#epsteinfilestransparencyact — Public Fediverse posts

This sounds like an order he placed at his friend #JeffreyEpstein 🤢 Hence #ReleaseTheEpsteinFiles

https://www.nytimes.com/2026/09/07/opinion/trump-meat-import.html

#uspol #politics #Epstein #EpsteinFiles #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #EpsteinFilesRelease #EpsteinClass #Trump #DonaldTrump #TrumpAdministration #TrumpAdministration2026 #SecondTrumpAdministration #EpsteinCoverup #EpsteinClientList #EpsteinScandal

Update for #KatiePhang v. #ToddBlanche (26-cv-01417) District Court, District of Columbia over non-production of documents covered by the #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73246595/phang-v-blanche/

There was a hearing, it ran longer than expected, and the DOJ sent a know-nothing to stonewall the judge's questions. That poor, poor attorney.

I would have given you the blow-by-blow but the court telephone system collapsed under the weight of everyone trying to dial in.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qDD-kjBiqok

https://www.allrisenews.com/p/judge-sullivan-contempt-phang-blanche

Update for #KatiePhang v. #ToddBlanche (26-cv-01417) District Court, District of Columbia over non-production of documents covered by the #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73246595/phang-v-blanche/

2026/08/11 Phang opposes Blanche's motion (Doc 28) to stay the complaint because the rules everyone has to follow are just to hard for the Attorney General to comply with while also doing the evil bidding of Lord Vader. Doc 30.

> Defendant’s request lacks any legal basis, and it also has no basis in reality. The Court has unequivocally ruled on the threshold issues identified by Defendant. ... The Attorney General is obviously trying to delay this case, and this Court should not condone his tactics.

> Defendant largely failed to comply with the Court’s preliminary injunction order.

> Defendant admitted that the redactions do not contain victim information, but claimed that the redactions are proper because they contain private email addresses. See ECF 19 at 11–12. Defendant, again, is wrong. See ECF 20 at 7.

> In addition to his failure to comply with the Court’s preliminary injunction order, Defendant Blanche failed to answer Plaintiff’s Complaint by his June 26, 2026 deadline.

> Defendant’s counsel made clear to Plaintiff’s counsel that his failure to comply with the deadline was not neglect at all — rather, Defendant made a calculated decision not to respond to the Complaint until Defendant decided the preliminary injunction proceedings were concluded.

2026/08/13 — Public Hearing! Make your predictions now!

Update for #KatiePhang v. #ToddBlanche (26-cv-01417) District Court, District of Columbia over non-production of documents covered by the #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct

2026/08/06 Judge orders Blanche to

① "The Defendant shall be prepared to discuss what documentation he will provide to support his assertions." because this judge will not take the DOJ's naked word for it.

② "The Defendant shall be prepared to explain why the handwritten notes cannot be redacted manually, or why the redactions cannot be accomplished in another way." because the DOJ's opinion is not law the way that acts of Congress are.

③ "The Defendant shall be prepared to discuss his timing for complying with this requirement [to publish a list of written
justification for all redactions.]"

2026/08/07 The 2026/08/13 hearing is going to be a nationally public shellacking with the public invited to dial in and listen — provided no recordings are made.

2026/08/05 Dueling motions today in #KatiePhang v. #ToddBlanche (26-cv-01417) District Court, District of Columbia over non-production of documents covered by the #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct

https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73246595/phang-v-blanche/

Doc 27 Phang moves to light a fire under Blanche, who missed the 2026/06/29 deadline and have him file an answer to the complaint by 2026/08/10 with all those internal administration decision records filed by 2026/08/17.

> There is no question that [Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche] is in default.

Doc 28 Blanche moves to stay the complaint because there is still a preliminary injunction motion pending???? Isn't that cause to move faster, not slower? And then he wants 60 *more* days.

> As indicated, the Department’s deadline for responding to the Complaint would have been due on June 26, 2026 had this case proceeded on a regular case schedule. To the extent any deadline was missed, that oversight, while regrettable, was not intentional and was not made in disregard of the Court’s deadline. Rather, it occurred while the Department was fully and visibly engaged in defending this action.

"The dog ate my homework" is more persuasive.

// Edit. OK, that was off the cuff and hasty, let me read the rest of the document to see if the claim is better fleshed out. What? There *IS* no more document?? Well, that's the last time I try to bail Todd Blanche out of anything!

// Edit 2: Read the exchange between Phang's lawyers and the DOJ lawyers defending Blanche. (Doc 27-2)

Saturday update for #KatiePhang v. #ToddBlanche (26-cv-01417) District Court, District of Columbia over non-production of documents covered by the #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct — the judge says to the #DOJ: I don't trust your representations, bring all the receipts. (Doc 23.) https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73246595/phang-v-blanche/

> ORDERED that Defendant shall submit to the Court on [2026/07/30] by no later than 3:00 pm the following documents: [8 unredacted emails] and documentation supporting Defendant’s representation that the names that have been redacted in the published version of the documents are the names of victims; [an unredacted document] and documentation supporting the Defendant’s representation that the names in the “to” and “from” lines that have been redacted in the published version of the documents are the names of law enforcement personnel; and [another unredacted document] and documentation supporting the Defendant’s representation that the names that have been redacted in the published version of the documents are the names of victims.

This last document is EFTA00194840 which Todd Blanche says is substantially similar to the EFTA01703108 which exists only in redacted copy. (Doc 19, p. 13)

While the order of the items varies, these look like the 10 items identified in Katie Phang's Preliminary Injunction motion (Doc 9) and the first 10 items in the Order to Show Cause (Doc 16).

EFTA00749245 — Someone emailed Epstein “where are you? are you ok I loved the torture video” but Todd Blanche wrote that it was OK to redact the email sender since members of Congress leaked who it was. Oh, R'ly?

Michael Popok interview with #KatiePhang about this failure of #ToddBlanche to even defend the failure to comply with the #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct .

She also sees misogyny and the curious substitution of the DOJ or Government for Todd Blanche who is personally responsible and named in the lawsuit.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TixrzeOsHKI

@KimPerales This is very similar to the argument in #KatiePhang v. #ToddBlanche that the #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct, being specific and detailed and passed much more recently, nullifies regulations and prohibitions predicated on the Privacy Act when the DOJ does the job Congress wants them to do.

Update in #KatiePhang v. #ToddBlanche (26-cv-01417) District Court, District of Columbia over non-production of documents covered by the #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73246595/phang-v-blanche/

In response to Phang's argument that Blanche hasn't been following the law, which is his job, and the proposed $1000/day fines for continued delay, Blanche offers the following (Doc 22):

Phang is getting hysterical, unlike me, a logical man, "the Court *has not ordered* “the immediate production of documents,” but rather has ordered the Department to “show cause if [it] declines to do so.”".

(Quotes = a verbatim quote.)

