home.social

#tribal — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #tribal, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Are Colorado Moose Invasive? New Research Says NO
    --
    colorado.edu/asmagazine/2026/0 <-- shared technical article
    --
    youtu.be/orpLT22YnKQ?si=aThWWj <-- shared overview video
    --
    doi.org/10.1111/jbi.70279 <-- shared paper
    --
    “The modern Colorado moose is often considered just that: modern - brought to the state by wildlife officials in the late 1970s, preceded by very occasional reports of moose sightings in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
    Since being translocated to Colorado, these charismatic megafauna have been a source of both fascination and concern. In Rocky Mountain National Park [RMNP], where moose populations have thrived, ecosystems have been changing, and moose-associated impacts have sparked renewed conversations about managing an animal labeled “non-native.”
    However, newly published research [link above] by an interdisciplinary team of scientists, archivists and Tribal cultural heritage leaders shows that the “non-native” label is inaccurate. They present evidence demonstrating that moose have been in Colorado for at least centuries and likely longer.
    The researchers analyzed newspaper archives, archaeological site reports, scientific journals, museum collections and photo archives to understand where and when moose were present in Colorado prior to the mid-1900s. Perhaps most importantly, notes lead author William Taylor, a University of Colorado Boulder associate professor of anthropology and CU Museum curator of archaeology, the scholars sought Indigenous histories, and in doing so found evidence of moose being well known and deeply integrated into traditional knowledge of Native people in the southern Rockies.
    Crystal C’Bearing, a study co-author and Northern Arapaho Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, notes that among the Northern Arapaho, "the moose is considered a valued commodity among the Tribe.” She adds that societies within the Northern Arapaho "utilize many animals, including moose, in their clothing, society items and regalia. This tradition continues today."
    The scholarly approach of joining Indigenous knowledge with historical accounts, archaeology and paleontology, "shows the power of multiple independent lines of evidence converging on the conclusion that moose were part of southern Rocky Mountain ecosystems long before modern reintroductions," says study co-author Jonathan Dombrosky of Crow Canyon Archaeological Center and the University of Alabama. "More broadly, the study demonstrates how historical sciences can help us better understand the origins of modern ecosystems and make more informed decisions about their future…"
    #moose #populations #Colorado #USA #native #invasive #introduced #nonnative #translocated #megafauna #herbivore #ungulate #impacts #ecosystems #environment #vegetation #native #indigenous #tribal #FirstNation #archaeology #paleontology #symbology #reporting #historicalscience #history #RockyMountain #Rockies #regional #prehistory #Holocene #biogeography #archaeozoological #modern #premodern #management #archivists

  2. Are Colorado Moose Invasive? New Research Says NO
    --
    colorado.edu/asmagazine/2026/0 <-- shared technical article
    --
    youtu.be/orpLT22YnKQ?si=aThWWj <-- shared overview video
    --
    doi.org/10.1111/jbi.70279 <-- shared paper
    --
    “The modern Colorado moose is often considered just that: modern - brought to the state by wildlife officials in the late 1970s, preceded by very occasional reports of moose sightings in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
    Since being translocated to Colorado, these charismatic megafauna have been a source of both fascination and concern. In Rocky Mountain National Park [RMNP], where moose populations have thrived, ecosystems have been changing, and moose-associated impacts have sparked renewed conversations about managing an animal labeled “non-native.”
    However, newly published research [link above] by an interdisciplinary team of scientists, archivists and Tribal cultural heritage leaders shows that the “non-native” label is inaccurate. They present evidence demonstrating that moose have been in Colorado for at least centuries and likely longer.
    The researchers analyzed newspaper archives, archaeological site reports, scientific journals, museum collections and photo archives to understand where and when moose were present in Colorado prior to the mid-1900s. Perhaps most importantly, notes lead author William Taylor, a University of Colorado Boulder associate professor of anthropology and CU Museum curator of archaeology, the scholars sought Indigenous histories, and in doing so found evidence of moose being well known and deeply integrated into traditional knowledge of Native people in the southern Rockies.
    Crystal C’Bearing, a study co-author and Northern Arapaho Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, notes that among the Northern Arapaho, "the moose is considered a valued commodity among the Tribe.” She adds that societies within the Northern Arapaho "utilize many animals, including moose, in their clothing, society items and regalia. This tradition continues today."
    The scholarly approach of joining Indigenous knowledge with historical accounts, archaeology and paleontology, "shows the power of multiple independent lines of evidence converging on the conclusion that moose were part of southern Rocky Mountain ecosystems long before modern reintroductions," says study co-author Jonathan Dombrosky of Crow Canyon Archaeological Center and the University of Alabama. "More broadly, the study demonstrates how historical sciences can help us better understand the origins of modern ecosystems and make more informed decisions about their future…"
    #moose #populations #Colorado #USA #native #invasive #introduced #nonnative #translocated #megafauna #herbivore #ungulate #impacts #ecosystems #environment #vegetation #native #indigenous #tribal #FirstNation #archaeology #paleontology #symbology #reporting #historicalscience #history #RockyMountain #Rockies #regional #prehistory #Holocene #biogeography #archaeozoological #modern #premodern #management #archivists

