#xor — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #xor, aggregated by home.social.
-
TIL: xoshiro256, a PRNG with party tricks =)
https://www.pcg-random.org/posts/a-quick-look-at-xoshiro256.html
-
TIL: xoshiro256, a PRNG with party tricks =)
https://www.pcg-random.org/posts/a-quick-look-at-xoshiro256.html
-
TIL: xoshiro256, a PRNG with party tricks =)
https://www.pcg-random.org/posts/a-quick-look-at-xoshiro256.html
-
TIL: xoshiro256, a PRNG with party tricks =)
https://www.pcg-random.org/posts/a-quick-look-at-xoshiro256.html
-
TIL: xoshiro256, a PRNG with party tricks =)
https://www.pcg-random.org/posts/a-quick-look-at-xoshiro256.html
-
Архитектура «Обратного Хэша»: Нейросети без умножения
Современный Deep Learning уперся в производительность вычислений с плавающей точкой (float) и пропускную способность памяти. Мы предлагаем архитектуру «Обратного Хэша» , где нейрон — это не сумма произведений, а битовая функция. Ноль умножений. Ноль сложений. Только логика (XOR), статистика и скорость света. Let the bitwise revolution begin.
https://habr.com/ru/articles/996268/
#нейросети #deep_learning #оптимизация #алгоритмы #xor #битовые_операции #machine_learning #искусственный_интеллект #FPGA #BNN
-
CyberChef from GCHQ: Cyber Swiss Army Knife
https://gchq.github.io/CyberChef/
#ycombinator #base64 #hex #decode #encode #encrypt #decrypt #compress #decompress #regex #regular_expressions #hash #crypt #hexadecimal #user_agent #url #certificate #x_509 #parser #JSON #gzip #md5 #sha1 #aes #des #blowfish #xor -
CyberChef from GCHQ: Cyber Swiss Army Knife
https://gchq.github.io/CyberChef/
#ycombinator #base64 #hex #decode #encode #encrypt #decrypt #compress #decompress #regex #regular_expressions #hash #crypt #hexadecimal #user_agent #url #certificate #x_509 #parser #JSON #gzip #md5 #sha1 #aes #des #blowfish #xor -
CyberChef from GCHQ: The Cyber Swiss Army Knife
https://gchq.github.io/CyberChef/
#ycombinator #base64 #hex #decode #encode #encrypt #decrypt #compress #decompress #regex #regular_expressions #hash #crypt #hexadecimal #user_agent #url #certificate #x_509 #parser #JSON #gzip #md5 #sha1 #aes #des #blowfish #xor -
CyberChef from GCHQ: The Cyber Swiss Army Knife
https://gchq.github.io/CyberChef/
#ycombinator #base64 #hex #decode #encode #encrypt #decrypt #compress #decompress #regex #regular_expressions #hash #crypt #hexadecimal #user_agent #url #certificate #x_509 #parser #JSON #gzip #md5 #sha1 #aes #des #blowfish #xor -
Logic Syllabus • Discussion 1
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/06/02/logic-syllabus-discussion-1/Re: Logic Syllabus ( https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-syllabus/ )
Re: Laws of Form ( https://groups.io/g/lawsofform/topic/logic_syllabus/99218507 )
Re: John Mingers ( https://groups.io/g/lawsofform/message/2326 )JM: ❝In a previous post you mentioned the minimal negation operator. Is there also the converse of this, i.e. an operator which is true when exactly one of its arguments is true? Or is this just XOR?❞
Yes, the “just one true” operator is a very handy tool. We discussed it earlier under the headings of “genus and species relations” or “radio button logic”. Viewed in the form of a venn diagram it describes a partition of the universe of discourse into mutually exclusive and exhaustive regions.
Reading \(\texttt{(} x_1 \texttt{,} \ldots \texttt{,} x_m \texttt{)}\) to mean just one of \(x_1, \ldots, x_m\) is false, the form \(\texttt{((} x_1 \texttt{),} \ldots \texttt{,(} x_m \texttt{))}\) means just one of \(x_1, \ldots, x_m\) is true.
For two logical variables, though, the cases “condense” or “degenerate” and saying “just one true” is the same thing as saying “just one false”.
\[\texttt{((} x_1 \texttt{),(} x_2 \texttt{))} = \texttt{(} x_1 \texttt{,} x_2 \texttt{)} = x_1 + x_2 = \mathrm{xor} (x_1, x_2).\]
There's more information on the following pages.
