#steffen — Public Fediverse posts

https://www.europesays.com/videos/8044/ IRAN-KRIEG: „Das ist eigentlich die Überraschung!“ Iran-USA-Gespräche scheitern deutlich #2026 #aktuell #Angebot #angriffe #atomprogramm #Blockade #CarolinaTurzer #Chefkorrespondent #Druck #fernsehen #Gespräche #Iran #Kompromiss #Minen #n24 #nachrichten #NachrichtenAktuell #news #revolutionsgarden #Steffen #StraßeVonHormus #teheran #Trump #tv #Unterhändler #uran #UsMilitär #USA #verhandlungen #video #washington #welt #WELTNews #weltwirtschaft

Neues aus der Bohndesliga:
#Bohndesliga #RocketBeansTv #RBTV

WERDER BREMEN entlässt HORST STEFFEN! Unsere Reaction! | Bohndesliga

Sonntagabend gab WERDER BREMEN bekannt: HORST STEFFEN ist Geschichte! Die Hoffnung, ein neues Kapitel in der Werder-Geschichte zu starten, en

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ATZplRc_n3o
#spieltagzusammenfassung #etiennegarde #nikobackspin #tobiasescher #Werder #Bremen #WerderBremen #HorstSteffen #Steffen #Entlassung #Trainerentlassung

glaube fazit kann man heute schon vor spielschluss ziehen
frage mich ja was #steffen die woche über mit den jungs trainiert
ich sehe da momentan einfach keine mannschaft auf dem platz, mehr so ein hühnerhaufen wo keiner so recht weiss was er eigentlich genau machen soll 🤷‍♂️
selten soo viele fehlpässe und abstimmungsprobleme gesehen wie in diesem spiel
#B04SVW #werder #fussball #bundesliga

Heute ist #Matchday u. #Werder 💚⚽ absolviert das erste Heimspiel der Saison gg. Leverkusen. Trotz der ungewöhnlich langen Verletztenliste wird Trainer Horst #Steffen eine bundesligataugliche u. motivierte Elf ins Spiel schicken. Mein Tipp: 2 : 2 💚⚽ #AufGehtsWerder 💚⚽

🚨🟢 BREAKING | Horst #Steffen will become the new head coach of Werder Bremen!

56 y/o from Elversberg was the top candidate, as revealed. Verbal agreement was done. A total agreement with Elversberg has now been reached.

Steffen is set to replace Ole Werner. Exclusive news from Friday evening, soon to be official in the next hours.

@[email protected] 🇩🇪

Till #Steffen @till_steffen #Die_Grünen

Heute haben 124 Bundestagsabgeordnete den Gruppenantrag über die Einleitung eines Verfahrens zur Feststellung der Verfassungswidrigkeit der AfD bei der Bundestagspräsidentin angemeldet.

#Bundestagswahl2025 #Habeck4Kanzler

@mad

Here's a good thread on the paper and what it really looks at and what it finds. https://bsky.app/profile/emildimanchev.bsky.social/post/3l2kvb242gb22

(If you read the thread in the account setting "experimental thread layout", don't forget to click into the last post displayed. The thread continues, but the experimental setting doesn't indicate that.)

Emil looks in particular at [one author's claim in the PIK news release and] the newspaper claims that CO2pricing were the winner in the study on effectiveness of climate policy https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adl6547 .

He explains how the analysis approach fundamentally doesn't allow for this conclusion at all.
(And I am not surprised that one of the authors has the audacity to claim it had. That's economists for you – what else can one expect.)

If one desperately WANTS to pull a message regarding CO2price from the paper, it's this:
CO2price was in those big policy packages which were followed by some emission reductions. (I wouldn't even dare to say "which resulted in reductions". In part due to the 3 economic crises in the analysis window).

And who put the CO2price in bigger policy packages? Mainstream economists did, the neoliberal ideologists who advise governments everywhere by now.

People with more wits added other tools to policy packages that resulted in some reductions.

But all of it was too slow, too little, too incremental, not enough. Incrementalism doesn't cut it. It says precisely that in papers by real scientists, eg the Hothouse paper in 2018 by Will #Steffen , Jon Schellnhuber et al.

No country should now try and repeat a policy mix. We don't have time for trial and error anymore. And no country should listen to mainstream economists anymore. Ever.

Here's a good thread on the paper and what it really looks at and what it finds. https://bsky.app/profile/emildimanchev.bsky.social/post/3l2kvb242gb22

(If you read the thread in the account setting "experimental thread layout", don't forget to click into the last post displayed. The thread continues, but the experimental setting doesn't indicate that.)

Emil looks in particular at [one author's claim in the PIK news release and] the newspaper claims that CO2pricing were the winner in the study on effectiveness of climate policy https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adl6547 .

He explains how the analysis approach fundamentally doesn't allow for this conclusion at all.
(And I am not surprised that one of the authors has the audacity to claim it had. That's economists for you – what else can one expect.)

If one desperately WANTS to pull a message regarding CO2price from the paper, it's this:
CO2price was in those big policy packages which were followed by some emission reductions. (I wouldn't even dare to say "which resulted in reductions". In part due to the 3 economic crises in the analysis window).

And who put the CO2price in bigger policy packages? Mainstream economists did, the neoliberal ideologists who advise governments everywhere by now.

People with more wits added other tools to policy packages that resulted in some reductions.

