"A list of supplementary Collections which may be of interest"
Seriously now?
5 results for “hrefna”
"A list of supplementary Collections which may be of interest"
Seriously now?
I love* how "streams" is given absolutely no examples and only a minimal definition in AP -.-
So a while back I talked about what an actor model would look like for ActivityPub, starting from the basic step that an AP "actor" would require a minimum of two actors and a profile to model successfully.
Let's talk for a minute about how replies could work.
What if for every post there was an adjacent actor. The post _isn't_ an actor—it is just created with a ref pointing toward an actor that is created somewhere in space. That can be the creator, but if we were doing this with a real actor system and framework it would be arbitrary (as in it doesn't matter if it is the creator) and more standard to do a unique one.
Now if you reply to that address you will always have your post considered as a reply to the post in question.
You can do that today with a lot of metadata, but what if you didn't need all of that metadata and it was embedded directly into the post itself? There were a repliesActor specified on the post itself?
I really need to get more people on board with my partner's Anti-Malory Agenda (or as one coworker put it: Le Morte d'Author).
A lot of the Arthurian things out there are essentially very samey, but traditional Arthurian lit is _extremely_ interesting, very weird, and not at all what people expect.