home.social

#effectivepopulationsize — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #effectivepopulationsize, aggregated by home.social.

  1. The neutralist-selectionist debate needs moderating, and this paper makes some good contributions, but ultimately disappoints. It defends #NeutralTheory as acknowledging #BackgroundSelection, but does not qualify that this is only a limited form of background selection - one with strong deleterious effects and Ud<1, such that background selection can be captured by a 1-locus model of random #GeneticDrift with lower #EffectivePopulationSize. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10 1/n

  2. The neutralist-selectionist debate needs moderating, and this paper makes some good contributions, but ultimately disappoints. It defends #NeutralTheory as acknowledging #BackgroundSelection, but does not qualify that this is only a limited form of background selection - one with strong deleterious effects and Ud<1, such that background selection can be captured by a 1-locus model of random #GeneticDrift with lower #EffectivePopulationSize. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10 1/n

  3. The neutralist-selectionist debate needs moderating, and this paper makes some good contributions, but ultimately disappoints. It defends #NeutralTheory as acknowledging #BackgroundSelection, but does not qualify that this is only a limited form of background selection - one with strong deleterious effects and Ud<1, such that background selection can be captured by a 1-locus model of random #GeneticDrift with lower #EffectivePopulationSize. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10 1/n

  4. The neutralist-selectionist debate needs moderating, and this paper makes some good contributions, but ultimately disappoints. It defends #NeutralTheory as acknowledging #BackgroundSelection, but does not qualify that this is only a limited form of background selection - one with strong deleterious effects and Ud<1, such that background selection can be captured by a 1-locus model of random #GeneticDrift with lower #EffectivePopulationSize. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10 1/n

  5. The neutralist-selectionist debate needs moderating, and this paper makes some good contributions, but ultimately disappoints. It defends #NeutralTheory as acknowledging #BackgroundSelection, but does not qualify that this is only a limited form of background selection - one with strong deleterious effects and Ud<1, such that background selection can be captured by a 1-locus model of random #GeneticDrift with lower #EffectivePopulationSize. onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10 1/n

  6. Background selection at unlinked sites might not matter if it can be well captured by a lower #EffectivePopulationSize describing #GeneticDrift in a 1-locus idealized model. So we added a figure to demonstrate that this isn't the case. 6/5

  7. Background selection at unlinked sites might not matter if it can be well captured by a lower #EffectivePopulationSize describing #GeneticDrift in a 1-locus idealized model. So we added a figure to demonstrate that this isn't the case. 6/5

  8. Background selection at unlinked sites might not matter if it can be well captured by a lower #EffectivePopulationSize describing #GeneticDrift in a 1-locus idealized model. So we added a figure to demonstrate that this isn't the case. 6/5

  9. Background selection at unlinked sites might not matter if it can be well captured by a lower #EffectivePopulationSize describing #GeneticDrift in a 1-locus idealized model. So we added a figure to demonstrate that this isn't the case. 6/5

  10. Background selection at unlinked sites might not matter if it can be well captured by a lower #EffectivePopulationSize describing #GeneticDrift in a 1-locus idealized model. So we added a figure to demonstrate that this isn't the case. 6/5