#jiangsuversusjoes — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #jiangsuversusjoes, aggregated by home.social.
-
Remember that #ScheduleA case where the plaintiff submitted a bunch of grainy photos as "evidence" of utility patent infringement?
https://mastodon.social/@design_law/110225260838246143
Well, yesterday the judge granted two defendants' motions for bond damages but denied their motions for fees and sanctions:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309.76.0.pdf
-
Okay, so now NinjaSafe's motion for fees is also fully briefed: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309.69.0.pdf
At first glance, it looks (not surprisingly) pretty similar to Hyponix's reply: https://mastodon.social/@design_law/110417662584156530
#JiangsuVersusJoes #Utility Patents #ScheduleA #ScheduleAFightsBack
-
Hyponix has filed its reply in support of its motion for fees in #JiangsuVersusJoes: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309.67.0.pdf
-
Oh, one more note on the plaintiff's oppositions to the pending motion for fees in #JiangsuVersusJoes
As far as I can tell, the plaintiff did NOT attempt to justify its #ImproperDisgorgementDemands.
-
More from #JiangsuVersusJoes: Here's a declaration filed by plaintiff's counsel, Steven R. Fairchild, in opposition to the motions for fees:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309.64.0.pdf
He states that he "personally reviewed the product listings for all named defendants with an eye towards the patent claims."
-
And here is the opposition to the second motion for fees in #JiangsuVersusJoes
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309.65.0.pdf
My guess is that this will be substantially identical to the other response: https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309.62.0.pdf
-
The plaintiff has filed its opposition to the first motion for fees in #JiangsuVersusJoes:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309.62.0.pdf
-
Yesterday, a second defendant filed a motion for fees in the #ScheduleA case of #JiangsuVersusJoes:
https://storage.courtlistener.com/recap/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309/gov.uscourts.nysd.596309.55.0.pdf
Note: NinjaSafe is represented by the same counsel as Hyponix, who filed the first motion for fees in this case.
This is the case where the plaintiff submitted a bunch of website photos as "evidence" of utility patent infringement: https://mastodon.social/@design_law/110225260838246143