home.social

Search

5 results for “pgl”

  1. FILS Europe: Long live chat communications – The DESK

    Despite the industry focus on automating every aspect of the trading process, some panelists at FILS Europe jumped…
    #Europe #EU #CreditAgricoleCorporate&InvestmentBank #DarrenMoore #GuillaumeCarreno #Legal&GeneralAssetManagement #OlivierDermaux #S&PGlobal
    europesays.com/europe/160160/

  2. Dassault Systèmes successfully issues €1 billion in bonds and refinances its revolving credit facility

    Press Release VELIZY-VILLACOUBLAY, France — June 15, 2026 NOT FOR RELEASE, PUBLICATION OR DISTRIBUTION TO ANY U.S. PERSON…
    #France #FR #Europe #EU #DassaultSystèmes #Dassault #EuronextParis #revolvingcreditfacility #S&PGlobalRatings
    europesays.com/france/95131/

  3. Quote from Enrico Fatighenti:

    > What bothers me most is the double standard.
    >
    > Whenever I referee a paper, or receive a thesis or project from a student, I apply the same standards that most of us do. If a paper or thesis is so badly written that I cannot get past the first page without considerable effort, I reject it and ask for a new, readable version.
    >
    > With these AI-generated papers, I feel that we, as a community, are not applying the same standards of quality and rigour. They can simply release multiple 100+ page papers claiming to have solved this or that problem, often with redundant arguments, unclear logical structure, multiple dead ends, and strange or unsettling terminology — in other words, slop. And we are then expected to go through it, check it, clean it up, simplify it, and explain what is actually going on.
    >
    > This comes at a considerable cost to us in terms of time and effort, while they can simply move on and slop-bulldoze the next conjecture. And, of course, the credit remains theirs. In some sense, we are willingly contributing to our own demise.
    >
    > I think the paradigm has to shift. We should apply to AI-generated mathematical announcements the same standards of rigour, clarity, and exposition that we demand from human-generated papers. Do you want the approval of the mathematical community? A badge of legitimacy? Then give us something that is actually readable and verifiable. If not, we should simply ignore it.
    >
    > In other words, I do not think that we, as a community, should spend our time cleaning up their mess in order to increase someone else’s commercial revenues.

    proofsandprompts.com/2026/10/0

    #mathematics #math #maths #ai #llm

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.