#portscan — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #portscan, aggregated by home.social.
-
Enable sfportscan preprocessor in Snort to detect TCP SYN, UDP, and ICMP scans. Uses a sliding window algorithm to track source IP, destination IP, and protocol, classifying scans as portscan or portsweep. Deploy on Ubuntu 22.04, Debian 12, or FreeBSD 13. #snort #portscan #ValtersIT
https://www.valtersit.com/vault/snort-with-portscan-detection-preprocessor-for-anomaly-alert-ddf24e/
-
Enable sfportscan preprocessor in Snort to detect TCP SYN, UDP, and ICMP scans. Uses a sliding window algorithm to track source IP, destination IP, and protocol, classifying scans as portscan or portsweep. Deploy on Ubuntu 22.04, Debian 12, or FreeBSD 13. #snort #portscan #ValtersIT
https://www.valtersit.com/vault/snort-with-portscan-detection-preprocessor-for-anomaly-alert-ddf24e/
-
Angry IP Scanner has released a new version.
And I was named as a contributor 😀
https://github.com/angryip/ipscan/releases/tag/3.9.3
By the way, my ipscan plugins are free software (GNU GPLv3, REUSE compliant) and can be found on Codeberg.
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/ipscan-plugins
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/-/packages/generic/ipscan-plugins/#Networking #Programming #ipscan #PortScan
#SSH #RouterOS #EchoProtocol #TimeProtocol #CHARGEN #ChargenProtocol #DaytimeProtocol #DNS #Leetspeak #Ping -
Angry IP Scanner has released a new version.
And I was named as a contributor 😀
https://github.com/angryip/ipscan/releases/tag/3.9.3
By the way, my ipscan plugins are free software (GNU GPLv3, REUSE compliant) and can be found on Codeberg.
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/ipscan-plugins
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/-/packages/generic/ipscan-plugins/#Networking #Programming #ipscan #PortScan
#SSH #RouterOS #EchoProtocol #TimeProtocol #CHARGEN #ChargenProtocol #DaytimeProtocol #DNS #Leetspeak #Ping -
Angry IP Scanner has released a new version.
And I was named as a contributor 😀
https://github.com/angryip/ipscan/releases/tag/3.9.3
By the way, my ipscan plugins are free software (GNU GPLv3, REUSE compliant) and can be found on Codeberg.
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/ipscan-plugins
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/-/packages/generic/ipscan-plugins/#Networking #Programming #ipscan #PortScan
#SSH #RouterOS #EchoProtocol #TimeProtocol #CHARGEN #ChargenProtocol #DaytimeProtocol #DNS #Leetspeak #Ping -
Angry IP Scanner has released a new version.
And I was named as a contributor 😀
https://github.com/angryip/ipscan/releases/tag/3.9.3
By the way, my ipscan plugins are free software (GNU GPLv3, REUSE compliant) and can be found on Codeberg.
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/ipscan-plugins
https://codeberg.org/mark22k/-/packages/generic/ipscan-plugins/#Networking #Programming #ipscan #PortScan
#SSH #RouterOS #EchoProtocol #TimeProtocol #CHARGEN #ChargenProtocol #DaytimeProtocol #DNS #Leetspeak #Ping -
Are there lots of port scan bots on the loose again today? I got over 700 new IP bans in the Fail2Ban recidive jail today. Lot's of IP's from the communistic orc Federation and from China, too. Annoying...
-
Are there lots of port scan bots on the loose again today? I got over 700 new IP bans in the Fail2Ban recidive jail today. Lot's of IP's from the communistic orc Federation and from China, too. Annoying...
-
Are there lots of port scan bots on the loose again today? I got over 700 new IP bans in the Fail2Ban recidive jail today. Lot's of IP's from the communistic orc Federation and from China, too. Annoying...
-
TIL The FreeBSD kernel auto-tarpits (for want of a better word) portscans on your host as soon as they attempt to connect to a closed port. If you see the following in your logs, that’s what’s happening.
"kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 3877 to 190 packets/sec”
Shodan - looking at you!
You can have more fun using blackhole in sysctl
https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=blackhole&sektion=4&manpath=freebsd-release-ports
None of this is a substitute for a firewall.
