home.social

#tanya — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #tanya, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Weeks before #Israel recognized #Somaliland, two #Miami #Chabad followers slipped into the #HornOfAfrica to print the #Tanya—a centuries-old #Hasidic work rarely seen in such sensitive regions. Their journey blends faith, risk, and geopolitics in one remarkable mission.

    saxafimedia.com/israel-recogni

  2. Weeks before #Israel recognized #Somaliland, two #Miami #Chabad followers slipped into the #HornOfAfrica to print the #Tanya—a centuries-old #Hasidic work rarely seen in such sensitive regions. Their journey blends faith, risk, and geopolitics in one remarkable mission.

    saxafimedia.com/israel-recogni

  3. Preity Zinta recalls being a ‘third wheel’ to Bobby Deol and Tanya during their honeymoon on Soldier shoot |

    Preity Zinta has given fans a sweet peek into her friendship with Bobby and Tanya Deol, sharing how…
    #NewsBeep #News #Celebrities #bobby #BobbyDeol #Diwaliparty #Entertainment #manishmalhotrasdiwali #PreityZinta #preityzintabobbydeol #Soldiershoot #tanya #TanyaDeol #UK #UnitedKingdom
    newsbeep.com/uk/200170/

  4. This is just so disappointing and depressing. I thought #Tanya was doing a reasonable job as environment minister, but this article shows that was not the case! 😩 www.theguardian.com/environment/...

    Federal Labor ministers at odd...

  5. GOOD MORNING from Tanya Tiger. Tanya likes hanging out on her top bench, where she has a great video of staff and interns doing their morning cleaning tasks and watching guests enjoying the Discovery Area. Come on out for a tour.

    #tiger #tigers #bigcats #whitecat #whitetiger #tanya #TCWR #TurpentineCreek #GFAS #RescueToRefuge #Sanctuary #BigCat #Cats #refuge #morning #goodmorning #morningroutine #morningwalk #morningmotivation #morningvibes #morninginspiration #hello

  6. GOOD MORNING from Tanya Tiger. Tanya likes hanging out on her top bench, where she has a great video of staff and interns doing their morning cleaning tasks and watching guests enjoying the Discovery Area. Come on out for a tour.

    #tiger #tigers #bigcats #whitecat #whitetiger #tanya #TCWR #TurpentineCreek #GFAS #RescueToRefuge #Sanctuary #BigCat #Cats #refuge #morning #goodmorning #morningroutine #morningwalk #morningmotivation #morningvibes #morninginspiration #hello

  7. Murray Watt on #RadioNational
    The EPA laws were "Delayed/prevented by the Coalition and the Greens".

    Bullshit.

    Tanya Plibersek had the Greens squared-away. The Coalition was irrelevant. The EPA was shot in the head by Albanese to keep WA seats safe. End of.

    And now? When they could lay waste to WA seats, and *still* easily win the next election? Now, when the full range of nation-changing levers are just begging to be pulled? Now, what is the most important item on the agenda?

    Send Murray Watt to WA to kiss the gas ring of Santos and Woodside, and deliver the message that an EPA will never be able to reject based on climate.

    The ALP is clearly saying #GetFucked to the #Greens (and to the #climate). We need gas, coal and oil more than we need you.

    The remaining question:
    #Tanya, really, are you seriously going to sit there taking this shit?
    #ALP how fucking meek will you be? You have two terms to change the nation. Is "meh" all you fuckers have got written on your wishlists?

  8. Murray Watt on #RadioNational
    The EPA laws were "Delayed/prevented by the Coalition and the Greens".

    Bullshit.

    Tanya Plibersek had the Greens squared-away. The Coalition was irrelevant. The EPA was shot in the head by Albanese to keep WA seats safe. End of.

    And now? When they could lay waste to WA seats, and *still* easily win the next election? Now, when the full range of nation-changing levers are just begging to be pulled? Now, what is the most important item on the agenda?

