#i2117 — Public Fediverse posts

BIG CLIMATE WIN: Washington voters resoundingly reject INITIATIVE 2117, which would have overturned the state's ambitious climate law championed by Gov. Jay Inslee. The effort was bankrolled by right-wing mega-millionaire Brian Heywood.
Background here: https://hillheat.news/p/u-s-climate-politics-almanac-2024-climate-ballot-measures
#uspol #climate #election2024 #wapol #i2117

BIG CLIMATE WIN: Washington voters resoundingly reject INITIATIVE 2117, which would have overturned the state's ambitious climate law championed by Gov. Jay Inslee. The effort was bankrolled by right-wing mega-millionaire Brian Heywood.
Background here: https://hillheat.news/p/u-s-climate-politics-almanac-2024-climate-ballot-measures
#uspol #climate #election2024 #wapol #i2117

BIG CLIMATE WIN: Washington voters resoundingly reject INITIATIVE 2117, which would have overturned the state's ambitious climate law championed by Gov. Jay Inslee. The effort was bankrolled by right-wing mega-millionaire Brian Heywood.
Background here: https://hillheat.news/p/u-s-climate-politics-almanac-2024-climate-ballot-measures
#uspol #climate #election2024 #wapol #i2117

BIG CLIMATE WIN: Washington voters resoundingly reject INITIATIVE 2117, which would have overturned the state's ambitious climate law championed by Gov. Jay Inslee. The effort was bankrolled by right-wing mega-millionaire Brian Heywood.
Background here: https://hillheat.news/p/u-s-climate-politics-almanac-2024-climate-ballot-measures
#uspol #climate #election2024 #wapol #i2117

BIG CLIMATE WIN: Washington voters resoundingly reject INITIATIVE 2117, which would have overturned the state's ambitious climate law championed by Gov. Jay Inslee. The effort was bankrolled by right-wing mega-millionaire Brian Heywood.
Background here: https://hillheat.news/p/u-s-climate-politics-almanac-2024-climate-ballot-measures
#uspol #climate #election2024 #wapol #i2117

2024 Voter Guide: Who the transpo orgs endorsed – UPDATED

Alright, folks, let’s do this. This is the big one for a lot of reasons, but for biking in Seattle specifically this is the most important ballot of the entire decade. We need to vote NO on Initiative 2117 and vote YES on Seattle Proposition 1. If we want to make our streets safer, connect our bike network to every neighborhood, expand and maintain our regional trail network, and accellerate our dismal rate of sidewalk construction, it’s all on the line. Tell all your friends and family members how much these measures mean to you and to our communities. And if you aren’t already spending your time volunteering to get out the vote in swing states, consider joining the Keep Seattle Moving campaign.

It seems that a lot of people have heard the message that voters should say NO to all the state initiatives, and the endorsements below agree. But we need to make sure folks know to vote YES on the proposition. I may lose sleep worrying that people will group the proposition in with the initiatives and just vote no on them all.

Your ballot for the November 5 general election should have arrived in the mail, or should arrive very soon. Eligible voters have until October 28 to register or update your address online in King County. After that date, voters can still register in person up to and including election day at a voting center. If you are not in King County, check your county’s voter information pages for details.

I have gathered endorsements from several organizations working for safer streets and better transit in our area: The Urbanist (URB), Transportation for Washington (T4W), Washington Bikes (WAB), and the Transit Riders Union (TRU). Check the endorsements pages for each organization for more information on why they chose who they chose (the Urbanist did a particularly good job of explaining their reasoning this year). If an organization did not mention a race, then I left them off the list. But if they specifically noted “no endorsement,” I did include that. Note that Cascade Bicycle Club, Seattle Neighborhood Greenways and Transportation Choices Coalition are 501(c)(3) non-profits that can accept tax-deductible donations, and U.S. law allows them to endorse ballot measures but not political candidates or parties. Cascade and TCC’s respective sister organizations Washington Bikes and Transportation for Washington are separate 501(c)(4) non-profits that can endorse candidates.

UPDATE 10-22: Added a few endorsements from Cascade Bicycle Club, Seattle Neighborhood Greenways, Transportation Choices Coalition and Seattle Transit Blog to the list.

