home.social

#njac — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #njac, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. #NCPPR is not a concerned shareholder. They're a #KochBrothers-backed conservative group that bought a handful of #NYT shares so they could sue. A court already threw out the same tactic against #Starbucks: #NCPPR wasn't protecting investors, it was "advancing its own political agenda" with "obvious vindictiveness."

    The #JPost article frames them as accountability watchdogs:

    […] "The purpose of the demand is to investigate whether the company's board of directors and senior management have upheld their fiduciary duties" … "It is instead seeking to investigate possible corporate mismanagement, inadequate oversight" … "Mostly, the inspection of the processes is of great shareholder concern, especially for financial reasons."

    #NCPPR owns maybe 56 shares. A court already ruled they use lawsuits to push politics, not protect investors. They brought in a tiny Jewish advocacy group (#NJAC, ~$11K annual budget) for the optics.

    Their own lawyer admits a defamation suit "would likely fail." They're using a US law called Section 1782 - which lets parties in foreign lawsuits compel US companies to hand over evidence. Israel files a weak defamation case, then uses 1782 to force the #NYT to produce everything: notes, sources, names, photos, medical records.

    jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitis

    vinnews.com/2026/05/14/israel-

    #ncppr #kochbrothers #nyt #starbucks #jpost #njac #gazagenocide #israel #palestine #christianzionism

  2. #NCPPR is not a concerned shareholder. They're a #KochBrothers-backed conservative group that bought a handful of #NYT shares so they could sue. A court already threw out the same tactic against #Starbucks: #NCPPR wasn't protecting investors, it was "advancing its own political agenda" with "obvious vindictiveness."

    The #JPost article frames them as accountability watchdogs:

    […] "The purpose of the demand is to investigate whether the company's board of directors and senior management have upheld their fiduciary duties" … "It is instead seeking to investigate possible corporate mismanagement, inadequate oversight" … "Mostly, the inspection of the processes is of great shareholder concern, especially for financial reasons."

    #NCPPR owns maybe 56 shares. A court already ruled they use lawsuits to push politics, not protect investors. They brought in a tiny Jewish advocacy group (#NJAC, ~$11K annual budget) for the optics.

    Their own lawyer admits a defamation suit "would likely fail." They're using a US law called Section 1782 - which lets parties in foreign lawsuits compel US companies to hand over evidence. Israel files a weak defamation case, then uses 1782 to force the #NYT to produce everything: notes, sources, names, photos, medical records.

    jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitis

    vinnews.com/2026/05/14/israel-

    #ncppr #kochbrothers #nyt #starbucks #jpost #njac #gazagenocide #israel #palestine #christianzionism

  3. #NCPPR is not a concerned shareholder. They're a #KochBrothers-backed conservative group that bought a handful of #NYT shares so they could sue. A court already threw out the same tactic against #Starbucks: #NCPPR wasn't protecting investors, it was "advancing its own political agenda" with "obvious vindictiveness."

    The #JPost article frames them as accountability watchdogs:

    […] "The purpose of the demand is to investigate whether the company's board of directors and senior management have upheld their fiduciary duties" … "It is instead seeking to investigate possible corporate mismanagement, inadequate oversight" … "Mostly, the inspection of the processes is of great shareholder concern, especially for financial reasons."

    #NCPPR owns maybe 56 shares. A court already ruled they use lawsuits to push politics, not protect investors. They brought in a tiny Jewish advocacy group (#NJAC, ~$11K annual budget) for the optics.

    Their own lawyer admits a defamation suit "would likely fail." They're using a US law called Section 1782 - which lets parties in foreign lawsuits compel US companies to hand over evidence. Israel files a weak defamation case, then uses 1782 to force the #NYT to produce everything: notes, sources, names, photos, medical records.

    jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitis

    vinnews.com/2026/05/14/israel-

    #ncppr #kochbrothers #nyt #starbucks #jpost #njac #gazagenocide #israel #palestine #christianzionism

  4. #NCPPR is not a concerned shareholder. They're a #KochBrothers-backed conservative group that bought a handful of #NYT shares so they could sue. A court already threw out the same tactic against #Starbucks: #NCPPR wasn't protecting investors, it was "advancing its own political agenda" with "obvious vindictiveness."

    The #JPost article frames them as accountability watchdogs:

    […] "The purpose of the demand is to investigate whether the company's board of directors and senior management have upheld their fiduciary duties" … "It is instead seeking to investigate possible corporate mismanagement, inadequate oversight" … "Mostly, the inspection of the processes is of great shareholder concern, especially for financial reasons."

    #NCPPR owns maybe 56 shares. A court already ruled they use lawsuits to push politics, not protect investors. They brought in a tiny Jewish advocacy group (#NJAC, ~$11K annual budget) for the optics.

    Their own lawyer admits a defamation suit "would likely fail." They're using a US law called Section 1782 - which lets parties in foreign lawsuits compel US companies to hand over evidence. Israel files a weak defamation case, then uses 1782 to force the #NYT to produce everything: notes, sources, names, photos, medical records.

    jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitis

    vinnews.com/2026/05/14/israel-

    #ncppr #kochbrothers #nyt #starbucks #jpost #njac #gazagenocide #israel #palestine #christianzionism

  5. #NCPPR is not a concerned shareholder. They're a #KochBrothers-backed conservative group that bought a handful of #NYT shares so they could sue. A court already threw out the same tactic against #Starbucks: #NCPPR wasn't protecting investors, it was "advancing its own political agenda" with "obvious vindictiveness."

    The #JPost article frames them as accountability watchdogs:

    […] "The purpose of the demand is to investigate whether the company's board of directors and senior management have upheld their fiduciary duties" … "It is instead seeking to investigate possible corporate mismanagement, inadequate oversight" … "Mostly, the inspection of the processes is of great shareholder concern, especially for financial reasons."

