home.social

#defining — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #defining, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. Airbus Stock Braces for a Defining Week Amid Production Paralysis

    Airbus confronts a pivotal week with a lawsuit over engine delays, weak Q1 results, and a dividend payout…
    #Netherlands #Nederland #NL #Europe #Europa #EU #Airbus #Amid #Braces #Defining #Paralysis #Production #stock #Week
    europesays.com/netherlands/397

  2. CLAUDE’S NEW AI CONSTITUTION: HOW ANTHROPIC IS DEFINING AI VALUES AND BEHAVIOR

    Anthropic just published Claude’s full AI constitution. Why would an AI need one, and how does it shape Claude’s ethics, safety, and decisions?

    Read More: blog.harislab.tech/articles/cl

    #articles #Claudes #Constitution #Anthropic #Defining #Values #Behavior

  3. Baltimore Ravens’ Derrick Henry Shares Career Defining Goal

    Baltimore Ravens’ running back Derrick Henry is focused on a defining goal: winning a Super Bowl. At 32…
    #NFL #BaltimoreRavens #Baltimore #Ravens #baltimore #career #Defining #Derrick #Football #goal #henry #shares
    rawchili.com/nfl/690297/

  4. Baltimore Ravens’ Derrick Henry Shares Career Defining Goal

    Baltimore Ravens’ running back Derrick Henry is focused on a defining goal: winning a Super Bowl. At 32…
    #NFL #BaltimoreRavens #Baltimore #Ravens #baltimore #career #Defining #Derrick #Football #goal #henry #shares
    rawchili.com/nfl/690297/

  5. The #DH 2011 (big tent digital humanities) website is currently no longer working. I was still able to access it last autumn. Does anyone know whether this is just a temporary problem or has the site actually been taken offline? dh2011.stanford.edu #defining-notdefiningDH

  6. The #DH 2011 (big tent digital humanities) website is currently no longer working. I was still able to access it last autumn. Does anyone know whether this is just a temporary problem or has the site actually been taken offline? dh2011.stanford.edu #defining-notdefiningDH

  7. The #DH 2011 (big tent digital humanities) website is currently no longer working. I was still able to access it last autumn. Does anyone know whether this is just a temporary problem or has the site actually been taken offline? dh2011.stanford.edu #defining-notdefiningDH

  8. The #DH 2011 (big tent digital humanities) website is currently no longer working. I was still able to access it last autumn. Does anyone know whether this is just a temporary problem or has the site actually been taken offline? dh2011.stanford.edu #defining-notdefiningDH

  9. The #DH 2011 (big tent digital humanities) website is currently no longer working. I was still able to access it last autumn. Does anyone know whether this is just a temporary problem or has the site actually been taken offline? dh2011.stanford.edu #defining-notdefiningDH

  10. 20 defining moments from his career so far

    At just 17 years, three months, and 22 days old, Lionel Messi makes his official league debut for Barcelona, coming on as a substitute late in the game. against Espanyol. At the time, he becomes the youngest player to represent the club in an official game after joining the club’s famed La Masia academy in 2000, moving from Argentine club Newell’s Old Boys as a 13-year-old. #defining #moments #career

    10bmnews.com/2025/03/20-defini

  11. I am trying to take a program that works on Win32 and build it on Linux. An enum with a field named "Always" is failing to compile with a strange error. With a sinking suspicion, I look in the system headers and discover that /usr/include/X11/X.h is #defining "Always" to 2.

    The Open Group, what the hell??? I don't suppose X11 has an equivalent of #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN #define NOMINMAX does it … :(

  12. I am trying to take a program that works on Win32 and build it on Linux. An enum with a field named "Always" is failing to compile with a strange error. With a sinking suspicion, I look in the system headers and discover that /usr/include/X11/X.h is #defining "Always" to 2.

    The Open Group, what the hell??? I don't suppose X11 has an equivalent of #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN #define NOMINMAX does it … :(

  13. I am trying to take a program that works on Win32 and build it on Linux. An enum with a field named "Always" is failing to compile with a strange error. With a sinking suspicion, I look in the system headers and discover that /usr/include/X11/X.h is #defining "Always" to 2.

    The Open Group, what the hell??? I don't suppose X11 has an equivalent of #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN #define NOMINMAX does it … :(

  14. I am trying to take a program that works on Win32 and build it on Linux. An enum with a field named "Always" is failing to compile with a strange error. With a sinking suspicion, I look in the system headers and discover that /usr/include/X11/X.h is #defining "Always" to 2.