Seattle City Government

Seattle Proposition No. 1: Yes (URB, T4W, WAB, TRU, Cascade Bicycle Club, Transportation Choices Coalition, Seattle Neighborhood Greenways and Seattle Transit Blog)

Seattle City Council 8: Alexis Mercedes Rinck (URB, T4W, WAB, TRU, Seattle Transit Blog)

Washington State Initiatives

Initiative 2066: No (URB, TRU, Seattle Transit Blog)

Initiative 2109: No (URB, TRU, Seattle Transit Blog)

Initiative 2117: No (URB, T4W, WAB, TRU, Cascade Bicycle Club, Transportation Choices Coalition, Seattle Transit Blog)

Initiative 2124: No (URB, TRU)

Washington State Leadership

Governor: Bob Ferguson (WAB), No Endorsement (URB)

Attorney General: Nick Brown (URB)

Lands Commissioner: Dave Upthegrove (URB, T4W)

United States Legislature:

U.S. Senate: Maria Cantwell (T4W, WAB)

1st Congressional District: Susan DelBene (URB, WAB)

2nd Congressional District: Rick Larsen (T4W, WAB), No Endorsement (URB)

6th Congressional District: Emily Randall (WAB)

7th Congrassional District: Pramila Jayapal (WAB)

8th Congressional District: Kim Schrier (WAB), No Endorsement (URB)

9th Congressional District: Adam Smith (WAB), Melissa Chaudhry (TRU), No Endorsement (URB)

10th Congrassional District: Marilyn Strickland (WAB)

Washington State Legislature:

Legislative District 01 – Position 1: Davina Duerr (URB, T4W, WAB)

LD01-2: Shelley Kloba (WAB)

LD03 Senate: Marcus Riccelli (T4W, WAB)

LD03-1: Natasha Hill (T4W, WAB)

LD05 Senate: Bill Ramos (T4W, WAB)

LD05-1: Victoria Hunt (T4W, URB)

LD06-1: Steven McCray II (T4W)

LD06-2: Michaela Kelso (T4W)

LD09-1: Patrick Miller (T4W)

LD10 Senate: Janet St. Clair (T4W)

LD11-1: David Hackney (T4W)

LD12-1: Heather Koellen (T4W)

LD14 Senate: Maria Beltran (T4W, WAB)

LD14-2: Ana Ruiz Kennedy (T4W)

LD17-2: Terri Niles (T4W)

LD18-1: Deken Letinich (T4W)

LD18-2: John Zingale (T4W)

LD19-1: Mike Coverdale (T4W)

LD21-2: Lillian Ortiz-Self (T4W)

LD22 Senate: Jessica Bateman (URB, T4W, WAB)

LD22-1: Beth Doglio (T4W, WAB)

LD22-2: Lisa Parshley (T4W)

LD23-1: Tarra Simmons (T4W)

LD23-2: Greg Nance (T4W, WAB)

LD24 Senate: Mike Chapman (T4W)

LD24-1: Adam Bernbaum (WAB)

LD25 Senate: Kenneth King (T4W)

LD25-1: Cameron Severns (T4W)

LD25-2: Shellie Willis (T4W)

LD26-2: Tiffiny Mitchell (T4W)

LD27 Senate: Yasmin Trudeau (URB, T4W)

LD27-1: Laurie Jinkins (T4W)

LD27-2: Jake Fey (T4W, WAB), Devin Rydel Kelly (URB)

LD28 Senate: T’wina Nobles (URB, T4W, WAB)

LD28-1: Mari Leavitt (WAB)

LD28-2: Dan Bronoske (T4W)

LD29-1: No Endorsement (URB)

LD29-2: Sharlett Mena (URB, T4W, WAB)

LD30-1: Jamila Taylor (T4W)

LD30-2: Kristine Reeves (T4W)

LD32-1: Cindy Ryu (T4W, WAB)

LD33-2: Mia Su-Ling Gregerson (URB)

LD34-1: Emily Alvarado (URB, WAB)

LD34-2: Joe Fitzgibbon (URB, T4W, WAB)

LD35-2: James DeHart (T4W)

LD36-1: Julia Reed (URB, T4W, WAB)

LD36-2: Liz Berry (URB, T4W, WAB)

LD37-1: Sharon Tomiko Santos (T4W)

LD37-2: Chipalo Street (URB, T4W)

LD38-1: Julio Cortez (URB, WAB)

LD38-2: Mary Fosse (WAB)

LD39 Senate: John Snow (T4W)

LD39-1: Sam Low (WAB)

LD40 Senate: Liz Lovelett (T4W, WAB)

LD40-1: Debra Lekanoff (T4W)

LD40-2: Alex Ramel (T4W, WAB)

LD41 Senate: Lisa Wellman (T4W)

LD41-2: My-Linh Thai (URB, T4W, WAB)

