#sigstore — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #sigstore, aggregated by home.social.
-
#SigStore / #PyPI attestations: #PGP is hard! We must invent a new signing scheme that's so much easier on users.
The tools, after I've spent hours *integrating* them into #Gentoo, and getting them working for everything before:
* Verifying google_auth-2.46.0.tar.gz ...
Provenance signed by a Google Cloud account, but no service account provided; use '--gcp-service-account'Yeah, I'm sure that's *so much simpler* than PGP.
-
For the last couple of weeks, I've been deep diving into container supply chain security.
I built a full GitHub Actions demo pipeline:
• Vulnerability scanning
• SBOM generation
• Keyless signing + attestations
• SLSA build provenanceThe highlight: zero long-lived secrets. GitHub Actions uses OIDC to obtain a short-lived certificate, signs the image (and publishes attestations), and records everything in a public transparency log. No keys to rotate or leak.
The post also covers hardened base images (distroless and Docker's new Hardened Images) and how to enforce signatures on the consumer side with Kubernetes admission policies.
Blog + companion repo to fork: https://lnkd.in/gtdNYWW8
#SupplyChainSecurity #SBOM #Sigstore #GitHubActions #DevSecOps #ZeroTrust
-
OpenSSF-funded improvements to Sigstore’s rekor-monitor are making transparency logs easier to monitor for malicious package releases and identity misuse.
Great work by @trailofbits, with support from the sigstore maintainer community including Hayden Blauzvern and @mihaimaruseac.
🔗 https://openssf.org/blog/2025/12/19/catching-malicious-package-releases-using-a-transparency-log/
-
💡 OpenSSF Project Highlight: Sigstore - A Wax Seal of Security for the Digital Era
❓ Why this matters: the Sigstore project is building a modern, transparent trust layer for open source.
Watch this interview and learn more about #Sigstore: https://youtu.be/m5eTw4x33kU?si=JFY3C81VFjBhNIML
-
🎉 The new #Sigstore Rekor transparency log public dataset is now available on BigQuery!
This dataset makes it easier for researchers to analyze software signing trends & understand how artifacts are signed across the open source ecosystem.
🔗Read: https://openssf.org/blog/2025/10/15/announcing-the-sigstore-transparency-log-research-dataset/
-
Przygotowałem wstępnie weryfikację autentyczności plików z #PyPI dla #Gentoo.
Wiecie, ten nowy wynalazek, który chroni przed atakami podmieniającymi pliki na PyPI, i upewnia się, że macie do czynienia z oryginalnymi plikami z GitHuba. No bo, jak powszechnie wiadomo, repozytoria na GitHubie i tamtejsze systemy CD są mało prawdopodobnym celem ataków. No i absolutnie nie trzeba się martwić tym, że klucze, repozytoria i te systemy CD są w rękach Microsoftu.
-
I've drafted support for verification of #PyPI provenance for #Gentoo.
You know, the new fancy thing that protects against supply chain attacks on PyPI, and verifies that you're using genuine #GitHub artifacts. Because, you know, GitHub repositories and deployment pipelines are an unlikely attack vector. And you definitely don't need to worry about #Microsoft owning the keys, the repositories and the pipelines at all.
-
🚨 The AI wave is here, and with it comes a new cybersecurity battleground.
Discover how open source tools like #Sigstore, and #SLSA-based frameworks can help close these gaps and build more resilient AI systems.
Read the blog and learn how to get involved: https://openssf.org/blog/2025/08/12/securing-ai-the-next-cybersecurity-battleground/
-
New to OpenSSF or thinking about getting involved? We've got you. 💡
This blog by Ejiro and Sal introduces all our working groups, tools, and projects like #sigstore, #SLSA, and #OpenSSFScorecard.
Start here 👉 https://openssf.org/blog/2025/08/08/from-beginner-to-builder-understanding-openssf-community-and-working-groups/
-
🚀 NEW on We ❤️ Open Source 🚀
Docker is retiring Content Trust. Nigel Douglas explains what’s changing, why Notary is deprecated, and how to prepare with Sigstore or Notation.
https://allthingsopen.org/articles/docker-content-trust-sigstore-vs-notation
#WeLoveOpenSource #Docker #Containers #Sigstore #Notation #FOSS #CloudNative
-
🔐 New Case Study: How is Google securing the future of machine learning?
By partnering with #sigstore and the Open Source Security Foundation (OpenSSF), they’ve implemented model signing that makes AI systems more trustworthy by default.
https://openssf.org/blog/2025/07/23/case-study-google-secures-machine-learning-models-with-sigstore/
-
1/2
Today I was playing with Minisign and Cosign to evaluate whether it’s worth signing some of my OSS software with something other than PGP.Here’s my verdict: Minisign is promising… Much easier to use than PGP. That simplicity, of course, comes at the cost of giving up a few features.