Phang is stupid, too, because she says the #DOJ “makes clear that whatever the federal statute requires [it] to do, [it] will not comply” but the DOJ "has attempted to highlight for the Court the differing demands of several applicable statutes" while Phang's claim "the Epstein Act clearly trumps, as it was the more recently enacted law” doesn't even amount to an argument.

(Doesn't it though?)

Why Phang doesn't rebut my points on a per document basis almost like she hasn't read them yet!

(Yeah, that's the point, dumbass.)

It is simply *too early* in the expensive and slow process of civil litigation to compel the production of the #EpsteinFiles since we need an expensive litigation on full discovery for every page and whatever you rule produced we will appeal.

There! Now how can Phang possibly say "Notably, in his response, the Attorney General makes clear that whatever the federal statute requires him to do, he will not comply."? (this is the actual quote from Phang's Doc 2, which puts the blame on Blanche and not the DOJ as an organization).

This has been my paraphrase of Doc 22.

#ToddBlanche explains to #KatiePhang and the District Court why so many incomplete and inappropriately redacted #Epstein files. Doc 19, 2026/07/02 in Phang v. Blanche (26-cv-01417) District Court, District of Columbia https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73246595/phang-v-blanche/ (continued)

6 emails had a victim as sender and/or recipient and so those should stay redacted of PII, even it it looks like they were collaborators. (pp. 10–11)

7th email: "I don't understand SMTP headers." Blanche leans on the Privacy Act and not the #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct to redact those names, as per unsigned DOJ memo. 'Sides, Thomas Massie was able to figure it out, so you don't need one more email address. (pp. 11–12)

8th email: Private email address of non-victim also redacted because *memo*. (p. 12)

9th email EFTA00038227: Law Enforcement names/emails redacted because *memo*. One of the four "conspirators" newly unredacted on website now because not a victim. Hey, you can't mean we have to update all the redactions on all the documents when we learn X is not a victim, right?? (p. 12–13)

EFTA01703108 is a photocopy of a redacted draft indictment. We can't find the original but we think all of the redactions which were made *sometime* by *someone* are names of victims by comparing with a different draft. (p. 13)

The court-ordered release of handwritten law enforcement notes seems just too *hard*. (p. 14)

The court-ordered release of foreign-language material seems just too *hard*. Why are you so mean when Trump-adjacent Congress isn't? (p. 14)

Congress didn't give us a deadline to publish the final list of redactions, so just trust we will, eventually. (pp 14–15)

We will fight if you ask for more. (p. 15)

#ToddBlanche explains to #KatiePhang and the District Court why so many incomplete and inappropriately redacted #Epstein files. Doc 19, 2026/07/02 in Phang v. Blanche (26-cv-01417) District Court, District of Columbia https://www.courtlistener.com/docket/73246595/phang-v-blanche/

He could have avoided this by producing the documents the law requires, but no-o-o.... (p. 2)

Congress required this of them and spent time and Congress-appropirated resources on the task. (p. 2)

Strong "you're not the boss of me" energy. Also, "I didn't do, you can't prove it." (pp. 2–3)

How *dare* the judge claim the DOJ conceded that it broke the #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct when we just didn't contradict the many ways we obviously did when given a chance during the *preliminary* proceedings. The best innocent lawyers always save the best evidence and arguments for the end. (p. 3) [But, how is ¶ 1 above not a concession of the same shape?]

This is part of the statute. (pp. 4–5)

Congress, who gave us 100% of our budget, did not give us *more* money to expose these #EFTA files. (p. 6)

From day 1, Blanche was the PR flack who was tasked with telling Congress "everything is fine." (p. 6)

He's also #Trump's flunky, so he did PR flack for him too. Over 1k victims and relatives. (p. 6)

Some work completed by 2026/02/14. (pp. 6–7)

We also created a murder hole to spy on members of Congress who wanted to peep at the unredacted files: (p. 7) [budget for PR?]

More "you're not the boss of me" energy. (pp. 7–8)

Stupid, stupid court came to the opposite conclusion. (p. 8)

This is how stupid the court is. (pp. 8–10)

But assuming for a second that you are the boss of me, and because I am not in a posture to start an appeal, allow me to start to begin. (p. 10)

As if we all didn't know that #PresidentCoverup happily participates in cover-ups when it suits him

#uspol #politics #TrumpAdministration2026 #SecondTrumpAdminstration #AlienFiles #GOP_Propaganda #AlienEnemiesAct #EpsteinFiles #TrumpAdministration #EpsteinFiles #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #EpsteinFilesCoverup #Trump #DonaldTrump

"They investigated me for months – FOUND NOTHING!!! So 16 year old charge resulted! […] NO FUN, NOT WORHT IT!!"

#JeffreyEpstein's alleged suicide note reads suspiciously like something #DonaldTrump would say 🤔

#uspol #politics #Trump #EpsteinFiles #EpsteinSuicideNote #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #EpsteinCoverup

When you are not as wealthy as #JeffreyEpstein was, you now get a chance to feel like you've got a #EpsteinBirthdayBook entry from #DonaldTrump by holding a dollar bill in your hands

#uspol #politics #EpsteinFiles #EpsteinCoverup #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #ScottBessent

Unfortunately, this won't be her Wikipedia infobox picture (which would then potentially appear in search engines' right-hand infoboxes).

But, maybe, this can:

#uspol #politics #PamBondi #PamBondiFiring #PamBondiFired #JeffreyEpstein #EpsteinFiles #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #EpsteinList #EpsteinClientList #EpsteinCoverup #ToddBlanche #EpsteinSurvivors

Whenever we need a picture of just fired U.S. attorney general #PamBondi for illustration, we should use this one and this one only:

#uspol #politics #PamBondiFiring #PamBondiFired #JeffreyEpstein #EpsteinFiles #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #EpsteinList #EpsteinClientList #EpsteinCoverup #ToddBlanche

Epstein files reveal the power – and peril – of online sleuths doing the government’s work

https://fed.brid.gy/r/https://interaksyon.philstar.com/politics-issues/2026/03/09/310259/epstein-files-reveal-the-power-and-peril-of-online-sleuths-doing-the-governments-work/

"NEW YORK (AP) — Lawyers for imprisoned British socialite Ghislaine Maxwell are fighting the requested release of 90,000 pages related to disgraced financier Jeffrey Epstein and Maxwell, saying a law used to force the public release of millions of documents is unconstitutional."

#EpsteinFiles #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #GhislaineMaxwell
https://apnews.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-ghislaine-maxwell-b9890fa6fa230fa649c8a847c76d97da

Furthermore, would breaking the #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct be part of #impeachment proceedings against #PamBondi (and possibly #ToddBlanche)?

