home.social

#hardware-level — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #hardware-level, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. 🤔 Oh, because obviously, if your toaster had feelings, it would be at the hardware level, right? 🙄 This article boldly goes where no philosopher has gone before: straight into the #motherboard of existential dread. 🤖🌳
    smoothbrains.net/posts/2026-05 #toasterphilosophy #existentialdread #hardwarelevel #techhumor #HackerNews #ngated

  2. 🤔 Oh, because obviously, if your toaster had feelings, it would be at the hardware level, right? 🙄 This article boldly goes where no philosopher has gone before: straight into the #motherboard of existential dread. 🤖🌳
    smoothbrains.net/posts/2026-05 #toasterphilosophy #existentialdread #hardwarelevel #techhumor #HackerNews #ngated

  3. @[email protected] @[email protected]
    The
    #FreeSoftwareFoundation/ #FSF is full of shit.

    Full stop.

    Their characterization is exaggerated and misleading.

    #Widevine is not a "#hardware-level #backdoor" that gives #StreamingServices "permanent access" to "deep components" of your device.

    Widevine is a
    #content #protection technology developed by Google and used by many streaming services to prevent unauthorized access and piracy of digital content.

    It operates at different security levels, with varying degrees of hardware integration, but none of these constitute a "backdoor".

    Widevine offers three security levels:

    1.
    Level 1 (L1): The highest security level, where content processing and cryptography operations are handled inside a Trusted Execution Environment (TEE) on the device's hardware.

    2.
    Level 2 (L2): Only cryptography operations are handled inside a TEE.

    3.
    Level 3 (L3): Content processing and cryptography operations are handled in software, without a TEE.

    Widevine's primary functions are:

    1. Content
    #encryption to prevent unauthorized access
    2. Secure
    #key #management
    3. Adaptive security based on device capabilities and content quality

    FSF's claims about a
    "hardware-level backdoor" is false. Widevine uses hardware security features when available (L1 and L2), but it's not a backdoor.

    FSF's claims about
    "permanent access" is false! Widevine does not provide permanent access to your device. It operates only when you're using a service that implements it.

    FSF's claims about granting services access to
    "deep components of your machine" is false! While Widevine does interact with hardware in L1 and L2 implementations, it's limited to specific, isolated areas designed for secure processing. It doesn't have unrestricted access to your entire device.

    FSF significantly exaggerates the nature and impact of Widevine
    #DRM. Widevine is a content protection technology, not a "backdoor" or unrestricted access mechanism for streaming services.

    It's almost like the FSF has an agenda here they're pushing, and to help push their agenda they're literally making shit up in the process.

    https://social.cyware.com/news/googles-widevine-l3-drm-cracked-by-a-security-researcher-eaed58ca

    https://github.com/seanpm2001/Its-time-to-cut-WideVine-DRM

    https://www.irisa.fr/en/node/1234

    https://krebsonsecurity.com/2020/10/google-mending-another-crack-in-widevine/

    https://www.fsf.org/givingguide/v12/