home.social

#aimarketing — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #aimarketing, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. FYI: DeepIntent says Cora AI cuts pharma campaign planning time 50%: Speed claim rests on a survey of 275 closed-beta customers; drug brands and agencies also get VideoAmp linear TV forecasts. What changed since June's Helix AI? ppc.land/deepintent-says-cora- #PharmaMarketing #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #CampaignPlanning #MarketingTechnology

  2. FYI: DeepIntent says Cora AI cuts pharma campaign planning time 50%: Speed claim rests on a survey of 275 closed-beta customers; drug brands and agencies also get VideoAmp linear TV forecasts. What changed since June's Helix AI? ppc.land/deepintent-says-cora- #PharmaMarketing #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #CampaignPlanning #MarketingTechnology

  3. FYI: DeepIntent says Cora AI cuts pharma campaign planning time 50%: Speed claim rests on a survey of 275 closed-beta customers; drug brands and agencies also get VideoAmp linear TV forecasts. What changed since June's Helix AI? ppc.land/deepintent-says-cora- #PharmaMarketing #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #CampaignPlanning #MarketingTechnology

  4. FYI: DeepIntent says Cora AI cuts pharma campaign planning time 50%: Speed claim rests on a survey of 275 closed-beta customers; drug brands and agencies also get VideoAmp linear TV forecasts. What changed since June's Helix AI? ppc.land/deepintent-says-cora- #PharmaMarketing #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #CampaignPlanning #MarketingTechnology

  5. Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, children of all ages, it's all true!

    It's now basically inevitable that we'll have AGI superintelligence by the end of 2024.

    And there's a 10% chance this AGI superintelligence, which will basically be LLM software running on physical hardware that fills a massive data centre with the energy and water use of a small European country, will cause humans to go extinct by 2030.

    And by extinct, I don't mean as a result of climate change from the fossil fuel air pollution we're using to fuel it. Please don't think about that stuff!

    No, I mean by, erm... Things like hacking the power grid and such... Which would also presumably cause it to cease existing... Which wouldn't exactly be superintelligent.

    But... y'know... details!

    How will we ever stop it?!

    I mean, it's not like we live in a world where less intelligent creatures and even inanimate objects kill off more intelligent creatures every day.

    It's not like we live in a world where virii and microbes and bricks can kill off more intelligent creatures.

    Brains beat brawn every time!

    Put a statistician in a fight with an MMA champion and clearly the maths professor is going to win, right?

    And if that doesn't sound true when it's phrased like that, then you need to just shush for a moment and pretend that it does.

    And if one of our LLMs in a massive hyperscale AI data centre somehow magically became sentient, it's not like we could just shut off the water. Or the electricity. Or stop delivering massive quantities of gas and oil to the onsite gas turbines.

    Or just find the nearest Telstra pit and put a bloody shovel through the fibre optic cables that connect it to the outside world.

    So we need to immediately figure out ways to stop this happening!

    What's that?

    You say we could prevent this happening by just not building the massive AI data centres?

    You say we could tax the rich so they don't have the money to build massive AI data centres?

    No! We absolutely must not do that under any circumstances!

    See, our position is really quite straightforward.

    We're claiming our product poses an existential risk to humanity that justifies urgent action to mitigate the risk, but also simultaneously we don't want you to think it /genuinely/ poses an existential risk to humanity that /actually/ justifies urgent action that would be guaranteed mitigate the risk, such as not building massive AI data centres, or by not providing access to the ginormous quantities of water and land and energy and capital that our product which is causing this supposed threat depends on.

    So why say it?

    Mostly, because if we say things like: "We can make a product that could make massive monopolistic short-term profits in a few years, but there's a 10% chance it kills everyone alive, give us money to build it," then the Silicon Valley VCs and Wall Street bankers will throw literal billions our way.

    Whereas if we were to say: "We can make a product that solves a genuine problem and we have a sustainable business model for it that will deliver stable long-term returns," then they won't.

    Because under American capitalism, "a chance it kills every person" is seen to be a worthwhile risk to take in exchange for short-term profits.