    Send Murray Watt to WA to kiss the gas ring of Santos and Woodside, and deliver the message that an EPA will never be able to reject based on climate.

    The ALP is clearly saying #GetFucked to the #Greens (and to the #climate). We need gas, coal and oil more than we need you.

    The remaining question:
    #Tanya, really, are you seriously going to sit there taking this shit?
    #ALP how fucking meek will you be? You have two terms to change the nation. Is "meh" all you fuckers have got written on your wishlists?

  9. Murray Watt on #RadioNational
    The EPA laws were "Delayed/prevented by the Coalition and the Greens".

    Bullshit.

    Tanya Plibersek had the Greens squared-away. The Coalition was irrelevant. The EPA was shot in the head by Albanese to keep WA seats safe. End of.

    And now? When they could lay waste to WA seats, and *still* easily win the next election? Now, when the full range of nation-changing levers are just begging to be pulled? Now, what is the most important item on the agenda?

    Send Murray Watt to WA to kiss the gas ring of Santos and Woodside, and deliver the message that an EPA will never be able to reject based on climate.

    The ALP is clearly saying #GetFucked to the #Greens (and to the #climate). We need gas, coal and oil more than we need you.

    The remaining question:
    #Tanya, really, are you seriously going to sit there taking this shit?
    #ALP how fucking meek will you be? You have two terms to change the nation. Is "meh" all you fuckers have got written on your wishlists?

  10. Murray Watt on #RadioNational
    The EPA laws were "Delayed/prevented by the Coalition and the Greens".

    Bullshit.

    Tanya Plibersek had the Greens squared-away. The Coalition was irrelevant. The EPA was shot in the head by Albanese to keep WA seats safe. End of.

    And now? When they could lay waste to WA seats, and *still* easily win the next election? Now, when the full range of nation-changing levers are just begging to be pulled? Now, what is the most important item on the agenda?

    Send Murray Watt to WA to kiss the gas ring of Santos and Woodside, and deliver the message that an EPA will never be able to reject based on climate.

    The ALP is clearly saying #GetFucked to the #Greens (and to the #climate). We need gas, coal and oil more than we need you.

    The remaining question:
    #Tanya, really, are you seriously going to sit there taking this shit?
    #ALP how fucking meek will you be? You have two terms to change the nation. Is "meh" all you fuckers have got written on your wishlists?

  11. Murray Watt on #RadioNational
    The EPA laws were "Delayed/prevented by the Coalition and the Greens".

    Bullshit.

    Tanya Plibersek had the Greens squared-away. The Coalition was irrelevant. The EPA was shot in the head by Albanese to keep WA seats safe. End of.

    And now? When they could lay waste to WA seats, and *still* easily win the next election? Now, when the full range of nation-changing levers are just begging to be pulled? Now, what is the most important item on the agenda?

    Send Murray Watt to WA to kiss the gas ring of Santos and Woodside, and deliver the message that an EPA will never be able to reject based on climate.

    The ALP is clearly saying #GetFucked to the #Greens (and to the #climate). We need gas, coal and oil more than we need you.

    The remaining question:
    #Tanya, really, are you seriously going to sit there taking this shit?
    #ALP how fucking meek will you be? You have two terms to change the nation. Is "meh" all you fuckers have got written on your wishlists?

  12. Judge demands ‘some kind of evidence’ from Trump’s EPA to halt climate grants

    Federal judge Tanya Chutkan issues restraining order pending new filings over billions in axed research grants

    A federal judge considering the Trump administration’s abrupt cancellation of climate research grants worth billions of dollars
    told government lawyers they had to produce
    “some kind of evidence” of wrongdoing to back up such drastic actions.

    Climate United, which coordinates investment in clean energy projects,
    sued to seek access to $7bn that was frozen before it was cancelled on Tuesday night by #Lee #Zeldin,
    the New York Republican congressman turned administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

    In US district court in Washington on Wednesday, Judge #Tanya #Chutkan asked lawyers for the EPA:
    “Can you proffer any evidence that [the grant] was illegal,
    or evidence of abuse or fraud or bribery
    – that any of that was improperly or unlawfully done, other than the fact that Mr Zeldin doesn’t like it?”

