#smbnetfs — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #smbnetfs, aggregated by home.social.
-
@CyDeFect @FiLiS In theory, yes. In practice, not so much. The #gvfs-based approach creates "weird" mountpoints in a user scope. The #smbnetfs variant creates some "dynamic" mountpoint where you have to access a hostname/ip-address using it as it was a subdirectory. Both not what I would have needed for home directories via #SMB3. Plus, they both perform badly.
So, in my case, just using #NFS for #FreeBSD clients (and still offering #SMB3 via #samba for #Windows clients) was the sanest solution.