    I really hope that clarifies our argument.

    #AI #LLM #DataCenter #DataCentre #GenAI #tech #Anthropic #OpenAI #Google #Microsoft #Gemini #Copilot #Claude #AGI #capitalism #aimarketing #BigTech #tech

  6. Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, children of all ages, it's all true!

    It's now basically inevitable that we'll have AGI superintelligence by the end of 2024.

    And there's a 10% chance this AGI superintelligence, which will basically be LLM software running on physical hardware that fills a massive data centre with the energy and water use of a small European country, will cause humans to go extinct by 2030.

    And by extinct, I don't mean as a result of climate change from the fossil fuel air pollution we're using to fuel it. Please don't think about that stuff!

    No, I mean by, erm... Things like hacking the power grid and such... Which would also presumably cause it to cease existing... Which wouldn't exactly be superintelligent.

    But... y'know... details!

    How will we ever stop it?!

    I mean, it's not like we live in a world where less intelligent creatures and even inanimate objects kill off more intelligent creatures every day.

    It's not like we live in a world where virii and microbes and bricks can kill off more intelligent creatures.

    Brains beat brawn every time!

    Put a statistician in a fight with an MMA champion and clearly the maths professor is going to win, right?

    And if that doesn't sound true when it's phrased like that, then you need to just shush for a moment and pretend that it does.

    And if one of our LLMs in a massive hyperscale AI data centre somehow magically became sentient, it's not like we could just shut off the water. Or the electricity. Or stop delivering massive quantities of gas and oil to the onsite gas turbines.

    Or just find the nearest Telstra pit and put a bloody shovel through the fibre optic cables that connect it to the outside world.

    So we need to immediately figure out ways to stop this happening!

    What's that?

    You say we could prevent this happening by just not building the massive AI data centres?

    You say we could tax the rich so they don't have the money to build massive AI data centres?

    No! We absolutely must not do that under any circumstances!

    See, our position is really quite straightforward.

    We're claiming our product poses an existential risk to humanity that justifies urgent action to mitigate the risk, but also simultaneously we don't want you to think it /genuinely/ poses an existential risk to humanity that /actually/ justifies urgent action that would be guaranteed mitigate the risk, such as not building massive AI data centres, or by not providing access to the ginormous quantities of water and land and energy and capital that our product which is causing this supposed threat depends on.

    So why say it?

    Mostly, because if we say things like: "We can make a product that could make massive monopolistic short-term profits in a few years, but there's a 10% chance it kills everyone alive, give us money to build it," then the Silicon Valley VCs and Wall Street bankers will throw literal billions our way.

    Whereas if we were to say: "We can make a product that solves a genuine problem and we have a sustainable business model for it that will deliver stable long-term returns," then they won't.

    Because under American capitalism, "a chance it kills every person" is seen to be a worthwhile risk to take in exchange for short-term profits.

    I really hope that clarifies our argument.

    #AI #LLM #DataCenter #DataCentre #GenAI #tech #Anthropic #OpenAI #Google #Microsoft #Gemini #Copilot #Claude #AGI #capitalism #aimarketing #BigTech #tech

  7. Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, children of all ages, it's all true!

    It's now basically inevitable that we'll have AGI superintelligence by the end of 2024.

    And there's a 10% chance this AGI superintelligence, which will basically be LLM software running on physical hardware that fills a massive data centre with the energy and water use of a small European country, will cause humans to go extinct by 2030.

    And by extinct, I don't mean as a result of climate change from the fossil fuel air pollution we're using to fuel it. Please don't think about that stuff!

    No, I mean by, erm... Things like hacking the power grid and such... Which would also presumably cause it to cease existing... Which wouldn't exactly be superintelligent.

    But... y'know... details!

    How will we ever stop it?!

    I mean, it's not like we live in a world where less intelligent creatures and even inanimate objects kill off more intelligent creatures every day.

    It's not like we live in a world where virii and microbes and bricks can kill off more intelligent creatures.

    Brains beat brawn every time!