  3. Are Colorado Moose Invasive? New Research Says NO
    --
    colorado.edu/asmagazine/2026/0 <-- shared technical article
    --
    youtu.be/orpLT22YnKQ?si=aThWWj <-- shared overview video
    --
    doi.org/10.1111/jbi.70279 <-- shared paper
    --
    “The modern Colorado moose is often considered just that: modern - brought to the state by wildlife officials in the late 1970s, preceded by very occasional reports of moose sightings in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
    Since being translocated to Colorado, these charismatic megafauna have been a source of both fascination and concern. In Rocky Mountain National Park [RMNP], where moose populations have thrived, ecosystems have been changing, and moose-associated impacts have sparked renewed conversations about managing an animal labeled “non-native.”
    However, newly published research [link above] by an interdisciplinary team of scientists, archivists and Tribal cultural heritage leaders shows that the “non-native” label is inaccurate. They present evidence demonstrating that moose have been in Colorado for at least centuries and likely longer.
    The researchers analyzed newspaper archives, archaeological site reports, scientific journals, museum collections and photo archives to understand where and when moose were present in Colorado prior to the mid-1900s. Perhaps most importantly, notes lead author William Taylor, a University of Colorado Boulder associate professor of anthropology and CU Museum curator of archaeology, the scholars sought Indigenous histories, and in doing so found evidence of moose being well known and deeply integrated into traditional knowledge of Native people in the southern Rockies.
    Crystal C’Bearing, a study co-author and Northern Arapaho Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, notes that among the Northern Arapaho, "the moose is considered a valued commodity among the Tribe.” She adds that societies within the Northern Arapaho "utilize many animals, including moose, in their clothing, society items and regalia. This tradition continues today."
    The scholarly approach of joining Indigenous knowledge with historical accounts, archaeology and paleontology, "shows the power of multiple independent lines of evidence converging on the conclusion that moose were part of southern Rocky Mountain ecosystems long before modern reintroductions," says study co-author Jonathan Dombrosky of Crow Canyon Archaeological Center and the University of Alabama. "More broadly, the study demonstrates how historical sciences can help us better understand the origins of modern ecosystems and make more informed decisions about their future…"
    #moose #populations #Colorado #USA #native #invasive #introduced #nonnative #translocated #megafauna #herbivore #ungulate #impacts #ecosystems #environment #vegetation #native #indigenous #tribal #FirstNation #archaeology #paleontology #symbology #reporting #historicalscience #history #RockyMountain #Rockies #regional #prehistory #Holocene #biogeography #archaeozoological #modern #premodern #management #archivists

