home.social

#boundedreflectivism — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #boundedreflectivism, aggregated by home.social.

  1. My next #CogSci paper should be how #LLMs get us from #BoundedReflectivism (doi.org/10.1111/meta.12534) to #StrategicReflectivism.

    #AI research shows PRAGMATIC SHIFTING between single (intuitive) and dual (reflective) models outperforms both kinds of model.

    #epistemology #PhilMind

  2. My next #CogSci paper should be how #LLMs get us from #BoundedReflectivism (doi.org/10.1111/meta.12534) to #StrategicReflectivism.

    #AI research shows PRAGMATIC SHIFTING between single (intuitive) and dual (reflective) models outperforms both kinds of model.

    #epistemology #PhilMind

  3. My next #CogSci paper should be how #LLMs get us from #BoundedReflectivism (doi.org/10.1111/meta.12534) to #StrategicReflectivism.

    #AI research shows PRAGMATIC SHIFTING between single (intuitive) and dual (reflective) models outperforms both kinds of model.

    #epistemology #PhilMind

  4. My next #CogSci paper should be how #LLMs get us from #BoundedReflectivism (doi.org/10.1111/meta.12534) to #StrategicReflectivism.

    #AI research shows PRAGMATIC SHIFTING between single (intuitive) and dual (reflective) models outperforms both kinds of model.

    #epistemology #PhilMind

  5. My next #CogSci paper should be how #LLMs get us from #BoundedReflectivism (doi.org/10.1111/meta.12534) to #StrategicReflectivism.

    #AI research shows PRAGMATIC SHIFTING between single (intuitive) and dual (reflective) models outperforms both kinds of model.

    #epistemology #PhilMind

  6. #Meta researchers find more support for #BoundedReflectivism: dx.doi.org/10.1111/meta.12534

    A "slow" transformer model (reasoning chain + solution) outperforms a "fast" (solution only) model, but a dual-minded model that automatically switches between fast and slow modes performs as well as the slow mode, but with fewer reasoning steps — i.e., reflective reasoning was beneficial, but sometimes not worth it: doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2410.09

    #AI #philosophyOfMind #epistemology #LLM

  7. More successful predictions of my #BoundedReflectivism & #EpistemicIdentity article from 2022?

    From about 2017 or 2018, I reviewed evidence suggesting that reflective thinking often helps, but may even hinder our judgment depending on factors like whether we are reasoning based on shared identities and epistemic standards (doi.org/10.1111/meta.12534).

    Years later Robb Willer et al. solicited ideas for debiasing political judgments. After years of testing 25 different interventions, their results are published in #Science: doi.org/10.1126/science.adh476

    They found that biased evaluations of politicized facts were impacted by both
    - REFLECTION (on potential misperceptions of undemocratic actions) and
    - shared IDENTITY cues (which could help *or* hinder!)

    #decisionScience #politics #psychology #philosophy #epistemology #metaphilosophy #JDM #debiasing #chatBot

  8. More successful predictions of my #BoundedReflectivism & #EpistemicIdentity article from 2022?

    From about 2017 or 2018, I reviewed evidence suggesting that reflective thinking often helps, but may even hinder our judgment depending on factors like whether we are reasoning based on shared identities and epistemic standards (doi.org/10.1111/meta.12534).

    Years later Robb Willer et al. solicited ideas for debiasing political judgments. After years of testing 25 different interventions, their results are published in #Science: doi.org/10.1126/science.adh476

    They found that biased evaluations of politicized facts were impacted by both
    - REFLECTION (on potential misperceptions of undemocratic actions) and
    - shared IDENTITY cues (which could help *or* hinder!)

    #decisionScience #politics #psychology #philosophy #epistemology #metaphilosophy #JDM #debiasing #chatBot

  9. More successful predictions of my #BoundedReflectivism & #EpistemicIdentity article from 2022?

    From about 2017 or 2018, I reviewed evidence suggesting that reflective thinking often helps, but may even hinder our judgment depending on factors like whether we are reasoning based on shared identities and epistemic standards (doi.org/10.1111/meta.12534).

    Years later Robb Willer et al. solicited ideas for debiasing political judgments. After years of testing 25 different interventions, their results are published in #Science: doi.org/10.1126/science.adh476

    They found that biased evaluations of politicized facts were impacted by both
    - REFLECTION (on potential misperceptions of undemocratic actions) and
    - shared IDENTITY cues (which could help *or* hinder!)

    #decisionScience #politics #psychology #philosophy #epistemology #metaphilosophy #JDM #debiasing #chatBot

  10. More successful predictions of my #BoundedReflectivism & #EpistemicIdentity article from 2022?

    From about 2017 or 2018, I reviewed evidence suggesting that reflective thinking often helps, but may even hinder our judgment depending on factors like whether we are reasoning based on shared identities and epistemic standards (doi.org/10.1111/meta.12534).

    Years later Robb Willer et al. solicited ideas for debiasing political judgments. After years of testing 25 different interventions, their results are published in #Science: doi.org/10.1126/science.adh476

    They found that biased evaluations of politicized facts were impacted by both
    - REFLECTION (on potential misperceptions of undemocratic actions) and
    - shared IDENTITY cues (which could help *or* hinder!)

    #decisionScience #politics #psychology #philosophy #epistemology #metaphilosophy #JDM #debiasing #chatBot

  11. More successful predictions of my #BoundedReflectivism & #EpistemicIdentity article from 2022?

    From about 2017 or 2018, I reviewed evidence suggesting that reflective thinking often helps, but may even hinder our judgment depending on factors like whether we are reasoning based on shared identities and epistemic standards (doi.org/10.1111/meta.12534).

    Years later Robb Willer et al. solicited ideas for debiasing political judgments. After years of testing 25 different interventions, their results are published in #Science: doi.org/10.1126/science.adh476

    They found that biased evaluations of politicized facts were impacted by both
    - REFLECTION (on potential misperceptions of undemocratic actions) and
    - shared IDENTITY cues (which could help *or* hinder!)

    #decisionScience #politics #psychology #philosophy #epistemology #metaphilosophy #JDM #debiasing #chatBot