#uspol #politics #DOJ #DepartmentOfJustice #EpsteinFiles #EpsteinClass #JeffreyEpstein #EpsteinCoverup #EpsteinClientList #EpsteinScandal #EpsteinFilesRelease

Also, who can sue? If possible, I would assume, for example, @marcelias from the Elias Law Group, #GlennKirschner or @harrylitman

#JusticeMattersWithGlennKirschner #DemocracyWatch #DemocracyDocket #BrianTylerCohen #BrianTylerCohenNews #MarcElias #uspol #politics #ToddBlanche #DOJ #DepartmentOfJustice #PamBondi #EpsteinFiles #EpsteinClass #JeffreyEpstein #EpsteinCoverup #EpsteinClientList #EpsteinScandal #EpsteinFilesRelease #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #HarryLitman #TalkingFedsWithHarryLitman

Are there currently any ongoing prosecutions for violations of the #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct in terms of
– not releasing ALL the files on the deadline
– redacting names that were forbidding by that very law to be redacted (e.g. co-conspirators)
– not redacting names of victims/ #EpsteinSurvivors
?

#uspol #politics #ToddBlanche #DOJ #DepartmentOfJustice #PamBondi #EpsteinFiles #EpsteinClass #JeffreyEpstein #EpsteinCoverup #EpsteinClientList #EpsteinScandal #EpsteinFilesRelease

DOJ Under Congressional Scrutiny After Improper Redactions in Epstein Files

https://murica.website/2026/02/doj-under-congressional-scrutiny-after-improper-redactions-in-epstein-files/

"Members of Congress will be able to begin reviewing the unredacted version of the Justice Department’s files on Jeffrey Epstein on Monday morning, according to two sources familiar with the DOJ’s plans."

#EpsteinFiles #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #JusticeForSurvivors
https://www.nbcnews.com/politics/congress/members-congress-view-unredacted-epstein-files-monday-rcna257836

Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files – GovTrack.us

Tracking Congress & the White House

• Congress
• White House
• Help
• About Us

Search GovTrack for

Legislative Recap Jan. 30, 2026: Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files »

1. News From Us
2. Legislative Recap

Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files

Jan. 30, 2026 · by Amy West

Shutdown? Shutdown

By midday on Friday, January 30 the Senate had not passed the remaining appropriations bills and the current continuing resolution funding parts of the federal government ended Saturday night at midnight. The House is not in session this weekend, so there will definitely be a brief partial weekend shutdown, but the government is expected to be funded again, for a time, by later in the week.

As a recap, Congress is supposed to pass appropriations bills before the fiscal year begins on October 1, and last year’s failure to do so led to the long October-November shutdown. In November, Congress reached a deal to fund some federal entities through the rest of this fiscal year (Agriculture, VA, and Congress itself) and then in mid-January reached a deal to fund others (Commerce, DOJ, Interior, and more), but that still left out a lot. Now, Congress is working to fund Defense, Homeland Security (DHS), Labor, HHS, Education, Transportation, HUD, State, and more). It looked like a deal had been reached until CBP killed Minnesotan Alex Pretti.

Friday night, the Senate passed 71-29 a revised version of H.R. 7148: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026. While it has the same bill number as the one passed in the House last Friday, the content is different. The Senate changed DHS funding to a two-week continuing resolution, after which point DHS would face another potential shutdown, and attached that to the other five appropriations bills to fund those remaining parts of the government for the rest of the fiscal year.

So now, in order to keep this shutdown short, the House must vote again on H.R. 7148. Given that the White House has signaled support for this plan, the expectation was that things would go smoothly in the House on Monday. But as of February 1, House Democrats are blocking fast-track rules, which will add a few extra days to the process at most.

There was a hiccup on Thursday when Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said he was objecting to this plan unless a repealed-in-the-House provision was reinstated. That provision would allow a small number of senators to sue the government for exorbitant monetary damages as the result of searches in Operation Arctic Frost. (This article is about the first unanimous House vote to repeal that provision, but they again voted unanimously last week and attached the repeal to the appropriations bills.) As of this morning, Sen. Graham also says he objects to the plan because he wants a vote on banning sanctuary cities.

Graham agreed to let the vote go forward once Majority Leader Thune agreed to separate votes later on reinstating the monetary damages provision as well as a vote on legislation against sanctuary cities.

What Effect Will the Two Week Continuing Resolution Have on ICE?

Very little. As Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) noted on X about just ICE, an agency within DHS:

In 2025, ICE received $10 billion in appropriations. The 2026 bill holds ICE at $10 billion — but last year Congress gave them $75 billion in advance funding. So even if ICE appropriations were eliminated, ICE would still have a 750% increase over last year.

Two articles this week have noted how ICE has been spending its vast sums of money: The powerful tools in ICE’s arsenal to track suspects — and protesters from the Washington Post and ICE Begins Buying ‘Mega’ Warehouse Detention Centers Across US from Bloomberg. A shutdown or continuing resolution would have no effect on these expenditures. Heck, even if ICE received no new funding at all this year, it would have no effect because these are expenditures based on appropriations already made.

Other parts of DHS do need funding to continue full normal operations, such as TSA, FEMA, and CISA.

Epstein Files

According to Ryan Nobles, an NBC reporter:

JUST IN: Deputy AG Todd Blanche says the Department of Justice has now released every file connected to the Epstein investigation that they are legally allowed and/or forced to release.

The files are posted on the Department of Justice website.

Today marks six weeks since the files were supposed to be released, if the administration felt compelled to follow the law. Is it all of the files? Definitely not since many have been redacted to prevent identifying Epstein survivors and because an unknown amount of legal activity remains in place. Is it all of the files that are required by the law that Congress passed? Also unclear. It just happened Friday morning and there’s a lot of files, so more information will doubtless come out in the near future.

Updated on February 1 to add some context and update the status of the bill.

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files – GovTrack.us

Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files – GovTrack.us

Tracking Congress & the White House

• Congress
• White House
• Help
• About Us

Search GovTrack for

Legislative Recap Jan. 30, 2026: Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files »

1. News From Us
2. Legislative Recap

Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files

Jan. 30, 2026 · by Amy West

Shutdown? Shutdown

By midday on Friday, January 30 the Senate had not passed the remaining appropriations bills and the current continuing resolution funding parts of the federal government ended Saturday night at midnight. The House is not in session this weekend, so there will definitely be a brief partial weekend shutdown, but the government is expected to be funded again, for a time, by later in the week.

As a recap, Congress is supposed to pass appropriations bills before the fiscal year begins on October 1, and last year’s failure to do so led to the long October-November shutdown. In November, Congress reached a deal to fund some federal entities through the rest of this fiscal year (Agriculture, VA, and Congress itself) and then in mid-January reached a deal to fund others (Commerce, DOJ, Interior, and more), but that still left out a lot. Now, Congress is working to fund Defense, Homeland Security (DHS), Labor, HHS, Education, Transportation, HUD, State, and more). It looked like a deal had been reached until CBP killed Minnesotan Alex Pretti.