-
TIL The FreeBSD kernel auto-tarpits (for want of a better word) portscans on your host as soon as they attempt to connect to a closed port. If you see the following in your logs, that’s what’s happening.
"kernel: Limiting closed port RST response from 3877 to 190 packets/sec”
Shodan - looking at you!
You can have more fun using blackhole in sysctl
https://man.freebsd.org/cgi/man.cgi?query=blackhole&sektion=4&manpath=freebsd-release-ports
None of this is a substitute for a firewall.
-
-
-
-
-
For anyone interested: I'm now using Port Authority. It's free, open source and works nicely.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.aaronjwood.portauthority.free
-
For anyone interested: I'm now using Port Authority. It's free, open source and works nicely.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.aaronjwood.portauthority.free
-
For anyone interested: I'm now using Port Authority. It's free, open source and works nicely.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.aaronjwood.portauthority.free
-
For anyone interested: I'm now using Port Authority. It's free, open source and works nicely.
https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.aaronjwood.portauthority.free
-
“Brave aims to curb practice of websites that #PortScan visitors. Brave will allow users to choose which sites can access [#localhost] network resources.” Dan Goodin, Ars Technica #Privacy #WebBrowsers
https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/06/brave-will-soon-control-which-sites-can-access-your-local-network-resources/
This should be the new #WebPlatform standard: deny by default. A handful of allow-by-default exceptions for PC vendors’ support sites that connect to a helper service on a specific port to identify the model and installed driver versions. One of very few legitimate uses. -
“Brave aims to curb practice of websites that #PortScan visitors. Brave will allow users to choose which sites can access [#localhost] network resources.” Dan Goodin, Ars Technica #Privacy #WebBrowsers
https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/06/brave-will-soon-control-which-sites-can-access-your-local-network-resources/
This should be the new #WebPlatform standard: deny by default. A handful of allow-by-default exceptions for PC vendors’ support sites that connect to a helper service on a specific port to identify the model and installed driver versions. One of very few legitimate uses. -
“Brave aims to curb practice of websites that #PortScan visitors. Brave will allow users to choose which sites can access [#localhost] network resources.” Dan Goodin, Ars Technica #Privacy #WebBrowsers
https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/06/brave-will-soon-control-which-sites-can-access-your-local-network-resources/
This should be the new #WebPlatform standard: deny by default. A handful of allow-by-default exceptions for PC vendors’ support sites that connect to a helper service on a specific port to identify the model and installed driver versions. One of very few legitimate uses. -
“Brave aims to curb practice of websites that #PortScan visitors. Brave will allow users to choose which sites can access [#localhost] network resources.” Dan Goodin, Ars Technica #Privacy #WebBrowsers
https://arstechnica.com/security/2023/06/brave-will-soon-control-which-sites-can-access-your-local-network-resources/
This should be the new #WebPlatform standard: deny by default. A handful of allow-by-default exceptions for PC vendors’ support sites that connect to a helper service on a specific port to identify the model and installed driver versions. One of very few legitimate uses. -
O Brave, our network's savior and friend.
We bow at your feet, our issues to mend.
Allowing us to choose where we go
Standing as defenders against those who port scan and so.
Our thanks and gratitude you shall always receive.
For giving us control and the power to believe. -
O Brave, our network's savior and friend.
We bow at your feet, our issues to mend.
Allowing us to choose where we go
Standing as defenders against those who port scan and so.
Our thanks and gratitude you shall always receive.
For giving us control and the power to believe. -
anybody here use #masscan on internal pen tests if the network is big? I'm looking for advice on what rate you might run at. I'm not worried about noise, I am worried about swamping the network.
-
anybody here use #masscan on internal pen tests if the network is big? I'm looking for advice on what rate you might run at. I'm not worried about noise, I am worried about swamping the network.
-
anybody here use #masscan on internal pen tests if the network is big? I'm looking for advice on what rate you might run at. I'm not worried about noise, I am worried about swamping the network.
-
anybody here use #masscan on internal pen tests if the network is big? I'm looking for advice on what rate you might run at. I'm not worried about noise, I am worried about swamping the network.