Search
1000 results for “OpenRefine”
-
RE: https://mastodon.social/@shriramk/116006853263047366
“OpenReview’s backend obligingly returned the full, de-anonymized profiles of reviewers, authors, and area chairs, not just for ICLR 2026, but for any conference hosted on the platform.
Double-blind review, the sacred cow of CS publishing, had just become Naked Review.”
#OpenReview -
Thank you for your work. 🌼
Some hashtags for spreading the posting:
#openreview #openscience #openaccess
@timnitGebru -
Thank you for your work. 🌼
Some hashtags for spreading the posting:
#openreview #openscience #openaccess
@timnitGebru -
Thank you for your work. 🌼
Some hashtags for spreading the posting:
#openreview #openscience #openaccess
@timnitGebru -
Thank you for your work. 🌼
Some hashtags for spreading the posting:
#openreview #openscience #openaccess
@timnitGebru -
I got this very weird email from #OpenReview
A Message from AI Research Leaders: Join Us in Supporting OpenReview
(https://openreview.net/forum/pineau|a_message_from_ai_research_leaders_join_us_in_supporting_openreview)First, I appreciate OpenReview because they provide a way to organise conference submissions and reviews to Bioc and EuroBioc conferences.
That would be the reason I would consider supporting them.
NOT because AI conferences benefit from it.
If OpenReview is so central to AI< why can't any of the AI companies not donate a tiny drop of their funds to guarantee OpenReview sustainability for the forthcoming future?
I now had to check that OpenReview wasn't using our reviews to train AI models - I could see any indication they do.
-
I got this very weird email from #OpenReview
A Message from AI Research Leaders: Join Us in Supporting OpenReview
(https://openreview.net/forum/pineau|a_message_from_ai_research_leaders_join_us_in_supporting_openreview)First, I appreciate OpenReview because they provide a way to organise conference submissions and reviews to Bioc and EuroBioc conferences.
That would be the reason I would consider supporting them.
NOT because AI conferences benefit from it.
If OpenReview is so central to AI< why can't any of the AI companies not donate a tiny drop of their funds to guarantee OpenReview sustainability for the forthcoming future?
I now had to check that OpenReview wasn't using our reviews to train AI models - I could see any indication they do.
-
I got this very weird email from #OpenReview
A Message from AI Research Leaders: Join Us in Supporting OpenReview
(https://openreview.net/forum/pineau|a_message_from_ai_research_leaders_join_us_in_supporting_openreview)First, I appreciate OpenReview because they provide a way to organise conference submissions and reviews to Bioc and EuroBioc conferences.
That would be the reason I would consider supporting them.
NOT because AI conferences benefit from it.
If OpenReview is so central to AI< why can't any of the AI companies not donate a tiny drop of their funds to guarantee OpenReview sustainability for the forthcoming future?
I now had to check that OpenReview wasn't using our reviews to train AI models - I could see any indication they do.
-
I got this very weird email from #OpenReview
A Message from AI Research Leaders: Join Us in Supporting OpenReview
(https://openreview.net/forum/pineau|a_message_from_ai_research_leaders_join_us_in_supporting_openreview)First, I appreciate OpenReview because they provide a way to organise conference submissions and reviews to Bioc and EuroBioc conferences.
That would be the reason I would consider supporting them.
NOT because AI conferences benefit from it.
If OpenReview is so central to AI< why can't any of the AI companies not donate a tiny drop of their funds to guarantee OpenReview sustainability for the forthcoming future?
I now had to check that OpenReview wasn't using our reviews to train AI models - I could see any indication they do.
-
I got this very weird email from #OpenReview
A Message from AI Research Leaders: Join Us in Supporting OpenReview
(https://openreview.net/forum/pineau|a_message_from_ai_research_leaders_join_us_in_supporting_openreview)First, I appreciate OpenReview because they provide a way to organise conference submissions and reviews to Bioc and EuroBioc conferences.
That would be the reason I would consider supporting them.
NOT because AI conferences benefit from it.
If OpenReview is so central to AI< why can't any of the AI companies not donate a tiny drop of their funds to guarantee OpenReview sustainability for the forthcoming future?
I now had to check that OpenReview wasn't using our reviews to train AI models - I could see any indication they do.
-
A thought from 2016.
It took us nine years and a bit. In retrospect, I think we held out pretty long.
-
Yesterday, an #OpenReview vulnerability led to the leak of reviewer identities of all the major academic AI conferences, including the ongoing #ICLR2026 conferences. #ICLRLeaks This is both a huge disaster, and an opportunity to tackle the serious flaws of AI research. eu.36kr.com/en/p/3572028...
Academic Circle in Uproar: ICL... -
Yesterday, an #OpenReview vulnerability led to the leak of reviewer identities of all the major academic AI conferences, including the ongoing #ICLR2026 conferences. #ICLRLeaks This is both a huge disaster, and an opportunity to tackle the serious flaws of AI research. eu.36kr.com/en/p/3572028...