    #Marc #Sacks, a government lawyer, said:
    “The determination is based on the information contained in the termination letter.”
    Chutkan said:
    “That’s pretty circular,”
    then asked if Climate United had violated federal regulations.

    Sacks said:
    “I think the agency cited both of those regulations within their termination letter.”
    Chutkan said:
    “I can cite cases all day long, but you have to have some kind of evidence or proffer to back it up.”
    She also said:
    “You can’t even tell me what the evidence of malfeasance is.”

    There is plentiful evidence that Zeldin is implementing an assault on attempts to tackle the climate crisis.
    The EPA issued a slew of rollbacks of rules to combat pollution on Wednesday.

    Zeldin said he was “driving a dagger through the heart of climate-change religion and ushering in America’s Golden Age”.
    Climate groups reacted with horror.
    #Jason #Rylander, legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute, told the Guardian:
    “Come hell or high water, raging fires and deadly heatwaves, Trump and his cronies are bent on putting polluter profits ahead of people’s lives.
    This move won’t stand up in court. We’re going to fight it every step of the way.”

    Climate United is not the only group to have sued over access to grants.
    In New York, the Coalition for Green Capital has sued over the cancellation of a $5bn grant,
    an act it called “patently and plainly unlawful on its face”
    and “arbitrary and pretextual”.
    In Washington, lawyers for Climate United argued that the EPA had not followed the law,
    meaning Chutkan could rule on the matter.
    Lawyers for the government said it was a contract dispute, so she could not.
    Chutkan said:
    “The government didn’t decide who it wanted to contract with.
    A new administration came in, didn’t like the contract any more.
    That’s what new administrations do.
    But there are procedures that have to be followed.
    And it doesn’t appear, at least on the record before me, that those procedures have been followed.”

    The hearing ended without Chutkan issuing a ruling or temporary restraining order,
    but asking both sides to make
    👉new filings by Monday evening:
    Climate United to amend its lawsuit
    and the government to provide information about alleged wrongdoing.
    “I don’t have the credible evidence that’s required,” Chutkan said.
    theguardian.com/us-news/2025/m

  13. Judge demands ‘some kind of evidence’ from Trump’s EPA to halt climate grants

    Federal judge Tanya Chutkan issues restraining order pending new filings over billions in axed research grants

    A federal judge considering the Trump administration’s abrupt cancellation of climate research grants worth billions of dollars
    told government lawyers they had to produce
    “some kind of evidence” of wrongdoing to back up such drastic actions.

    Climate United, which coordinates investment in clean energy projects,
    sued to seek access to $7bn that was frozen before it was cancelled on Tuesday night by #Lee #Zeldin,
    the New York Republican congressman turned administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

    In US district court in Washington on Wednesday, Judge #Tanya #Chutkan asked lawyers for the EPA:
    “Can you proffer any evidence that [the grant] was illegal,
    or evidence of abuse or fraud or bribery
    – that any of that was improperly or unlawfully done, other than the fact that Mr Zeldin doesn’t like it?”

    #Marc #Sacks, a government lawyer, said:
    “The determination is based on the information contained in the termination letter.”
    Chutkan said:
    “That’s pretty circular,”
    then asked if Climate United had violated federal regulations.

    Sacks said:
    “I think the agency cited both of those regulations within their termination letter.”
    Chutkan said:
    “I can cite cases all day long, but you have to have some kind of evidence or proffer to back it up.”
    She also said:
    “You can’t even tell me what the evidence of malfeasance is.”

    There is plentiful evidence that Zeldin is implementing an assault on attempts to tackle the climate crisis.
    The EPA issued a slew of rollbacks of rules to combat pollution on Wednesday.

