home.social

#scite — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #scite, aggregated by home.social.

  1. #Scite
    - structured #boolean output to improve transparency in Assistant workflows
    - continued rolling out new #Patents Search experience
    scite.ai/blog/november-2025-re

  2. #Scite
    - structured #boolean output to improve transparency in Assistant workflows
    - continued rolling out new #Patents Search experience
    scite.ai/blog/november-2025-re

  3. éditeur #scite comment avoir la sortie en chasse fixe ?

  4. I think the Scintilla Text Editor ( #SciTE ) will be my next Texteditor. Has great Syntax Code Highlighting and Code Folding,

    I’m by far no developer, but I love Code and seeing it on the screen in an editor. :mycomputer: The only thing I've mastered since #VivaldiBrowser is CSS; with the help of @Vivaldi and the awesome Forum there. 🙏 :vivaldi_gray:

    Used it years ago on Windows for the first time. Now on MacOS and since a week on Q4OS.

    scintilla.org/SciTE.html

  5. @Monolecte

    En tant qu'#IDE, je reste sur #VSCodium, mais je suis à l'aise avec #Vim.

    Par contre, quand j'ai besoin d'éditer vite fait un peu de code, j'utilise #Scite pour lequel j'ai eu un crush il y a de nombreuses années (j'utilisais encode Windows 2000, à l'époque !)

  6. @Monolecte

    En tant qu'#IDE, je reste sur #VSCodium, mais je suis à l'aise avec #Vim.

    Par contre, quand j'ai besoin d'éditer vite fait un peu de code, j'utilise #Scite pour lequel j'ai eu un crush il y a de nombreuses années (j'utilisais encode Windows 2000, à l'époque !)

  7. @Monolecte

    En tant qu'#IDE, je reste sur #VSCodium, mais je suis à l'aise avec #Vim.

    Par contre, quand j'ai besoin d'éditer vite fait un peu de code, j'utilise #Scite pour lequel j'ai eu un crush il y a de nombreuses années (j'utilisais encode Windows 2000, à l'époque !)

  8. @Monolecte

    En tant qu'#IDE, je reste sur #VSCodium, mais je suis à l'aise avec #Vim.

    Par contre, quand j'ai besoin d'éditer vite fait un peu de code, j'utilise #Scite pour lequel j'ai eu un crush il y a de nombreuses années (j'utilisais encode Windows 2000, à l'époque !)

  9. @Monolecte

    En tant qu'#IDE, je reste sur #VSCodium, mais je suis à l'aise avec #Vim.

    Par contre, quand j'ai besoin d'éditer vite fait un peu de code, j'utilise #Scite pour lequel j'ai eu un crush il y a de nombreuses années (j'utilisais encode Windows 2000, à l'époque !)

  10. Update. I know that #scite can often do this job. But it's not free and it's limited to research literature (where it does a great job). I'd like a free tool that also covers #journalism.

  11. Update. I know that #scite can often do this job. But it's not free and it's limited to research literature (where it does a great job). I'd like a free tool that also covers #journalism.

  12. Update. I know that #scite can often do this job. But it's not free and it's limited to research literature (where it does a great job). I'd like a free tool that also covers #journalism.

  13. Update. I know that #scite can often do this job. But it's not free and it's limited to research literature (where it does a great job). I'd like a free tool that also covers #journalism.

  14. Update. I know that #scite can often do this job. But it's not free and it's limited to research literature (where it does a great job). I'd like a free tool that also covers #journalism.

  15. AI science search engines are exploding in number — are they any good? [Nature] nature.com/articles/d41586-023
    >Several search tools claim to help researchers do science.

    #academic #SearchEngines #Elicit #Consensus #Scite #GoogleScholar #ChatGTP #LLM #AI

  16. AI science search engines are exploding in number — are they any good? [Nature] nature.com/articles/d41586-023
    >Several search tools claim to help researchers do science.

    #academic #SearchEngines #Elicit #Consensus #Scite #GoogleScholar #ChatGTP #LLM #AI

  17. AI science search engines are exploding in number — are they any good? [Nature] nature.com/articles/d41586-023
    >Several search tools claim to help researchers do science.

    #academic #SearchEngines #Elicit #Consensus #Scite #GoogleScholar #ChatGTP #LLM #AI

  18. AI science search engines are exploding in number — are they any good? [Nature] nature.com/articles/d41586-023
    >Several search tools claim to help researchers do science.

    #academic #SearchEngines #Elicit #Consensus #Scite #GoogleScholar #ChatGTP #LLM #AI

  19. AI science search engines are exploding in number — are they any good? [Nature] nature.com/articles/d41586-023
    >Several search tools claim to help researchers do science.

    #academic #SearchEngines #Elicit #Consensus #Scite #GoogleScholar #ChatGTP #LLM #AI

  20. @Seirdy Hi, regarding fighting misinformation on the issue of rare adverse effects of the vaccine:
    I have followed this issue closely. That 1 JAMA Cardiology study he cited is actually legit and JAMA Cardiology a respectable Journal in the field. See #pubpeer, #scite and #ulrichsweb reports' main pages. He of course neglected, as is typical, to mention other studies and the review and editorials that came after this, but he IS right about the increased risk in that 1 particular study.

  21. @Seirdy Hi, regarding fighting misinformation on the issue of rare adverse effects of the vaccine:
    I have followed this issue closely. That 1 JAMA Cardiology study he cited is actually legit and JAMA Cardiology a respectable Journal in the field. See #pubpeer, #scite and #ulrichsweb reports' main pages. He of course neglected, as is typical, to mention other studies and the review and editorials that came after this, but he IS right about the increased risk in that 1 particular study.

  22. @Seirdy Hi, regarding fighting misinformation on the issue of rare adverse effects of the vaccine:
    I have followed this issue closely. That 1 JAMA Cardiology study he cited is actually legit and JAMA Cardiology a respectable Journal in the field. See #pubpeer, #scite and #ulrichsweb reports' main pages. He of course neglected, as is typical, to mention other studies and the review and editorials that came after this, but he IS right about the increased risk in that 1 particular study.

  23. @Seirdy Hi, regarding fighting misinformation on the issue of rare adverse effects of the vaccine:
    I have followed this issue closely. That 1 JAMA Cardiology study he cited is actually legit and JAMA Cardiology a respectable Journal in the field. See #pubpeer, #scite and #ulrichsweb reports' main pages. He of course neglected, as is typical, to mention other studies and the review and editorials that came after this, but he IS right about the increased risk in that 1 particular study.

  24. @Seirdy Hi, regarding fighting misinformation on the issue of rare adverse effects of the vaccine:
    I have followed this issue closely. That 1 JAMA Cardiology study he cited is actually legit and JAMA Cardiology a respectable Journal in the field. See #pubpeer, #scite and #ulrichsweb reports' main pages. He of course neglected, as is typical, to mention other studies and the review and editorials that came after this, but he IS right about the increased risk in that 1 particular study.