#icmje — Public Fediverse posts

For ways forward, we looked at #ICMJE definitions of the roles of authors and contributors:
https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html

While offering clear criteria, they can be further improved with view to the responsibilities of authors and #ResearchIntegrity:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1161

For ways forward, we looked at #ICMJE definitions of the roles of authors and contributors:
https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html

While offering clear criteria, they can be further improved with view to the responsibilities of authors and #ResearchIntegrity:
https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/leap.1161

New posting! This one's a #HowTo guide to #authorship on scientific publications, drawing heavily on #ICMJE criteria and #CRediT taxonomy, and based on #MedComms experience. Hope it's helpful! As always, likes/comments/reposts very welcome😊👇
https://totalinternalreflectionblog.com/2025/06/13/credit-where-credits-due-a-short-guide-to-authorships-in-scientific-papers/

Update. An editorial in _Annals of Internal Medicine_ responds to "Political Action That Threatens the Integrity of Medical Research."
https://www.acpjournals.org/doi/10.7326/ANNALS-25-00985

"The editors have given a great deal of thought to actions Annals can take to counter some of this damage. Following an executive order that limited the ability of health agency staff to communicate externally, we quickly published all manuscripts with government-affiliated authors that were accepted but awaiting publication before we could receive a request to withdraw them. As a member of the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [#ICMJE], Annals helped develop and strongly endorses the guidance it posted in early February 2025 relevant to journals' responses to requests to withdraw, revise, or alter authorship of manuscripts in process at scientific journals. To date, we are unaware of any request to retract published articles that include banned terms or address issues the U.S. administration deems unsavory. If we receive such requests, Annals will not honor them. Retraction is warranted only when there is clear evidence of major errors or scientific misconduct that seriously compromise research findings."

#Censorship #DefendResearch #Medicine #Takedowns #Trump #USPol #USPolitics

Update. Statement from #TheLancet in response to recent US executive orders
https://www.thelancet.com/editorial-policies#anchor10

"The Lancet Group will be making no changes to our editorial policies regarding withdrawal, authorship change, inclusive language, or retraction. Ahead of publication, the withdrawal of submitted papers and authorship changes will only generally be considered if the written agreement of all authors is received. The Lancet Group will continue to recommend the use of inclusive language, accepting authors’ ultimate choice of terminology when it is scientifically accurate and respectful, and will continue to encourage authors to follow the Sex and Gender Equity in Research (SAGER) reporting guidelines. Published papers will only be corrected or retracted when they contain factual errors or if scientific misconduct has taken place. These policies are in line with recently issued guidance from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [#ICMJE]."

#Censorship #DefendResearch #DEI #Medicine #ScholComm #Takedowns #Trump #USPol #USPolitics

Update. The International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (#ICMJE) has updated its guidance in light of recent actions by the #Trump administration.
https://www.icmje.org/news-and-editorials/icmje_guidance_notice.html

"If authors request removal or addition of an author after manuscript submission or publication, journal editors should seek an explanation and signed statement of agreement for the requested change from all listed authors including the author to be removed or added…Corrections are warranted for errors of fact that should have been recognized at the time of publication. Matters of debate and evolving science and methods are not errors. Retraction of published work is generally reserved for errors serious enough to invalidate results and conclusions and/or when there is scientific misconduct.."

#Censorship #DefendResearch #Medicine #ScholComm #Takedowns #USPol #USPolitics

Update. An editorial in #JAMA and the #JAMANetwork.
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2830748?guestAccessKey=47e4b56b-8f69-4ff3-a26e-3a66a88b2c67&linkId=753250407

"Some authors of scientific works in process have had to remove their names from publications for these publications to proceed; others have chosen to pause or withdraw their publications. While some of these actions are directly related to the executive order to #HHS employees to cease communications, many have been undertaken preemptively by authors who are not subject to the order but are presumably fearful of the challenges of communicating complex findings in this current environment. Some authors are engaging in anticipatory compliance by scrubbing from their manuscripts words they fear may be deemed, in the moment, politically unacceptable…We remain steadfast in our guidance to authors and readers across the JAMA Network journals and endorse and adhere to the standards set by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors [#ICMJE]…We will act flexibly, where appropriate, to ensure that censoring efforts will not silence the integrity of the scientific process or clear communication of scientific information important for health."

#Censorship #DefendResearch #Medicine #ScholComm #Takedowns #Trump #USPol #USPolitics

New study: More than one-third of public health #journals (33.7%) do not ask authors for data-sharing statements. Those that do request data-sharing statements are more likely to be #OpenAccess, high in #JIF, published in the UK, or endorsers of the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (#CONSORT).
https://www.jmir.org/2025/1/e64069

Note that "the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (#ICMJE) require[s] that all papers submitted after July 1, 2018, must include a data-sharing statement."
https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jama/fullarticle/2630773

#Medicine #OpenData #ScholComm

Update. The co-authors of this article (above) are "planning to launch an 'aggressive' outreach campaign to journals, publishers, universities, funders and organizations such as the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (#ICMJE) to implement their recommendations." Good.
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-023-01846-9

They've already launched a #petition you can sign to lend your weight. I just signed and hope you will too.
https://www.change.org/p/simplify-manuscript-submissions-in-academic-journals

A bit of fun exercising my mind around DORA* and authorship policies:

While immensely helpful for a range of purposes, does the #ICMJE statement around author- & contributorship structurally limit our view as to what we look for when evaluating individual's contributions to research?
https://www.icmje.org/recommendations/browse/roles-and-responsibilities/defining-the-role-of-authors-and-contributors.html

How much further do alternatives such as CRediT go?
https://credit.niso.org/

#PublicationEthics #ResearchAssessment

*https://sfdora.org/read/