    Zeldin said he was “driving a dagger through the heart of climate-change religion and ushering in America’s Golden Age”.
    Climate groups reacted with horror.
    #Jason #Rylander, legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute, told the Guardian:
    “Come hell or high water, raging fires and deadly heatwaves, Trump and his cronies are bent on putting polluter profits ahead of people’s lives.
    This move won’t stand up in court. We’re going to fight it every step of the way.”

    Climate United is not the only group to have sued over access to grants.
    In New York, the Coalition for Green Capital has sued over the cancellation of a $5bn grant,
    an act it called “patently and plainly unlawful on its face”
    and “arbitrary and pretextual”.
    In Washington, lawyers for Climate United argued that the EPA had not followed the law,
    meaning Chutkan could rule on the matter.
    Lawyers for the government said it was a contract dispute, so she could not.
    Chutkan said:
    “The government didn’t decide who it wanted to contract with.
    A new administration came in, didn’t like the contract any more.
    That’s what new administrations do.
    But there are procedures that have to be followed.
    And it doesn’t appear, at least on the record before me, that those procedures have been followed.”

    The hearing ended without Chutkan issuing a ruling or temporary restraining order,
    but asking both sides to make
    👉new filings by Monday evening:
    Climate United to amend its lawsuit
    and the government to provide information about alleged wrongdoing.
    “I don’t have the credible evidence that’s required,” Chutkan said.
    theguardian.com/us-news/2025/m

  14. Judge demands ‘some kind of evidence’ from Trump’s EPA to halt climate grants

    Federal judge Tanya Chutkan issues restraining order pending new filings over billions in axed research grants

    A federal judge considering the Trump administration’s abrupt cancellation of climate research grants worth billions of dollars
    told government lawyers they had to produce
    “some kind of evidence” of wrongdoing to back up such drastic actions.

    Climate United, which coordinates investment in clean energy projects,
    sued to seek access to $7bn that was frozen before it was cancelled on Tuesday night by #Lee #Zeldin,
    the New York Republican congressman turned administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

    In US district court in Washington on Wednesday, Judge #Tanya #Chutkan asked lawyers for the EPA:
    “Can you proffer any evidence that [the grant] was illegal,
    or evidence of abuse or fraud or bribery
    – that any of that was improperly or unlawfully done, other than the fact that Mr Zeldin doesn’t like it?”

    #Marc #Sacks, a government lawyer, said:
    “The determination is based on the information contained in the termination letter.”
    Chutkan said:
    “That’s pretty circular,”
    then asked if Climate United had violated federal regulations.

    Sacks said:
    “I think the agency cited both of those regulations within their termination letter.”
    Chutkan said:
    “I can cite cases all day long, but you have to have some kind of evidence or proffer to back it up.”
    She also said:
    “You can’t even tell me what the evidence of malfeasance is.”

    There is plentiful evidence that Zeldin is implementing an assault on attempts to tackle the climate crisis.
    The EPA issued a slew of rollbacks of rules to combat pollution on Wednesday.

    Zeldin said he was “driving a dagger through the heart of climate-change religion and ushering in America’s Golden Age”.
    Climate groups reacted with horror.
    #Jason #Rylander, legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute, told the Guardian:
    “Come hell or high water, raging fires and deadly heatwaves, Trump and his cronies are bent on putting polluter profits ahead of people’s lives.
    This move won’t stand up in court. We’re going to fight it every step of the way.”

    Climate United is not the only group to have sued over access to grants.
    In New York, the Coalition for Green Capital has sued over the cancellation of a $5bn grant,
    an act it called “patently and plainly unlawful on its face”
    and “arbitrary and pretextual”.
    In Washington, lawyers for Climate United argued that the EPA had not followed the law,
    meaning Chutkan could rule on the matter.
    Lawyers for the government said it was a contract dispute, so she could not.
    Chutkan said:
    “The government didn’t decide who it wanted to contract with.
    A new administration came in, didn’t like the contract any more.
    That’s what new administrations do.
    But there are procedures that have to be followed.
    And it doesn’t appear, at least on the record before me, that those procedures have been followed.”