    Put a statistician in a fight with an MMA champion and clearly the maths professor is going to win, right?

    And if that doesn't sound true when it's phrased like that, then you need to just shush for a moment and pretend that it does.

    And if one of our LLMs in a massive hyperscale AI data centre somehow magically became sentient, it's not like we could just shut off the water. Or the electricity. Or stop delivering massive quantities of gas and oil to the onsite gas turbines.

    Or just find the nearest Telstra pit and put a bloody shovel through the fibre optic cables that connect it to the outside world.

    So we need to immediately figure out ways to stop this happening!

    What's that?

    You say we could prevent this happening by just not building the massive AI data centres?

    You say we could tax the rich so they don't have the money to build massive AI data centres?

    No! We absolutely must not do that under any circumstances!

    See, our position is really quite straightforward.

    We're claiming our product poses an existential risk to humanity that justifies urgent action to mitigate the risk, but also simultaneously we don't want you to think it /genuinely/ poses an existential risk to humanity that /actually/ justifies urgent action that would be guaranteed mitigate the risk, such as not building massive AI data centres, or by not providing access to the ginormous quantities of water and land and energy and capital that our product which is causing this supposed threat depends on.

    So why say it?

    Mostly, because if we say things like: "We can make a product that could make massive monopolistic short-term profits in a few years, but there's a 10% chance it kills everyone alive, give us money to build it," then the Silicon Valley VCs and Wall Street bankers will throw literal billions our way.

    Whereas if we were to say: "We can make a product that solves a genuine problem and we have a sustainable business model for it that will deliver stable long-term returns," then they won't.

    Because under American capitalism, "a chance it kills every person" is seen to be a worthwhile risk to take in exchange for short-term profits.

    I really hope that clarifies our argument.

    #AI #LLM #DataCenter #DataCentre #GenAI #tech #Anthropic #OpenAI #Google #Microsoft #Gemini #Copilot #Claude #AGI #capitalism #aimarketing #BigTech #tech

  8. Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, children of all ages, it's all true!

    It's now basically inevitable that we'll have AGI superintelligence by the end of 2024.

    And there's a 10% chance this AGI superintelligence, which will basically be LLM software running on physical hardware that fills a massive data centre with the energy and water use of a small European country, will cause humans to go extinct by 2030.

    And by extinct, I don't mean as a result of climate change from the fossil fuel air pollution we're using to fuel it. Please don't think about that stuff!

    No, I mean by, erm... Things like hacking the power grid and such... Which would also presumably cause it to cease existing... Which wouldn't exactly be superintelligent.

    But... y'know... details!

    How will we ever stop it?!

    I mean, it's not like we live in a world where less intelligent creatures and even inanimate objects kill off more intelligent creatures every day.

    It's not like we live in a world where virii and microbes and bricks can kill off more intelligent creatures.

    Brains beat brawn every time!

    Put a statistician in a fight with an MMA champion and clearly the maths professor is going to win, right?

    And if that doesn't sound true when it's phrased like that, then you need to just shush for a moment and pretend that it does.

    And if one of our LLMs in a massive hyperscale AI data centre somehow magically became sentient, it's not like we could just shut off the water. Or the electricity. Or stop delivering massive quantities of gas and oil to the onsite gas turbines.

    Or just find the nearest Telstra pit and put a bloody shovel through the fibre optic cables that connect it to the outside world.

    So we need to immediately figure out ways to stop this happening!

    What's that?

    You say we could prevent this happening by just not building the massive AI data centres?

    You say we could tax the rich so they don't have the money to build massive AI data centres?

    No! We absolutely must not do that under any circumstances!

    See, our position is really quite straightforward.

    We're claiming our product poses an existential risk to humanity that justifies urgent action to mitigate the risk, but also simultaneously we don't want you to think it /genuinely/ poses an existential risk to humanity that /actually/ justifies urgent action that would be guaranteed mitigate the risk, such as not building massive AI data centres, or by not providing access to the ginormous quantities of water and land and energy and capital that our product which is causing this supposed threat depends on.

    So why say it?

