home.social

#softskills — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #softskills, aggregated by home.social.

  1. There's a "soft skills shortage" amongst young people because state and capital don't want you to be proficient at conflict resolution, resource management, risk management, forecasting, task scheduling and networking

    They want you dependant on the system to do all that for you, put simply they want obedient workers that can push the buttons in their cubicle and not well rounded socially proficient people capable of organizing a revolution

    #Anarchism #SoftSkills

  2. There's a "soft skills shortage" amongst young people because state and capital don't want you to be proficient at conflict resolution, resource management, risk management, forecasting, task scheduling and networking

    They want you dependant on the system to do all that for you, put simply they want obedient workers that can push the buttons in their cubicle and not well rounded socially proficient people capable of organizing a revolution

    #Anarchism #SoftSkills

  3. There's a "soft skills shortage" amongst young people because state and capital don't want you to be proficient at conflict resolution, resource management, risk management, forecasting, task scheduling and networking

    They want you dependant on the system to do all that for you, put simply they want obedient workers that can push the buttons in their cubicle and not well rounded socially proficient people capable of organizing a revolution

    #Anarchism #SoftSkills

  4. There's a "soft skills shortage" amongst young people because state and capital don't want you to be proficient at conflict resolution, resource management, risk management, forecasting, task scheduling and networking

    They want you dependant on the system to do all that for you, put simply they want obedient workers that can push the buttons in their cubicle and not well rounded socially proficient people capable of organizing a revolution

    #Anarchism #SoftSkills

  5. There's a "soft skills shortage" amongst young people because state and capital don't want you to be proficient at conflict resolution, resource management, risk management, forecasting, task scheduling and networking

    They want you dependant on the system to do all that for you, put simply they want obedient workers that can push the buttons in their cubicle and not well rounded socially proficient people capable of organizing a revolution

    #Anarchism #SoftSkills

  6. We're getting excited for #techbash 2026 and this year's keynotes!

    Register by Sept 7th with code LABORDAY10 to save on 3-day and 4-day tickets. View the schedule & register today: techbash.com/schedule

    #devcommunity #softskills #ai #learning #kalahari #poconos #devconference

  7. Soft-Skills-Kurse gelten oft als sichere Investition in die eigene #Karriere. Eine neue deutsche Studie findet dafür jedoch erstaunlich wenig Belege.

    Untersucht wurden 5’439 Vollzeitbeschäftigte, davon 549 mit arbeitgeberfinanzierter Weiterbildung in Bereichen wie #Kommunikation, Kooperation oder #Konfliktmanagement. Bis zu drei Jahre später zeigten sich keine statistisch signifikanten Effekte auf Lohn, Führungsverantwortung, Zahl unterstellter Mitarbeitender oder Arbeitszufriedenheit.

    Wichtig ist die Einordnung: Die Studie zeigt nicht, dass Soft-Skills-Trainings wirkungslos sind. Gemessen wurden individuelle Karriereeffekte, nicht Lerngewinn, Verhalten im Arbeitsalltag oder betrieblicher Nutzen. Zudem stammen die Daten aus Deutschland; andere Studien kommen teils zu abweichenden Ergebnissen.

    link.springer.com/article/10.1

    #SoftSkills #Weiterbildung

  8. “Education is what remains after one has forgotten what one has learned in school.” – Albert Einstein

    Technical careers are long, while specific technologies are temporary. The most valuable lessons are often problem-solving skills, communication, learning strategies, and systems thinking. Those remain useful long after a framework is obsolete.

    💬 Which skill from earlier in your career still pays dividends today?

    #ContinuousImprovement #DevGrowth #SoftSkills
    Photo by MD Duran on Unsplash

  9. Technical skills open doors. Soft skills determine how far you can go afterwards. Communication, empathy and negotiation are engineering skills too.

    Based on “Soft Skills: The Software Developer’s Life Manual” by John Sonmez.
    #SoftSkills #SoftwareEngineering #CareerGrowth
    Photo by Cherrydeck on Unsplash

  10. #SoftSkills, #HardSkills ou #LesDeux ? Ce soir à 18h45 en exclusivité lors du Craft Monthly sur les soft-skills !

    Présenté par Advent Of Craft et @swcraftstras !

    Avec Rémy Cassagne et moi-même.

    Vous pouvez trouver l'événement sur Meetup : meetup.com/fr-fr/software-craf

    Ou venir directement sur Discord : discord.gg/v9MkvCWnmN?event=15

    Ou encore suivre le live sur le Twich de Advent of Craft : twitch.tv/adventofcraft

    #Interview #softwareCraft #swcraftstras

  11. “The beginner sees many possibilities. The expert sees few.” – Shunryu Suzuki

    Experience helps us recognize patterns and avoid dead ends. At the same time, expertise can narrow our perspective. Strong engineering teams benefit from combining fresh viewpoints with hard-earned experience.

