#placefield — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #placefield, aggregated by home.social.
-
@elduvelle_neuro @Andrewpapale
@BrianMSweisAs Andy Papale said, we have a bunch of papers with both rats and mice on the #RestaurantRow task. (The data is all in https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6, and publicly available.) Generally, we talk about similarities, but mice learn slower. Rats show the transition from wait zone to #precommitment in the offer zone in a few days, while mice take a lot longer.
Another space where I think there have been rat and mouse comparisons (although I don't find any explicit comparisons) is in the place field stability literature. My memory is that Cliff Kentros had really cool data on (#PlaceCell) #PlaceField stability as a function of #hippocampus #dopamine levels and task. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6) Rats tended to live on the high-DA (place cells are stable) side while mice tended to live on the low-DA (place cells are unstable) side. But both could be manipulated with tasks and #dopamine (ant)agonists. I don't know if anyone explicitly looked at this.
-
@elduvelle_neuro @Andrewpapale
@BrianMSweisAs Andy Papale said, we have a bunch of papers with both rats and mice on the #RestaurantRow task. (The data is all in https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6, and publicly available.) Generally, we talk about similarities, but mice learn slower. Rats show the transition from wait zone to #precommitment in the offer zone in a few days, while mice take a lot longer.
Another space where I think there have been rat and mouse comparisons (although I don't find any explicit comparisons) is in the place field stability literature. My memory is that Cliff Kentros had really cool data on (#PlaceCell) #PlaceField stability as a function of #hippocampus #dopamine levels and task. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6) Rats tended to live on the high-DA (place cells are stable) side while mice tended to live on the low-DA (place cells are unstable) side. But both could be manipulated with tasks and #dopamine (ant)agonists. I don't know if anyone explicitly looked at this.
-
@elduvelle_neuro @Andrewpapale
@BrianMSweisAs Andy Papale said, we have a bunch of papers with both rats and mice on the #RestaurantRow task. (The data is all in https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6, and publicly available.) Generally, we talk about similarities, but mice learn slower. Rats show the transition from wait zone to #precommitment in the offer zone in a few days, while mice take a lot longer.
Another space where I think there have been rat and mouse comparisons (although I don't find any explicit comparisons) is in the place field stability literature. My memory is that Cliff Kentros had really cool data on (#PlaceCell) #PlaceField stability as a function of #hippocampus #dopamine levels and task. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6) Rats tended to live on the high-DA (place cells are stable) side while mice tended to live on the low-DA (place cells are unstable) side. But both could be manipulated with tasks and #dopamine (ant)agonists. I don't know if anyone explicitly looked at this.
-
@elduvelle_neuro @Andrewpapale
@BrianMSweisAs Andy Papale said, we have a bunch of papers with both rats and mice on the #RestaurantRow task. (The data is all in https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6, and publicly available.) Generally, we talk about similarities, but mice learn slower. Rats show the transition from wait zone to #precommitment in the offer zone in a few days, while mice take a lot longer.
Another space where I think there have been rat and mouse comparisons (although I don't find any explicit comparisons) is in the place field stability literature. My memory is that Cliff Kentros had really cool data on (#PlaceCell) #PlaceField stability as a function of #hippocampus #dopamine levels and task. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6) Rats tended to live on the high-DA (place cells are stable) side while mice tended to live on the low-DA (place cells are unstable) side. But both could be manipulated with tasks and #dopamine (ant)agonists. I don't know if anyone explicitly looked at this.
-
@elduvelle_neuro @Andrewpapale
@BrianMSweisAs Andy Papale said, we have a bunch of papers with both rats and mice on the #RestaurantRow task. (The data is all in https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6, and publicly available.) Generally, we talk about similarities, but mice learn slower. Rats show the transition from wait zone to #precommitment in the offer zone in a few days, while mice take a lot longer.
Another space where I think there have been rat and mouse comparisons (although I don't find any explicit comparisons) is in the place field stability literature. My memory is that Cliff Kentros had really cool data on (#PlaceCell) #PlaceField stability as a function of #hippocampus #dopamine levels and task. (https://www.nature.com/articles/s42003-022-04235-6) Rats tended to live on the high-DA (place cells are stable) side while mice tended to live on the low-DA (place cells are unstable) side. But both could be manipulated with tasks and #dopamine (ant)agonists. I don't know if anyone explicitly looked at this.