#ulrichsweb — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #ulrichsweb, aggregated by home.social.
-
Extended version available in preprint: https://doi.org/10.31219/osf.io/w8tqs @serhii @tibhannover @tibosl #scholarlypublishing #Ulrichsweb #Ukraine
-
The new article by our "German" researcher in @tibosl about Ukrainian journals in #Ulrichsweb:
:doi: https://doi.org/10.1002/leap.1605
A big round of applause to @Maryna_Nazarovets, but also a huge respect to the editor and reviewers at #LearnedPublishing for agreeing to review a study of Ukrainian journals with such a strong historical focus! 👏
@tibhannover
#science #journal #publishing #openaccess #Ukraine -
@Seirdy Hi, regarding fighting misinformation on the issue of rare adverse effects of the vaccine:
I have followed this issue closely. That 1 JAMA Cardiology study he cited is actually legit and JAMA Cardiology a respectable Journal in the field. See #pubpeer, #scite and #ulrichsweb reports' main pages. He of course neglected, as is typical, to mention other studies and the review and editorials that came after this, but he IS right about the increased risk in that 1 particular study. -
@Seirdy Hi, regarding fighting misinformation on the issue of rare adverse effects of the vaccine:
I have followed this issue closely. That 1 JAMA Cardiology study he cited is actually legit and JAMA Cardiology a respectable Journal in the field. See #pubpeer, #scite and #ulrichsweb reports' main pages. He of course neglected, as is typical, to mention other studies and the review and editorials that came after this, but he IS right about the increased risk in that 1 particular study. -
@Seirdy Hi, regarding fighting misinformation on the issue of rare adverse effects of the vaccine:
I have followed this issue closely. That 1 JAMA Cardiology study he cited is actually legit and JAMA Cardiology a respectable Journal in the field. See #pubpeer, #scite and #ulrichsweb reports' main pages. He of course neglected, as is typical, to mention other studies and the review and editorials that came after this, but he IS right about the increased risk in that 1 particular study. -
@Seirdy Hi, regarding fighting misinformation on the issue of rare adverse effects of the vaccine:
I have followed this issue closely. That 1 JAMA Cardiology study he cited is actually legit and JAMA Cardiology a respectable Journal in the field. See #pubpeer, #scite and #ulrichsweb reports' main pages. He of course neglected, as is typical, to mention other studies and the review and editorials that came after this, but he IS right about the increased risk in that 1 particular study. -
@Seirdy Hi, regarding fighting misinformation on the issue of rare adverse effects of the vaccine:
I have followed this issue closely. That 1 JAMA Cardiology study he cited is actually legit and JAMA Cardiology a respectable Journal in the field. See #pubpeer, #scite and #ulrichsweb reports' main pages. He of course neglected, as is typical, to mention other studies and the review and editorials that came after this, but he IS right about the increased risk in that 1 particular study.