  4. Are Colorado Moose Invasive? New Research Says NO
    --
    colorado.edu/asmagazine/2026/0 <-- shared technical article
    --
    youtu.be/orpLT22YnKQ?si=aThWWj <-- shared overview video
    --
    doi.org/10.1111/jbi.70279 <-- shared paper
    --
    “The modern Colorado moose is often considered just that: modern - brought to the state by wildlife officials in the late 1970s, preceded by very occasional reports of moose sightings in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
    Since being translocated to Colorado, these charismatic megafauna have been a source of both fascination and concern. In Rocky Mountain National Park [RMNP], where moose populations have thrived, ecosystems have been changing, and moose-associated impacts have sparked renewed conversations about managing an animal labeled “non-native.”
    However, newly published research [link above] by an interdisciplinary team of scientists, archivists and Tribal cultural heritage leaders shows that the “non-native” label is inaccurate. They present evidence demonstrating that moose have been in Colorado for at least centuries and likely longer.
    The researchers analyzed newspaper archives, archaeological site reports, scientific journals, museum collections and photo archives to understand where and when moose were present in Colorado prior to the mid-1900s. Perhaps most importantly, notes lead author William Taylor, a University of Colorado Boulder associate professor of anthropology and CU Museum curator of archaeology, the scholars sought Indigenous histories, and in doing so found evidence of moose being well known and deeply integrated into traditional knowledge of Native people in the southern Rockies.
    Crystal C’Bearing, a study co-author and Northern Arapaho Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, notes that among the Northern Arapaho, "the moose is considered a valued commodity among the Tribe.” She adds that societies within the Northern Arapaho "utilize many animals, including moose, in their clothing, society items and regalia. This tradition continues today."
    The scholarly approach of joining Indigenous knowledge with historical accounts, archaeology and paleontology, "shows the power of multiple independent lines of evidence converging on the conclusion that moose were part of southern Rocky Mountain ecosystems long before modern reintroductions," says study co-author Jonathan Dombrosky of Crow Canyon Archaeological Center and the University of Alabama. "More broadly, the study demonstrates how historical sciences can help us better understand the origins of modern ecosystems and make more informed decisions about their future…"
    #moose #populations #Colorado #USA #native #invasive #introduced #nonnative #translocated #megafauna #herbivore #ungulate #impacts #ecosystems #environment #vegetation #native #indigenous #tribal #FirstNation #archaeology #paleontology #symbology #reporting #historicalscience #history #RockyMountain #Rockies #regional #prehistory #Holocene #biogeography #archaeozoological #modern #premodern #management #archivists

  5. Are Colorado Moose Invasive? New Research Says NO
    --
    colorado.edu/asmagazine/2026/0 <-- shared technical article
    --
    youtu.be/orpLT22YnKQ?si=aThWWj <-- shared overview video
    --
    doi.org/10.1111/jbi.70279 <-- shared paper
    --
    “The modern Colorado moose is often considered just that: modern - brought to the state by wildlife officials in the late 1970s, preceded by very occasional reports of moose sightings in the 19th and early 20th centuries.
    Since being translocated to Colorado, these charismatic megafauna have been a source of both fascination and concern. In Rocky Mountain National Park [RMNP], where moose populations have thrived, ecosystems have been changing, and moose-associated impacts have sparked renewed conversations about managing an animal labeled “non-native.”
    However, newly published research [link above] by an interdisciplinary team of scientists, archivists and Tribal cultural heritage leaders shows that the “non-native” label is inaccurate. They present evidence demonstrating that moose have been in Colorado for at least centuries and likely longer.
    The researchers analyzed newspaper archives, archaeological site reports, scientific journals, museum collections and photo archives to understand where and when moose were present in Colorado prior to the mid-1900s. Perhaps most importantly, notes lead author William Taylor, a University of Colorado Boulder associate professor of anthropology and CU Museum curator of archaeology, the scholars sought Indigenous histories, and in doing so found evidence of moose being well known and deeply integrated into traditional knowledge of Native people in the southern Rockies.
    Crystal C’Bearing, a study co-author and Northern Arapaho Tribal Historic Preservation Officer, notes that among the Northern Arapaho, "the moose is considered a valued commodity among the Tribe.” She adds that societies within the Northern Arapaho "utilize many animals, including moose, in their clothing, society items and regalia. This tradition continues today."
    The scholarly approach of joining Indigenous knowledge with historical accounts, archaeology and paleontology, "shows the power of multiple independent lines of evidence converging on the conclusion that moose were part of southern Rocky Mountain ecosystems long before modern reintroductions," says study co-author Jonathan Dombrosky of Crow Canyon Archaeological Center and the University of Alabama. "More broadly, the study demonstrates how historical sciences can help us better understand the origins of modern ecosystems and make more informed decisions about their future…"