    The Open Group, what the hell??? I don't suppose X11 has an equivalent of #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN #define NOMINMAX does it … :(

  15. I am trying to take a program that works on Win32 and build it on Linux. An enum with a field named "Always" is failing to compile with a strange error. With a sinking suspicion, I look in the system headers and discover that /usr/include/X11/X.h is #defining "Always" to 2.

    The Open Group, what the hell??? I don't suppose X11 has an equivalent of #define WIN32_LEAN_AND_MEAN #define NOMINMAX does it … :(

  16. So I did a thing. I wanted to take out some of the #Sexism in #ODND so went Alignment impacting instead of Gender divisive. Looked at the decision to take this path and tried to make the characters have strong #Alignment impacts from rolling their stats defining the characters choices. Some characters should not have certain stats as part of #Exploring and #defining the characters during random creation, in order to reinforce the universe and campaign tropes for the system. #RPG #RGPDdesign

  17. So I did a thing. I wanted to take out some of the #Sexism in #ODND so went Alignment impacting instead of Gender divisive. Looked at the decision to take this path and tried to make the characters have strong #Alignment impacts from rolling their stats defining the characters choices. Some characters should not have certain stats as part of #Exploring and #defining the characters during random creation, in order to reinforce the universe and campaign tropes for the system. #RPG #RGPDdesign

  18. So I did a thing. I wanted to take out some of the #Sexism in #ODND so went Alignment impacting instead of Gender divisive. Looked at the decision to take this path and tried to make the characters have strong #Alignment impacts from rolling their stats defining the characters choices. Some characters should not have certain stats as part of #Exploring and #defining the characters during random creation, in order to reinforce the universe and campaign tropes for the system. #RPG #RGPDdesign

  19. The Supreme Court agreed to hear a case next term that could #preempt Congress and the Biden administration from instituting a #federal #wealth #tax — another potentially lucrative gift for conservative justices’ billionaire benefactors and the super rich.
    A think tank affiliated with some of those benefactors recently pressed the court to accept the case and outlaw such taxes.
    The new case, #Moore v. United States, is tailored to try to block Democrats’ promised agenda by #defining what can — and cannot — count as #taxable#income” under the Constitution.
    It specifically challenges a one-time levy on some shareholders for their foreign corporate earnings that was included in the 2017 Republican tax law.
    The plaintiffs are a Washington state couple who faced a $15,000 tax bill under that provision for a stake they owned in an Indian company. They argue that their #corporate #earnings should #not count as taxable income under the Constitution because they had not been distributed to shareholders as #dividends.
    The real goal of the case is “to slam shut the door on a #federal #wealth #tax,” as the couple’s lawyers wrote in a 2021 column. The couple’s petition to the Supreme Court expressly decries previous wealth tax proposals from Democrats, including Biden, and urges the justices to “head off a major constitutional clash down the line
    levernews.com/the-supreme-cour

  20. The Supreme Court agreed to hear a case next term that could #preempt Congress and the Biden administration from instituting a #federal #wealth #tax — another potentially lucrative gift for conservative justices’ billionaire benefactors and the super rich.
    A think tank affiliated with some of those benefactors recently pressed the court to accept the case and outlaw such taxes.
    The new case, #Moore v. United States, is tailored to try to block Democrats’ promised agenda by #defining what can — and cannot — count as #taxable#income” under the Constitution.
    It specifically challenges a one-time levy on some shareholders for their foreign corporate earnings that was included in the 2017 Republican tax law.
    The plaintiffs are a Washington state couple who faced a $15,000 tax bill under that provision for a stake they owned in an Indian company. They argue that their #corporate #earnings should #not count as taxable income under the Constitution because they had not been distributed to shareholders as #dividends.
    The real goal of the case is “to slam shut the door on a #federal #wealth #tax,” as the couple’s lawyers wrote in a 2021 column. The couple’s petition to the Supreme Court expressly decries previous wealth tax proposals from Democrats, including Biden, and urges the justices to “head off a major constitutional clash down the line
    levernews.com/the-supreme-cour