    The hearing ended without Chutkan issuing a ruling or temporary restraining order,
    but asking both sides to make
    👉new filings by Monday evening:
    Climate United to amend its lawsuit
    and the government to provide information about alleged wrongdoing.
    “I don’t have the credible evidence that’s required,” Chutkan said.
    theguardian.com/us-news/2025/m

  15. Judge demands ‘some kind of evidence’ from Trump’s EPA to halt climate grants

    Federal judge Tanya Chutkan issues restraining order pending new filings over billions in axed research grants

    A federal judge considering the Trump administration’s abrupt cancellation of climate research grants worth billions of dollars
    told government lawyers they had to produce
    “some kind of evidence” of wrongdoing to back up such drastic actions.

    Climate United, which coordinates investment in clean energy projects,
    sued to seek access to $7bn that was frozen before it was cancelled on Tuesday night by #Lee #Zeldin,
    the New York Republican congressman turned administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

    In US district court in Washington on Wednesday, Judge #Tanya #Chutkan asked lawyers for the EPA:
    “Can you proffer any evidence that [the grant] was illegal,
    or evidence of abuse or fraud or bribery
    – that any of that was improperly or unlawfully done, other than the fact that Mr Zeldin doesn’t like it?”

    #Marc #Sacks, a government lawyer, said:
    “The determination is based on the information contained in the termination letter.”
    Chutkan said:
    “That’s pretty circular,”
    then asked if Climate United had violated federal regulations.

    Sacks said:
    “I think the agency cited both of those regulations within their termination letter.”
    Chutkan said:
    “I can cite cases all day long, but you have to have some kind of evidence or proffer to back it up.”
    She also said:
    “You can’t even tell me what the evidence of malfeasance is.”

    There is plentiful evidence that Zeldin is implementing an assault on attempts to tackle the climate crisis.
    The EPA issued a slew of rollbacks of rules to combat pollution on Wednesday.

    Zeldin said he was “driving a dagger through the heart of climate-change religion and ushering in America’s Golden Age”.
    Climate groups reacted with horror.
    #Jason #Rylander, legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute, told the Guardian:
    “Come hell or high water, raging fires and deadly heatwaves, Trump and his cronies are bent on putting polluter profits ahead of people’s lives.
    This move won’t stand up in court. We’re going to fight it every step of the way.”

    Climate United is not the only group to have sued over access to grants.
    In New York, the Coalition for Green Capital has sued over the cancellation of a $5bn grant,
    an act it called “patently and plainly unlawful on its face”
    and “arbitrary and pretextual”.
    In Washington, lawyers for Climate United argued that the EPA had not followed the law,
    meaning Chutkan could rule on the matter.
    Lawyers for the government said it was a contract dispute, so she could not.
    Chutkan said:
    “The government didn’t decide who it wanted to contract with.
    A new administration came in, didn’t like the contract any more.
    That’s what new administrations do.
    But there are procedures that have to be followed.
    And it doesn’t appear, at least on the record before me, that those procedures have been followed.”

    The hearing ended without Chutkan issuing a ruling or temporary restraining order,
    but asking both sides to make
    👉new filings by Monday evening:
    Climate United to amend its lawsuit
    and the government to provide information about alleged wrongdoing.
    “I don’t have the credible evidence that’s required,” Chutkan said.
    theguardian.com/us-news/2025/m

  16. Judge demands ‘some kind of evidence’ from Trump’s EPA to halt climate grants

    Federal judge Tanya Chutkan issues restraining order pending new filings over billions in axed research grants

    A federal judge considering the Trump administration’s abrupt cancellation of climate research grants worth billions of dollars
    told government lawyers they had to produce
    “some kind of evidence” of wrongdoing to back up such drastic actions.

    Climate United, which coordinates investment in clean energy projects,
    sued to seek access to $7bn that was frozen before it was cancelled on Tuesday night by #Lee #Zeldin,
    the New York Republican congressman turned administrator of the Environmental Protection Agency.