Friday night, the Senate passed 71-29 a revised version of H.R. 7148: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026. While it has the same bill number as the one passed in the House last Friday, the content is different. The Senate changed DHS funding to a two-week continuing resolution, after which point DHS would face another potential shutdown, and attached that to the other five appropriations bills to fund those remaining parts of the government for the rest of the fiscal year.

So now, in order to keep this shutdown short, the House must vote again on H.R. 7148. Given that the White House has signaled support for this plan, the expectation was that things would go smoothly in the House on Monday. But as of February 1, House Democrats are blocking fast-track rules, which will add a few extra days to the process at most.

There was a hiccup on Thursday when Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said he was objecting to this plan unless a repealed-in-the-House provision was reinstated. That provision would allow a small number of senators to sue the government for exorbitant monetary damages as the result of searches in Operation Arctic Frost. (This article is about the first unanimous House vote to repeal that provision, but they again voted unanimously last week and attached the repeal to the appropriations bills.) As of this morning, Sen. Graham also says he objects to the plan because he wants a vote on banning sanctuary cities.

Graham agreed to let the vote go forward once Majority Leader Thune agreed to separate votes later on reinstating the monetary damages provision as well as a vote on legislation against sanctuary cities.

What Effect Will the Two Week Continuing Resolution Have on ICE?

Very little. As Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) noted on X about just ICE, an agency within DHS:

In 2025, ICE received $10 billion in appropriations. The 2026 bill holds ICE at $10 billion — but last year Congress gave them $75 billion in advance funding. So even if ICE appropriations were eliminated, ICE would still have a 750% increase over last year.

Two articles this week have noted how ICE has been spending its vast sums of money: The powerful tools in ICE’s arsenal to track suspects — and protesters from the Washington Post and ICE Begins Buying ‘Mega’ Warehouse Detention Centers Across US from Bloomberg. A shutdown or continuing resolution would have no effect on these expenditures. Heck, even if ICE received no new funding at all this year, it would have no effect because these are expenditures based on appropriations already made.

Other parts of DHS do need funding to continue full normal operations, such as TSA, FEMA, and CISA.

Epstein Files

According to Ryan Nobles, an NBC reporter:

JUST IN: Deputy AG Todd Blanche says the Department of Justice has now released every file connected to the Epstein investigation that they are legally allowed and/or forced to release.

The files are posted on the Department of Justice website.

Today marks six weeks since the files were supposed to be released, if the administration felt compelled to follow the law. Is it all of the files? Definitely not since many have been redacted to prevent identifying Epstein survivors and because an unknown amount of legal activity remains in place. Is it all of the files that are required by the law that Congress passed? Also unclear. It just happened Friday morning and there’s a lot of files, so more information will doubtless come out in the near future.

Updated on February 1 to add some context and update the status of the bill.

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files – GovTrack.us

Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files – GovTrack.us

Tracking Congress & the White House

• Congress
• White House
• Help
• About Us

Search GovTrack for

Legislative Recap Jan. 30, 2026: Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files »

1. News From Us
2. Legislative Recap

Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files

Jan. 30, 2026 · by Amy West

Shutdown? Shutdown

By midday on Friday, January 30 the Senate had not passed the remaining appropriations bills and the current continuing resolution funding parts of the federal government ended Saturday night at midnight. The House is not in session this weekend, so there will definitely be a brief partial weekend shutdown, but the government is expected to be funded again, for a time, by later in the week.

As a recap, Congress is supposed to pass appropriations bills before the fiscal year begins on October 1, and last year’s failure to do so led to the long October-November shutdown. In November, Congress reached a deal to fund some federal entities through the rest of this fiscal year (Agriculture, VA, and Congress itself) and then in mid-January reached a deal to fund others (Commerce, DOJ, Interior, and more), but that still left out a lot. Now, Congress is working to fund Defense, Homeland Security (DHS), Labor, HHS, Education, Transportation, HUD, State, and more). It looked like a deal had been reached until CBP killed Minnesotan Alex Pretti.

Friday night, the Senate passed 71-29 a revised version of H.R. 7148: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026. While it has the same bill number as the one passed in the House last Friday, the content is different. The Senate changed DHS funding to a two-week continuing resolution, after which point DHS would face another potential shutdown, and attached that to the other five appropriations bills to fund those remaining parts of the government for the rest of the fiscal year.

So now, in order to keep this shutdown short, the House must vote again on H.R. 7148. Given that the White House has signaled support for this plan, the expectation was that things would go smoothly in the House on Monday. But as of February 1, House Democrats are blocking fast-track rules, which will add a few extra days to the process at most.

There was a hiccup on Thursday when Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said he was objecting to this plan unless a repealed-in-the-House provision was reinstated. That provision would allow a small number of senators to sue the government for exorbitant monetary damages as the result of searches in Operation Arctic Frost. (This article is about the first unanimous House vote to repeal that provision, but they again voted unanimously last week and attached the repeal to the appropriations bills.) As of this morning, Sen. Graham also says he objects to the plan because he wants a vote on banning sanctuary cities.

Graham agreed to let the vote go forward once Majority Leader Thune agreed to separate votes later on reinstating the monetary damages provision as well as a vote on legislation against sanctuary cities.

What Effect Will the Two Week Continuing Resolution Have on ICE?

Very little. As Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) noted on X about just ICE, an agency within DHS:

In 2025, ICE received $10 billion in appropriations. The 2026 bill holds ICE at $10 billion — but last year Congress gave them $75 billion in advance funding. So even if ICE appropriations were eliminated, ICE would still have a 750% increase over last year.

Two articles this week have noted how ICE has been spending its vast sums of money: The powerful tools in ICE’s arsenal to track suspects — and protesters from the Washington Post and ICE Begins Buying ‘Mega’ Warehouse Detention Centers Across US from Bloomberg. A shutdown or continuing resolution would have no effect on these expenditures. Heck, even if ICE received no new funding at all this year, it would have no effect because these are expenditures based on appropriations already made.

Other parts of DHS do need funding to continue full normal operations, such as TSA, FEMA, and CISA.

Epstein Files

According to Ryan Nobles, an NBC reporter:

JUST IN: Deputy AG Todd Blanche says the Department of Justice has now released every file connected to the Epstein investigation that they are legally allowed and/or forced to release.

The files are posted on the Department of Justice website.

Today marks six weeks since the files were supposed to be released, if the administration felt compelled to follow the law. Is it all of the files? Definitely not since many have been redacted to prevent identifying Epstein survivors and because an unknown amount of legal activity remains in place. Is it all of the files that are required by the law that Congress passed? Also unclear. It just happened Friday morning and there’s a lot of files, so more information will doubtless come out in the near future.

Updated on February 1 to add some context and update the status of the bill.

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files – GovTrack.us

Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files – GovTrack.us

Tracking Congress & the White House

• Congress
• White House
• Help
• About Us

Search GovTrack for

Legislative Recap Jan. 30, 2026: Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files »

1. News From Us
2. Legislative Recap

Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files

Jan. 30, 2026 · by Amy West

Shutdown? Shutdown

By midday on Friday, January 30 the Senate had not passed the remaining appropriations bills and the current continuing resolution funding parts of the federal government ended Saturday night at midnight. The House is not in session this weekend, so there will definitely be a brief partial weekend shutdown, but the government is expected to be funded again, for a time, by later in the week.