Academic Circle in Uproar: ICL... -
Yesterday, an #OpenReview vulnerability led to the leak of reviewer identities of all the major academic AI conferences, including the ongoing #ICLR2026 conferences. #ICLRLeaks This is both a huge disaster, and an opportunity to tackle the serious flaws of AI research. eu.36kr.com/en/p/3572028...
Academic Circle in Uproar: ICL... -
Yesterday, an #OpenReview vulnerability led to the leak of reviewer identities of all the major academic AI conferences, including the ongoing #ICLR2026 conferences. #ICLRLeaks This is both a huge disaster, and an opportunity to tackle the serious flaws of AI research. eu.36kr.com/en/p/3572028...
Academic Circle in Uproar: ICL... -
@krismicinski Oh wow. In my pile of around 12 papers for AAAI (I'm senior PC) I missed about 9 (out of 36) reviews yesterday (12h before the AoE deadline just now) from regular PC members. Extrapolating to 23,000 papers / 69,000 reviews, people are trying to upload 17,000+ reviews as we speak ...
-
@krismicinski Oh wow. In my pile of around 12 papers for AAAI (I'm senior PC) I missed about 9 (out of 36) reviews yesterday (12h before the AoE deadline just now) from regular PC members. Extrapolating to 23,000 papers / 69,000 reviews, people are trying to upload 17,000+ reviews as we speak ...
-
@krismicinski Oh wow. In my pile of around 12 papers for AAAI (I'm senior PC) I missed about 9 (out of 36) reviews yesterday (12h before the AoE deadline just now) from regular PC members. Extrapolating to 23,000 papers / 69,000 reviews, people are trying to upload 17,000+ reviews as we speak ...
-
@Lluis_Revilla I just learned about #OpenReview (https://openreview.net/about), which they use for the paper submissions. This looks like an interesting tool.
-
@Lluis_Revilla I just learned about #OpenReview (https://openreview.net/about), which they use for the paper submissions. This looks like an interesting tool.
-
@Lluis_Revilla I just learned about #OpenReview (https://openreview.net/about), which they use for the paper submissions. This looks like an interesting tool.
-
@Lluis_Revilla I just learned about #OpenReview (https://openreview.net/about), which they use for the paper submissions. This looks like an interesting tool.
-
@Lluis_Revilla I just learned about #OpenReview (https://openreview.net/about), which they use for the paper submissions. This looks like an interesting tool.
-
To clarify: I think these #mdpi #frontiers #SciRep should be treated as #preprints. I agree there are some really good preprints!
Regarding options for #openreview publishing, there's now @PeerCommunityIn and @PeerCommunityJournal for many fields!
-
Ich habe eine Phishing Mail erhalten, von “Barclays”. So weit nichts besonderes. Bemerkenswert finde ich, dass der Link auf Bing führt und von dort geht’s weiter auf die eigentliche Phishing Page. Hat Bing eine #openredirect Lücke?
-
Please let's do #openreview in academia. #reviewer2 provided such an excellent and thoughtful line of reasoning for his or her rejection that I would definitely invite him as a co-author. And the fact that this sounds sarcastic shows the need for more openness in our #peerreview system.
-
Implementing and caring for open standards is the core of our work at @okfn – e.g. #opendefinition, #frictionlessdata, #opendatacommons etc. Now, in a key moment for democracies worldwide, we are turning our attention to electoral processes 🧵
-
Looking at a recent graph from the Web of Science service, it's terrible: I no longer review!
In fact, I have just changed my pattern: much less reviews for big companies (Elesevier, ...), a priority for #openreview (conferences and workshops).
Clarivate and co. should recognize that authors are changing their behavior and include this important part of #scientists' jobs.
https://www.webofscience.com -
Mangrove Reviews - Start https://mangrove.reviews/ #openreviews #mangrove #feedback #opendata #review
-
@JKLund @copim @siusoon @lozross @openreflections @simonxix @Rebekka_Kie @Simon @zBlace
Also helpful in understanding what some of us mean by 'experimental' is this description of Clarice Lispector's later work, especially The Hour of the Star and The Passion of G.H.:
'Resisting both the experimental writing that could be experienced as mere aesthetic or wordplay and the kind of "identitarian" writing that serves to categorize writers by their identity, Lispector's work does neither'.
It's comes from the last chapter of Cynthia Cruz's 2021 book for Repeater: The Melancholia of Class: A Manifesto for the Working Class.
#OAbooks #openaccess
#ExperimentalPublishing
#books #experimentalwriting
#lispectorhttps://repeaterbooks.com/product/the-melancholia-of-class-a-manifesto-for-the-working-class/