LD43-1: Nicole Macri (URB, T4W)

LD43-2: Shaun Scott (URB, T4W, WAB)

LD44-1: Brandy Donaghy (T4W, WAB)

LD45-2: Melissa Demyan (URB)

LD46-1: Gerry Pollet (T4W)

LD46-2: Darya Farivar (URB, T4W, WAB)

LD47-1: Debra Jean Entenman (WAB)

LD47-2: Chris Stearns (T4W, WAB)

LD48-1: Vandana Slatter (T4W, WAB)

LD48-2: Amy Walen (T4W)

LD49-1: Sharon Wylie (T4W, WAB)

LD49-2: Monica Jurado Stonier (T4W, WAB)

County Leadership

Chelan County Commissioner D3: Brad Hawkins (T4W)

Clallam County Commissioner D2: Kate Dexter (T4W)

Clark County Council D3: Wil Fuentes (T4W)

Franklin County Council D2: Blance Barajas (T4W)

Island County Commissioner D2: Christina Elliott (T4W)

Kitsap County Commissioner D1: Christine Rolfes (T4W)

Pierce County Assessor-Treasurer: Marty Campbell (T4W)

Pierce County Executive: Ryan Mello (URB, T4W, WAB)

Pierce County Council D2: Davida Haygood (URB, T4W)

Pierce County Council D3: John Linboe (URB)

Pierce County Council D4: Rosie Ayala (T4W)

Pierce County Council D6: Jani Hitchen (URB, T4W)

Spokane County Commissioner D5: Molly Marshall (T4W)

Yakima County Commissioner D2: Susan Soto Palmer (T4W)

NOTE: I typed a lot of this in by hand and my eyes were very tired by the end of it, so please let me know in the comments or at [email protected] if you spot any typos.

#SEAbikes #Seattle

WSDOT: Promised e-bike rebate program still far from launching

If you were waiting for Washington State’s rebate program to kick in before buying an e-bike, the state still has a lot of work to do before it is available. When it finally does launch at some undetermined point in the future, the state expects all 8,500 of them to be gobbled up quickly and doled out via a randomization system with most of the funding going to households making less than 80% of the area median income.

Of course, none of this means anything if Washington voters approve I-2117 in November, a terrible decision that would defund a laundry list of good investments such as clean air, transit, roads, wildfire prevention, ferries and, yes, e-bike rebates.

The state legislature funded an e-bike rebate program in 2023 using funds from the Climate Commitment Act. But more than a year later, the program has yet to select a vendor to build out the custom software infrastructure needed to handle income verification and voucher distribution. WSDOT’s Active Transportation Division noted in a recent blog post that they plan to select a vendor in November to start that work. Though they don’t say it in the post, this timing would allow them to see if I-2117 passes before committing to building out the software. So whether I-2117 passes or not, the campaign itself seems to have already delayed work on this program, harming local bike shops as people wait to see if they can get a cheaper e-bike later.

If I-2117 fails and the program can move forward, WSDOT does not yet have a timeline for when they expect the program to get up and running, noting only that they are “confident we’ll have plenty to report in our next legislative update due July 2025,” according to a WSDOT blog post. If you make more than 80% of area median income (find out here), then rebates would be limited to $300 at most and you would need to win a lottery of sorts to get chosen. $300 is not nothing, but it might not be worth it to you to wait. E-bike prices are much lower now than they were even a couple years ago, and they may very well increase $300 by the time this program gets going depending how the industry and consumer demand evolves. It’s impossible to know, but e-bike prices have been volatile since the pandemic began.

Despite the program delays, the team has been working to develop their plan and hire staff, according to WSDOT. They have learned from the logistical struggles in other places and worked with a University of Washington research team to publish a lengthy policy document (PDF) on how best to structure the whole thing based on best practices and the specifics of how the legislature wrote the law.

The research team concluded that the state should launch the program in phases focused on a few communities before launching statewide and that interested Washington residents should apply in advance through an online system that then selects recipients at random. They could then use the rebate only through a bike shop with a physical store in Washington that also offers on-site repairs and that will fully assemble and size-adjust the bike for the buyer. They must also offer a warranty of at least a year. Mountain bikes should be excluded from the program, but all three recognized classes of e-bikes should be included. Adaptive e-bikes designed for accessibility should also be included, which is great news because they can be really expensive and typically are not covered by health insurance. There should be no more than rebate per household. Rebates should be applied at the register, so buyers would not need to float the rebate amount while waiting for a reimbursement check from the state. This is especially important for low-income buyers who can qualify for up to $1,200 in rebates, an amount of money that qualified buyers may not have available. However, it does add layers of complexity to the system.