    💬 How do you balance expertise with openness to new ideas?

    #Teamwork #Leadership #DevGrowth #SoftSkills

    Photo by Markus Winkler on Unsplash

  12. Build better teams through communication with Hannah Lorenzo at #techbash 2026.

    Today only! Save 12% on tickets with code SUMMERTIME - techbash.com

    #teamwork #communication #softwaredev #softskills #developers

  13. Today's the last day of our summer sale. Use code SUMMERTIME to save on all 3-day and 4-day tickets!

    View keynotes, workshops & full schedule: techbash.com/

    #webdev #dotnet #cloud #ai #devops #softskills #python #csharp #azure #vscode #golang #javascript #softwaredev #devcommunity

  14. Du bist Software Entwickler*in und hast Lust deine Kommunikations- und Konfliktnavigations-Skills aufs nächste Level zu bringen?

    In meinem nächsten #iSAQB CPSA-A-SOFT Training bei @socreatory sind noch ein paar Plätze frei.

    Di-Do 04.-06. August 2026, full remote, maximal 12 Personen

    Inklusive Arbeit mit *echten* Konfliktfällen. ("intensiv aber lohnend" beschrieb es ein Teilnehmer so schön 😁)

    Details hier: socreatory.com/de/trainings/so

    Bei Fragen gerne melden

    #SoftwareArchitektur #SoftSkills

  15. Эволюция аналитика: как изменилась профессия

    Привет, Хабр! Меня зовут Софья Худякова, я руковожу отделом продуктовой аналитики в «Гарде». Занимаюсь аналитикой требований уже почти двадцать лет — сначала как специалист, теперь как руководитель отдела. За это время профессия изменилась настолько, что список компетенций, по которому я нанимаю людей сегодня, почти не похож на тот, с которым я начинала. В этой статье — не про хард-скиллы и технологии (об этом написано достаточно), а про то, как изменился образ мышления, который нужен современному аналитику.

    habr.com/ru/companies/garda/ar

    #навыки_аналитика #карьера_продуктового_аналитика #softskills #системный_анализ #профессия_продуктового_аналитика #навыки_продуктового_аналитика

  16. Check out this year's developer sessions! Join us for TechBash 2026 October 13-16 in the Kalahari Resort Poconos.

    Early bird rates end next week!

    zc.vg/8RQar?m=0

    #developers #dotnet #cloud #devops #ai #softskills #javascript #python #csharp #appdev #devcommunity #devconference

  17. Какие методы оценки персонала реально работают в 2026 году

    На рынке десятки инструментов оценки сотрудников, но у каждого свой потолок точности, стоимость и сценарий применения. Разберем пять методов, которые реально используют компании, и посмотрим, где каждый из них полезен, а где создает иллюзию контроля.

    habr.com/ru/articles/1040198/

    #оценка_персонала #оценка_компетенций_персонала #ассессмент #метод_360_градусов #интервьюирование #hardskills #softskills

  18. It's a Tool
    It's a Person
    It's a Hypervigilance Problem

    The tech industry's insistence on distinguishing between "soft skills" — caring for people — and "hard skills" — engineering rigor — is a reflection of the Cybernetics split itself. First-order thinking framed as "hard skills." Second-order thinking framed as "soft skills." This distinction, based on felt sense alone, does not hold under epistemic pressure. Neither does it within the causality-driven epistemology of the tech industry itself, in which only measurable impact is real, or as Silicon Valley likes to put it: #MoveFastAndBreakThings

    Imagine Margaret Hamilton had built NASA's Apollo 11 flight computer with that mindset. History would remember a failed moon landing and dead astronauts. "Hard skills" and "soft skills" are two sides of the same coin. The care is the code and the code is the care. Hamilton — the woman who coined the term "software engineering" — understood this. Silicon Valley chose to forget.

