulation. As knowledge availability, mobilization, and accessibility become increasingly central to current technological paradigms in the West, it's time to take cultural and epistemological matters seriously.

    #Technology #AI #KnowledgeManipulation #CulturalStudies #Epistemology #PowerAndControl #TechTrends #WesternTechnology #DigitalAge

    axios.com/2025/03/06/exclusive via @digyoursoul

  12. For those who haven't realized yet, the perpetual battle for power is always about knowledge manipulation. As knowledge availability, mobilization, and accessibility become increasingly central to current technological paradigms in the West, it's time to take cultural and epistemological matters seriously.

    #Technology #AI #KnowledgeManipulation #CulturalStudies #Epistemology #PowerAndControl #TechTrends #WesternTechnology #DigitalAge

    axios.com/2025/03/06/exclusive via @digyoursoul

  13. For those who haven't realized yet, the perpetual battle for power is always about knowledge manipulation. As knowledge availability, mobilization, and accessibility become increasingly central to current technological paradigms in the West, it's time to take cultural and epistemological matters seriously.

    axios.com/2025/03/06/exclusive via @digyoursoul

  14. For those who haven't realized yet, the perpetual battle for power is always about knowledge manipulation. As knowledge availability, mobilization, and accessibility become increasingly central to current technological paradigms in the West, it's time to take cultural and epistemological matters seriously.

    #Technology #AI #KnowledgeManipulation #CulturalStudies #Epistemology #PowerAndControl #TechTrends #WesternTechnology #DigitalAge

    axios.com/2025/03/06/exclusive via @digyoursoul

  15. For those who haven't realized yet, the perpetual battle for power is always about knowledge manipulation. As knowledge availability, mobilization, and accessibility become increasingly central to current technological paradigms in the West, it's time to take cultural and epistemological matters seriously.

    #Technology #AI #KnowledgeManipulation #CulturalStudies #Epistemology #PowerAndControl #TechTrends #WesternTechnology #DigitalAge

    axios.com/2025/03/06/exclusive via @digyoursoul

  16. Amodei, Altman, labour market forecasts, alleged unemployment, shifting skills, and seller hoaxes.

    Yes, the discussion deserves a lot of attention, but at this stage the hype mixed with communication from lobbies and pure sales activities leads to putting together easy correlations on some data.

    Even two years ago hallucinating scenarios were told (or rather here, hallucinated 🙃), related to the adoption of GenAI.

    When we look at these scenarios today, in the light of the real data not on adoption but above all on the steps backwards compared to corporate contracts, we realise that things are always a little more complicated on the ground.

    It is true that automation takes away space for juniors, but it is also true that for everyone else new figures are becoming necessary, IT jobs are not decreasing (despite the initial layouffs rushed by many US companies that now re-employ them with different job descriptions), because today there are gains in overall productivity that are laughable with an increase in pressure on individuals (and the levelling logics suggest that when a technology reaches everyone, it increases performance but not the volume of work).

    Drawing conclusions in these moments, when you are too attentive to bubbles like this here - and less to data and research (the real one, not the one of the sellers' reports!) - leads to bad decisions.

    #Amodei #Altman #LabourMarket #FutureOfWork #Unemployment #SkillShift #Automation #GenAI #TechTrends #DataAnalysis #CorporateTech #Productivity #ITJobs #TechInsights #HallucinatingScenarios #TechHype #ResearchMatters #TechDecisions

  17. Amodei, Altman, labour market forecasts, alleged unemployment, shifting skills, and seller hoaxes.

    Yes, the discussion deserves a lot of attention, but at this stage the hype mixed with communication from lobbies and pure sales activities leads to putting together easy correlations on some data.

    Even two years ago hallucinating scenarios were told (or rather here, hallucinated 🙃), related to the adoption of GenAI.

    When we look at these scenarios today, in the light of the real data not on adoption but above all on the steps backwards compared to corporate contracts, we realise that things are always a little more complicated on the ground.

    It is true that automation takes away space for juniors, but it is also true that for everyone else new figures are becoming necessary, IT jobs are not decreasing (despite the initial layouffs rushed by many US companies that now re-employ them with different job descriptions), because today there are gains in overall productivity that are laughable with an increase in pressure on individuals (and the levelling logics suggest that when a technology reaches everyone, it increases performance but not the volume of work).

    Drawing conclusions in these moments, when you are too attentive to bubbles like this here - and less to data and research (the real one, not the one of the sellers' reports!) - leads to bad decisions.