    Mostly, because if we say things like: "We can make a product that could make massive monopolistic short-term profits in a few years, but there's a 10% chance it kills everyone alive, give us money to build it," then the Silicon Valley VCs and Wall Street bankers will throw literal billions our way.

    Whereas if we were to say: "We can make a product that solves a genuine problem and we have a sustainable business model for it that will deliver stable long-term returns," then they won't.

    Because under American capitalism, "a chance it kills every person" is seen to be a worthwhile risk to take in exchange for short-term profits.

    I really hope that clarifies our argument.

    #AI #LLM #DataCenter #DataCentre #GenAI #tech #Anthropic #OpenAI #Google #Microsoft #Gemini #Copilot #Claude #AGI #capitalism #aimarketing #BigTech #tech

  9. Ladies and gentlemen, boys and girls, children of all ages, it's all true!

    It's now basically inevitable that we'll have AGI superintelligence by the end of 2024.

    And there's a 10% chance this AGI superintelligence, which will basically be LLM software running on physical hardware that fills a massive data centre with the energy and water use of a small European country, will cause humans to go extinct by 2030.

    And by extinct, I don't mean as a result of climate change from the fossil fuel air pollution we're using to fuel it. Please don't think about that stuff!

    No, I mean by, erm... Things like hacking the power grid and such... Which would also presumably cause it to cease existing... Which wouldn't exactly be superintelligent.

    But... y'know... details!

    How will we ever stop it?!

    I mean, it's not like we live in a world where less intelligent creatures and even inanimate objects kill off more intelligent creatures every day.

    It's not like we live in a world where virii and microbes and bricks can kill off more intelligent creatures.

    Brains beat brawn every time!

    Put a statistician in a fight with an MMA champion and clearly the maths professor is going to win, right?

    And if that doesn't sound true when it's phrased like that, then you need to just shush for a moment and pretend that it does.

    And if one of our LLMs in a massive hyperscale AI data centre somehow magically became sentient, it's not like we could just shut off the water. Or the electricity. Or stop delivering massive quantities of gas and oil to the onsite gas turbines.

    Or just find the nearest Telstra pit and put a bloody shovel through the fibre optic cables that connect it to the outside world.

    So we need to immediately figure out ways to stop this happening!

    What's that?

    You say we could prevent this happening by just not building the massive AI data centres?

    You say we could tax the rich so they don't have the money to build massive AI data centres?

    No! We absolutely must not do that under any circumstances!

    See, our position is really quite straightforward.

    We're claiming our product poses an existential risk to humanity that justifies urgent action to mitigate the risk, but also simultaneously we don't want you to think it /genuinely/ poses an existential risk to humanity that /actually/ justifies urgent action that would be guaranteed mitigate the risk, such as not building massive AI data centres, or by not providing access to the ginormous quantities of water and land and energy and capital that our product which is causing this supposed threat depends on.

    So why say it?

    Mostly, because if we say things like: "We can make a product that could make massive monopolistic short-term profits in a few years, but there's a 10% chance it kills everyone alive, give us money to build it," then the Silicon Valley VCs and Wall Street bankers will throw literal billions our way.

    Whereas if we were to say: "We can make a product that solves a genuine problem and we have a sustainable business model for it that will deliver stable long-term returns," then they won't.

    Because under American capitalism, "a chance it kills every person" is seen to be a worthwhile risk to take in exchange for short-term profits.

    I really hope that clarifies our argument.

    #AI #LLM #DataCenter #DataCentre #GenAI #tech #Anthropic #OpenAI #Google #Microsoft #Gemini #Copilot #Claude #AGI #capitalism #aimarketing #BigTech #tech

  10. Unlock the potential of AI driven social media strategies to boost brand growth online. Discover how automation can streamline your marketing efforts and deliver better results.
    Explore more here fontis.short.gy/0aSJkCWOMH
    Read the Blog

    #AIMarketing #SocialMedia

  11. Unlock the potential of AI driven social media strategies to boost brand growth online. Discover how automation can streamline your marketing efforts and deliver better results.
    Explore more here fontis.short.gy/0aSJkCWOMH
    Read the Blog

