home.social

#generalintellect — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #generalintellect, aggregated by home.social.

  1. “An #LLM is trained on the accumulated output of #human #writing — billions of documents, articles, conversations, books — the materialized #GeneralIntellect, scraped from the public #internet and converted into a #proprietary #asset.”

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5zca2ola2zxpkw37w4f3wxtu/post/3mjzbiomppk2n

  2. “An #LLM is trained on the accumulated output of #human #writing — billions of documents, articles, conversations, books — the materialized #GeneralIntellect, scraped from the public #internet and converted into a #proprietary #asset.”

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5zca2ola2zxpkw37w4f3wxtu/post/3mjzbiomppk2n

  3. “An #LLM is trained on the accumulated output of #human #writing — billions of documents, articles, conversations, books — the materialized #GeneralIntellect, scraped from the public #internet and converted into a #proprietary #asset.”

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5zca2ola2zxpkw37w4f3wxtu/post/3mjzbiomppk2n

  4. “An #LLM is trained on the accumulated output of #human #writing — billions of documents, articles, conversations, books — the materialized #GeneralIntellect, scraped from the public #internet and converted into a #proprietary #asset.”

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5zca2ola2zxpkw37w4f3wxtu/post/3mjzbiomppk2n

  5. “An #LLM is trained on the accumulated output of #human #writing — billions of documents, articles, conversations, books — the materialized #GeneralIntellect, scraped from the public #internet and converted into a #proprietary #asset.”

    RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:5zca2ola2zxpkw37w4f3wxtu/post/3mjzbiomppk2n

  6. "6. Does Marx think automation leads automatically to communism?

    Absolutely not.

    Automation creates conditions of possibility, not outcomes. Without collective control, machinery deepens domination:

    “The instrument of labour, when it takes the form of a machine, immediately becomes a competitor of the worker himself.” — Capital, Vol. I, ch. 15, sec. 5 (Penguin ed., p. ~557)

    Nothing about technological progress guarantees emancipation.

    7. How is this relevant to AI today?

    Marx’s framework asks:

    Who owns the systems?

    Who controls deployment?

    Who captures the surplus?

    Whose labor is displaced, deskilled, or intensified?

    AI, like machinery in Marx’s time, is social knowledge frozen into capital. The political question is not whether it exists, but under what relations."

    reddit.com/r/LeftistsForAI/com

    #Marx #Automation #AI #Productivity #GeneralIntellect

  7. Da Marx e Keynes una soluzione per sconfiggere il neoliberismo

    rizomatica.noblogs.org/2024/02

    Dopo aver soddisfatto i bisogni primari improcrastinabili, la natura dei bisogni secondari relazionali procrastinabili, quindi la loro soddisfazione, dipendono soprattu

    #Economia #Politica #bisogni #capitalismo #consumismo #GeneralIntellect #keynes #Marx #neoliberismo #produttivit #StatoSociale #teoria #valore

  8. #AI #Labor #Automation #GeneralIntellect: "This book [The Eye of the Master] began with a simple question: What relation exists between labor, rules, and automation, i.e., the invention of new technologies? To answer this question, it has illuminated practices, machines, and algorithms from different perspectives—from the “concrete” dimension of production and the “abstract” dimension of disciplines such as mathematics and computer science. The concern, however, has not been to repeat the separation of the concrete and abstract domains but to see their coevolution throughout history: eventually to investigate labor, rules, and automation, dialectically, as material abstractions. The initial chapter emphasized this aspect by highlighting how ancient rituals, counting tools, and “social algorithms” all contributed to the making of mathematical ideas. To affirm, as did the introduction, that labor is a logical activity is not a way of abdicating to the mentality of industrial machines and corporate algorithms, but rather of recognizing that human praxis expresses its own logic (an anti-logic, some might say)—a power of speculation and invention, before techno-science captures and alienates it."

    e-flux.com/journal/141/577253/