    We're watching the wine glass break in real time. 🍷

    ---

    Intrigued? Read more at:
    systemic.engineering/the-trick/

    #Tech #AI #Climate #ScientificProgramming #SystemicEngineering #Cybernetics #SystemicTherapy #History #TheMathDoesntLie #SubTuring #FormalVerification #SpectralGraphTheory #ReductiveAI #FOSS #OpenSource #AuDHD #Neuroqueer #DGSF #Cybernetics #FirstOrderCybernetics #StochasticParrot #SecondOrderCybernetics #GraphTheory #Eigenvalues #AIAlignment #AISafety #AIConsciousness #Consciousness #WomenInTech #Computer #ComputerScience #SoftwareEngineering #SoftSkills #HardSkills #ItsAllTheSame

  19. Вопросы на собеседованиях, к которым лучше готовиться заранее

    Есть вопросы, которые кажутся простыми — пока вы не оказываетесь на собеседовании и вам их не задают. «Расскажите про сложную задачу, которую вы решали сами и которой гордитесь». Казалось бы, что тут сложного? Вы работаете несколько лет, задач было море, истории есть. Но именно в этот момент что-то идет не так. Меня зовут Ольга Колюкова, я консультант-эксперт в

    habr.com/ru/companies/korus_co

    # #карьера #карьера_в_it #карьера_в_itиндустрии #карьера_в_ит #собеседования #собеседования_в_ит #подготовка_к_собеседованию #softskills #софтскиллы

  20. Remote Learning & Communication Skills: A Guide for Students:
    Master remote learning communication skills with our guide on digital etiquette, essential collaboration tools, and wellness tips. Learn how to beat Zoom fatigue and stay ahead in the academic world.

    Read more:
    dev.to/iftikhar_ishaquememon/r

    #Productivity #Softskills #Learning #Education

  21. 𝗪𝗵𝗲𝗻 𝗔𝗜 𝗠𝗲𝗲𝘁𝘀 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 – 𝗛𝘂𝗺𝗮𝗻 𝗝𝘂𝗱𝗴𝗲𝗺𝗲𝗻𝘁 𝗥𝗲𝗺𝗮𝗶𝗻𝘀 𝗖𝗿𝘂𝗰𝗶𝗮𝗹 🤖🧠

    In Part 3 of the #SoftSkills series by ITech Progress GmbH, we explore why communication, critical thinking, and human judgement are becoming more important than ever for software architects and tech professionals.

    #AI can suggest options and analyze data – but understanding context, weighing risks, and making responsible decisions remain deeply human skills.

    👉 t1p.de/xa1pf

    #SoftwareArchitecture #iSAQB

  22. 𝗖𝗹𝗮𝗿𝗶𝘁𝘆 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗔𝗴𝗲 𝗼𝗳 𝗔𝗜 – 𝗪𝗵𝘆 𝗣𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗶𝘀𝗲 𝗖𝗼𝗺𝗺𝘂𝗻𝗶𝗰𝗮𝘁𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝗠𝗮𝘁𝘁𝗲𝗿𝘀 🗣️

    As #AI becomes part of everyday work, clear communication is turning into a critical skill. 🤖 In Part 2 of the #SoftSkills series by ITech Progress GmbH, we explore why precise prompts, cognitive framing, and critical thinking are becoming essential for software architects and tech professionals.

    Read the article on the #iSAQB blog 👉 t1p.de/su9io

    #SoftwareArchitecture #Communication #CriticalThinking #FutureSkills

  23. Rethinking human resources for malaria control and elimination in Africa

    The comprehensive policy review by Halima Mwenesi and colleagues “Rethinking human resources and capacity building needs for malaria control and elimination in Africa” argues that the stagnation in global malaria progress is fundamentally a human resources crisis rather than solely a biological or technical failure.

    The authors posit that the current workforce is insufficient in number and ill-equipped with the necessary skills to navigate the complex transition from malaria control to elimination.

    It is a critical indictment of the status quo in malaria training and offers a roadmap for structural reform.

    This article summarizes key points from the policy review and examines how The Geneva Learning Foundation’s peer learning-to-action model could be used by national programmes to transform the health workforce.

    The mismatch between training and operational needs

    The authors identify a severe imbalance in training priorities where capacity building has historically favored biomedical and basic sciences such as entomology and parasitology.

    While essential, this focus has led to a neglect of operational, translational, and implementation sciences.

    The report highlights that while the global community produces high-level scientists who understand the parasite, it fails to produce “translational scientists” who can bridge the gap between global guidelines and local realities.

    This has resulted, they argue, in a workforce lacking the practical competencies to operationalize complex elimination strategies that require precision and adaptation.

    The deficit in leadership and social sciences

    A major finding is the specific deficit in so-called “soft skills” and social sciences which are increasingly critical as programs move toward elimination.

    The authors argue that modern malaria control requires competencies in leadership, health diplomacy, anthropology, sociology, and political analysis.

    Program managers currently lack the training to navigate complex political landscapes, mobilize domestic resources, or engage effectively with communities to sustain interventions.

    The review emphasizes that understanding community behavior and social determinants is as critical as understanding vector behavior but this is rarely reflected in curricula.

    Data illiteracy and the failure of surveillance

    The paper identifies pervasive “data illiteracy” across the workforce.