Minimal Negation Operators
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation_operatorRelated Truth Tables
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation_operator#Truth_tablesGenus, Species, Pie Charts, Radio Buttons
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/11/10/genus-species-pie-charts-radio-buttons-1/Related Discussions
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/?s=Radio+Buttons#Logic #LogicSyllabus #BooleanDomain #BooleanFunction #BooleanValuedFunction
#Peirce #LogicalGraph #MinimalNegationOperator #ExclusiveDisjunction #XOR
#CactusLanguage #PropositionalCalculus #RadioButtonLogic #TruthTable -
Logic Syllabus • Discussion 1
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/06/02/logic-syllabus-discussion-1/Re: Logic Syllabus ( https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-syllabus/ )
Re: Laws of Form ( https://groups.io/g/lawsofform/topic/logic_syllabus/99218507 )
Re: John Mingers ( https://groups.io/g/lawsofform/message/2326 )JM: ❝In a previous post you mentioned the minimal negation operator. Is there also the converse of this, i.e. an operator which is true when exactly one of its arguments is true? Or is this just XOR?❞
Yes, the “just one true” operator is a very handy tool. We discussed it earlier under the headings of “genus and species relations” or “radio button logic”. Viewed in the form of a venn diagram it describes a partition of the universe of discourse into mutually exclusive and exhaustive regions.
Reading \(\texttt{(} x_1 \texttt{,} \ldots \texttt{,} x_m \texttt{)}\) to mean just one of \(x_1, \ldots, x_m\) is false, the form \(\texttt{((} x_1 \texttt{),} \ldots \texttt{,(} x_m \texttt{))}\) means just one of \(x_1, \ldots, x_m\) is true.
For two logical variables, though, the cases “condense” or “degenerate” and saying “just one true” is the same thing as saying “just one false”.
\[\texttt{((} x_1 \texttt{),(} x_2 \texttt{))} = \texttt{(} x_1 \texttt{,} x_2 \texttt{)} = x_1 + x_2 = \mathrm{xor} (x_1, x_2).\]
There's more information on the following pages.
Minimal Negation Operators
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation_operatorRelated Truth Tables
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Minimal_negation_operator#Truth_tablesGenus, Species, Pie Charts, Radio Buttons
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2021/11/10/genus-species-pie-charts-radio-buttons-1/Related Discussions
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/?s=Radio+Buttons#Logic #LogicSyllabus #BooleanDomain #BooleanFunction #BooleanValuedFunction
#Peirce #LogicalGraph #MinimalNegationOperator #ExclusiveDisjunction #XOR
#CactusLanguage #PropositionalCalculus #RadioButtonLogic #TruthTable -
Logic Syllabus • 2
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-syllabus/Logical Operators
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Logic_Syllabus#Logical_operatorsLogical Negation • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_negation
Logical NAND • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_NAND
Logical NNOR • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_NNOR
Logical Conjunction • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_conjunction
Logical Disjunction • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction
Exclusive Disjunction • https://oeis.org/wiki/Exclusive_disjunction
Logical Implication • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_implication
Logical Equality • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_equality#Logic #LogicSyllabus #LogicalOperator #LogicalConnective
#Negation #NAND #NNOR #LogicalConjunction #LogicalDisjunction
#ExclusiveDisjunction #XOR #LogicalImplication #LogicalEquality -
Logic Syllabus • 2
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/logic-syllabus/Logical Operators
• https://oeis.org/wiki/Logic_Syllabus#Logical_operatorsLogical Negation • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_negation
Logical NAND • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_NAND
Logical NNOR • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_NNOR
Logical Conjunction • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_conjunction
Logical Disjunction • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_disjunction
Exclusive Disjunction • https://oeis.org/wiki/Exclusive_disjunction
Logical Implication • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_implication
Logical Equality • https://oeis.org/wiki/Logical_equality#Logic #LogicSyllabus #LogicalOperator #LogicalConnective
#Negation #NAND #NNOR #LogicalConjunction #LogicalDisjunction
#ExclusiveDisjunction #XOR #LogicalImplication #LogicalEquality