    #AIMarketing #SocialMedia

  12. Unlock the potential of AI driven social media strategies to boost brand growth online. Discover how automation can streamline your marketing efforts and deliver better results.
    Explore more here fontis.short.gy/0aSJkCWOMH
    Read the Blog

    #AIMarketing #SocialMedia

  13. Unlock the potential of AI driven social media strategies to boost brand growth online. Discover how automation can streamline your marketing efforts and deliver better results.
    Explore more here fontis.short.gy/0aSJkCWOMH
    Read the Blog

    #AIMarketing #SocialMedia

  14. Unlock the potential of AI driven social media strategies to boost brand growth online. Discover how automation can streamline your marketing efforts and deliver better results.
    Explore more here fontis.short.gy/0aSJkCWOMH
    Read the Blog

    #AIMarketing #SocialMedia

  15. FYI: Publishers spent $113m in one month buying back their search traffic: Publishers spent $113m buying paid search in July 2026, up 274% in three years, as AI Overviews now answer nearly 100% of Google's People Also Ask results. ppc.land/publishers-spent-113m #DigitalMarketing #PaidSearch #SearchTraffic #AIMarketing #PPC

  16. FYI: Publishers spent $113m in one month buying back their search traffic: Publishers spent $113m buying paid search in July 2026, up 274% in three years, as AI Overviews now answer nearly 100% of Google's People Also Ask results. ppc.land/publishers-spent-113m #DigitalMarketing #PaidSearch #SearchTraffic #AIMarketing #PPC

  17. FYI: Publishers spent $113m in one month buying back their search traffic: Publishers spent $113m buying paid search in July 2026, up 274% in three years, as AI Overviews now answer nearly 100% of Google's People Also Ask results. ppc.land/publishers-spent-113m #DigitalMarketing #PaidSearch #SearchTraffic #AIMarketing #PPC

  18. FYI: Publishers spent $113m in one month buying back their search traffic: Publishers spent $113m buying paid search in July 2026, up 274% in three years, as AI Overviews now answer nearly 100% of Google's People Also Ask results. ppc.land/publishers-spent-113m #DigitalMarketing #PaidSearch #SearchTraffic #AIMarketing #PPC

  19. ICYMI: DeepIntent says Cora AI cuts pharma campaign planning time 50%: Speed claim rests on a survey of 275 closed-beta customers; drug brands and agencies also get VideoAmp linear TV forecasts. What changed since June's Helix AI? ppc.land/deepintent-says-cora- #PharmaMarketing #AIMarketing #MarketingTechnology #CampaignPlanning #AdTech

  20. ICYMI: DeepIntent says Cora AI cuts pharma campaign planning time 50%: Speed claim rests on a survey of 275 closed-beta customers; drug brands and agencies also get VideoAmp linear TV forecasts. What changed since June's Helix AI? ppc.land/deepintent-says-cora- #PharmaMarketing #AIMarketing #MarketingTechnology #CampaignPlanning #AdTech

  21. ICYMI: DeepIntent says Cora AI cuts pharma campaign planning time 50%: Speed claim rests on a survey of 275 closed-beta customers; drug brands and agencies also get VideoAmp linear TV forecasts. What changed since June's Helix AI? ppc.land/deepintent-says-cora- #PharmaMarketing #AIMarketing #MarketingTechnology #CampaignPlanning #AdTech

  22. ICYMI: DeepIntent says Cora AI cuts pharma campaign planning time 50%: Speed claim rests on a survey of 275 closed-beta customers; drug brands and agencies also get VideoAmp linear TV forecasts. What changed since June's Helix AI? ppc.land/deepintent-says-cora- #PharmaMarketing #AIMarketing #MarketingTechnology #CampaignPlanning #AdTech

  23. DeepIntent says Cora AI cuts pharma campaign planning time 50%: Speed claim rests on a survey of 275 closed-beta customers; drug brands and agencies also get VideoAmp linear TV forecasts. What changed since June's Helix AI? ppc.land/deepintent-says-cora- #PharmaMarketing #AIMarketing #CampaignPlanning #DeepIntent #CoraAI

