home.social

#neovim — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #neovim, aggregated by home.social.

  1. ark.nvim variables pane now working!

    Still need to add support for Ark's debugger and variables pane, but the plugin is starting to feel very usable.

    github.com/wurli/jet.ark

    #RStats #Neovim #DataScience

  2. ark.nvim variables pane now working!

    Still need to add support for Ark's debugger and variables pane, but the plugin is starting to feel very usable.

    github.com/wurli/jet.ark

    #RStats #Neovim #DataScience

  3. ark.nvim variables pane now working!

    Still need to add support for Ark's debugger and variables pane, but the plugin is starting to feel very usable.

    github.com/wurli/jet.ark

    #RStats #Neovim #DataScience

  4. ark.nvim variables pane now working!

    Still need to add support for Ark's debugger and variables pane, but the plugin is starting to feel very usable.

    github.com/wurli/jet.ark

    #RStats #Neovim #DataScience

  5. ark.nvim variables pane now working!

    Still need to add support for Ark's debugger and variables pane, but the plugin is starting to feel very usable.

    github.com/wurli/jet.ark

  6. #neovim Development News

    The 0.12 version updates `writefile()` to treat Lua strings as "blob", so it can be used to write binary data.

    PR:
    - github.com/neovim/neovi...

    feat(eval): treat Lua string a...

  7. #neovim Development News

    The 0.12 version updates `writefile()` to treat Lua strings as "blob", so it can be used to write binary data.

    PR:
    - github.com/neovim/neovi...

    feat(eval): treat Lua string a...

  8. #neovim Development News

    The 0.12 version updates `writefile()` to treat Lua strings as "blob", so it can be used to write binary data.

    PR:
    - github.com/neovim/neovi...

    feat(eval): treat Lua string a...

  9. #neovim Development News

    The 0.12 version updates `writefile()` to treat Lua strings as "blob", so it can be used to write binary data.

    PR:
    - github.com/neovim/neovi...

    feat(eval): treat Lua string a...

  10. 🪙 Neovim have a ~$800k Bitcoin donation sitting untouched since 2023 | Hacker News news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4

    #neovim #crypto #opensource

  11. 🪙 Neovim have a ~$800k Bitcoin donation sitting untouched since 2023 | Hacker News news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4

    #neovim #crypto #opensource

  12. 🪙 Neovim have a ~$800k Bitcoin donation sitting untouched since 2023 | Hacker News news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4

    #neovim #crypto #opensource

  13. 🪙 Neovim have a ~$800k Bitcoin donation sitting untouched since 2023 | Hacker News news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4

    #neovim #crypto #opensource

  14. 🪙 Neovim have a ~$800k Bitcoin donation sitting untouched since 2023 | Hacker News news.ycombinator.com/item?id=4

    #neovim #crypto #opensource

  15. A bit of a philosophical question:

    Like many others, I stopped using
    #neovim after the maintainer doubled down on his inclusion of a DHH endorsement from the project home page. (Apparently he's since removed it; somehow I had missed that news.) I didn't want to use a product from somebody who wore an endorsement from an ethnic cleansing advocate as a badge of honor.

    I have, however, been questioning the rationale behind my decision. If a commercial product is sold by someone repulsive, my decision not to buy the product has an obvious benefit: it keeps my money from going to someone whom I cannot, in good conscience, support. But what does my refusing to use a free product do? I never contributed to neovim, either financially or with code. He's no worse off now than when I used neovim every day. He probably has no idea I ever used it before, or have stopped using it now. What, exactly, am I accomplishing?

    This isn't me looking for an excuse to use my favorite editor again. I'm still not using it until I can do so with a genuinely clear conscience. And my intuition is that avoiding free stuff from people who support evil is still, in general, a good thing. I just don't have a rational justification for it. Thoughts?

    (Any replies along the lines of "DHH is good ackshully, stop being so woke" will result in blocks.)

  16. A bit of a philosophical question:

    Like many others, I stopped using
    #neovim after the maintainer doubled down on his inclusion of a DHH endorsement from the project home page. (Apparently he's since removed it; somehow I had missed that news.) I didn't want to use a product from somebody who wore an endorsement from an ethnic cleansing advocate as a badge of honor.