  6. Post: 150 People Max

    The more I contemplate the fractures in modern society, the more I believe that the path forward requires turning away from massive, impersonal collectives and returning to smaller ones. I am drawn to a specific figure: 150. This is the estimated number of people who can live together under a social contract before it begins to bend and break. I first encountered this concept in Sebastian Junger’s Tribe, a book that remains a staple on my shelf today.

    This threshold is known as Dunbar’s number, named after anthropologist Robin Dunbar. He theorized that humans can only comfortably maintain stable social relationships with approximately 150 people. This isn’t just a guess; it is backed by neurology and real-world evidence. Historical hunter-gatherer societies, modern military sub-units, and effective corporate departments frequently cluster around this size. Even in the age of social media, where we can follow thousands, our meaningful interactions still cap out at around the 150-person mark.

    Consider the implications for a moment. Science suggests a person can only truly recognize about 500 people—the kind of recognition you have for someone you drive past every day but don’t know personally. If our brains are biologically limited to conceptualizing relationships 150 times over, how can we expect to make informed political decisions that affect millions? When the scale of government exceeds our cognitive capacity for community, the sense of mutual accountability vanishes.

    This suggests a profound need for a societal shift toward “mini-collectivism.” By prioritizing local governance over centralized giants, we return to a scale where the social contract is enforceable through actual relationships rather than rigid, bureaucratic hierarchies. While it raises questions about how a globalized world would function without formalized large-scale governments, the current model’s failure to maintain social cohesion cannot be ignored.

    There is something essential in this limitation. I’d love to hear your thoughts—please comment below if you think we can ever truly scale community beyond our biology.

    #150 #anthropology #life #mentalHealth #philosophy #post #relationships #RobinDunbar #SebastianJunger #tribal #tribe #tribes #writing
  7. Post: 150 People Max

    The more I contemplate the fractures in modern society, the more I believe that the path forward requires turning away from massive, impersonal collectives and returning to smaller ones. I am drawn to a specific figure: 150. This is the estimated number of people who can live together under a social contract before it begins to bend and break. I first encountered this concept in Sebastian Junger’s Tribe, a book that remains a staple on my shelf today.

    This threshold is known as Dunbar’s number, named after anthropologist Robin Dunbar. He theorized that humans can only comfortably maintain stable social relationships with approximately 150 people. This isn’t just a guess; it is backed by neurology and real-world evidence. Historical hunter-gatherer societies, modern military sub-units, and effective corporate departments frequently cluster around this size. Even in the age of social media, where we can follow thousands, our meaningful interactions still cap out at around the 150-person mark.

    Consider the implications for a moment. Science suggests a person can only truly recognize about 500 people—the kind of recognition you have for someone you drive past every day but don’t know personally. If our brains are biologically limited to conceptualizing relationships 150 times over, how can we expect to make informed political decisions that affect millions? When the scale of government exceeds our cognitive capacity for community, the sense of mutual accountability vanishes.

    This suggests a profound need for a societal shift toward “mini-collectivism.” By prioritizing local governance over centralized giants, we return to a scale where the social contract is enforceable through actual relationships rather than rigid, bureaucratic hierarchies. While it raises questions about how a globalized world would function without formalized large-scale governments, the current model’s failure to maintain social cohesion cannot be ignored.

    There is something essential in this limitation. I’d love to hear your thoughts—please comment below if you think we can ever truly scale community beyond our biology.

    #150 #anthropology #life #mentalHealth #philosophy #post #relationships #RobinDunbar #SebastianJunger #tribal #tribe #tribes #writing
  8. Post: 150 People Max

    The more I contemplate the fractures in modern society, the more I believe that the path forward requires turning away from massive, impersonal collectives and returning to smaller ones. I am drawn to a specific figure: 150. This is the estimated number of people who can live together under a social contract before it begins to bend and break. I first encountered this concept in Sebastian Junger’s Tribe, a book that remains a staple on my shelf today.