One wrinkle in their plan is that the program must, by law, dedicate 40% of the investments “to vulnerable populations within the boundaries of overburdened communities” as defined by the Washington Department of Ecology as well as some of the “highly impacted communities” identified by the Department of Health. However, they may find that one disparity in such communities is often a lack of access to bike shops. So it will be interesting to see how the program mitigates this problem. I don’t know if there’s enough funding here to incentivize new shops within our state’s bike shop deserts, but that would be a wonderful side-effect if it happened. A bicycle is an incredible source of very low-cost transportation, but only if the bike is working. In the Puget Sound region, Everett, North Seattle/Shoreline, South Seattle, South King County, Northeast Puyallup and South and East Tacoma are identified as overburdened by the Department of Ecology, while census tracts that at least partially contain tribal lands are also noted as “highly impacted communities” under state statute. The legal definitions here are overlapping and a bit difficult for me to follow, and it’s very possible that my descriptions in this paragraph are not inclusive of them all. Focused outreach and early rollouts of the program should begin in these areas of the state.

#SEAbikes #Seattle

Cascade: ‘Vote NO on I-2117 if you love bikes and trails’

One of the most important choices on November’s packed ballot will be rejecting I-2117, an irresponsible initiative backed by a wealthy conservative hedge fund manager that would obliterate funding for a laundry list of great things Washington State invests in like clean air, asthma prevention, wildfire prevention, Safe Routes to School, trails, ferries, public transit and more. Even if you don’t like transit and biking (boo!), this initiative would also cut funding for state road and highway improvements.

Specifically, I-2117 would overturn the 2021 Climate Commitment Act, a so-called cap-and-trade law on carbon emissions that is already baked into the state’s budget including 2022’s Move Ahead Washington transportation funding package. The initiative would also limit the state’s ability to pursue other carbon-reduction strategies in the future. It’s so bad, even the Seattle Times Editorial Board says to vote NO on I-2117.

The initiative would benefit large carbon-emitting businesses at the expense of everybody else. Regular people across Washington will get nothing good from it. If you think that the oil conglomerates are going to lower your gas prices out of the kindness of their hearts as a thank you for passing I-2117, then I’ve got an oil refinery in Anacortes to sell you. The companies will put all their tax savings in their pockets, and you will be left with deteriorating roads, longer ferry lines, and fewer alternatives to driving.

It’s no surprise that Cascade Bicycle Club is strongly against I-2117, and the organization is even hosting an online event 1 p.m. September 17 about the impact on bikes and to help folks get involved in the effort to reject the initiative. They also wrote a blog post outlining their case for voting NO:

Washington has been named the nation’s most bicycle-friendly state many times over–and that’s not just because it’s so beautiful. It’s because we invest in it. 

That’s why we’re urging you to vote NO on Initiative 2117 on your fall ballot. I-2117 is a misleading initiative that would slash investments we’re making in bike, pedestrian, and active transportation projects across Washington. 

Remember two years ago when we passed that epic transportation package with funding for bike trails like Eastrail, Safe Routes to School, and more? I-2117 would devastate Move Ahead WA, a historic funding package that would invest $16 billion over 16 years into our transportation infrastructure. Critically, that includes nearly $1.3 billion in investment in 56 bike and pedestrian projects–all potentially on the chopping block if I-2117 passes. And when you look at “active transportation” more broadly on the Risk of Repeal map, that number balloons to 155 projects at risk–from Spokane to Seattle, Yakima to Bellingham, and everywhere in between. 

Here’s What’s At Risk 

• $290 million for Safe Routes to School, which supports projects that improve safety and mobility within two miles of primary, middle and high schools–like crosswalks, and signage near schools and playground;
• $216 million for the School-Based Bicycle Safety Education Program, which teaches kids of all ages to be more confident cyclists and to understand street safety;
• $591 million to bicycle and pedestrian projects and grants, including sections of the 42-mile Eastrail multi-use trail, extensions of the Interurban Trail, work on the Mountains to Sound Greenway Trail;
• $313 million in Complete Streets grants to make streets safer for people on bikes, in cars, waking, and riding transit
• And more!There are no two ways about it: ​​I-2117 would slash funding for walking, biking, and trail projects across our state. It would make Washington a worse place to ride bikes–especially for our kids. 

[Read more]

Share

• Mastodon
• Twitter
• Facebook
• Reddit
• Email

#SEAbikes #Seattle