home.social

Search

5 results for “aristotle”

  1. Isn’t setting up an ‘Electoral Reform Comission’ just an obvious way to block the people from their democratic interests rights; kick them into the long grass?

    Consider actual revolutionary acts like the Luddites, Suffragettes, Civil Rights and the Extinction Rebellion movements. Affecting change, like an end to the broligarchs abuse of capital is as far away from being National Commissions as you can possibly get.

    ‘They usually involve experts and specialists, rather than politicians, and they sit independently of government. They will often take evidence and call witnesses before making a final report and recommendations. Past commissions have taken the form of Royal Commissions, which consider broad issues, or independent commissions (reviews) which are typically smaller and more specific. These differ from parliamentary commissions which are set up by parliament and made up of MPs and Peers.’ electoral-reform.org.uk/what-i

    Don’t expect an Electoral National Commission to be anything other than a whitewash.

    Truth is, there is no ecological time for electoral reform, a revolution is needed. The democratic rights of diverse interests are necessary for the birth of a sustainable Republic Sovereignty; to defeat the fascists Corporate Sovereignty!

  2. I have long noticed that the ancient Greeks had a compulsion to attribute everything to an inventor, often implausibly so to someone very famous; I think I have found the apotheosis of this tendency in Aristotle attributing the invention of the baby rattle to "mathematician, music theorist, statesman, and strategist" Archytas.

  3. Greek archaeologist Manolis Andronikos, born OTD in 1919, taught at the Aristotle University of Thessaloniki toilet-guru.com/mycenae/?s=mb

  4. #AI #RenéDescartes

    "AI is forcing us to reckon with a 400-year-old problem

    René Descartes drew a line between humans and machines. AI is blurring it.

    (. . .)

    Like much modern fantasy, Philip Pullman’s *His Dark Materials* series features magical objects. Each book in the trilogy is named after one; the second is *The Subtle Knife*. This knife looks unremarkable, but when wielded by the right person, it can cut a hole in the world — a portal into an alternate universe. Unfortunately, the portal’s edges also turn out to be a wound in the fabric of reality … and the wound bleeds. Sinister, invisible things leak out, hungry ghosts that prey upon the living. To banish these ghosts, the tear in reality must be closed.

    (. . .)

    With his 'mechanical philosophy,' French polymath René Descartes (1596–1650) forged the subtle knife that promised to resolve this metaphysical crisis by cutting the sciences free of their spiritual encumbrance, severing bodies from souls. The trick was to deny the existence of the lower two of Aristotle’s three levels of ensoulment: the 'nutritive,' possessed by all life forms including plants, and the 'sensitive,' possessed by animals. Per Descartes, investigable, clockwork-like mechanisms could fully account not only for the inanimate world but also for plant and animal behavior, without any need for a supernatural animating force. This left only human beings, whose 'rational souls' (Aristotle’s highest level) were in keeping with Church doctrine: immortal, immaterial, and indivisible.

    At this point, the model that cut so elegantly needed to confront the discontinuity it had created in the world: Our immaterial souls must perceive the world through bodily senses, as well as control the body’s willed actions. But how?

    Descartes reasoned that, since the rational soul was indivisible, it must act upon a central, undivided structure in the brain, which he referred to as 'Gland H.' We now know it as the pineal gland — certainly not any special locus of perception or action — but the H might as well have stood for the name of one of the monsters that the Cartesian wound has let slip into our world: homunculus, the 'little man' in our brain pulling our strings, who must have, if we are to explain his ability to perceive and act upon the world, an even smaller homunculus within, a dizzying prospect of infinite regress. Unless, of course, we allow Descartes’ dualism to stand, in which case the mind is immaterial: a ghost in the machine. Or, if we exorcise ghosts and homunculi while acknowledging the possibility that our bodies could continue to give every appearance of intelligent, rational behavior, we are left with the prospect of a philosophical zombie: an entity just like us on the outside, but with no 'me' on the inside, no conscious or subjective experience."

    bigthink.com/philosophy/healin

Share on Mastodon

Enter the server where you have an account.