    This threshold is known as Dunbar’s number, named after anthropologist Robin Dunbar. He theorized that humans can only comfortably maintain stable social relationships with approximately 150 people. This isn’t just a guess; it is backed by neurology and real-world evidence. Historical hunter-gatherer societies, modern military sub-units, and effective corporate departments frequently cluster around this size. Even in the age of social media, where we can follow thousands, our meaningful interactions still cap out at around the 150-person mark.

    Consider the implications for a moment. Science suggests a person can only truly recognize about 500 people—the kind of recognition you have for someone you drive past every day but don’t know personally. If our brains are biologically limited to conceptualizing relationships 150 times over, how can we expect to make informed political decisions that affect millions? When the scale of government exceeds our cognitive capacity for community, the sense of mutual accountability vanishes.

    This suggests a profound need for a societal shift toward “mini-collectivism.” By prioritizing local governance over centralized giants, we return to a scale where the social contract is enforceable through actual relationships rather than rigid, bureaucratic hierarchies. While it raises questions about how a globalized world would function without formalized large-scale governments, the current model’s failure to maintain social cohesion cannot be ignored.

    There is something essential in this limitation. I’d love to hear your thoughts—please comment below if you think we can ever truly scale community beyond our biology.

    #150 #anthropology #life #mentalHealth #philosophy #post #relationships #RobinDunbar #SebastianJunger #tribal #tribe #tribes #writing
  9. Post: 150 People Max

    The more I contemplate the fractures in modern society, the more I believe that the path forward requires turning away from massive, impersonal collectives and returning to smaller ones. I am drawn to a specific figure: 150. This is the estimated number of people who can live together under a social contract before it begins to bend and break. I first encountered this concept in Sebastian Junger’s Tribe, a book that remains a staple on my shelf today.

    This threshold is known as Dunbar’s number, named after anthropologist Robin Dunbar. He theorized that humans can only comfortably maintain stable social relationships with approximately 150 people. This isn’t just a guess; it is backed by neurology and real-world evidence. Historical hunter-gatherer societies, modern military sub-units, and effective corporate departments frequently cluster around this size. Even in the age of social media, where we can follow thousands, our meaningful interactions still cap out at around the 150-person mark.

    Consider the implications for a moment. Science suggests a person can only truly recognize about 500 people—the kind of recognition you have for someone you drive past every day but don’t know personally. If our brains are biologically limited to conceptualizing relationships 150 times over, how can we expect to make informed political decisions that affect millions? When the scale of government exceeds our cognitive capacity for community, the sense of mutual accountability vanishes.

    This suggests a profound need for a societal shift toward “mini-collectivism.” By prioritizing local governance over centralized giants, we return to a scale where the social contract is enforceable through actual relationships rather than rigid, bureaucratic hierarchies. While it raises questions about how a globalized world would function without formalized large-scale governments, the current model’s failure to maintain social cohesion cannot be ignored.

    There is something essential in this limitation. I’d love to hear your thoughts—please comment below if you think we can ever truly scale community beyond our biology.

    #150 #anthropology #life #mentalHealth #philosophy #post #relationships #RobinDunbar #SebastianJunger #tribal #tribe #tribes #writing
  10. Post: 150 People Max

    The more I contemplate the fractures in modern society, the more I believe that the path forward requires turning away from massive, impersonal collectives and returning to smaller ones. I am drawn to a specific figure: 150. This is the estimated number of people who can live together under a social contract before it begins to bend and break. I first encountered this concept in Sebastian Junger’s Tribe, a book that remains a staple on my shelf today.

    This threshold is known as Dunbar’s number, named after anthropologist Robin Dunbar. He theorized that humans can only comfortably maintain stable social relationships with approximately 150 people. This isn’t just a guess; it is backed by neurology and real-world evidence. Historical hunter-gatherer societies, modern military sub-units, and effective corporate departments frequently cluster around this size. Even in the age of social media, where we can follow thousands, our meaningful interactions still cap out at around the 150-person mark.