    #NCPPR owns maybe 56 shares. A court already ruled they use lawsuits to push politics, not protect investors. They brought in a tiny Jewish advocacy group (#NJAC, ~$11K annual budget) for the optics.

    Their own lawyer admits a defamation suit "would likely fail." They're using a US law called Section 1782 - which lets parties in foreign lawsuits compel US companies to hand over evidence. Israel files a weak defamation case, then uses 1782 to force the #NYT to produce everything: notes, sources, names, photos, medical records.

    jpost.com/diaspora/antisemitis

    vinnews.com/2026/05/14/israel-

    #ncppr #kochbrothers #nyt #starbucks #jpost #njac #gazagenocide #israel #palestine #christianzionism

  6. The National Jewish Advocacy Center (NJAC) is attempting to remove a book written by UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese from Amazon due to her vocal stance on Israeli war crimes and the genocide of Palestinians.

    #NJAC #FrancescaAlbanese #Amazon #Censorship #Gaza #SaveGaza #StopIsrael #SanctionIsrael #BDS
    #palestine #Israel #Politics #Genocide #CeasefireScam

    @palestine

  7. The National Jewish Advocacy Center (NJAC) is attempting to remove a book written by UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese from Amazon due to her vocal stance on Israeli war crimes and the genocide of Palestinians.

    #NJAC #FrancescaAlbanese #Amazon #Censorship #Gaza #SaveGaza #StopIsrael #SanctionIsrael #BDS
    #palestine #Israel #Politics #Genocide #CeasefireScam

    @palestine

  8. The National Jewish Advocacy Center (NJAC) is attempting to remove a book written by UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese from Amazon due to her vocal stance on Israeli war crimes and the genocide of Palestinians.

    #NJAC #FrancescaAlbanese #Amazon #Censorship #Gaza #SaveGaza #StopIsrael #SanctionIsrael #BDS
    #palestine #Israel #Politics #Genocide #CeasefireScam

    @palestine

  9. The National Jewish Advocacy Center (NJAC) is attempting to remove a book written by UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese from Amazon due to her vocal stance on Israeli war crimes and the genocide of Palestinians.

    #NJAC #FrancescaAlbanese #Amazon #Censorship #Gaza #SaveGaza #StopIsrael #SanctionIsrael #BDS
    #palestine #Israel #Politics #Genocide #CeasefireScam

    @palestine

  10. The National Jewish Advocacy Center (NJAC) is attempting to remove a book written by UN Special Rapporteur Francesca Albanese from Amazon due to her vocal stance on Israeli war crimes and the genocide of Palestinians.

    #NJAC #FrancescaAlbanese #Amazon #Censorship #Gaza #SaveGaza #StopIsrael #SanctionIsrael #BDS
    #palestine #Israel #Politics #Genocide #CeasefireScam

    @palestine

  11. National #JewishAdvocacy Center (#NJAC) announced a lawsuit against #AssociatedPress (#AP) for material support of #terrorism for buying photos from alleged #Hamas linked #freelancers, including award winning #Gaza #journalists who are accused of knowing ahead of time about the October 7 massacres. The suit sought damages under the Anti-Terrorism Act and was filed in Southern District of #Florida on behalf of #Israeli-Americans who were survivors, family of victims, or those displaced after the attack.

    jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/art

  12. National #JewishAdvocacy Center (#NJAC) announced a lawsuit against #AssociatedPress (#AP) for material support of #terrorism for buying photos from alleged #Hamas linked #freelancers, including award winning #Gaza journalists who are accused of knowing ahead of time about the October 7 massacres. The suit sought damages under the Anti-Terrorism Act and was filed in Southern District of #Florida on behalf of #Israeli-Americans who were survivors, family of victims, or those displaced after the attack.

    jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/art

  13. National #JewishAdvocacy Center (#NJAC) announced a lawsuit against #AssociatedPress (#AP) for material support of #terrorism for buying photos from alleged #Hamas linked #freelancers, including award winning #Gaza #journalists who are accused of knowing ahead of time about the October 7 massacres. The suit sought damages under the Anti-Terrorism Act and was filed in Southern District of #Florida on behalf of #Israeli-Americans who were survivors, family of victims, or those displaced after the attack.

    jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/art

  14. National #JewishAdvocacy Center (#NJAC) announced a lawsuit against #AssociatedPress (#AP) for material support of #terrorism for buying photos from alleged #Hamas linked #freelancers, including award winning #Gaza #journalists who are accused of knowing ahead of time about the October 7 massacres. The suit sought damages under the Anti-Terrorism Act and was filed in Southern District of #Florida on behalf of #Israeli-Americans who were survivors, family of victims, or those displaced after the attack.

    jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/art

  15. National #JewishAdvocacy Center (#NJAC) announced a lawsuit against #AssociatedPress (#AP) for material support of #terrorism for buying photos from alleged #Hamas linked #freelancers, including award winning #Gaza journalists who are accused of knowing ahead of time about the October 7 massacres. The suit sought damages under the Anti-Terrorism Act and was filed in Southern District of #Florida on behalf of #Israeli-Americans who were survivors, family of victims, or those displaced after the attack.

    jpost.com/israel-hamas-war/art

  16. While the entire higher judiciary crushed #NJAC - what has it done to bring about accountability in judiciary - failing which - it is every citizen's right to call out the *entire higher judiciary* corrupt.

  17. While the entire higher judiciary crushed #NJAC - what has it done to bring about accountability in judiciary - failing which - it is every citizen's right to call out the *entire higher judiciary* corrupt.