    I have, however, been questioning the rationale behind my decision. If a commercial product is sold by someone repulsive, my decision not to buy the product has an obvious benefit: it keeps my money from going to someone whom I cannot, in good conscience, support. But what does my refusing to use a free product do? I never contributed to neovim, either financially or with code. He's no worse off now than when I used neovim every day. He probably has no idea I ever used it before, or have stopped using it now. What, exactly, am I accomplishing?

    This isn't me looking for an excuse to use my favorite editor again. I'm still not using it until I can do so with a genuinely clear conscience. And my intuition is that avoiding free stuff from people who support evil is still, in general, a good thing. I just don't have a rational justification for it. Thoughts?

    (Any replies along the lines of "DHH is good ackshully, stop being so woke" will result in blocks.)

  17. A bit of a philosophical question:

    Like many others, I stopped using
    #neovim after the maintainer doubled down on his inclusion of a DHH endorsement from the project home page. (Apparently he's since removed it; somehow I had missed that news.) I didn't want to use a product from somebody who wore an endorsement from an ethnic cleansing advocate as a badge of honor.

    I have, however, been questioning the rationale behind my decision. If a commercial product is sold by someone repulsive, my decision not to buy the product has an obvious benefit: it keeps my money from going to someone whom I cannot, in good conscience, support. But what does my refusing to use a free product do? I never contributed to neovim, either financially or with code. He's no worse off now than when I used neovim every day. He probably has no idea I ever used it before, or have stopped using it now. What, exactly, am I accomplishing?

    This isn't me looking for an excuse to use my favorite editor again. I'm still not using it until I can do so with a genuinely clear conscience. And my intuition is that avoiding free stuff from people who support evil is still, in general, a good thing. I just don't have a rational justification for it. Thoughts?

    (Any replies along the lines of "DHH is good ackshully, stop being so woke" will result in blocks.)

  18. A bit of a philosophical question:

    Like many others, I stopped using
    #neovim after the maintainer doubled down on his inclusion of a DHH endorsement from the project home page. (Apparently he's since removed it; somehow I had missed that news.) I didn't want to use a product from somebody who wore an endorsement from an ethnic cleansing advocate as a badge of honor.

    I have, however, been questioning the rationale behind my decision. If a commercial product is sold by someone repulsive, my decision not to buy the product has an obvious benefit: it keeps my money from going to someone whom I cannot, in good conscience, support. But what does my refusing to use a free product do? I never contributed to neovim, either financially or with code. He's no worse off now than when I used neovim every day. He probably has no idea I ever used it before, or have stopped using it now. What, exactly, am I accomplishing?

    This isn't me looking for an excuse to use my favorite editor again. I'm still not using it until I can do so with a genuinely clear conscience. And my intuition is that avoiding free stuff from people who support evil is still, in general, a good thing. I just don't have a rational justification for it. Thoughts?

    (Any replies along the lines of "DHH is good ackshully, stop being so woke" will result in blocks.)

  19. A bit of a philosophical question:

    Like many others, I stopped using
    #neovim after the maintainer doubled down on his inclusion of a DHH endorsement from the project home page. (Apparently he's since removed it; somehow I had missed that news.) I didn't want to use a product from somebody who wore an endorsement from an ethnic cleansing advocate as a badge of honor.

    I have, however, been questioning the rationale behind my decision. If a commercial product is sold by someone repulsive, my decision not to buy the product has an obvious benefit: it keeps my money from going to someone whom I cannot, in good conscience, support. But what does my refusing to use a free product do? I never contributed to neovim, either financially or with code. He's no worse off now than when I used neovim every day. He probably has no idea I ever used it before, or have stopped using it now. What, exactly, am I accomplishing?

    This isn't me looking for an excuse to use my favorite editor again. I'm still not using it until I can do so with a genuinely clear conscience. And my intuition is that avoiding free stuff from people who support evil is still, in general, a good thing. I just don't have a rational justification for it. Thoughts?

    (Any replies along the lines of "DHH is good ackshully, stop being so woke" will result in blocks.)