home.social

#zerogpt — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #zerogpt, aggregated by home.social.

  1. The Netskope Threat Labs Report for Financial Services 2026 is out!

    ⛈️ #ChatGPT most used #GenAI app
    ⛈️ #ZeroGPT most blocked GenAI app
    ⛈️ #GitHub top exploited app for #malware download
    ⛈️ Regulated data lead #DLP policy violations

    #cybersecurity

    netskope.com/resources/threat-

  2. I compared the 2025 and 2026 Netskope Threat Labs Reports📢

    🌩️ #ChatGPT is the most popular #GenAI app
    🌩️ In 2026 #ZeroGpt is the top blocked app, in 2025 it was Quillbot

    And much more summarized in this #infographic

    2026: netskope.com/resources/cloud-a
    2025: netskope.com/resources/cloud-a

  3. The #infosec year starts with a💥with our 2026 Netskope Threat Labs Report📢

    🌩️#ChatGPT most popular #GenAI app
    🌩️#ZeroGPT most blocked GenAI app
    🌩️Banks top #phishing targets
    🌩️#Microsoft top spoofed brand
    🌩️#GitHub top #cloud app for #malware download

    netskope.com/resources/cloud-a

  4. Jemensch schreibt bei X einen Text über KI.

    Laut #ZeroGPT ist der Text zu 98,97% "AI/GPT generated". Die 1,03% sind die Überschrift. 🤭

  5. “Fire and Fury”, il libro sugli incendi a Maui che alimenta il complottismo grazie all’AI

    @aitech

    L’autore anonimo ha pubblicato ben 10 libri in appena due mesi, ma sottoponendo il testo su #Zerogpt esso risulta scritto grazie all’Intelligenza Artificiale

    Di @DavidPuente su #Open

    open.online/2023/08/31/fire-an

  6. Please stop trusting #zeroGpt or other #GPT detectors. The thing with #AI generated text is that it's text and text is just text. There are very limited ways to express anything in text. what you write and what an AI writes use the same language, grammar and letters. AI doesn't leave any metadata or something in the text that these detectors can spot.
    The current models do have some sort of pattern that they tend to use in their generations, and these detectors more or less look for these patterns. But the thing is that these patterns are not special at all and literally anyone could unintentionally right like an AI without them knowing. Guess what these tools will say when they see their texts? Happily give a ridiculously high rating of this text being written by AI. That's it. These tools literally just take a guess, and their guess is as good as yours. In fact most the time your guess would be much more educated since you know that person and how likely that they will actually be using an AI or if that is their typical writing style.
    People blindly trusting these detectors are affecting the lives of many people in false positives.

    Note: I hugely oversimplified how these detectors work, you could search on the internet for more information, but there sophistication doesn't make them more reliable. What I said above still holds true

  7. My 4th article for the NY #CitizenScience column comes out Thursday. It may interest #professors, #parents, & #admin to know that #ZeroGPT said 2.29% of my article was AI-generated (wrong: it was all me, a test).

    Then I asked #ChatGPT to respond:

    #changethegame #SubatomicWriting

  8. I just used #ZeroGPT to test if it could tell when it was something I wrote or something #ChatGPT wrote and sometimes it was VERY correct & other times it was convinced I was GPT. It also missed when it was AI if I told ChatGPT to write in the style of Hemingway.

  9. Well, yeah, tested #zeroGPT with a conference submission I wrote in back in 2020. This service thinks it’s AI/GPT generated text. Maybe I’m not human after all, I know some people have suspected it… 🤣

  10. Well, you should definitely take apps like #zeroGPT with a grain of salt. I got a lot of false positives when I tested it. Can’t figure out why, for one document it classified all paragraphs individually as human written, but combined as GPT generated. Very odd.