    Health workers collect vast amounts of data to satisfy donor reporting requirements but often lack the skills to interpret or use it for local decision-making.

    This results in a “data-rich but information-poor” environment.

    As countries move toward elimination, the need for real-time, granular surveillance becomes paramount.

    The current workforce is unable to perform the rapid data analysis required to detect and respond to outbreaks at the sub-national level.

    Fragmentation and lack of coordination

    The review critiques the fragmentation of investments in training, capacity-building, and technical assistance driven by donor agendas.

    It notes a lack of coordination among donors and agencies which leads to a proliferation of uncoordinated short courses and workshops that do not necessarily align with national strategic plans.

    This fragmentation is exacerbated by a lack of data on the workforce itself.

    Many countries lack a central registry of malaria personnel which makes it impossible to forecast needs, plan for attrition, or manage career pathways.

    The call for structural transformation

    The authors call for a radical shift toward “South-South” collaboration where African institutions take the lead in training.

    They advocate for moving away from ad hoc workshops toward institutionalized, long-term capacity building.

    Crucially, they recommend the use of digital platforms to democratize access to knowledge for mid-level and community-based cadres who are often excluded from elite fellowships.

    How can learning science help transform malaria training investments into tangible health worker performance?

    For a global health epidemiologist accustomed to viewing disease control through the lens of biological interventions and coverage rates, the human resource crisis described by Mwenesi and colleagues represents a “delivery failure” of validated tools.

    The Geneva Learning Foundation (TGLF) learning science model functions as a structural intervention designed to repair broken delivery mechanisms in global health and humanitarian response.

    The following analysis translates the TGLF approach into terms recognizable to an epidemiologist or program manager who operates with the assumption that training is primarily about the transmission of technical knowledge.

    Moving from passive transmission to implementation fidelity

    Epidemiologists understand that a vaccine with high efficacy in a trial often has low effectiveness in the real world due to poor administration or cold chain failure.

    Similarly, Mwenesi et al. identify that technical malaria guidelines fail because the “human infrastructure” cannot implement them.

    Traditional training assumes that if you lecture health workers on a protocol, which is a transmission of information, they will execute it.

    This is a “single-loop” assumption.

    The TGLF model introduces an “implementation loop.”

    Instead of merely receiving information, learners in the TGLF network must design a micro-project to apply the new guideline in their specific district, execute it, and report back on the results using their own local data.

    This turns the workforce from passive recipients of protocols into active testers of implementation fidelity.

    It directly addresses the “translational science” gap identified in the paper by forcing the learner to translate theory into practice immediately.

    Sceptics often argue that this approach places an undue burden on an already overworked workforce.

    However, the TGLF model embeds learning into the workflow itself.

    This is not additional work but rather “learning-based work.”

    Participants do not create hypothetical projects.

    They identify a bottleneck they are currently facing, such as a specific pocket of malaria transmission, and use the learning cycle to address it.

    This transforms the training from an external interruption into an operational support mechanism.

    By embedding learning into the workflow, it operationalizes Mwenesi’s call for translational science.

    It considers the daily struggle of the health worker as a form of structured scientific inquiry: they hypothesize a solution, test it, and report the results.

    This is implementation as science.

    Operationalizing data use for local decision-making

    Mwenesi notes that health workers collect data but do not use it.

    In the TGLF model, data is not something sent “up” to the ministry.

    It is the raw material for peer support and feedback.

    In a TGLF peer learning exercise, a district medical officer in Ghana shares their case management data to compare performance with a peer in Uganda.

    They share because they want to, not because they are required to.

    This creates a social incentive to understand and analyze one’s own data.

    It builds the “data literacy” the authors call for not through abstract statistics courses but through the practical necessity of explaining one’s own performance to a colleague.

    This process transforms data from a compliance burden into a tool for local problem-solving.

    Is there a risk that peer learning will pool ignorance?

    Is there a valid concern regarding the risk of “pooled ignorance” where peers might reinforce incorrect practices?

    The TGLF model mitigates this through “structured emergence.”

    The model does not dismiss expert knowledge but uses global guidelines as the “anchor” for local problem-solving.

    In this system, a health worker cannot simply state an opinion.

    They must submit an action plan that is peer-reviewed against a rubric derived from WHO guidelines.

    This process ensures fidelity to technical standards while allowing for necessary local adaptation.

    The aggregation of thousands of these peer-reviewed plans creates a new form of rigorous, practice-based evidence that complements expert guidance.

    Scaling “soft skills” through structured peer review

    The review calls for leadership and diplomacy skills but notes these are hard to teach in workshops.

    The TGLF model builds these skills implicitly through its pedagogical structure.