  24. DeepIntent says Cora AI cuts pharma campaign planning time 50%: Speed claim rests on a survey of 275 closed-beta customers; drug brands and agencies also get VideoAmp linear TV forecasts. What changed since June's Helix AI? ppc.land/deepintent-says-cora- #PharmaMarketing #AIMarketing #CampaignPlanning #DeepIntent #CoraAI

  25. DeepIntent says Cora AI cuts pharma campaign planning time 50%: Speed claim rests on a survey of 275 closed-beta customers; drug brands and agencies also get VideoAmp linear TV forecasts. What changed since June's Helix AI? ppc.land/deepintent-says-cora- #PharmaMarketing #AIMarketing #CampaignPlanning #DeepIntent #CoraAI

  26. ICYMI: Microsoft says AI Max testers gained 8% more conversions: Brand lists cap at 20 per campaign with 100 brands each, and API Max CPC survives to January 12, 2027. Which bid ceilings remain for holiday search buyers? ppc.land/microsoft-says-ai-max #Microsoft #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #PPC #AdTech

  27. ICYMI: Microsoft says AI Max testers gained 8% more conversions: Brand lists cap at 20 per campaign with 100 brands each, and API Max CPC survives to January 12, 2027. Which bid ceilings remain for holiday search buyers? ppc.land/microsoft-says-ai-max #Microsoft #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #PPC #AdTech

  28. ICYMI: Microsoft says AI Max testers gained 8% more conversions: Brand lists cap at 20 per campaign with 100 brands each, and API Max CPC survives to January 12, 2027. Which bid ceilings remain for holiday search buyers? ppc.land/microsoft-says-ai-max #Microsoft #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #PPC #AdTech

  29. ICYMI: Microsoft says AI Max testers gained 8% more conversions: Brand lists cap at 20 per campaign with 100 brands each, and API Max CPC survives to January 12, 2027. Which bid ceilings remain for holiday search buyers? ppc.land/microsoft-says-ai-max #Microsoft #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #PPC #AdTech

  30. ICYMI: Microsoft says AI Max testers gained 8% more conversions: Brand lists cap at 20 per campaign with 100 brands each, and API Max CPC survives to January 12, 2027. Which bid ceilings remain for holiday search buyers? ppc.land/microsoft-says-ai-max #Microsoft #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #PPC #AdTech

  31. FYI: Explaining AI marketing: AI marketing is marketing where a model, not a person, makes the decision. How the prediction, generation and agent layers work, and where each one still fails. ppc.land/ai-marketing/ #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #MarketingStrategy #ArtificialIntelligence #MarketingAutomation

  32. FYI: Explaining AI marketing: AI marketing is marketing where a model, not a person, makes the decision. How the prediction, generation and agent layers work, and where each one still fails. ppc.land/ai-marketing/ #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #MarketingStrategy #ArtificialIntelligence #MarketingAutomation

  33. FYI: Explaining AI marketing: AI marketing is marketing where a model, not a person, makes the decision. How the prediction, generation and agent layers work, and where each one still fails. ppc.land/ai-marketing/ #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #MarketingStrategy #ArtificialIntelligence #MarketingAutomation

  34. FYI: Explaining AI marketing: AI marketing is marketing where a model, not a person, makes the decision. How the prediction, generation and agent layers work, and where each one still fails. ppc.land/ai-marketing/ #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #MarketingStrategy #ArtificialIntelligence #MarketingAutomation

  35. FYI: Explaining AI marketing: AI marketing is marketing where a model, not a person, makes the decision. How the prediction, generation and agent layers work, and where each one still fails. ppc.land/ai-marketing/ #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #MarketingStrategy #ArtificialIntelligence #MarketingAutomation