As a recap, Congress is supposed to pass appropriations bills before the fiscal year begins on October 1, and last year’s failure to do so led to the long October-November shutdown. In November, Congress reached a deal to fund some federal entities through the rest of this fiscal year (Agriculture, VA, and Congress itself) and then in mid-January reached a deal to fund others (Commerce, DOJ, Interior, and more), but that still left out a lot. Now, Congress is working to fund Defense, Homeland Security (DHS), Labor, HHS, Education, Transportation, HUD, State, and more). It looked like a deal had been reached until CBP killed Minnesotan Alex Pretti.

Friday night, the Senate passed 71-29 a revised version of H.R. 7148: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026. While it has the same bill number as the one passed in the House last Friday, the content is different. The Senate changed DHS funding to a two-week continuing resolution, after which point DHS would face another potential shutdown, and attached that to the other five appropriations bills to fund those remaining parts of the government for the rest of the fiscal year.

So now, in order to keep this shutdown short, the House must vote again on H.R. 7148. Given that the White House has signaled support for this plan, the expectation was that things would go smoothly in the House on Monday. But as of February 1, House Democrats are blocking fast-track rules, which will add a few extra days to the process at most.

There was a hiccup on Thursday when Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said he was objecting to this plan unless a repealed-in-the-House provision was reinstated. That provision would allow a small number of senators to sue the government for exorbitant monetary damages as the result of searches in Operation Arctic Frost. (This article is about the first unanimous House vote to repeal that provision, but they again voted unanimously last week and attached the repeal to the appropriations bills.) As of this morning, Sen. Graham also says he objects to the plan because he wants a vote on banning sanctuary cities.

Graham agreed to let the vote go forward once Majority Leader Thune agreed to separate votes later on reinstating the monetary damages provision as well as a vote on legislation against sanctuary cities.

What Effect Will the Two Week Continuing Resolution Have on ICE?

Very little. As Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) noted on X about just ICE, an agency within DHS:

In 2025, ICE received $10 billion in appropriations. The 2026 bill holds ICE at $10 billion — but last year Congress gave them $75 billion in advance funding. So even if ICE appropriations were eliminated, ICE would still have a 750% increase over last year.

Two articles this week have noted how ICE has been spending its vast sums of money: The powerful tools in ICE’s arsenal to track suspects — and protesters from the Washington Post and ICE Begins Buying ‘Mega’ Warehouse Detention Centers Across US from Bloomberg. A shutdown or continuing resolution would have no effect on these expenditures. Heck, even if ICE received no new funding at all this year, it would have no effect because these are expenditures based on appropriations already made.

Other parts of DHS do need funding to continue full normal operations, such as TSA, FEMA, and CISA.

Epstein Files

According to Ryan Nobles, an NBC reporter:

JUST IN: Deputy AG Todd Blanche says the Department of Justice has now released every file connected to the Epstein investigation that they are legally allowed and/or forced to release.

The files are posted on the Department of Justice website.

Today marks six weeks since the files were supposed to be released, if the administration felt compelled to follow the law. Is it all of the files? Definitely not since many have been redacted to prevent identifying Epstein survivors and because an unknown amount of legal activity remains in place. Is it all of the files that are required by the law that Congress passed? Also unclear. It just happened Friday morning and there’s a lot of files, so more information will doubtless come out in the near future.

Updated on February 1 to add some context and update the status of the bill.

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files – GovTrack.us

Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files – GovTrack.us

Tracking Congress & the White House

• Congress
• White House
• Help
• About Us

Search GovTrack for

Legislative Recap Jan. 30, 2026: Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files »

1. News From Us
2. Legislative Recap

Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files

Jan. 30, 2026 · by Amy West

Shutdown? Shutdown

By midday on Friday, January 30 the Senate had not passed the remaining appropriations bills and the current continuing resolution funding parts of the federal government ended Saturday night at midnight. The House is not in session this weekend, so there will definitely be a brief partial weekend shutdown, but the government is expected to be funded again, for a time, by later in the week.

As a recap, Congress is supposed to pass appropriations bills before the fiscal year begins on October 1, and last year’s failure to do so led to the long October-November shutdown. In November, Congress reached a deal to fund some federal entities through the rest of this fiscal year (Agriculture, VA, and Congress itself) and then in mid-January reached a deal to fund others (Commerce, DOJ, Interior, and more), but that still left out a lot. Now, Congress is working to fund Defense, Homeland Security (DHS), Labor, HHS, Education, Transportation, HUD, State, and more). It looked like a deal had been reached until CBP killed Minnesotan Alex Pretti.

Friday night, the Senate passed 71-29 a revised version of H.R. 7148: Consolidated Appropriations Act, 2026. While it has the same bill number as the one passed in the House last Friday, the content is different. The Senate changed DHS funding to a two-week continuing resolution, after which point DHS would face another potential shutdown, and attached that to the other five appropriations bills to fund those remaining parts of the government for the rest of the fiscal year.

So now, in order to keep this shutdown short, the House must vote again on H.R. 7148. Given that the White House has signaled support for this plan, the expectation was that things would go smoothly in the House on Monday. But as of February 1, House Democrats are blocking fast-track rules, which will add a few extra days to the process at most.

There was a hiccup on Thursday when Sen. Lindsey Graham (R-SC), said he was objecting to this plan unless a repealed-in-the-House provision was reinstated. That provision would allow a small number of senators to sue the government for exorbitant monetary damages as the result of searches in Operation Arctic Frost. (This article is about the first unanimous House vote to repeal that provision, but they again voted unanimously last week and attached the repeal to the appropriations bills.) As of this morning, Sen. Graham also says he objects to the plan because he wants a vote on banning sanctuary cities.

Graham agreed to let the vote go forward once Majority Leader Thune agreed to separate votes later on reinstating the monetary damages provision as well as a vote on legislation against sanctuary cities.

What Effect Will the Two Week Continuing Resolution Have on ICE?

Very little. As Sen. Rand Paul (R-KY) noted on X about just ICE, an agency within DHS:

In 2025, ICE received $10 billion in appropriations. The 2026 bill holds ICE at $10 billion — but last year Congress gave them $75 billion in advance funding. So even if ICE appropriations were eliminated, ICE would still have a 750% increase over last year.

Two articles this week have noted how ICE has been spending its vast sums of money: The powerful tools in ICE’s arsenal to track suspects — and protesters from the Washington Post and ICE Begins Buying ‘Mega’ Warehouse Detention Centers Across US from Bloomberg. A shutdown or continuing resolution would have no effect on these expenditures. Heck, even if ICE received no new funding at all this year, it would have no effect because these are expenditures based on appropriations already made.

