#wordproblems — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #wordproblems, aggregated by home.social.
-
So... a student sent me a bunch of word problems. The thing is that in those word problems the protagonists are jerks to one another.
:catthinking:
Makes me wonder about the mental state of the math instructor who produced those word problems.
:holdthepain:
-
So... a student sent me a bunch of word problems. The thing is that in those word problems the protagonists are jerks to one another.
:catthinking:
Makes me wonder about the mental state of the math instructor who produced those word problems.
:holdthepain:
-
So... a student sent me a bunch of word problems. The thing is that in those word problems the protagonists are jerks to one another.
:catthinking:
Makes me wonder about the mental state of the math instructor who produced those word problems.
:holdthepain:
-
So... a student sent me a bunch of word problems. The thing is that in those word problems the protagonists are jerks to one another.
:catthinking:
Makes me wonder about the mental state of the math instructor who produced those word problems.
:holdthepain:
-
Must've killed off a few hundred thousand brain cells last night, because I was trying to come up with a particular word, and the only thing that deigned to exit my mouth in **multiple** tries was "skeleton of a horse's head."
Horse skull. I was trying to say horse skull.
-
CW: Everybody knows that there's a 40% chance that a given cop is a domestic abuser, but what if there's more than one? For instance, what's the probability that a set of two cops contains at least one domestic abuser? (Math & ACAB)
It's kind of hard to calculate this directly but of course there is a trick! We're going to calculate the chance that neither cop is a domestic abuser instead. Then all other sets of two cops will contain at least one
There's a 60% chance that cop one isn't and a 60% chance that cop two isn't. This makes the chance that both aren't 0.6 x 0.6 = 0.36. so 36% of pairs of cops fail to contain a domestic abuser, which means 64% contain at least one. If you see two cops and say that there's a 64% chance that one is an abuser, well, that is correct!
This keeps working! The chance that none in a set of three is an abuser is 0.6 x 0.6 x 0.6 = (0.6)^3 = 0.216, so there's a 78.4% = 100-21.6 chance that a set of three cops contains at least one abuser.
If there are n cops the formula is:
(1-(0.6)^n)*100
n. % chance of at least one
1. 40
2. 64
3. 78.4
4. 87
5. 92.2
6. 95.3Word problems don't have to be counterrevolutionary...
#ACAB #PoliceAbolition #Abolition #WordProblems #DiscreteProbability #Mathstodon