#improperdisgorgementdemands — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #improperdisgorgementdemands, aggregated by home.social.
-
In this #ScheduleA case, Floatup (represented by Doniger / Burroughs) asserts a utility patent, but calls--and treats it like--a design patent:
https://www.scribd.com/document/699275045/Floatup-v-Schedule-A-Motion-for-TRO-sans-exhibits
It is not. https://patents.google.com/patent/US11794860B1/en?oq=11%2c794%2c860
-
Boies Schiller files a #ScheduleA complaint, tells the judge the plaintiffs are entitled to disgorgement of profits (they are not):
-
Entropic v. Cox - Plaintiff states, in a joint FRCP 26(f) statement, that it is "eligible to recover" design patent damages for utility patent infringement: https://www.scribd.com/document/663718240/Entropic-v-Cox-26-f-Report
No, it is not. That's not a thing.
#ImproperDisgorgementDemands #UtilityPatents #Remedies #PatentFedi
-
Oh, one more note on the plaintiff's oppositions to the pending motion for fees in #JiangsuVersusJoes
As far as I can tell, the plaintiff did NOT attempt to justify its #ImproperDisgorgementDemands.