home.social

#minimalnegationoperator — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #minimalnegationoperator, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Survey of Animated Logical Graphs • 7
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/03

    This is a Survey of blog and wiki posts on Logical Graphs, encompassing several families of graph‑theoretic structures originally developed by Charles S. Peirce as graphical formal languages or visual styles of syntax amenable to interpretation for logical applications.

    Please follow the above link for the full set of resources.
    Articles and blog series on the core ideas are linked below.

    Beginnings —

    Logical Graphs • First Impressions
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/08

    Logical Graphs • Formal Development
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/09

    Elements —

    Logic Syllabus
    oeis.org/wiki/Logic_Syllabus

    Logical Graphs
    oeis.org/wiki/Logical_Graphs

    Minimal Negation Operators
    oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation

    Propositional Equation Reasoning Systems
    oeis.org/wiki/Propositional_Eq

    Examples —

    Peirce's Law
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/10
    oeis.org/wiki/Peirce%27s_law

    Praeclarum Theorema
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/10
    oeis.org/wiki/Logical_Graphs#P

    Proof Animations
    oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey/

    Excursions —

    Cactus Language
    oeis.org/wiki/Cactus_Language_

    Futures Of Logical Graphs
    oeis.org/wiki/Futures_Of_Logic

    Applications —

    Applications of a Propositional Calculator • Constraint Satisfaction Problems
    academia.edu/4727842/Applicati

    Exploratory Qualitative Analysis of Sequential Observation Data
    oeis.org/wiki/User:Jon_Awbrey/

    Differential Analytic Turing Automata
    oeis.org/wiki/Differential_Ana

    Survey of Theme One Program
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/02

    #Peirce #Logic #LogicalGraphs #EntitativeGraphs #ExistentialGraphs
    #SpencerBrown #LawsOfForm #BooleanFunctions #PropositionalCalculus
    #CactusSyntax #MinimalNegationOperator #PeircesLaw #TuringAutomata

  2. Functional Logic • Inquiry and Analogy • Preliminaries
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/06

    Functional Logic • Inquiry and Analogy
    oeis.org/wiki/Functional_Logic

    This report discusses C.S. Peirce's treatment of analogy, placing it in relation to his overall theory of inquiry. We begin by introducing three basic types of reasoning Peirce adopted from classical logic. In Peirce's analysis both inquiry and analogy are complex programs of logical inference which develop through stages of these three types, though normally in different orders.

    Note on notation. The discussion to follow uses logical conjunctions, expressed in the form of concatenated tuples \(e_1 \ldots e_k,\) and minimal negation operations, expressed in the form of bracketed tuples \(\texttt{(} e_1 \texttt{,} \ldots \texttt{,} e_k \texttt{)},\) as the principal expression-forming operations of a calculus for boolean-valued functions, that is, for propositions. The expressions of this calculus parse into data structures whose underlying graphs are called “cacti” by graph theorists. Hence the name “cactus language” for this dialect of propositional calculus.

    Resources —

    Logic Syllabus
    oeis.org/wiki/Logic_Syllabus

    Boolean Function
    oeis.org/wiki/Boolean_function

    Boolean-Valued Function
    oeis.org/wiki/Boolean-valued_f

    Logical Conjunction
    oeis.org/wiki/Logical_conjunct

    Minimal Negation Operator
    oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation

    #Peirce #Logic #Abduction #Deduction #Induction #Analogy #Inquiry
    #BooleanFunction #LogicalConjunction #MinimalNegationOperator
    #LogicalGraph #CactusLanguage #PropositionalCalculus

  3. Logic Syllabus • Discussion 1
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/06

    Re: Logic Syllabus ( inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-s )
    Re: Laws of Form ( groups.io/g/lawsofform/topic/l )
    Re: John Mingers ( groups.io/g/lawsofform/message )

    JM: ❝In a previous post you mentioned the minimal negation operator. Is there also the converse of this, i.e. an operator which is true when exactly one of its arguments is true? Or is this just XOR?❞

    Yes, the “just one true” operator is a very handy tool. We discussed it earlier under the headings of “genus and species relations” or “radio button logic”. Viewed in the form of a venn diagram it describes a partition of the universe of discourse into mutually exclusive and exhaustive regions.

    Reading \(\texttt{(} x_1 \texttt{,} \ldots \texttt{,} x_m \texttt{)}\) to mean just one of \(x_1, \ldots, x_m\) is false, the form \(\texttt{((} x_1 \texttt{),} \ldots \texttt{,(} x_m \texttt{))}\) means just one of \(x_1, \ldots, x_m\) is true.

    For two logical variables, though, the cases “condense” or “degenerate” and saying “just one true” is the same thing as saying “just one false”.

    \[\texttt{((} x_1 \texttt{),(} x_2 \texttt{))} = \texttt{(} x_1 \texttt{,} x_2 \texttt{)} = x_1 + x_2 = \mathrm{xor} (x_1, x_2).\]

    There's more information on the following pages.

    Minimal Negation Operators
    oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation

    Related Truth Tables
    oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation

    Genus, Species, Pie Charts, Radio Buttons
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/11

    Related Discussions
    inquiryintoinquiry.com/?s=Radi

    #Logic #LogicSyllabus #BooleanDomain #BooleanFunction #BooleanValuedFunction
    #Peirce #LogicalGraph #MinimalNegationOperator #ExclusiveDisjunction #XOR
    #CactusLanguage #PropositionalCalculus #RadioButtonLogic #TruthTable