home.social

#haack — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #haack, aggregated by home.social.

  1. @janhoglund Anything that requires a reasoning subject (e.g., synthetic reasoning, any target oriented usage of analogies) is out of scope for #formalization (i.e., a #mechanism - no new #knowledge without the re-appraisal of believes in the light of new evidence (i.e, #abduction or #retroduction. Without "sociology of knowledge" the very idea of "objectivity of knowledge", in the Popperian sense, doesn't work (e.g., #Haack S. "Epistemology with a knowing subject." 1979). #philosophy #ai

  2. @janhoglund Anything that requires a reasoning subject (e.g., synthetic reasoning, any target oriented usage of analogies) is out of scope for #formalization (i.e., a #mechanism - no new #knowledge without the re-appraisal of believes in the light of new evidence (i.e, #abduction or #retroduction. Without "sociology of knowledge" the very idea of "objectivity of knowledge", in the Popperian sense, doesn't work (e.g., #Haack S. "Epistemology with a knowing subject." 1979). #philosophy #ai

  3. @janhoglund Anything that requires a reasoning subject (e.g., synthetic reasoning, any target oriented usage of analogies) is out of scope for #formalization (i.e., a #mechanism - no new #knowledge without the re-appraisal of believes in the light of new evidence (i.e, #abduction or #retroduction. Without "sociology of knowledge" the very idea of "objectivity of knowledge", in the Popperian sense, doesn't work (e.g., #Haack S. "Epistemology with a knowing subject." 1979). #philosophy #ai

  4. @janhoglund Anything that requires a reasoning subject (e.g., synthetic reasoning, any target oriented usage of analogies) is out of scope for (i.e., a - no new without the re-appraisal of believes in the light of new evidence (i.e, or . Without "sociology of knowledge" the very idea of "objectivity of knowledge", in the Popperian sense, doesn't work (e.g., S. "Epistemology with a knowing subject." 1979).

  5. @janhoglund Anything that requires a reasoning subject (e.g., synthetic reasoning, any target oriented usage of analogies) is out of scope for #formalization (i.e., a #mechanism - no new #knowledge without the re-appraisal of believes in the light of new evidence (i.e, #abduction or #retroduction. Without "sociology of knowledge" the very idea of "objectivity of knowledge", in the Popperian sense, doesn't work (e.g., #Haack S. "Epistemology with a knowing subject." 1979). #philosophy #ai

  6. @jef

    William #Whewell's notion of #Consilience is often mentioned in this connection. It was later picked up by #EOWilson.

    #Peirce's #Pragmatism takes some pains to side-step the superficial dichotomy between #Objectivism or #Foundationalism and #Coherentism or #Consensualism.

    Susan #Haack, for instance, tries to integrate them in her concept of #Foundherentism.

    Well, that's enough isms for one day ...

  7. @jef

    William #Whewell's notion of #Consilience is often mentioned in this connection. It was later picked up by #EOWilson.

    #Peirce's #Pragmatism takes some pains to side-step the superficial dichotomy between #Objectivism or #Foundationalism and #Coherentism or #Consensualism.

    Susan #Haack, for instance, tries to integrate them in her concept of #Foundherentism.

    Well, that's enough isms for one day ...

  8. @jef

    William #Whewell's notion of #Consilience is often mentioned in this connection. It was later picked up by #EOWilson.

    #Peirce's #Pragmatism takes some pains to side-step the superficial dichotomy between #Objectivism or #Foundationalism and #Coherentism or #Consensualism.

    Susan #Haack, for instance, tries to integrate them in her concept of #Foundherentism.

    Well, that's enough isms for one day ...

  9. @jef

    William #Whewell's notion of #Consilience is often mentioned in this connection. It was later picked up by #EOWilson.

    #Peirce's #Pragmatism takes some pains to side-step the superficial dichotomy between #Objectivism or #Foundationalism and #Coherentism or #Consensualism.

    Susan #Haack, for instance, tries to integrate them in her concept of #Foundherentism.

    Well, that's enough isms for one day ...

  10. @jef

    William #Whewell's notion of #Consilience is often mentioned in this connection. It was later picked up by #EOWilson.

    #Peirce's #Pragmatism takes some pains to side-step the superficial dichotomy between #Objectivism or #Foundationalism and #Coherentism or #Consensualism.

    Susan #Haack, for instance, tries to integrate them in her concept of #Foundherentism.

    Well, that's enough isms for one day ...

  11. CW: On Scientism

    The Problem with #Scientism

    #Philosopher of science Susan #Haack has proposed an influential list of six signs of #scientistic thinking, which — with some caveats and modifications — can be usefully deployed in the context of this discussion.’

    blog.apaonline.org/2018/01/25/

  12. CW: On Scientism

    The Problem with #Scientism

    #Philosopher of science Susan #Haack has proposed an influential list of six signs of #scientistic thinking, which — with some caveats and modifications — can be usefully deployed in the context of this discussion.’

    blog.apaonline.org/2018/01/25/

  13. CW: On Scientism

    The Problem with #Scientism

    #Philosopher of science Susan #Haack has proposed an influential list of six signs of #scientistic thinking, which — with some caveats and modifications — can be usefully deployed in the context of this discussion.’

    blog.apaonline.org/2018/01/25/

  14. CW: On Scientism

    The Problem with #Scientism

    #Philosopher of science Susan #Haack has proposed an influential list of six signs of #scientistic thinking, which — with some caveats and modifications — can be usefully deployed in the context of this discussion.’

    blog.apaonline.org/2018/01/25/