    When a participant submits an action plan, they must receive and respond to critical feedback from peers in other countries.

    They must negotiate differing viewpoints and defend their technical choices.

    This mimics the “health diplomacy” and leadership dynamics required in real-world program management.

    Furthermore, because they must engage community stakeholders to implement their projects, they practice the anthropological and social engagement skills Mwenesi identifies as missing.

    They learn leadership not by studying a theory of leadership but by leading a change initiative in their facility.

    While some experts argue that soft skills require “hard contact” in physical spaces, TGLF results suggest that physical proximity often limits a worker to their known environment and existing biases.

    The TGLF model introduces a form of “cosmopolitan localism.”

    When a nurse in rural Nigeria must explain her challenge to a peer in urban India, she is forced to articulate her context with a clarity and diplomacy not required when speaking to a neighbor.

    This defiance of distance fosters a quantum leap in communication capabilities.

    Participants report that the skills learned in negotiating these digital, cross-cultural peer relationships directly translate to better engagement with their physical-world colleagues and community leaders.

    Addressing the incentive structure and correcting expertise asymmetry

    The paper critiques the “brain drain” and the reliance on experts from the Global North.

    TGLF operationalizes the “South-South” collaboration recommended by the authors by creating a flat digital hierarchy.

    In this model, the “expert” is not a visiting consultant from Geneva but a peer who has successfully solved the problem in their own context.

    A nurse in Nigeria learns how to improve bed net usage from a nurse in Kenya who solved that exact refusal issue last month.

    This actually results in greater interest, comprehension, and use of official guidelines.

    It also validates local knowledge and creates the “critical mass of thinking professionals” that Mwenesi argues is essential for elimination.

    It shifts the source of authority from external experts to the collective intelligence of the network.

    Transforming the economy of per diem

    A common critique of moving away from face-to-face training is the reliance of health workers on per diems for financial survival.

    Mwenesi implies that the current system is unsustainable.

    The TGLF model operates on the evidence that per diem-driven training often restricts access to a “training aristocracy” of recurrent participants while excluding the frontline workers who most need the knowledge.

    TGLF replaces the financial incentive with a professional survival incentive.

    In the Nigeria Immunization Collaborative, over 4,300 health workers participated without per diems.

    They did so because the program addressed the specific pain points of their daily work.

    This filters the workforce for “positive deviants,” or those with high intrinsic motivation who are most likely to drive elimination efforts, rather than those primarily motivated by daily subsistence allowances.

    A “surveillance system” for human resources and performance

    Finally, the review notes the lack of registries and data on the workforce itself.

    The TGLF digital network acts as a real-time sensor of workforce capacity.

    By engaging thousands of health workers simultaneously, the platform generates data on who is active, what problems they are facing, and where their skills are deficient.

    For an epidemiologist, this is equivalent to a surveillance system for human resources.

    It provides the visibility needed to forecast gaps and target interventions precisely, replacing the “blind” proliferation of uncoordinated workshops with a data-driven approach to capacity building.

    Regarding concerns that digital platforms fail in low-resource settings due to poor connectivity, TGLF utilizes a “cognitively quiet” design that functions on low-bandwidth connections and mobile devices.

    This design respects the technological reality of the African context.

    Data from the Teach to Reach program, which has engaged over 60,000 participants in remote, ongoing peer learning activities , demonstrates that when the technology is adapted to the user rather than the other way around, participation rates exceed those of physical workshops.

    This scale allows for the identification of systemic patterns and workforce gaps that would be invisible in a smaller, face-to-face cohort.

    Reference

    Mwenesi, H., Mbogo, C., Casamitjana, N., Castro, M.C., Itoe, M.A., Okonofua, F., Tanner, M., 2022. Rethinking human resources and capacity building needs for malaria control and elimination in Africa. PLOS Glob Public Health 2, e0000210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000210

    Reda Sadki (2023). How do we reframe health performance management within complex adaptive systems?. Reda Sadki: Learning to make a difference. https://doi.org/10.59350/mx5qr-qet97

    Reda Sadki (2024). Prioritizing the health and care workforce shortage: protect, invest, together. Reda Sadki: Learning to make a difference. https://doi.org/10.59350/zzqr4-9g482

    Reda Sadki (2024). Protect, invest, together: strengthening health workforce through new learning models. Reda Sadki: Learning to make a difference. https://doi.org/10.59350/g24b4-7fj64

    Reda Sadki (2024). What is double-loop learning in global health?. Reda Sadki: Learning to make a difference. https://doi.org/10.59350/s4xtw-b7274