Other parts of DHS do need funding to continue full normal operations, such as TSA, FEMA, and CISA.

Epstein Files

According to Ryan Nobles, an NBC reporter:

JUST IN: Deputy AG Todd Blanche says the Department of Justice has now released every file connected to the Epstein investigation that they are legally allowed and/or forced to release.

The files are posted on the Department of Justice website.

Today marks six weeks since the files were supposed to be released, if the administration felt compelled to follow the law. Is it all of the files? Definitely not since many have been redacted to prevent identifying Epstein survivors and because an unknown amount of legal activity remains in place. Is it all of the files that are required by the law that Congress passed? Also unclear. It just happened Friday morning and there’s a lot of files, so more information will doubtless come out in the near future.

Updated on February 1 to add some context and update the status of the bill.

Continue/Read Original Article Here: Shutdown? Shutdown. Also More Epstein Files – GovTrack.us

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jsNDi-Rd8E8

https://piped.video/watch?v=jsNDi-Rd8E8

https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=jsNDi-Rd8E8

#politics #uspol #TrumpAdministration #TrumpAdministration2026 #SecondTrumpAdminstration #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #UnitedStatesDepartmentOfJustice #DOJ

If the #UnitedStatesDepartmentOfJustice keeps missing court- or Congress-set binding deadlines, they should be barred from filing non-essential cases until they did their homework in existing cases

#politics #uspol #TrumpAdministration #TrumpAdministration2026 #SecondTrumpAdminstration #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct

Lees tip -> Trage vrijgave Epstein-dossiers kan jaren duren ondanks wettelijk mandaat | De vrijgave van Epstein-dossiers verloopt zo traag dat volledige openbaarheid nog jaren kan duren. | #DonaldTrump #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #JeffreyEpstein #ministerievanJustitieVS #RoKhanna #transparantie |

https://hbpmedia.nl/trage-vrijgave-epstein-dossiers-kan-jaren-duren-ondanks-wettelijk-mandaat/

Lees tip -> Trage vrijgave Epstein-dossiers kan jaren duren ondanks wettelijk mandaat | De vrijgave van Epstein-dossiers verloopt zo traag dat volledige openbaarheid nog jaren kan duren. | #DonaldTrump #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #JeffreyEpstein #ministerievanJustitieVS #RoKhanna #transparantie |

https://hbpmedia.nl/trage-vrijgave-epstein-dossiers-kan-jaren-duren-ondanks-wettelijk-mandaat/

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=PR4sbVlsz5c

https://piped.video/watch?v=PR4sbVlsz5c

https://inv.nadeko.net/watch?v=PR4sbVlsz5c

#uspol #politics #EpsteinFilesTransparencyAct #Trump #DonaldTrump #JeffreyEpsteinCoverup #HouseOversightCommitteeDischargePetition #LaurenBoebert #SecondTrumpAdministration #TrumpAdministration #TrumpAdministration2025 #MAGA #BrianTylerCohen #BrianTylerCohenNews

Wednesday Reads: Trump’s Corruption on Full Display

Good Afternoon!!

Long-time friends Jeffrey Epstein and Donald Trump

Yesterday was a dramatic day in the efforts by Congressional Democrats and a few Republicans to force the release of the Epstein files held by the DOJ? Could the Epstein scandal along with the struggling economy finally bring down Donald Trump after all these years?

Jason Lange and Tim Reid at HuffPost: Brutal New Poll Shows Just How Badly Donald Trump Is Tanking On Epstein And The Economy.

President Donald Trump’s approval rating fell to 38%, the lowest since his return to power, with Americans unhappy about his handling of the high cost of living and the investigation into the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a Reuters/Ipsos poll found.

The four-day poll, which concluded on Monday, comes as Trump’s grip on his Republican Party shows signs of weakening. The Republican-controlled House of Representatives on Tuesday passed a measure to force the release of Justice Department files on Epstein. Trump had opposed the move for months while one of his closest supporters in Congress, Representative Marjorie Taylor Greene, turned into a harsh critic over his resistance. Trump reversed his position on Sunday as lawmakers prepared to move forward without him.

The survey showed Trump’s overall approval has fallen two percentage points since a Reuters/Ipsos poll in early November.

The poll, which was conducted online, surveyed 1,017 U.S. adults nationwide and had a margin of error of about 3 percentage points.

Trump started his second term in office with 47% of Americans giving him a thumbs up. The nine-point decline since January leaves his overall popularity near the lows seen during his first term in office, and close to the weakest ratings for his Democratic predecessor in the White House, Joe Biden. Biden’s approval rating sank as low as 35% while Trump’s first-term popularity fell as low as 33%

NPR: Poll: Democrats have biggest advantage for control of Congress in 8 years.

Heading into the 2026 midterm elections, there are some very big warning signs for Republicans in the latest NPR/PBS News/Marist poll.

The survey of 1,443 adults, conducted from Nov. 10-13 found:

• Democrats holding their largest advantage, 14 points, since 2017 on the question of who respondents would vote for if the midterm elections were held today;
• President Trump’s approval rating is just 39%, his lowest since right after the Jan. 6, 2021 attack on the Capitol;
• A combined 6-in-10 blame congressional Republicans or Trump for the government shutdown; and
• Nearly 6-in-10 say Trump’s top priority should be lowering prices — and no other issue comes close….

Coming off huge wins up and down the ballot across the country in this year’s off-year elections, Democrats lead Republicans, 55%-41%, when people were asked who they would vote for in their district if the election for Congress were held today.

It’s the largest Democratic advantage on this question, known as the congressional ballot, in the Marist poll since November 2017. The parallel is striking, considering that was at the same point in Trump’s first term as this poll now. Democrats wound up winning 40 House seats in 2018.

If the midterms were today, most say they would pick a Democrat. What’s more, independents chose Democrats by a 33-point margin on this question. It’s all quite the reversal of fortune from a year ago when, just before the 2024 elections when President Trump won back the White House, the parties were tied on the congressional ballot.

Historically, Democrats have needed a sizable advantage on the congressional ballot to signal that they would do well in upcoming midterms.

After months of efforts by Democrats to force the release of the Epstein files, suddenly yesterday their plans came to fruition in surprising fashion.

AP: Congress acts swiftly to force release of Epstein files, and Trump agrees to sign bill.

Both the House and Senate acted decisively Tuesday to pass a bill to force the Justice Department to publicly release its files on the convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, a remarkable display of approval for an effort that had struggled for months to overcome opposition from President Donald Trump and Republican leadership.