    In US district court in Washington on Wednesday, Judge #Tanya #Chutkan asked lawyers for the EPA:
    “Can you proffer any evidence that [the grant] was illegal,
    or evidence of abuse or fraud or bribery
    – that any of that was improperly or unlawfully done, other than the fact that Mr Zeldin doesn’t like it?”

    #Marc #Sacks, a government lawyer, said:
    “The determination is based on the information contained in the termination letter.”
    Chutkan said:
    “That’s pretty circular,”
    then asked if Climate United had violated federal regulations.

    Sacks said:
    “I think the agency cited both of those regulations within their termination letter.”
    Chutkan said:
    “I can cite cases all day long, but you have to have some kind of evidence or proffer to back it up.”
    She also said:
    “You can’t even tell me what the evidence of malfeasance is.”

    There is plentiful evidence that Zeldin is implementing an assault on attempts to tackle the climate crisis.
    The EPA issued a slew of rollbacks of rules to combat pollution on Wednesday.

    Zeldin said he was “driving a dagger through the heart of climate-change religion and ushering in America’s Golden Age”.
    Climate groups reacted with horror.
    #Jason #Rylander, legal director at the Center for Biological Diversity’s Climate Law Institute, told the Guardian:
    “Come hell or high water, raging fires and deadly heatwaves, Trump and his cronies are bent on putting polluter profits ahead of people’s lives.
    This move won’t stand up in court. We’re going to fight it every step of the way.”

    Climate United is not the only group to have sued over access to grants.
    In New York, the Coalition for Green Capital has sued over the cancellation of a $5bn grant,
    an act it called “patently and plainly unlawful on its face”
    and “arbitrary and pretextual”.
    In Washington, lawyers for Climate United argued that the EPA had not followed the law,
    meaning Chutkan could rule on the matter.
    Lawyers for the government said it was a contract dispute, so she could not.
    Chutkan said:
    “The government didn’t decide who it wanted to contract with.
    A new administration came in, didn’t like the contract any more.
    That’s what new administrations do.
    But there are procedures that have to be followed.
    And it doesn’t appear, at least on the record before me, that those procedures have been followed.”

    The hearing ended without Chutkan issuing a ruling or temporary restraining order,
    but asking both sides to make
    👉new filings by Monday evening:
    Climate United to amend its lawsuit
    and the government to provide information about alleged wrongdoing.
    “I don’t have the credible evidence that’s required,” Chutkan said.
    theguardian.com/us-news/2025/m

  17. CW: 18+ NSFW

    A lot more... but gotta' save some for later. :blobcatheart:
    (8/8)

    #NSFW #Porn #Lis #Tanya #Anal #Gape #Ass #Doggystyle #Missionary #GapingFriday

  18. A major lawsuit to end Elon Musk’s takeover of the federal government has landed before one of Donald Trump’s least favorite judges.
    Judge #Tanya #Chutkan, who presided over Trump’s federal election interference case, was assigned the federal lawsuit
    filed by 14 states against the president and Musk, attacking the so-called Department of Government Efficiency’s authority.
    Chutkan gained the national spotlight as she refused to accept arguments from Trump’s legal team at nearly every step in the January 6 case.
    She infuriated Trump when she placed a gag order on him in October 2023 and said that his presidential candidacy did not give him “carte blanche” to vilify public servants “who are simply doing their job.”
    Trump lashed out at the judge, calling her “the most evil person” as she seemed unwilling to bend to the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling.
    Now Chutkan will preside over a pivotal lawsuit that will determine the future of the U.S. government and the second Trump administration.
    The suit directly attacks Musk as a “21st century tech baron,”
    claiming that “the scope and reach of his executive authority appear unprecedented in U.S. history.”
    “His power includes, at least, the authority to cease the payment of congressionally approved funds,
    access sensitive and confidential data across government agencies,
    cut off systems access to federal employees and contractors at will,
    and take over and dismantle entire independent federal agencies,”
    the lawsuit states.
    newrepublic.com/post/191559/ju