But all of it was too slow, too little, too incremental, not enough. Incrementalism doesn't cut it. It says precisely that in papers by real scientists, eg the Hothouse paper in 2018 by Will #Steffen , Jon Schellnhuber et al.

No country should now try and repeat a policy mix. We don't have time for trial and error anymore. And no country should listen to mainstream economists anymore. Ever.

@jknodlseder

Here's a good thread on the paper and what it really looks at and what it finds. https://bsky.app/profile/emildimanchev.bsky.social/post/3l2kvb242gb22

(If you read the thread in the account setting "experimental thread layout", don't forget to click into the last post displayed. The thread continues, but the experimental setting doesn't indicate that.)

Emil looks in particular at [one author's claim in the PIK news release and] the newspaper claims that CO2pricing were the winner in the study on effectiveness of climate policy https://www.science.org/doi/10.1126/science.adl6547 .

He explains how the analysis approach fundamentally doesn't allow for this conclusion at all.
(And I am not surprised that one of the authors has the audacity to claim it had. That's economists for you – what else can one expect.)

If one desperately WANTS to pull a message regarding CO2price from the paper, it's this:
CO2price was in those big policy packages which were followed by some emission reductions. (I wouldn't even dare to say "which resulted in reductions". In part due to the 3 economic crises in the analysis window).

And who put the CO2price in bigger policy packages? Mainstream economists did, the neoliberal ideologists who advise governments everywhere by now.

People with more wits added other tools to policy packages that resulted in some reductions.

But all of it was too slow, too little, too incremental, not enough. Incrementalism doesn't cut it. It says precisely that in papers by real scientists, eg the Hothouse paper in 2018 by Will #Steffen , Jon Schellnhuber et al.

No country should now try and repeat a policy mix. We don't have time for trial and error anymore. And no country should listen to mainstream economists anymore. Ever.

Weird. Maybe, I've got a logical mistake in my thinking

Will #Steffen et al 2018 https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.1810141115 warned in "Trajectories of the Earth System in the Anthropocene" of a "Hot House Earth" .
A term that got negative press all over and the paper is still discredited in public opinion among the non-scientific community, at least.
A Hot House Age is merely the term for an ice-less age in which the poles are not covered by kilometres of ice. That is called an Ice House Age.

#Talento et al 2021 https://esd.copernicus.org/articles/12/1275/2021/ modelled what happens to ice ages #glacial |s in several emission scenarios.
Today's CO2 concentration is already moving the next #iceage to later than what the #Milankovic cycles would dictate.
Scenarios for (in my opinion fictitious, unachievable) emissions of 1000 or 3000 Pg C move the next fullblown ice age to 600ky and 900ky from now.
Almost a million years. No ice age.

But the #AMOC is going to collapse: the convection in the Subpolar Gyre in the 2030s; the Northern branch of AMOC might tip before 2050 to later inevitably collapse, too.

Certainly that increases ice mass in Greenland, Europe, and Eurasia, and Arctic Sea Ice grows back, too. And all this AMOC-related ice grows and grows, each year puts more snow on the ever increasing ice layer.
I don't know how much ice is needed to meet criteria for a glacial definition.
But all that Eurasian ice also buries the boreal forests under it, ie removes their carbon from the cycle. And puts an ice plug on leaking methane from #permafrost in that area. (Tho not the permafrost in the far East. I gather, that area is not prone to ice sheets from Atlantic influences and needs other triggers to form? It wasn't covered by ice in #MIS11, 420ky ago. )

Weird isn't it, that ice mass models like Talento's don't factor in ever-increasing ice mass in low-to medium emission scenarios. Hm.

@Sustainable2050 Hey Aussies... Get used to it. Prof. Will #Steffen told you already years ago!
I remember being in a bunch of nice people transcribing and translating his speech into German. That was in the beginning of 2020.
The speech itself dates back into 2019.
https://youtu.be/OzQsjuzr3_M

Herbert #Steffen, Mitgründer der #Giordano-Bruno-Stiftung, ist tot. Er hat sich in außergewöhnlichem Maße für die Werte der #Aufklärung und des evolutionären #Humanismus engagiert.

Ein Nachruf: https://www.diehumanisten.de/2022/11/25/herbert-steffen-ein-nachruf/

#Gespräch mit #Steffen #Arlt;

#Tipp für #günstig​en #Tarif für #Internet:

1. Beliebiger O2 Vertrag (günstigster Tarif) - > Sim Karte wegpacken
2. Partnerkarte mit dazu buchen (50% Rabatt) mit O2 Unlimitied Data Max 5G;
3. Dazu: TV Option L; 4,99 Euro
4. Dazu: Mein Home XL 24,99 Euro (250 Mbit Download, 40 Mbit Upload)

Gesamtpreis ca. 45 Euro/Monat

#Gespräch mit #Steffen #Arlt;

#DJ im #Kastanienwäldchen von Norbert #Reda in #Berlin;

Freut sich auf bevorstehende #Wiedereröffnung nach #Corona;

Franz-Neumann-Plaz am #Schäfersee;

https://www.kastanienwaeldchen.de

Enough is Enough: **#HambacherForst: Memorial for #Steffen destroyed during operation by police and #RWE – To #ExtinctionRebellion: Why the police are not our friends**

"On Thursday a large operation by cops and RWE security personnel destroyed sev…"

https://enoughisenough14.org/2018/11/24/hambacherforst-memorial-for-steffen-destroyed-during-operation-by-police-and-rwe-to-extinctionrebellion-why-the-police-are-not-our-friends/

#anarchism #bot