    Consider the implications for a moment. Science suggests a person can only truly recognize about 500 people—the kind of recognition you have for someone you drive past every day but don’t know personally. If our brains are biologically limited to conceptualizing relationships 150 times over, how can we expect to make informed political decisions that affect millions? When the scale of government exceeds our cognitive capacity for community, the sense of mutual accountability vanishes.

    This suggests a profound need for a societal shift toward “mini-collectivism.” By prioritizing local governance over centralized giants, we return to a scale where the social contract is enforceable through actual relationships rather than rigid, bureaucratic hierarchies. While it raises questions about how a globalized world would function without formalized large-scale governments, the current model’s failure to maintain social cohesion cannot be ignored.

    There is something essential in this limitation. I’d love to hear your thoughts—please comment below if you think we can ever truly scale community beyond our biology.

    #150 #anthropology #life #mentalHealth #philosophy #post #relationships #RobinDunbar #SebastianJunger #tribal #tribe #tribes #writing
  11. CW: NSFW, nudité masculine

    @FenouilMental m'a inspiré hier soir avec sa photo, j'ai tenté de reproduire la même pose mais sans le petit drap 😜

    #homme #hommes #tatouage #tribal #gay #gaynsfw #NSFW #noiretblanc #nb

  12. CW: NSFW, nudité masculine

    @FenouilMental m'a inspiré hier soir avec sa photo, j'ai tenté de reproduire la même pose mais sans le petit drap 😜

    #homme #hommes #tatouage #tribal #gay #gaynsfw #NSFW #noiretblanc #nb

  13. CW: NSFW, nudité masculine

    @FenouilMental m'a inspiré hier soir avec sa photo, j'ai tenté de reproduire la même pose mais sans le petit drap 😜

    #homme #hommes #tatouage #tribal #gay #gaynsfw #NSFW #noiretblanc #nb

  14. CW: NSFW, nudité masculine

    @FenouilMental m'a inspiré hier soir avec sa photo, j'ai tenté de reproduire la même pose mais sans le petit drap 😜

    #homme #hommes #tatouage #tribal #gay #gaynsfw #NSFW #noiretblanc #nb

  15. Ozias
     Art Fight is officially halfway over, so... probably time to start doing some revenge. This one is for the first attack I received this year, by bsky.app/profile/eyeliner1k.bs! She did an amazing drawing of Selena which you can see here! artfight.net/attack/12963715.s Gotta say, I wasn't expecting my first attack just a few hours after Art Fight started, and such a nice one at that.
    Anyway, here's Ozias! I don't have much experience with muscular males, and I've never drawn an orca before, but this turned out to be quite a fun challenge! Also, really cool character design.

    See more on Patreon and SubscribeStar -> linktr.ee/scaliespe <- Join my Discord server!

    #spe #anthro #furry #furryart #orca #male #muscular #muscular_male #ozias #artfight #artfight2026 #art_fight #flexing #buff #tribal #aquatic #solo_male #dolphin #cetacean #whale #killer_whale

  16. Ozias
     Art Fight is officially halfway over, so... probably time to start doing some revenge. This one is for the first attack I received this year, by bsky.app/profile/eyeliner1k.bs! She did an amazing drawing of Selena which you can see here! artfight.net/attack/12963715.s Gotta say, I wasn't expecting my first attack just a few hours after Art Fight started, and such a nice one at that.
    Anyway, here's Ozias! I don't have much experience with muscular males, and I've never drawn an orca before, but this turned out to be quite a fun challenge! Also, really cool character design.

    See more on Patreon and SubscribeStar -> linktr.ee/scaliespe <- Join my Discord server!