Congressman Thomas Massie speaks at a news conference on the Epstein Files Transparency Act on November 18, 2025, with fellow Representatives Marjorie Taylor Greene and Ro Khanna [Annabelle Gordon Reuters]

When a small, bipartisan group of House lawmakers introduced a petition in July to maneuver around Speaker Mike Johnson’s control of the House floor, it appeared a longshot effort — especially as Trump urged his supporters to dismiss the matter as a “hoax.”But both Trump and Johnson failed to prevent the vote. The president in recent days bowed to political reality, saying he would sign the bill. And just hours after the House vote, senators agreed to approve it unanimously, skipping a formal roll call.The decisive, bipartisan work in Congress Tuesday further showed the pressure mounting on lawmakers and the Trump administration to meet long-held demands that the Justice Department release its case files on Epstein, a well-connected financier who killed himself in a Manhattan jail while awaiting trial in 2019 on charges he sexually abused and trafficked underage girls.For survivors of Epstein’s abuse, passage of the bill was a watershed moment in a years-long quest for accountability.“These women have fought the most horrific fight that no woman should have to fight. And they did it by banding together and never giving up,” said Rep. Marjorie Taylor Greene as she stood with some of the abuse survivors outside the Capitol Tuesday morning.“That’s what we did by fighting so hard against the most powerful people in the world, even the president of the United States, in order to make this vote happen today,” added Greene, a Georgia Republican.

In the end, only one lawmaker in Congress opposed the bill. Rep. Clay Higgins, a Louisiana Republican who is a fervent supporter of Trump, was the only “nay” vote in the House’s 427-1 tally. He said he worried the legislation could lead to the release of information on innocent people mentioned in the federal investigation.

Read more about the bill and Trump’s sudden reversal at the AP link.

This morning,  the bill went to Trump. Politico:  Senate sends Epstein files bill to Trump.

The Senate has officially passed legislation forcing the Justice Department to release more information about the case it built against the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein.

Senators had locked in an agreement to automatically pass the bill as soon as it was received from the House, which overwhelmingly passed it on Tuesday.

It now heads to President Donald Trump’s desk, where he has said he will sign it. That comes despite the fact that Speaker Mike Johnson sought eleventh-hour changes to the House-passed bill and didn’t rule out the possibility he would encourage Trump to veto it.

Assuming Trump follows through, the Justice Department will have 30 days to release the materials with redactions to protect Epstein’s victims.

Will Pam Bondi resist releasing the files? William Kristol at The Bulwark: ‘The Epstein Class.’

Who says Congress never gets anything done?

It was only a week ago that newly sworn in Rep. Adelita Grijalva (D-Ariz.) provided the final signature needed on the discharge petition to force a vote on The Epstein Files Transparency Act. Yesterday, the House approved the act by a vote of 427–1. About three hours later, the Senate deemed it passed by unanimous consent. The legislation will be transmitted to the White House today. President Trump has said he will sign the bill into law.

Epstein survivors speak at Capitol Hill news conference.

This act requires that the Justice Department make public within thirty days all the unclassified records, documents, communications, and investigative materials in its possession related to any of Jeffrey Epstein’s criminal activities, civil settlements, immunity, plea agreements, and investigatory proceedings. It specifies that “no record shall be withheld, delayed, or redacted on the basis of embarrassment, reputational harm, or political sensitivity, including to any government official, public figure, or foreign dignitary.”

The authors of the legislation tried to make sure any exceptions were narrowly drawn. The attorney general can only withhold or redact information from personal or medical files—the disclosure of which would constitute a clearly unwarranted invasion of personal privacy—or information that would jeopardize an active federal investigation or ongoing prosecution, “provided such withholding is narrowly tailored and temporary.” The law requires that all redactions must be accompanied by a written justification in the Federal Register.

Obviously, there is no guarantee that Donald Trump’s attorney general will carry out these legislative instructions in good faith. Pam Bondi could try to turn tight and reasonable exceptions into wide open loopholes. Her boss, the president, has already ordered up an investigation of Democrats tied to Epstein—and she quickly said she’d comply. Could that be a predicate for withholding documents?

But would she even bother to cite that investigation? There are, after all, no assurances that the attorney general won’t try to simply withhold documents and information without telling us she’s done so.

And so “distrust and verify” should be the motto going forward. Congress, the media, the survivors—everyone committed to having the truth come out—needs to be prepared to keep the pressure on throughout, and to scream from the rooftops if there seems to be evasion or stonewalling.

Read the rest at The Bulwark.

Trump’s blatant corruption and his disdain for women reporters were both on display as he struggled to deal with his failure on the Epstein files issue.

Trump hosted Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman in his tacky, gold-encrusted oval office yesterday, and then held a state dinner in bin Salman’s honor last night. The U.S. intelligence community found that bin Salman gave the order to murder Washington Post journalist Jamal Khashoggi in 2019, but also Saudi Arabia was largely responsible for the 9/11/2021 attacks.

Kathryn Watson and Jennifer Jacobs at CBS News: Trump welcomes MBS for White House visit with fanfare for Saudi crown prince and military flyover.

President Trump welcomed Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, known as MBS, to the White House with an elaborate military display Tuesday, praising the crown prince and insisting the U.S.-Saudi relationship has never been better as the two countries look to sign major business and national security deals.

Trump meets with Saudi Crown Prince in the oval office.

The pomp and circumstance — and the president’s praise and warmth toward MBS — were more typical of a visit from an allied Western democracy than an absolute monarchy with a troubled human rights record, pointing to the president’s focus on economic and business ties above virtually all else. The White House sees Saudi Arabia as a critical security partner in a turbulent Middle East, as well as an economic partner.

The White House arrival ceremony for the crown prince on Tuesday morning was laden with fanfare, complete with a U.S. military flyover, cannons, horses, and a red carpet. American and Saudi flags adorned the White House South Lawn, and a military band greeted the Saudi royal. Mr. Trump and the crown prince exchanged greetings as they shook hands, and then watched the formation of F-35 and F-16 fighter jets fly by before going inside the White House….

Ahead of bin Salman’s arrival, Mr. Trump told reporters Monday that the U.S. would sell F-35 fighter jets to the Saudis. In the Oval Office, MBS said the Saudis will increase a planned investment of $600 billion in the U.S. to closer to $1 trillion, an announcement that pleased Mr. Trump greatly.

Mr. Trump praised the crown prince in the Oval Office, calling him a “very good friend” and insisting his record on human rights is commendable, despite the State Department’s long list of concerns of human rights abuses in Saudi Arabia. Arbitrary and unlawful killings, disappearances, torture, serious restrictions on freedom of expression and restrictions on religious freedom continue to plague the nation, according to the latest 2024 State Department report.

Trump’s businesses are heavily involved with Saudi Arabia.

During the meeting with bin Salman, Trump denigrated reporter Mary Bruce for asking questions about Jeffrey Epstein and Jamal Khashoggi.

CNBC: Trump calls for ABC’s license to be revoked after reporter asks about Jeffrey Epstein files.

President Donald Trump on Tuesday called for ABC’s broadcast license to be revoked as he angrily lashed out at a reporter from the network who asked why he has not released files on notorious sex offender Jeffrey Epstein, his former friend.

