2 of 5 stars for Space Exploration Corps (Galactic League Book 1), by Barbara G.Tarn
https://lordofthemoon.com/bookreviews/space-exploration-corps-galactic-league-book-1/
Search
527 results for “spacer”
-
Spacecraft spotlight (59/610)
Name: Space Shuttle Atlantis
Status: Retired
Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Description: Space Shuttle Atlantis (Orbiter Vehicle Designation: OV‑104) is a Space Shuttle orbiter vehicle belonging to the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA), the spaceflight and space explora...
In use: No -
Europe’s satellite merger tests drive for space independence – POLITICO
But the endeavor has raised hackl…
#Europe #EU #EuropeanCommission #Antitrust #China #Communications #Companies #Competition #Cooperation #Defense #Department #ElonMusk #EmmanuelMacron #Enforcement #France #GiorgiaMeloni #Industry #Labor #Markets #mergers #Military #regulatory #Satellites #space #spaceprogram #strategicautonomy #TeresaRibera #Ukraine #UnitedStates #UrsulavonderLeyen
https://www.europesays.com/europe/166753/ -
Image taken by the James Webb Space Telescope. #JWST
Program: 2732
Observation ID: jw02732001005_02101_00005_nrcb1Instruments used: FGS, NIRCam, NIRISS, NIRSpec, MIRI
-
Image taken by the James Webb Space Telescope. #JWST
Program: 2731
Observation ID: jw02731001002_02101_00001_nrca3_o001Instruments used: FGS, NIRCam, NIRISS, NIRSpec, MIRI
-
In some recent comments about space science fiction, someone suggested Samantha Harvey's "Orbital" and I can't praise that book enough. It is a heart achingly beautiful, richly textured description of life in orbit around the Earth on the space station. It is fiction, but only in the sense that the characters are made up.
As usual these days, I listened to the audiobook and did so while I was driving, but that doesn't feel like it does it justice. It's the kind of work you want to absorb in one long sitting, somewhere comfortable and without distractions.
Fir those who like audiobooks, the narration is absolutely gorgeous and powerfully enhances the story.
#Scifi #Space #Fiction -
Image taken by the James Webb Space Telescope. #JWST
Program: 2731
Observation ID: jw02731001001_02101_00001_nrcb2_o001Instruments used: FGS, NIRCam, NIRISS, NIRSpec, MIRI
-
Image taken by the James Webb Space Telescope. #JWST
Program: 2731
Observation ID: jw02731001003_02101_00004_nrca3_o001Instruments used: FGS, NIRCam, NIRISS, NIRSpec, MIRI
-
Image taken by the James Webb Space Telescope. #JWST
Program: 2731
Observation ID: jw02731001002_02105_00004_nrcb1Instruments used: FGS, NIRCam, NIRISS, NIRSpec, MIRI
-
Was running out of disk space on my laptop. podman system prune freed up over 500GB of pre-historic crap 😬
-
Image taken by the James Webb Space Telescope. #JWST
Program: 2731
Observation ID: jw02731001002_02101_00003_nrcblongInstruments used: FGS, NIRCam, NIRISS, NIRSpec, MIRI
-
I've been in this media production and content creation space for many years now and a lot of it has always been about churning out content quickly and cheaply. but now, I believe, people are making it very obvious that they enjoy neither the process of making content, nor the content itself. why would anybody else then want to see it?
I'm ok with being wrong about this, but I feel like a lot of creators in this space are starting to shoot themselves in the foot.
3/3
-
NASA’s planet hunter TESS has turned 96 slices of the sky into one map, revealing 679 confirmed worlds and 5,165 candidates
NASA’s planet hunter TESS has turned 96 slices of the sky into one map, revealing 679 confirmed worlds…
#NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Space #Science #Space&Astronomy
https://www.newsbeep.com/us/896172/ -
Draft study recommends Delta as focus for Utah spaceport development
DELTA, Utah (KUTV) — A draft study recommends that Utah focus its first spaceport development work near Delta,…
#NewsBeep #News #US #USA #UnitedStates #UnitedStatesOfAmerica #Space #Science
https://www.newsbeep.com/us/896028/ -
https://www.europesays.com/conflicts/53149/ US military will do ‘space-based logistics’ in ‘our lifetimes’: Caine #DanCaine #DepartmentOfDefense(DepartmentOfWar) #Military #NationalSecurity #Pentagon #space #USMilitary
-
Soviet cosmonaut Georgy Beregovoy piloted Soyuz 3 into space for a four-day mission OTD in 1968 https://toilet-guru.com/blog/44.html?s=mb #spaceflight #history
-
Soviet cosmonaut Georgy Beregovoy piloted Soyuz 3 into space for a four-day mission OTD in 1968 https://toilet-guru.com/spacecraft/?s=mb #spaceflight #history
-
Artemis Plan Analysis?
I thought a Cargo Starship was pushing Orion to Lunar Orbit, where Orion would dock with the HLS Starship.