    Reda Sadki (2024). World Malaria Day 2024: We need new ways to support health workers leading change with local communities. Reda Sadki: Learning to make a difference. https://doi.org/10.59350/yrn1r-hpz62

    #brainDrain #cosmopolitanLocalism #dataQualityAndUse #doubleLoopLearning #HalimaMwenesi #healthWorkerMotivation #healthWorkerPerformance #healthWorkforce #HRH #implementationScience #leadership #learningStrategy #learningBasedWork #localization #malaria #peerLearning #performance #softSkills #TeachToReach #translationalScience
  24. Rethinking human resources for malaria control and elimination in Africa

    The comprehensive policy review by Halima Mwenesi and colleagues “Rethinking human resources and capacity building needs for malaria control and elimination in Africa” argues that the stagnation in global malaria progress is fundamentally a human resources crisis rather than solely a biological or technical failure.

    The authors posit that the current workforce is insufficient in number and ill-equipped with the necessary skills to navigate the complex transition from malaria control to elimination.

    It is a critical indictment of the status quo in malaria training and offers a roadmap for structural reform.

    This article summarizes key points from the policy review and examines how The Geneva Learning Foundation’s peer learning-to-action model could be used by national programmes to transform the health workforce.

    The mismatch between training and operational needs

    The authors identify a severe imbalance in training priorities where capacity building has historically favored biomedical and basic sciences such as entomology and parasitology.

    While essential, this focus has led to a neglect of operational, translational, and implementation sciences.

    The report highlights that while the global community produces high-level scientists who understand the parasite, it fails to produce “translational scientists” who can bridge the gap between global guidelines and local realities.

    This has resulted, they argue, in a workforce lacking the practical competencies to operationalize complex elimination strategies that require precision and adaptation.

    The deficit in leadership and social sciences

    A major finding is the specific deficit in so-called “soft skills” and social sciences which are increasingly critical as programs move toward elimination.

    The authors argue that modern malaria control requires competencies in leadership, health diplomacy, anthropology, sociology, and political analysis.

    Program managers currently lack the training to navigate complex political landscapes, mobilize domestic resources, or engage effectively with communities to sustain interventions.

    The review emphasizes that understanding community behavior and social determinants is as critical as understanding vector behavior but this is rarely reflected in curricula.

    Data illiteracy and the failure of surveillance

    The paper identifies pervasive “data illiteracy” across the workforce.

    Health workers collect vast amounts of data to satisfy donor reporting requirements but often lack the skills to interpret or use it for local decision-making.

    This results in a “data-rich but information-poor” environment.

    As countries move toward elimination, the need for real-time, granular surveillance becomes paramount.

    The current workforce is unable to perform the rapid data analysis required to detect and respond to outbreaks at the sub-national level.

    Fragmentation and lack of coordination

    The review critiques the fragmentation of investments in training, capacity-building, and technical assistance driven by donor agendas.

    It notes a lack of coordination among donors and agencies which leads to a proliferation of uncoordinated short courses and workshops that do not necessarily align with national strategic plans.

    This fragmentation is exacerbated by a lack of data on the workforce itself.

    Many countries lack a central registry of malaria personnel which makes it impossible to forecast needs, plan for attrition, or manage career pathways.

    The call for structural transformation

    The authors call for a radical shift toward “South-South” collaboration where African institutions take the lead in training.

    They advocate for moving away from ad hoc workshops toward institutionalized, long-term capacity building.

    Crucially, they recommend the use of digital platforms to democratize access to knowledge for mid-level and community-based cadres who are often excluded from elite fellowships.

    How can learning science help transform malaria training investments into tangible health worker performance?

    For a global health epidemiologist accustomed to viewing disease control through the lens of biological interventions and coverage rates, the human resource crisis described by Mwenesi and colleagues represents a “delivery failure” of validated tools.

    The Geneva Learning Foundation (TGLF) learning science model functions as a structural intervention designed to repair broken delivery mechanisms in global health and humanitarian response.

    The following analysis translates the TGLF approach into terms recognizable to an epidemiologist or program manager who operates with the assumption that training is primarily about the transmission of technical knowledge.

    Moving from passive transmission to implementation fidelity

    Epidemiologists understand that a vaccine with high efficacy in a trial often has low effectiveness in the real world due to poor administration or cold chain failure.

    Similarly, Mwenesi et al. identify that technical malaria guidelines fail because the “human infrastructure” cannot implement them.

    Traditional training assumes that if you lecture health workers on a protocol, which is a transmission of information, they will execute it.

    This is a “single-loop” assumption.

    The TGLF model introduces an “implementation loop.”

    Instead of merely receiving information, learners in the TGLF network must design a micro-project to apply the new guideline in their specific district, execute it, and report back on the results using their own local data.