    #spe #anthro #furry #furryart #orca #male #muscular #muscular_male #ozias #artfight #artfight2026 #art_fight #flexing #buff #tribal #aquatic #solo_male #dolphin #cetacean #whale #killer_whale

  17. Ozias
     Art Fight is officially halfway over, so... probably time to start doing some revenge. This one is for the first attack I received this year, by bsky.app/profile/eyeliner1k.bs! She did an amazing drawing of Selena which you can see here! artfight.net/attack/12963715.s Gotta say, I wasn't expecting my first attack just a few hours after Art Fight started, and such a nice one at that.
    Anyway, here's Ozias! I don't have much experience with muscular males, and I've never drawn an orca before, but this turned out to be quite a fun challenge! Also, really cool character design.

    See more on Patreon and SubscribeStar -> linktr.ee/scaliespe <- Join my Discord server!

    #spe #anthro #furry #furryart #orca #male #muscular #muscular_male #ozias #artfight #artfight2026 #art_fight #flexing #buff #tribal #aquatic #solo_male #dolphin #cetacean #whale #killer_whale

  18. Ozias
     Art Fight is officially halfway over, so... probably time to start doing some revenge. This one is for the first attack I received this year, by bsky.app/profile/eyeliner1k.bs! She did an amazing drawing of Selena which you can see here! artfight.net/attack/12963715.s Gotta say, I wasn't expecting my first attack just a few hours after Art Fight started, and such a nice one at that.
    Anyway, here's Ozias! I don't have much experience with muscular males, and I've never drawn an orca before, but this turned out to be quite a fun challenge! Also, really cool character design.

    See more on Patreon and SubscribeStar -> linktr.ee/scaliespe <- Join my Discord server!

    #spe #anthro #furry #furryart #orca #male #muscular #muscular_male #ozias #artfight #artfight2026 #art_fight #flexing #buff #tribal #aquatic #solo_male #dolphin #cetacean #whale #killer_whale

  19. Also as I understand, the Samaṇa (Sanskrit: Śramaṇa) movement -- including Buddhism, Jainism, et al -- was the organised response/resistance of south Asia's tribal and IVC/Dravidian peoples to the spread of Vedism, and it prompted the Upaniṣadic movement within Vedic Hinduism.

    #samana #shramana #buddhism #jainism #ajivika #tribal #indigenous #aasi #asi #indusvalley #ivc #harappa #dravidian #vedic #vedas #upanishads #hinduism

  20. Also as I understand, the Samaṇa (Sanskrit: Śramaṇa) movement -- including Buddhism, Jainism, et al -- was the organised response/resistance of south Asia's tribal and IVC/Dravidian peoples to the spread of Vedism, and it prompted the Upaniṣadic movement within Vedic Hinduism.

    #samana #shramana #buddhism #jainism #ajivika #tribal #indigenous #aasi #asi #indusvalley #ivc #harappa #dravidian #vedic #vedas #upanishads #hinduism

  21. Also as I understand, the Samaṇa (Sanskrit: Śramaṇa) movement -- including Buddhism, Jainism, et al -- was the organised response/resistance of south Asia's tribal and IVC/Dravidian peoples to the spread of Vedism, and it prompted the Upaniṣadic movement within Vedic Hinduism.

    #samana #shramana #buddhism #jainism #ajivika #tribal #indigenous #aasi #asi #indusvalley #ivc #harappa #dravidian #vedic #vedas #upanishads #hinduism

  22. Also as I understand, the Samaṇa (Sanskrit: Śramaṇa) movement -- including Buddhism, Jainism, et al -- was the organised response/resistance of south Asia's tribal and IVC/Dravidian peoples to the spread of Vedism, and it prompted the Upaniṣadic movement within Vedic Hinduism.

    #samana #shramana #buddhism #jainism #ajivika #tribal #indigenous #aasi #asi #indusvalley #ivc #harappa #dravidian #vedic #vedas #upanishads #hinduism

  23. Also as I understand, the Samaṇa (Sanskrit: Śramaṇa) movement -- including Buddhism, Jainism, et al -- was the organised response/resistance of south Asia's tribal and IVC/Dravidian peoples to the spread of Vedism, and it prompted the Upaniṣadic movement within Vedic Hinduism.

    #samana #shramana #buddhism #jainism #ajivika #tribal #indigenous #aasi #asi #indusvalley #ivc #harappa #dravidian #vedic #vedas #upanishads #hinduism