  21. The Supreme Court agreed to hear a case next term that could #preempt Congress and the Biden administration from instituting a #federal #wealth #tax — another potentially lucrative gift for conservative justices’ billionaire benefactors and the super rich.
    A think tank affiliated with some of those benefactors recently pressed the court to accept the case and outlaw such taxes.
    The new case, #Moore v. United States, is tailored to try to block Democrats’ promised agenda by #defining what can — and cannot — count as #taxable#income” under the Constitution.
    It specifically challenges a one-time levy on some shareholders for their foreign corporate earnings that was included in the 2017 Republican tax law.
    The plaintiffs are a Washington state couple who faced a $15,000 tax bill under that provision for a stake they owned in an Indian company. They argue that their #corporate #earnings should #not count as taxable income under the Constitution because they had not been distributed to shareholders as #dividends.
    The real goal of the case is “to slam shut the door on a #federal #wealth #tax,” as the couple’s lawyers wrote in a 2021 column. The couple’s petition to the Supreme Court expressly decries previous wealth tax proposals from Democrats, including Biden, and urges the justices to “head off a major constitutional clash down the line
    levernews.com/the-supreme-cour

  22. The Supreme Court agreed to hear a case next term that could #preempt Congress and the Biden administration from instituting a #federal #wealth #tax — another potentially lucrative gift for conservative justices’ billionaire benefactors and the super rich.
    A think tank affiliated with some of those benefactors recently pressed the court to accept the case and outlaw such taxes.
    The new case, #Moore v. United States, is tailored to try to block Democrats’ promised agenda by #defining what can — and cannot — count as #taxable#income” under the Constitution.
    It specifically challenges a one-time levy on some shareholders for their foreign corporate earnings that was included in the 2017 Republican tax law.
    The plaintiffs are a Washington state couple who faced a $15,000 tax bill under that provision for a stake they owned in an Indian company. They argue that their #corporate #earnings should #not count as taxable income under the Constitution because they had not been distributed to shareholders as #dividends.
    The real goal of the case is “to slam shut the door on a #federal #wealth #tax,” as the couple’s lawyers wrote in a 2021 column. The couple’s petition to the Supreme Court expressly decries previous wealth tax proposals from Democrats, including Biden, and urges the justices to “head off a major constitutional clash down the line
    levernews.com/the-supreme-cour

  23. The Supreme Court agreed to hear a case next term that could #preempt Congress and the Biden administration from instituting a #federal #wealth #tax — another potentially lucrative gift for conservative justices’ billionaire benefactors and the super rich.
    A think tank affiliated with some of those benefactors recently pressed the court to accept the case and outlaw such taxes.
    The new case, #Moore v. United States, is tailored to try to block Democrats’ promised agenda by #defining what can — and cannot — count as #taxable#income” under the Constitution.
    It specifically challenges a one-time levy on some shareholders for their foreign corporate earnings that was included in the 2017 Republican tax law.
    The plaintiffs are a Washington state couple who faced a $15,000 tax bill under that provision for a stake they owned in an Indian company. They argue that their #corporate #earnings should #not count as taxable income under the Constitution because they had not been distributed to shareholders as #dividends.
    The real goal of the case is “to slam shut the door on a #federal #wealth #tax,” as the couple’s lawyers wrote in a 2021 column. The couple’s petition to the Supreme Court expressly decries previous wealth tax proposals from Democrats, including Biden, and urges the justices to “head off a major constitutional clash down the line
    levernews.com/the-supreme-cour

  24. #Police would find their own #actions #appalling. Their use of #violence and #disregard of #training are their #defining #policies.
    Sadly, if you showed police how they #abuse the #community, they would just #react like #abusers and #say the community #deserves the abuse and 'made them' use violence.
    You can't #reform this #broken #construct.

  25. #Police would find their own #actions #appalling. Their use of #violence and #disregard of #training are their #defining #policies.
    Sadly, if you showed police how they #abuse the #community, they would just #react like #abusers and #say the community #deserves the abuse and 'made them' use violence.
    You can't #reform this #broken #construct.

  26. #Police would find their own #actions #appalling. Their use of #violence and #disregard of #training are their #defining #policies.
    Sadly, if you showed police how they #abuse the #community, they would just #react like #abusers and #say the community #deserves the abuse and 'made them' use violence.
    You can't #reform this #broken #construct.

  27. #Police would find their own #actions #appalling. Their use of #violence and #disregard of #training are their #defining #policies.
    Sadly, if you showed police how they #abuse the #community, they would just #react like #abusers and #say the community #deserves the abuse and 'made them' use violence.
    You can't #reform this #broken #construct.