    This turns the workforce from passive recipients of protocols into active testers of implementation fidelity.

    It directly addresses the “translational science” gap identified in the paper by forcing the learner to translate theory into practice immediately.

    Sceptics often argue that this approach places an undue burden on an already overworked workforce.

    However, the TGLF model embeds learning into the workflow itself.

    This is not additional work but rather “learning-based work.”

    Participants do not create hypothetical projects.

    They identify a bottleneck they are currently facing, such as a specific pocket of malaria transmission, and use the learning cycle to address it.

    This transforms the training from an external interruption into an operational support mechanism.

    By embedding learning into the workflow, it operationalizes Mwenesi’s call for translational science.

    It considers the daily struggle of the health worker as a form of structured scientific inquiry: they hypothesize a solution, test it, and report the results.

    This is implementation as science.

    Operationalizing data use for local decision-making

    Mwenesi notes that health workers collect data but do not use it.

    In the TGLF model, data is not something sent “up” to the ministry.

    It is the raw material for peer support and feedback.

    In a TGLF peer learning exercise, a district medical officer in Ghana shares their case management data to compare performance with a peer in Uganda.

    They share because they want to, not because they are required to.

    This creates a social incentive to understand and analyze one’s own data.

    It builds the “data literacy” the authors call for not through abstract statistics courses but through the practical necessity of explaining one’s own performance to a colleague.

    This process transforms data from a compliance burden into a tool for local problem-solving.

    Is there a risk that peer learning will pool ignorance?

    Is there a valid concern regarding the risk of “pooled ignorance” where peers might reinforce incorrect practices?

    The TGLF model mitigates this through “structured emergence.”

    The model does not dismiss expert knowledge but uses global guidelines as the “anchor” for local problem-solving.

    In this system, a health worker cannot simply state an opinion.

    They must submit an action plan that is peer-reviewed against a rubric derived from WHO guidelines.

    This process ensures fidelity to technical standards while allowing for necessary local adaptation.

    The aggregation of thousands of these peer-reviewed plans creates a new form of rigorous, practice-based evidence that complements expert guidance.

    Scaling “soft skills” through structured peer review

    The review calls for leadership and diplomacy skills but notes these are hard to teach in workshops.

    The TGLF model builds these skills implicitly through its pedagogical structure.

    When a participant submits an action plan, they must receive and respond to critical feedback from peers in other countries.

    They must negotiate differing viewpoints and defend their technical choices.

    This mimics the “health diplomacy” and leadership dynamics required in real-world program management.

    Furthermore, because they must engage community stakeholders to implement their projects, they practice the anthropological and social engagement skills Mwenesi identifies as missing.

    They learn leadership not by studying a theory of leadership but by leading a change initiative in their facility.

    While some experts argue that soft skills require “hard contact” in physical spaces, TGLF results suggest that physical proximity often limits a worker to their known environment and existing biases.

    The TGLF model introduces a form of “cosmopolitan localism.”

    When a nurse in rural Nigeria must explain her challenge to a peer in urban India, she is forced to articulate her context with a clarity and diplomacy not required when speaking to a neighbor.

    This defiance of distance fosters a quantum leap in communication capabilities.

    Participants report that the skills learned in negotiating these digital, cross-cultural peer relationships directly translate to better engagement with their physical-world colleagues and community leaders.

    Addressing the incentive structure and correcting expertise asymmetry

    The paper critiques the “brain drain” and the reliance on experts from the Global North.

    TGLF operationalizes the “South-South” collaboration recommended by the authors by creating a flat digital hierarchy.

    In this model, the “expert” is not a visiting consultant from Geneva but a peer who has successfully solved the problem in their own context.

    A nurse in Nigeria learns how to improve bed net usage from a nurse in Kenya who solved that exact refusal issue last month.

    This actually results in greater interest, comprehension, and use of official guidelines.

    It also validates local knowledge and creates the “critical mass of thinking professionals” that Mwenesi argues is essential for elimination.

    It shifts the source of authority from external experts to the collective intelligence of the network.

    Transforming the economy of per diem

    A common critique of moving away from face-to-face training is the reliance of health workers on per diems for financial survival.

    Mwenesi implies that the current system is unsustainable.

    The TGLF model operates on the evidence that per diem-driven training often restricts access to a “training aristocracy” of recurrent participants while excluding the frontline workers who most need the knowledge.

    TGLF replaces the financial incentive with a professional survival incentive.

    In the Nigeria Immunization Collaborative, over 4,300 health workers participated without per diems.

    They did so because the program addressed the specific pain points of their daily work.