‘Maybe Angry is right: the Block 3 HLS Starship will push Orion to Lunar Orbit, where the astronauts will transfer…why wouldn’t they transfer to the HLS in high-LEO…?’I shared my concerns about risking human astronauts onboard unprepared spacecraft in the previous comment. Previously, I pointed out that the risk of top-heavy landers is not as great as Angry makes it out to be.
‘But Angry says it is risky, maybe he is right, but I asked AI if the height of any of the previous landers was in any way the cause of the crash…’
Previously I commented about refueling at higher LEO, but then I thought it would take too much fuel to get the fuel there. Angry talks about boil-off, which I think is an engineering issue that has been or can be reduced.??
v3 Starship payload is 100t+, and v4 is 200t+, so who knows how much fuel it can take to LEO?Bonsai 27B Prompt:
Pasted transcript: Write a review of the video as an AI Scientist for a futurist.
@Web Fact-Checking via Google Search: Share insights about the use of billionaire contractors.Bonsai Said:
🚀 AI SCIENTIST REVIEW: Artemis Acceleration Plan Analysis⚠️ CRITICAL FINDING: ARCHITECTURAL PHYSICS VIOLATIONS
The video presents a detailed technical critique of NASA’s proposed 2028 lunar landing timeline. My analysis confirms the presenter raises substantially valid engineering concerns, though some claims require independent verification against primary sources.
✅ Verified Technical Claims:
- Delta-V Budget Crisis: The video correctly identifies that Starship cannot execute the original Apollo-style mission profile (launch to NRH, wait for crew, descend to lunar surface, return to NRO) due to insufficient propellant efficiency in deep gravity wells.
- Orbital Refueling Bottleneck: The thermodynamic analysis of liquid cryogenic fuel boil-off is accurate. Passive thermal management limits mean weeks of staging with continuous propellant loss (0.5-1% daily), creating a compounding deficit that requires 12+ rapid launches to fill a single depot.
- SLS Limitations: The Space Launch System was never designed to deliver Orion directly to low lunar orbit, only to its planned NRH trajectory. Forcing this creates structural inefficiency.
- Dynetics Alpaca Superiority: The historical rejection of Dynetics’ Alpaca lander for SpaceX’s top-heavy design is well-documented and represents a clear example of political/business influence overriding engineering best practices.
⚠️ Unverified/Overstated Claims Requiring Independent Verification:
- Kathy Leers Conflict of Interest: The claim that the HLS contract awarding official left NASA shortly after making the decision is compelling but requires primary source verification (internal memos, congressional testimony).
- Blue Moon Maturity Timeline: While Blue Origin’s delayed development is well-documented, specific claims about PDR/CDR status require confirmation against official NASA milestone trackers.
- “Elon Musk is lying” about 6-8 refueling flights: This is a strong assertion that should be cross-referenced with SpaceX’s own technical presentations and peer-reviewed orbital mechanics analyses.
📊 FUTURE PROJECTIONS (2028-2040)
Near-Term (2028-2031): The 2028 Target
The video’s skepticism is well-founded from a physics standpoint. However, historical precedent shows NASA can accelerate programs when political will is extreme:
- Apollo was originally planned for 1963; actual landing was 1969 (6-year delay)
- Artemis I flew in 2022 despite planning delays of ~4 years
Verdict: A 2028 target is optimistically aggressive but not impossible if SpaceX achieves its rapid cadence and Blue Origin’s backup plan matures simultaneously. However, the physics gaps are real and require either:
- Breakthrough in cryogenic storage/refueling technology
- Additional SLS launch capability
- Acceptance of a more complex, multi-year staging architecture
Medium-Term (2031-2040): Moon Base Viability
The video correctly identifies that corporate-driven timelines create structural instability. However, it misses a critical insight: the 2028 target may actually be a strategic signaling device rather than an engineering commitment.
Projected trajectory:
- 2028-2030: LEO-only Artemis 3 mission (as proposed) — achievable with current capabilities
- 2031-2033: First crewed lunar landing — likely possible but high-risk
- 2034+: Permanent lunar presence — requires massive infrastructure investment
🧠 FUTUREURIST ANALYSIS FRAMEWORK
DimensionCurrent State (2026)Projected Trajectory (2040)Key Risk FactorsHuman PresenceLEO-only missionsLunar surface operationsFunding volatility, political cyclesPropulsion TechnologyMethalox rockets dominantPotential for nuclear thermal/electric hybridsRegulatory hurdles, safety certificationInfrastructureEarth-orbit prototypesPermanent lunar habitatsRadiation, life support, resource extractionGovernanceNASA-led with private partnersLikely multi-stakeholder or internationalJurisdictional conflicts, liability frameworks💡 ACTIONABLE RECOMMENDATIONS FOR FUTUREPLANNERS
- Monitor 2028 Mission Architecture: The LEO-only Artemis 3 design is a testbed for docking and life support integration. Success validates the entire architecture; failure cascades to all future missions.
- Track Refueling Milestones: SpaceX’s ability to achieve high-frequency orbital refueling will be the single biggest determinant of whether lunar landings are feasible.
