home.social

Search

280 results for “kjoo”

  1. Maybe the of Computing was just too early or maybe it just the whole tech industry went down this year. But down by 90% is really bad.

  2. It's not about . It's not about . It is about customer advantage! The customer does not care, he cares about the result. And quantum inspired solutions are one way.

    spreaker.com/user/powerfulinsi

  3. @carlo "Quantum error mitigation (QEM) provides us a feasible alternative to mitigate errors of near-term quantum processors, and is also the continuous path that will take us from today’s quantum hard- ware to tomorrow’s fault-tolerant quantum computers." - we should not wait for 100% errorfree qubits or and should work with what we have.👍

    Nice read for sure. Thanks.

  4. For the people in the house and living in 🇦🇹 / 🎡, this could interesting to you.

    Frank Leymann will talk about "Topologische Datenanalyse und deren Quantenaspekte".

    Sorry, I don't have german translation of it, but it is about and more.

    informatics.tuwien.ac.at/news/

  5. Only one related has found its place into the latest technology radar by Thoughtworks? What happened just to ⁉️🤔

    thoughtworks.com/radar

  6. Maybe will change this from "HARD" to "NOT SO HARD" or even "EASY". 🤷‍♂️

    No no, don't worry. Not today, not tomorrow. But like MD5 was "unbreakable" long time ago, technical advances are coming fast.

    Source xkcd.com/936/

  7. I am afraid that if current encryption schemes are broken by it will more like being hit by a deadly meteroit then an earthquake. ☄️ This will not leave any technological component untouched.

    "Quantum computing looms in our future like a technological earthquake, because quantum decryption threatens to compromise a foundational element of data encryption schemes."

    mondaq.com/unitedstates/fin-te

  8. "Even if the Schnorr-based technique won’t break the Internet, quantum computers could eventually do so by running Shor’s algorithm. Security researchers have been busy developing a number of alternative cryptographic systems that are seen as less likely to succumb to a quantum attack, called post-quantum or quantum-safe. "

    Are quantum computers about to break online privacy?
    nature.com/articles/d41586-023

  9. Since it is often believed that replacing crypto is easy, shows here that it isn't. There are from now on 8 years for fixing software and hardware using sha-1. Maybe as a reminder for those who still believe that this is an easy job.

    “Modules that still use SHA-1 after 2030 will not be permitted for purchase by the federal government,” Celi said.

    nist.gov/news-events/news/2022

  10. @[email protected] @tc Hopefully the companies are re-encrypting as well. I guess this is the big issue with companies: this won't happen fast if there is not some kind of -- lets call it -- setup. And the appropriate to support this.

    If not, it can talk years before an alternative storage encryption is setup up. I have seen this where a replacement of a DMS took almost 5 years. 😱

  11. The threat: , the solution: by National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST).

    "In 2019, a team of researchers factored a 795-bit RSA key, making it the biggest key size ever to be solved." and "The researchers estimated that the sum of the computation time for both of the new records was about 4,000 core-years using Intel Xeon Gold 6130 CPUs (running at 2.1 GHz)."

    arstechnica.com/information-te

  12. Still some way to go but it is time to start to experiment with new algorithms and to get the hands dirty with . Expertise in won't come over night. Changing systems will take years.

    "Governments need to invest in cybersecurity that can defend against the future threat of bad actors using quantum computers that are exponentially faster than ordinary machines, a cryptography expert said."

    bworldonline.com/sparkup/2022/

  13. CW: "Quantum Computing Cybersecurity Preparedness Act"

    "a strategy for the migration of information technology systems of the Federal Government to post-quantum cryptography is needed" ==> 👍

  14. “All we need to do is replace those algorithms with newer versions that are quantum-resistant,” said Marc Witteman , CEO of Riscure. “Unfortunately, that is easier said than done.”

    Michael Osborne, CTO of IBM Quantum Safe, said during a recent webinar, “We understand quantum-safe as being safe in the quantum era. Part of that is replacing the cryptography that we use."

    Less talk, more action + 💯

    semiengineering.com/post-quant

  15. @roomey I am neither an expert in this area, but I haven't seen a suggestion to move to one of the possible candidates of the competition.

    Why? Because they are still not the final candidates and as it was demonstrated in August with the SIKE, you can see, how quickly a possible winner can be cracked. I would really defer the move to one of the candidates.

    But yes, is a must nowadays. Not only because of . It is generally needed!

  16. Lightweight Cryptography Standardization Process: NIST Selects Ascon

    Importance of standards for and other small devices is growing and growing. And the need for secure crypto shouldn't be underestimated 🔥

    "The algorithms are designed to protect data created and transmitted by the Internet of Things and other small electronics."

    csrc.nist.gov/News/2023/lightw

  17. @cybersecboardrm "But ABE offers a solution in such scenarios by enabling companies to make data available to employees who need access to it, while protecting such sensitive information." - If this works out as promised, this could be solving some interesting problems. for e.g. is "especially in addressing the challenge of data lakes"

  18. going to be "protected" by . Ok, maybe lets move back a step and do or even finish first. Or invent a new name for your supdupdatmegadecentralizedapp, like which is + . And furthermore in the meantime we get "Twitter 2.0", which does not need someone to post a screenshot in the year 2022.

    twitter.com/TBD54566975/status

  19. I don't have numbers, but I guess the dark number is way higher. Even higher then it was in 2019. And for companies ends by or or by services provided by or . So no real AI magic.

    And why this is done? Easy answer: "Startups labelled as being in AI attract 15% to 50% more funding than other technology firms." 🤷‍♂️

    forbes.com/sites/parmyolson/20

  20. @leyrer ich glaub die arbeiten eh schon daran und der Antrag für einen Server wurde von bearbeitet, aber leider wurde dieser wegen eines Formfehlers (fehlender verpflichtender Adelstitel) abgelehnt. 🇦🇹 Halt 😁

  21. Tomorrow in Vienna we have a great speaker visiting the Technical University of Vienna. Prof Frank Leymann will be talking about algorithm. 🎉🚀

    informatics.tuwien.ac.at/news/