ABC News reporter Mary Bruce

“I think you are a terrible reporter,” Trump told ABC News White House correspondent Mary Bruce.

The president said he did not like Bruce’s “attitude.”

“You ought to go back and learn how to be a reporter. No more questions from you,” Trump said in the Oval Office, where he was meeting with Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia.

Trump’s tirade came shortly before the House of Representatives voted overwhelmingly in favor of a bill to compel the Department of Justice to release all of its records on Epstein.

Bruce also asked the Crown Prince about ordering the murder of Jamal Khashoggi.

Brian Stelter at CNN: Analysis: Trump’s anti-press outburst hits differently with a Saudi prince by his side.

President Trump frequently demonstrates his disdain for journalists. He expresses his admiration for authoritarians almost as often.

Tuesday showed how intertwined those two instincts really are.

Trump repeatedly objected to press questions during an Oval Office photo op with Saudi Arabia’s crown prince, Mohammed bin Salman, whose country does not have a free press.

He lashed out at an ABC correspondent, Mary Bruce, after she invoked the 2018 murder of Jamal Khashoggi by Saudi agents.

The president said his ally, Brendan Carr, the chairman of the FCC, should “look at” punishing ABC over its news coverage.

“I think the license should be taken away from ABC because your news is so fake and it’s so wrong,” he asserted.

Trump misstated how FCC licenses actually work, but his message was clear: He’d like his government to retaliate the way a dictator would.

The president also called Bruce “insubordinate,” a word he rarely ever uses, while sitting next to the son of the Saudi king.

According to Reporters Without Borders, which tracks press freedom all around the world, “independent media are non-existent in Saudi Arabia, and Saudi journalists live under heavy surveillance, even when abroad.”

Trump even defended bin Salman. BBC: ‘Things happen’ – Trump defends Saudi crown prince over Khashoggi killing.

US President Donald Trump said Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman “knew nothing” about the 2018 killing of journalist Jamal Khashoggi, as he welcomed the kingdom’s de facto ruler to the White House.

Trump’s comments appeared to contradict a US intelligence assessment in 2021 which determined the crown prince had approved the operation that led to Khashoggi’s death at the Saudi consulate in Istanbul in 2018.

Jamal Khashoggi

The crown prince, who has denied any wrongdoing, said at the White House that Saudi Arabia “did all the right things” to investigate Khashoggi’s death, which he called “painful”.

It was his first US visit since the assassination, which sent shockwaves through the US-Saudi relationship.

In the Oval Office on Tuesday, Trump shot back at a reporter who asked a question about the killing.

“You’re mentioning someone that was extremely controversial,” the US president said.

“A lot of people didn’t like that gentleman that you’re talking about. Whether you like him or didn’t like him, things happen.”

“But he [the Crown Prince] knew nothing about it,” Trump added. “You don’t have to embarrass our guests.”

The crown prince added that Saudi Arabia “did all the right steps” to investigate the murder, which he called “painful” and a “huge mistake”.

A US intelligence report made public in 2021 – under President Joe Biden’s administration – determined that the crown prince had approved of a plan to “capture or kill” Khashoggi in Istanbul. During his first administration, Trump White House officials declined to release the report.

While dozens of Saudi officials faced sanctions in the wake of the assassination, none directly targeted the crown prince.

Trump attacked another reporter on Air Force One on Friday for asking about the Epstein files. The Guardian: Trump faces criticism for referring to female Bloomberg reporter as ‘piggy’

Donald Trump, who has a history of making extremely personal attacks on female journalists, referred to a Bloomberg News correspondent as a “piggy” during a clash onboard Air Force One on Friday.

While the remark did not initially get much attention, it picked up some traction on Tuesday and has drawn backlash from fellow journalists, including some who have previously been attacked by Trump themselves.

Bloomberg reporter Catherine Lucey

Catherine Lucey, Bloomberg’s White House correspondent, had taken advantage of a press opportunity with the president – known as a gaggle – to ask a question about the unfolding Jeffrey Epstein scandal and the possibility of the House voting to release all of the files related to his case, which now appears likely.

As Lucey started to ask why Trump was behaving the way he was “if there’s nothing incriminating in the files”, Trump pointed at her and said: “Quiet. Quiet, piggy.” [….]

“Disgusting and completely unacceptable,” CNN anchor Jake Tapper wrote on X, sharing a clip of the incident. Former Fox News anchor Gretchen Carlson also called the remark “disgusting and degrading”.

When asked about the incident, Lucey directed the Guardian to a spokesperson for her news organization.

“Our White House journalists perform a vital public service, asking questions without fear or favor,” a Bloomberg News spokesperson said on Tuesday afternoon. “We remain focused on reporting issues of public interest fairly and accurately.”

The New York Times on the guests at the state dinner for Crown Prince bin Salman last night (gift link): Who Attended Trump’s Dinner for the Saudi Crown Prince?

The world’s richest man. One of the world’s most famous soccer players. The president of soccer’s governing body. Dozens of executives from the finance, tech and energy sectors.

These are some of the guests who attended President Trump’s black-tie dinner for Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman of Saudi Arabia at the White House on Tuesday evening.

The red carpet welcome for Prince Mohammed is an extraordinary moment in diplomatic relations with Saudi Arabia. It is his first visit to the United States since the 2018 killing of the Washington Post columnist Jamal Khashoggi, which U.S. intelligence determined the prince ordered. Prince Mohammed has denied involvement.

After Mr. Khashoggi’s murder, some Western business executives and government officials backed out of Saudi Arabia’s global investment conference, including leaders of major American financial institutions. But by the following year, top deal makers were back at the event in Riyadh, the Saudi capital.

On Tuesday, Mr. Trump and the crown prince cast their partnership as one that would reap benefits for both countries. Already, Mr. Trump has agreed to sell F-35 fighter jets to the kingdom, and the prince has promised to invest nearly $1 trillion in the United States.

Use the gift link to see the list of powerful people who saw fit to honor the Saudi Crown Prince at last night’s state dinner.

More stories to check out today:

Politico: Appeals court panel mulls $1M penalty for Trump in lawsuit against Hillary Clinton.

The Harvard Crimson: Harvard To Launch New Investigation Into Epstein’s Ties to Summers, Other University Affiliates.

The New Republic: Trump’s Plot to Rig 2026 Is Falling Apart, and Boy Is He Mad About It.

Mark Joseph Stern at Slate: Trump’s Scheme to Give the GOP Extra House Seats Just Blew Up in His Face.

Marisa Kabas at The Handbasket: Moral rot in elite journalism is killing the whole field.

That’s it for me today. What’s on your mind?

#abcNewsReporterMaryBruce #adelitaGrijalva #bloombergReporterCatherineLucey #dischargePetition #donaldTrump #epsteinFiles #epsteinFilesTransparencyAct #jamalKhashoggi #jeffreyEpstein #pamBondi #roKhanna #saudiCrownPrinceMohammedBinSalman #thomasMassie #trumpPolls