  19. A major lawsuit to end Elon Musk’s takeover of the federal government has landed before one of Donald Trump’s least favorite judges.
    Judge #Tanya #Chutkan, who presided over Trump’s federal election interference case, was assigned the federal lawsuit
    filed by 14 states against the president and Musk, attacking the so-called Department of Government Efficiency’s authority.
    Chutkan gained the national spotlight as she refused to accept arguments from Trump’s legal team at nearly every step in the January 6 case.
    She infuriated Trump when she placed a gag order on him in October 2023 and said that his presidential candidacy did not give him “carte blanche” to vilify public servants “who are simply doing their job.”
    Trump lashed out at the judge, calling her “the most evil person” as she seemed unwilling to bend to the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling.
    Now Chutkan will preside over a pivotal lawsuit that will determine the future of the U.S. government and the second Trump administration.
    The suit directly attacks Musk as a “21st century tech baron,”
    claiming that “the scope and reach of his executive authority appear unprecedented in U.S. history.”
    “His power includes, at least, the authority to cease the payment of congressionally approved funds,
    access sensitive and confidential data across government agencies,
    cut off systems access to federal employees and contractors at will,
    and take over and dismantle entire independent federal agencies,”
    the lawsuit states.
    newrepublic.com/post/191559/ju

  20. A major lawsuit to end Elon Musk’s takeover of the federal government has landed before one of Donald Trump’s least favorite judges.
    Judge #Tanya #Chutkan, who presided over Trump’s federal election interference case, was assigned the federal lawsuit
    filed by 14 states against the president and Musk, attacking the so-called Department of Government Efficiency’s authority.
    Chutkan gained the national spotlight as she refused to accept arguments from Trump’s legal team at nearly every step in the January 6 case.
    She infuriated Trump when she placed a gag order on him in October 2023 and said that his presidential candidacy did not give him “carte blanche” to vilify public servants “who are simply doing their job.”
    Trump lashed out at the judge, calling her “the most evil person” as she seemed unwilling to bend to the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling.
    Now Chutkan will preside over a pivotal lawsuit that will determine the future of the U.S. government and the second Trump administration.
    The suit directly attacks Musk as a “21st century tech baron,”
    claiming that “the scope and reach of his executive authority appear unprecedented in U.S. history.”
    “His power includes, at least, the authority to cease the payment of congressionally approved funds,
    access sensitive and confidential data across government agencies,
    cut off systems access to federal employees and contractors at will,
    and take over and dismantle entire independent federal agencies,”
    the lawsuit states.
    newrepublic.com/post/191559/ju

  21. A major lawsuit to end Elon Musk’s takeover of the federal government has landed before one of Donald Trump’s least favorite judges.
    Judge #Tanya #Chutkan, who presided over Trump’s federal election interference case, was assigned the federal lawsuit
    filed by 14 states against the president and Musk, attacking the so-called Department of Government Efficiency’s authority.
    Chutkan gained the national spotlight as she refused to accept arguments from Trump’s legal team at nearly every step in the January 6 case.
    She infuriated Trump when she placed a gag order on him in October 2023 and said that his presidential candidacy did not give him “carte blanche” to vilify public servants “who are simply doing their job.”
    Trump lashed out at the judge, calling her “the most evil person” as she seemed unwilling to bend to the Supreme Court’s immunity ruling.
    Now Chutkan will preside over a pivotal lawsuit that will determine the future of the U.S. government and the second Trump administration.
    The suit directly attacks Musk as a “21st century tech baron,”
    claiming that “the scope and reach of his executive authority appear unprecedented in U.S. history.”
    “His power includes, at least, the authority to cease the payment of congressionally approved funds,
    access sensitive and confidential data across government agencies,
    cut off systems access to federal employees and contractors at will,
    and take over and dismantle entire independent federal agencies,”
    the lawsuit states.
    newrepublic.com/post/191559/ju