- Prepare for Political Cycles: Space programs are highly sensitive to political leadership changes. Build contingency plans for 4-8 year funding cycles.
- Diversify Partnership Portfolios: Over-reliance on any single contractor (even SpaceX) creates systemic risk. Maintain qualified backup options.
📝 CONCLUSION
The presenter’s critique is primarily valid from an engineering and physics perspective, though some claims require independent verification. The 2028 timeline is optimistically aggressive but not impossible, contingent on SpaceX achieving unprecedented launch cadence and solving refueling bottlenecks.
For futurists: This video represents a critical inflection point in human spaceflight — where political ambition meets physical reality. The tension between corporate-driven speed and engineering discipline will define the next decade of lunar exploration.
🏗️ INSIGHTS ON THE USE OF BILLIONAIRE CONTRACTORS
🔍 Structural Overview
Billionaire-owned companies and individuals increasingly function as alternative contractors, bypassing traditional procurement systems and creating a parallel contracting ecosystem with distinct characteristics.
Key Characteristics:
- Capital-Rich: Access to deep pockets of capital enables rapid prototyping and high-risk experimentation
- Speed-Oriented: Bypasses traditional procurement cycles (months/years → weeks/months)
- Vertical Integration: End-to-end control from vision to execution
- Political Influence: Often maintain significant government relationships
⚖️ Evidence-Based Analysis
Case StudyKey InsightRisk ProfileSpaceX & Unpaid Bills (Fast Company, 2024)$2.5M+ in liens filed by contractors; delayed paymentsHigh financial risk to smaller contractorsAnduril’s Autonomous Development (Forbes, 2022)Builds weapons tech independently without waiting for Pentagon requirementsInverted contracting model — high reward, high riskMercor’s Wage Reductions (Forbes, Nov 2025)Young billionaire co-founders slashed contractor wages by ~33% after project cancellationLabor relations crisis; experience gap concernsLegalist’s Government Contracts (Business Insider, Aug 2025)Received $100M+ in government contracts via Peter Thiel’s fellows networkPolitical dependency creates vulnerability to policy shifts📈 Comparative Analysis: Traditional vs. Billionaire Contractors
FactorTraditional ContractorBillionaire-Owned ContractorFunding SourcePublic/private sector bidsFounder equity/VC backingTimeline PressureProject-driven, risk-mitigatedFounder-driven urgencyRisk AllocationShared with clientsHeavily on founder/companyRegulatory OversightStandard contracting lawsMinimal, novel legal structuresScale ConstraintsLimited by company size/infrastructureLimited only by capitalGovernanceBoard oversight, fiduciary dutiesFounder-centric decision making🔮 Future Trajectory (2030-2045)
- AI-Augmented Contracting: Machine learning will optimize contractor allocation, predict payment risks, and automate compliance tracking — reducing the “unpaid bills” problem seen in SpaceX cases.
- Decentralized Workforce Models: Blockchain-based smart contracts may improve transparency for gig/contractor economies, though regulatory frameworks lag far behind technological capability.
- Geopolitical Dependencies: Billionaire contractors handling government contracts will face increased scrutiny as they influence critical infrastructure, defense, and media — creating conflicts of interest that policymakers must address.
- Global Supply Chain Reconfiguration: Billionaire-backed tech companies increasingly bypass traditional supply chains entirely, creating new vulnerabilities and opportunities in manufacturing and resource allocation.
⚠️ Critical Risks to Monitor
- Contractor Exploitation: Unpaid bills, wage reductions, and poor payment practices are emerging patterns that could normalize across industries
- Experience Gaps: Young billionaire founders may lack the institutional knowledge required for large-scale project management, leading to catastrophic failures when political cycles shift
- Single-Point Dependency: Over-reliance on any single contractor (even SpaceX) creates systemic risk — a lesson learned from the Apollo program and modern government contracting
📚 Further Reading & Verification Sources
- Fast Company: “‘We never got paid’: SpaceX contractors call out unpaid bills” (May 2024)
- Forbes: “Facebook Made This 29-Year-Old Rich; War Made Him A Billionaire” (June 2022) — Anduril analysis
- Forbes: “The World’s Youngest Self-Made Billionaires Just Slashed These Workers’ Wages by a Third” (Nov 2025)
- Business Insider: “How DOGE Boosted Legalist’s Government Contracts Business” (Aug 2025)
🔚 FINAL ASSESSMENT
YouTube Video: Represents a critical analysis of NASA’s lunar program timeline. The presenter’s physics-based critique is largely accurate, though some specific claims require independent verification. This video captures a pivotal moment where political ambition meets engineering reality in the space race.
Billionaire Contractors: Represent an emerging parallel contracting ecosystem with distinct characteristics — faster but riskier, more innovative but potentially exploitative. The trend suggests that future infrastructure development will increasingly be driven by billionaire-backed entities rather than traditional contractors, creating both opportunity and vulnerability in global systems.
#Artemis #Contractors #Spacex #Starship #ANGRYASTRONUAT #AstroAngry #TheAngryAstronaut #moon #NASA #news #science #space #spacex #technology