    #Amodei #Altman #LabourMarket #FutureOfWork #Unemployment #SkillShift #Automation #GenAI #TechTrends #DataAnalysis #CorporateTech #Productivity #ITJobs #TechInsights #HallucinatingScenarios #TechHype #ResearchMatters #TechDecisions

  18. Amodei, Altman, labour market forecasts, alleged unemployment, shifting skills, and seller hoaxes.

    Yes, the discussion deserves a lot of attention, but at this stage the hype mixed with communication from lobbies and pure sales activities leads to putting together easy correlations on some data.

    Even two years ago hallucinating scenarios were told (or rather here, hallucinated 🙃), related to the adoption of GenAI.

    When we look at these scenarios today, in the light of the real data not on adoption but above all on the steps backwards compared to corporate contracts, we realise that things are always a little more complicated on the ground.

    It is true that automation takes away space for juniors, but it is also true that for everyone else new figures are becoming necessary, IT jobs are not decreasing (despite the initial layouffs rushed by many US companies that now re-employ them with different job descriptions), because today there are gains in overall productivity that are laughable with an increase in pressure on individuals (and the levelling logics suggest that when a technology reaches everyone, it increases performance but not the volume of work).

    Drawing conclusions in these moments, when you are too attentive to bubbles like this here - and less to data and research (the real one, not the one of the sellers' reports!) - leads to bad decisions.

  19. Amodei, Altman, labour market forecasts, alleged unemployment, shifting skills, and seller hoaxes.

    Yes, the discussion deserves a lot of attention, but at this stage the hype mixed with communication from lobbies and pure sales activities leads to putting together easy correlations on some data.

    Even two years ago hallucinating scenarios were told (or rather here, hallucinated 🙃), related to the adoption of GenAI.

    When we look at these scenarios today, in the light of the real data not on adoption but above all on the steps backwards compared to corporate contracts, we realise that things are always a little more complicated on the ground.

    It is true that automation takes away space for juniors, but it is also true that for everyone else new figures are becoming necessary, IT jobs are not decreasing (despite the initial layouffs rushed by many US companies that now re-employ them with different job descriptions), because today there are gains in overall productivity that are laughable with an increase in pressure on individuals (and the levelling logics suggest that when a technology reaches everyone, it increases performance but not the volume of work).

    Drawing conclusions in these moments, when you are too attentive to bubbles like this here - and less to data and research (the real one, not the one of the sellers' reports!) - leads to bad decisions.

    #Amodei #Altman #LabourMarket #FutureOfWork #Unemployment #SkillShift #Automation #GenAI #TechTrends #DataAnalysis #CorporateTech #Productivity #ITJobs #TechInsights #HallucinatingScenarios #TechHype #ResearchMatters #TechDecisions

  20. Amodei, Altman, labour market forecasts, alleged unemployment, shifting skills, and seller hoaxes.

    Yes, the discussion deserves a lot of attention, but at this stage the hype mixed with communication from lobbies and pure sales activities leads to putting together easy correlations on some data.

    Even two years ago hallucinating scenarios were told (or rather here, hallucinated 🙃), related to the adoption of GenAI.

    When we look at these scenarios today, in the light of the real data not on adoption but above all on the steps backwards compared to corporate contracts, we realise that things are always a little more complicated on the ground.

    It is true that automation takes away space for juniors, but it is also true that for everyone else new figures are becoming necessary, IT jobs are not decreasing (despite the initial layouffs rushed by many US companies that now re-employ them with different job descriptions), because today there are gains in overall productivity that are laughable with an increase in pressure on individuals (and the levelling logics suggest that when a technology reaches everyone, it increases performance but not the volume of work).

    Drawing conclusions in these moments, when you are too attentive to bubbles like this here - and less to data and research (the real one, not the one of the sellers' reports!) - leads to bad decisions.

    #Amodei #Altman #LabourMarket #FutureOfWork #Unemployment #SkillShift #Automation #GenAI #TechTrends #DataAnalysis #CorporateTech #Productivity #ITJobs #TechInsights #HallucinatingScenarios #TechHype #ResearchMatters #TechDecisions

  21. What a marvel!
    Let’s hope no semiologist gets hurt reading this piece :)

    Art is becoming increasingly essential in asserting our cultural autonomy against a technological determinism that, more often than not, exists solely in the minds of those who take the Gartner Hype Cycle as gospel and the marketing of major consulting firms as sacred writ.

    The space of critique is our salvation.
    The future is a space for self-determination.

    [Link to article: Meet the Artist Using Ritual Magic to Trap Self-Driving Cars – Vice]

    vice.com/en/article/meet-the-a

    #ArtAsResistance #CriticalDesign #TechnologicalDeterminism #CulturalAutonomy #SpeculativeArt #AIArt #TechCriticism #FutureIsNow #SelfDrivingCars #RitualMagic #ContemporaryArt #AutonomyVsAutomation #DigitalCulture #PostDigitalArt

  22. What a marvel!
    Let’s hope no semiologist gets hurt reading this piece :)

    Art is becoming increasingly essential in asserting our cultural autonomy against a technological determinism that, more often than not, exists solely in the minds of those who take the Gartner Hype Cycle as gospel and the marketing of major consulting firms as sacred writ.

