#distributive — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #distributive, aggregated by home.social.
-
Как Omit {T, K} растворил типы, или что такое дистрибутивность типов в TypeScript
Представьте ситуацию: вы выкатываете новую фичу, а бэкендер спрашивает вас: «Слушай, а почему вместо событий — пустой объект?». Вы в шоке: «Как так — пустой объект? У меня же TypeScript, всё типизировано, такого не могло быть!». Спойлер — могло. Меня зовут Денис Платонов, я старший разработчик интерфейсов в Телемосте и я отвечаю за on-premise развёртывание веб-клиента Телемоста в инфраструктуре заказчика. В этой статье я расскажу о том, как безобидный на первый взгляд Omit превратил наш аккуратный тип событий в пустой объект. Заодно разберём, как работает дистрибутивность типов в TypeScript и поделимся, чему нас научил этот кейс.
-
I'm very interested in #DoughnutEconomics ! Are you curious and want to learn about it?
Listen to the podcast "Upstream: Doughnut Economics with Kate Raworth"!One important point is that the Doughnut Economics is #growth agnostic - it doesn't say that we need to stop or even reduce growth - simply because we can't foresee the growth. The most important thing is that we need to stay within the doughnut.
#regenerative #distributive
https://sites.libsyn.com/435210/kate-raworth-doughnut-economics-in-conversation -
I had cause to talk about the topic of my long-abandoned Thesis.
It was supposed to be about Distributive/Collective distinctions in language.
These distinctions exist in many forms across the languages of the world, many as explicitly signalled, with inflection or endings or the like.
Semantically they exist for all languages, because they exist for all human experience, just not all languages point them out in handy, regular ways.
They can apply to verbs or to nouns (semantically).
Taking a tug-of-war as an example for verbal distributive/collective, if the teams are pulling collectively, they are all pulling on the same rope.
If they were pulling distributively, they would each have one rope, possibly all connected in the center.
For nouns, often distributive meanings infer distinctness, individuality. For example, one could talk about the Moai of Easter Island with a distributive, signifying that the Moai are "here and there".
A collection of table silvers, on the other hand, neatly packed into a carrying case, would be more likely described with a collective.
One might also, perhaps paradoxically, use a collective to describe a set of different things. Like the set of cutlery at a fancy dinner, with the different kinds of forks and knives and spoons, laid out around the plate.
Some of these are also known in English, Danish, etc. So-called Collective Nouns are all nouns that imply a plurality with a singular noun.
But this presupposed plurality is in common to both collectives and distributives.
What I was aiming to do, was to figure out if there might be some "collective terms" that might contain traces of distributives instead of purely collective.
Alas, it was way too broad, and would have required a sort of semantic calculus that does not exist, so eh.
-
The 21st century goal is to 🔸meet the needs of all people within the means of the living planet 🔸
How can humanity get there?
Not with last century's economic thinking. #Doughnut #Economics proposes an economic mindset that's fit for our times.
It's not a set of policies and institutions, but rather a way of thinking to bring about the regenerative and distributive dynamics that this century calls for.
Drawing on insights from diverse schools of economic thought
- including ecological, feminist, institutional, behavioural and complexity economics
- it sets out seven ways to think like a 21st century economist in order to transform economies, local to global. The starting point of Doughnut Economics is to 🔹change the goal from endless GDP growth to thriving in the Doughnut🔹.At the same time, see the big picture by recognising that 🔹the economy is embedded within, and dependent upon, society and the living world.🔹
Doughnut Economics recognises that human behaviour can be nurtured to be #cooperative and #caring, just as it can be competitive and individualistic. It also recognises that economies, societies, and the rest of the living world, are complex, interdependent systems that are best understood through the lens of #systems #thinking.
And it calls for turning today's degenerative economies into #regenerative ones, and divisive economies into far more #distributive ones.
Lastly, Doughnut Economics recognises that growth may be a healthy phase of life, but nothing grows forever:
things that succeed do so by growing until it is time to 🔹grow up and thrive🔹 instead.