#crossspecies — Public Fediverse posts

@elduvelle_neuro @Andrewpapale
@BrianMSweis

#CrossSpecies #neuroscience

As Andy Papale said, we have a bunch of papers with both rats and mice on the #RestaurantRow task. (The data is all in https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6, and publicly available.) Generally, we talk about similarities, but mice learn slower. Rats show the transition from wait zone to #precommitment in the offer zone in a few days, while mice take a lot longer.

Another space where I think there have been rat and mouse comparisons (although I don't find any explicit comparisons) is in the place field stability literature. My memory is that Cliff Kentros had really cool data on (#PlaceCell) #PlaceField stability as a function of #hippocampus #dopamine levels and task. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6) Rats tended to live on the high-DA (place cells are stable) side while mice tended to live on the low-DA (place cells are unstable) side. But both could be manipulated with tasks and #dopamine (ant)agonists. I don't know if anyone explicitly looked at this.

@elduvelle_neuro @Andrewpapale
@BrianMSweis

#CrossSpecies #neuroscience

As Andy Papale said, we have a bunch of papers with both rats and mice on the #RestaurantRow task. (The data is all in https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6, and publicly available.) Generally, we talk about similarities, but mice learn slower. Rats show the transition from wait zone to #precommitment in the offer zone in a few days, while mice take a lot longer.

Another space where I think there have been rat and mouse comparisons (although I don't find any explicit comparisons) is in the place field stability literature. My memory is that Cliff Kentros had really cool data on (#PlaceCell) #PlaceField stability as a function of #hippocampus #dopamine levels and task. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6) Rats tended to live on the high-DA (place cells are stable) side while mice tended to live on the low-DA (place cells are unstable) side. But both could be manipulated with tasks and #dopamine (ant)agonists. I don't know if anyone explicitly looked at this.

@elduvelle_neuro @Andrewpapale
@BrianMSweis

#CrossSpecies #neuroscience

As Andy Papale said, we have a bunch of papers with both rats and mice on the #RestaurantRow task. (The data is all in https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6, and publicly available.) Generally, we talk about similarities, but mice learn slower. Rats show the transition from wait zone to #precommitment in the offer zone in a few days, while mice take a lot longer.

Another space where I think there have been rat and mouse comparisons (although I don't find any explicit comparisons) is in the place field stability literature. My memory is that Cliff Kentros had really cool data on (#PlaceCell) #PlaceField stability as a function of #hippocampus #dopamine levels and task. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6) Rats tended to live on the high-DA (place cells are stable) side while mice tended to live on the low-DA (place cells are unstable) side. But both could be manipulated with tasks and #dopamine (ant)agonists. I don't know if anyone explicitly looked at this.

@elduvelle_neuro @Andrewpapale
@BrianMSweis

#CrossSpecies #neuroscience

As Andy Papale said, we have a bunch of papers with both rats and mice on the #RestaurantRow task. (The data is all in https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6, and publicly available.) Generally, we talk about similarities, but mice learn slower. Rats show the transition from wait zone to #precommitment in the offer zone in a few days, while mice take a lot longer.

Another space where I think there have been rat and mouse comparisons (although I don't find any explicit comparisons) is in the place field stability literature. My memory is that Cliff Kentros had really cool data on (#PlaceCell) #PlaceField stability as a function of #hippocampus #dopamine levels and task. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6) Rats tended to live on the high-DA (place cells are stable) side while mice tended to live on the low-DA (place cells are unstable) side. But both could be manipulated with tasks and #dopamine (ant)agonists. I don't know if anyone explicitly looked at this.

@elduvelle_neuro @Andrewpapale
@BrianMSweis

#CrossSpecies #neuroscience

As Andy Papale said, we have a bunch of papers with both rats and mice on the #RestaurantRow task. (The data is all in https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6, and publicly available.) Generally, we talk about similarities, but mice learn slower. Rats show the transition from wait zone to #precommitment in the offer zone in a few days, while mice take a lot longer.

Another space where I think there have been rat and mouse comparisons (although I don't find any explicit comparisons) is in the place field stability literature. My memory is that Cliff Kentros had really cool data on (#PlaceCell) #PlaceField stability as a function of #hippocampus #dopamine levels and task. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6) Rats tended to live on the high-DA (place cells are stable) side while mice tended to live on the low-DA (place cells are unstable) side. But both could be manipulated with tasks and #dopamine (ant)agonists. I don't know if anyone explicitly looked at this.

New review on the “spatial cells” across different species! Looks very interesting:
Neural mechanisms for spatial cognition across vertebrates
Vinepinsky & Segev 2023

Small but important comment: it is perfectly normal for place cells to have multiple #PlaceFields ! Only in very small environments (<80cm diameter) will you mostly see single-field place cells. The single field is probably more the exception than the rule in the natural world.

#NeuroPaper #Review #Neuroscience #PlaceCells #HeadDirectionCells #GridCells #BVCs #CrossSpecies

New review on the “spatial cells” across different species! Looks very interesting:
Neural mechanisms for spatial cognition across vertebrates
Vinepinsky & Segev 2023

Small but important comment: it is perfectly normal for place cells to have multiple #PlaceFields ! Only in very small environments (<80cm diameter) will you mostly see single-field place cells. The single field is probably more the exception than the rule in the natural world.

#NeuroPaper #Review #Neuroscience #PlaceCells #HeadDirectionCells #GridCells #BVCs #CrossSpecies

New review on the “spatial cells” across different species! Looks very interesting:
Neural mechanisms for spatial cognition across vertebrates
Vinepinsky & Segev 2023

Small but important comment: it is perfectly normal for place cells to have multiple #PlaceFields ! Only in very small environments (<80cm diameter) will you mostly see single-field place cells. The single field is probably more the exception than the rule in the natural world.

#NeuroPaper #Review #Neuroscience #PlaceCells #HeadDirectionCells #GridCells #BVCs #CrossSpecies

New review on the “spatial cells” across different species! Looks very interesting:
Neural mechanisms for spatial cognition across vertebrates
Vinepinsky & Segev 2023

Small but important comment: it is perfectly normal for place cells to have multiple #PlaceFields ! Only in very small environments (<80cm diameter) will you mostly see single-field place cells. The single field is probably more the exception than the rule in the natural world.

#NeuroPaper #Review #Neuroscience #PlaceCells #HeadDirectionCells #GridCells #BVCs #CrossSpecies

New review on the “spatial cells” across different species! Looks very interesting:
Neural mechanisms for spatial cognition across vertebrates
Vinepinsky & Segev 2023

Small but important comment: it is perfectly normal for place cells to have multiple #PlaceFields ! Only in very small environments (<80cm diameter) will you mostly see single-field place cells. The single field is probably more the exception than the rule in the natural world.

#NeuroPaper #Review #Neuroscience #PlaceCells #HeadDirectionCells #GridCells #BVCs #CrossSpecies