    The space of critique is our salvation.
    The future is a space for self-determination.

    [Link to article: Meet the Artist Using Ritual Magic to Trap Self-Driving Cars – Vice]

    vice.com/en/article/meet-the-a

    #ArtAsResistance #CriticalDesign #TechnologicalDeterminism #CulturalAutonomy #SpeculativeArt #AIArt #TechCriticism #FutureIsNow #SelfDrivingCars #RitualMagic #ContemporaryArt #AutonomyVsAutomation #DigitalCulture #PostDigitalArt

  23. What a marvel!
    Let’s hope no semiologist gets hurt reading this piece :)

    Art is becoming increasingly essential in asserting our cultural autonomy against a technological determinism that, more often than not, exists solely in the minds of those who take the Gartner Hype Cycle as gospel and the marketing of major consulting firms as sacred writ.

    The space of critique is our salvation.
    The future is a space for self-determination.

    [Link to article: Meet the Artist Using Ritual Magic to Trap Self-Driving Cars – Vice]

    vice.com/en/article/meet-the-a

  24. What a marvel!
    Let’s hope no semiologist gets hurt reading this piece :)

    Art is becoming increasingly essential in asserting our cultural autonomy against a technological determinism that, more often than not, exists solely in the minds of those who take the Gartner Hype Cycle as gospel and the marketing of major consulting firms as sacred writ.

    The space of critique is our salvation.
    The future is a space for self-determination.

    [Link to article: Meet the Artist Using Ritual Magic to Trap Self-Driving Cars – Vice]

    vice.com/en/article/meet-the-a

    #ArtAsResistance #CriticalDesign #TechnologicalDeterminism #CulturalAutonomy #SpeculativeArt #AIArt #TechCriticism #FutureIsNow #SelfDrivingCars #RitualMagic #ContemporaryArt #AutonomyVsAutomation #DigitalCulture #PostDigitalArt

  25. What a marvel!
    Let’s hope no semiologist gets hurt reading this piece :)

    Art is becoming increasingly essential in asserting our cultural autonomy against a technological determinism that, more often than not, exists solely in the minds of those who take the Gartner Hype Cycle as gospel and the marketing of major consulting firms as sacred writ.

    The space of critique is our salvation.
    The future is a space for self-determination.

    [Link to article: Meet the Artist Using Ritual Magic to Trap Self-Driving Cars – Vice]

    vice.com/en/article/meet-the-a

    #ArtAsResistance #CriticalDesign #TechnologicalDeterminism #CulturalAutonomy #SpeculativeArt #AIArt #TechCriticism #FutureIsNow #SelfDrivingCars #RitualMagic #ContemporaryArt #AutonomyVsAutomation #DigitalCulture #PostDigitalArt

  26. Many academic papers could be half as long—or less. But we write them to be self-contained and accessible to a broad scholarly audience, so we repeat background, define well-known terms, pad the argument just to be safe. And then publishers restrict the number of footnotes.

    In an ideal world, a paper would be short, dense, even cryptic—and followed by a massive apparatus of notes explaining context, terminology, prior work, alternatives. Instead, we do the opposite: long main text, minimal notes

    #AcademicWriting #Scholarship #Footnotes #OpenScience #Epistemology #Publishing #AcademicLife #WritingThoughts #ScienceCommunication #ResearchWriting #AcademicTwitter #MastodonAcademia

  27. Many academic papers could be half as long—or less. But we write them to be self-contained and accessible to a broad scholarly audience, so we repeat background, define well-known terms, pad the argument just to be safe. And then publishers restrict the number of footnotes.

    In an ideal world, a paper would be short, dense, even cryptic—and followed by a massive apparatus of notes explaining context, terminology, prior work, alternatives. Instead, we do the opposite: long main text, minimal notes

    #AcademicWriting #Scholarship #Footnotes #OpenScience #Epistemology #Publishing #AcademicLife #WritingThoughts #ScienceCommunication #ResearchWriting #AcademicTwitter #MastodonAcademia

  28. Many academic papers could be half as long—or less. But we write them to be self-contained and accessible to a broad scholarly audience, so we repeat background, define well-known terms, pad the argument just to be safe. And then publishers restrict the number of footnotes.

    In an ideal world, a paper would be short, dense, even cryptic—and followed by a massive apparatus of notes explaining context, terminology, prior work, alternatives. Instead, we do the opposite: long main text, minimal notes