  36. FYI: Exact and phrase match keywords gain AI Mode ads in Google test: Until now, AI Max, Performance Max or broad match with Smart Bidding were the only ways in. Eligibility is capped at explicit user intent. How far does this go? ppc.land/exact-and-phrase-matc #GoogleAds #AIMarketing #PPC #DigitalMarketing #KeywordResearch

  37. FYI: Exact and phrase match keywords gain AI Mode ads in Google test: Until now, AI Max, Performance Max or broad match with Smart Bidding were the only ways in. Eligibility is capped at explicit user intent. How far does this go? ppc.land/exact-and-phrase-matc #GoogleAds #AIMarketing #PPC #DigitalMarketing #KeywordResearch

  38. FYI: Exact and phrase match keywords gain AI Mode ads in Google test: Until now, AI Max, Performance Max or broad match with Smart Bidding were the only ways in. Eligibility is capped at explicit user intent. How far does this go? ppc.land/exact-and-phrase-matc #GoogleAds #AIMarketing #PPC #DigitalMarketing #KeywordResearch

  39. FYI: Exact and phrase match keywords gain AI Mode ads in Google test: Until now, AI Max, Performance Max or broad match with Smart Bidding were the only ways in. Eligibility is capped at explicit user intent. How far does this go? ppc.land/exact-and-phrase-matc #GoogleAds #AIMarketing #PPC #DigitalMarketing #KeywordResearch

  40. ICYMI: Explaining AI marketing: AI marketing is marketing where a model, not a person, makes the decision. How the prediction, generation and agent layers work, and where each one still fails. ppc.land/ai-marketing/ #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #MachineLearning #MarketingStrategy #ArtificialIntelligence

  41. ICYMI: Explaining AI marketing: AI marketing is marketing where a model, not a person, makes the decision. How the prediction, generation and agent layers work, and where each one still fails. ppc.land/ai-marketing/ #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #MachineLearning #MarketingStrategy #ArtificialIntelligence

  42. ICYMI: Explaining AI marketing: AI marketing is marketing where a model, not a person, makes the decision. How the prediction, generation and agent layers work, and where each one still fails. ppc.land/ai-marketing/ #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #MachineLearning #MarketingStrategy #ArtificialIntelligence

  43. ICYMI: Explaining AI marketing: AI marketing is marketing where a model, not a person, makes the decision. How the prediction, generation and agent layers work, and where each one still fails. ppc.land/ai-marketing/ #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #MachineLearning #MarketingStrategy #ArtificialIntelligence

  44. ICYMI: Explaining AI marketing: AI marketing is marketing where a model, not a person, makes the decision. How the prediction, generation and agent layers work, and where each one still fails. ppc.land/ai-marketing/ #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #MachineLearning #MarketingStrategy #ArtificialIntelligence

  45. ICYMI: Explaining data strength: Data strength is Google's term for how complete an advertiser's first-party signals are when they reach its AI. What the framework contains and what it omits. ppc.land/data-strength/ #DataStrength #GoogleAds #DigitalMarketing #AIMarketing #FirstPartyData

  46. ICYMI: Explaining data strength: Data strength is Google's term for how complete an advertiser's first-party signals are when they reach its AI. What the framework contains and what it omits. ppc.land/data-strength/ #DataStrength #GoogleAds #DigitalMarketing #AIMarketing #FirstPartyData

  47. ICYMI: Explaining data strength: Data strength is Google's term for how complete an advertiser's first-party signals are when they reach its AI. What the framework contains and what it omits. ppc.land/data-strength/ #DataStrength #GoogleAds #DigitalMarketing #AIMarketing #FirstPartyData

  48. ICYMI: Explaining data strength: Data strength is Google's term for how complete an advertiser's first-party signals are when they reach its AI. What the framework contains and what it omits. ppc.land/data-strength/ #DataStrength #GoogleAds #DigitalMarketing #AIMarketing #FirstPartyData

  49. Explaining AI marketing: AI marketing is marketing where a model, not a person, makes the decision. How the prediction, generation and agent layers work, and where each one still fails. ppc.land/ai-marketing/ #AIMarketing #DigitalMarketing #MarketingStrategy #ArtificialIntelligence #DataDriven