    This filters the workforce for “positive deviants,” or those with high intrinsic motivation who are most likely to drive elimination efforts, rather than those primarily motivated by daily subsistence allowances.

    A “surveillance system” for human resources and performance

    Finally, the review notes the lack of registries and data on the workforce itself.

    The TGLF digital network acts as a real-time sensor of workforce capacity.

    By engaging thousands of health workers simultaneously, the platform generates data on who is active, what problems they are facing, and where their skills are deficient.

    For an epidemiologist, this is equivalent to a surveillance system for human resources.

    It provides the visibility needed to forecast gaps and target interventions precisely, replacing the “blind” proliferation of uncoordinated workshops with a data-driven approach to capacity building.

    Regarding concerns that digital platforms fail in low-resource settings due to poor connectivity, TGLF utilizes a “cognitively quiet” design that functions on low-bandwidth connections and mobile devices.

    This design respects the technological reality of the African context.

    Data from the Teach to Reach program, which has engaged over 60,000 participants in remote, ongoing peer learning activities , demonstrates that when the technology is adapted to the user rather than the other way around, participation rates exceed those of physical workshops.

    This scale allows for the identification of systemic patterns and workforce gaps that would be invisible in a smaller, face-to-face cohort.

    Reference

    Mwenesi, H., Mbogo, C., Casamitjana, N., Castro, M.C., Itoe, M.A., Okonofua, F., Tanner, M., 2022. Rethinking human resources and capacity building needs for malaria control and elimination in Africa. PLOS Glob Public Health 2, e0000210. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pgph.0000210

    Reda Sadki (2023). How do we reframe health performance management within complex adaptive systems?. Reda Sadki: Learning to make a difference. https://doi.org/10.59350/mx5qr-qet97

    Reda Sadki (2024). Prioritizing the health and care workforce shortage: protect, invest, together. Reda Sadki: Learning to make a difference. https://doi.org/10.59350/zzqr4-9g482

    Reda Sadki (2024). Protect, invest, together: strengthening health workforce through new learning models. Reda Sadki: Learning to make a difference. https://doi.org/10.59350/g24b4-7fj64

    Reda Sadki (2024). What is double-loop learning in global health?. Reda Sadki: Learning to make a difference. https://doi.org/10.59350/s4xtw-b7274

    Reda Sadki (2024). World Malaria Day 2024: We need new ways to support health workers leading change with local communities. Reda Sadki: Learning to make a difference. https://doi.org/10.59350/yrn1r-hpz62

    #brainDrain #cosmopolitanLocalism #dataQualityAndUse #doubleLoopLearning #HalimaMwenesi #healthWorkerMotivation #healthWorkerPerformance #healthWorkforce #HRH #implementationScience #leadership #learningStrategy #learningBasedWork #localization #malaria #peerLearning #performance #softSkills #TeachToReach #translationalScience
  25. Как собеседовать не идеальных

    Собеседования — как очередь в муниципальной больнице: все там были, но мало кто потом вспоминает с теплом. Кто-то берет «100 каверзных вопросов для собеседования» из интернета, кто-то топит за знание фреймворков, кто-то спрашивает разницу между интерфейсом и абстрактным классом. А потом начинается: А что начинается?

    habr.com/ru/articles/924228/

    #найм #собеседование #интервью #оценка_кандидата #матрица_компетенций #hardskills #softskills #тимлид #управление_людьми #управление_командой

  26. We've extracted basic test #ZeroHR test tasks into separate repositories. This way individuals and companies can try out our work for #free (as in beer).

    I will help up to 5 of those who hire #Rust or #Elixir developers make use of them without buying evaluations over at zerohr.io.

    Hit me up for a 15' call: savvycal.com/manpages/15

    #Recruiting #Evaluation #SoftSkills #HardSkills #Skills #HR #ElixirLang #Startup #Business #B2B

  27. WirtschaftsWoche: New Work: Warum Xing auf der Stelle tritt, während LinkedIn wächst und wächst

    Burda greift bei seiner Tochter New Work durch: Der Xing-Betreiber soll von der Börse genommen werden. Die Probleme des Jobportals werden derweil immer größer.
    New Work: Warum Xing auf der Stelle tritt, während LinkedIn wächst und wächst

  28. WirtschaftsWoche: KI: Nutzen Mitarbeiter ChatGPT unkontrolliert, kann es gefährlich werden

    Schnell noch die E-Mail von ChatGPT formulieren lassen oder eine Übersetzung durch die KI anfordern – Mitarbeiter ahnen nicht, dass sie damit unter Umständen Recht brechen. Doch das kann teuer werden 
    KI: Nutzen Mitarbeiter ChatGPT unkontrolliert, kann es gefährlich werden