#OSS #SoftwareSigning #ArtifactSigning #PGP #Minisign #Cosign #Sigstore
-
1/2
Today I was playing with Minisign and Cosign to evaluate whether it’s worth signing some of my OSS software with something other than PGP.Here’s my verdict: Minisign is promising… Much easier to use than PGP. That simplicity, of course, comes at the cost of giving up a few features.
#OSS #SoftwareSigning #ArtifactSigning #PGP #Minisign #Cosign #Sigstore
-
1/2
Today I was playing with Minisign and Cosign to evaluate whether it’s worth signing some of my OSS software with something other than PGP.Here’s my verdict: Minisign is promising… Much easier to use than PGP. That simplicity, of course, comes at the cost of giving up a few features.
#OSS #SoftwareSigning #ArtifactSigning #PGP #Minisign #Cosign #Sigstore
-
1/2
Today I was playing with Minisign and Cosign to evaluate whether it’s worth signing some of my OSS software with something other than PGP.Here’s my verdict: Minisign is promising… Much easier to use than PGP. That simplicity, of course, comes at the cost of giving up a few features.
#OSS #SoftwareSigning #ArtifactSigning #PGP #Minisign #Cosign #Sigstore
-
I don't suppose that trusting #sigstore to run a centralized CA and transparency logs just to issue short-lived certs for me to generate signatures is much more secure than #PGP signing using my own keys. I'm just increasing the attack surface...
The whole Googlesque philosophy of "trust us; don't be evil" is contrary to my take on information security.
But I'm also open to anyone convincing me otherwise.
-
📣 Announcing v1.0 of the model-signing project, developed by the #OpenSSF AI/ML WG! This project enables signing + verifying ML models of any size/format using #sigstore, self-signed certs, or key pairs. Read the blog to learn more & get involved: https://openssf.org/blog/2025/04/04/launch-of-model-signing-v1-0-openssf-ai-ml-working-group-secures-the-machine-learning-supply-chain/
-
Jakiś czas temu zaimplementowałem w #Gentoo wsparcie #SigStore, by móc weryfikować nowe wydania CPythona. Dziś dowiedziałem się, że #PyPI również obsługuje takie "poświadczenia". Tylko jak je weryfikować?
https://blog.sigstore.dev/pypi-attestations-ga/
Ten post sugeruje, że na blogu PyPI znajdę "detale istotne dla użytkowników". No więc zajrzyjmy tam.
https://blog.pypi.org/posts/2024-11-14-pypi-now-supports-digital-attestations/
Tylko informacje o publikowaniu i przeglądaniu ich (a sposób wymieniony tam nie jest właściwą odpowiedzią na https://pol.social/@mgorny/114053976252968950), a nie weryfikacji. Szukamy dalej.
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/
Tylko linki do kilku technicznych specyfikacji, nic przydatnego.
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/consuming-attestations/
O, tu w końcu jest jakiś przykład. Sprawdźmy podlinkowany projekt.
https://pypi.org/project/pypi-attestations/
> [!WAŻNE] Ta biblioteka stanowi szczegół implementacji wewnątrz referencyjnej implementacji PEP 740. Większość użytkowników nie musi korzystać z niej bezpośrednio; więcej szczegółów w dokumentacji PyPI. [tłum. własne]
Tyle że ten link prowadzi do strony ze specyfikacjami! Jak jeszcze trochę pokopiemy, to możemy znaleźć API, które dostarcza nasze "poświadczenie":
https://docs.pypi.org/api/integrity/
No fajno, tylko co z nim zrobić? Przeskoczmy pół godziny wprzód, które zmarnowałem, próbując go użyć. Pokrótce rzecz biorąc, jedyne co pypi-attestations może zrobić jest pobranie interesującego nas pliku i danych "poświadczenia" *wprost z serwera*, i zweryfikowanie go. Więc trzeba używać dodatkowego narzędzia, które dodatkowo zawsze korzysta z Internetu.
A przynajmniej tak sądzę, bo nie brak wszędzie słów "eksperymentalne", a dokumentacja chyba już gorsza być nie może. No cóż, zgłosiłem prośbę o weryfikację w trybie offline, zobaczymy:
-
So, a while ago I have implemented #SigStore support in #Gentoo, to be able to verify release artifacts for CPython releases. Today, I've learned that the "attestations" are supported on #PyPI now as well. But how to verify them?
https://blog.sigstore.dev/pypi-attestations-ga/
This post suggests that PyPI blog covers the "user-facing details". So let's check that.
https://blog.pypi.org/posts/2024-11-14-pypi-now-supports-digital-attestations/
But that just covers publishing and viewing them (and the way listed here is not the answer to https://social.treehouse.systems/@mgorny/114053976211703393), not verifying. So let's try searching further.
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/
Okay, this just links to a bunch of specifications, nothing useful for us here.
https://docs.pypi.org/attestations/consuming-attestations/
Okay, this one finally provides a snippet. Let's take a look at the project then.
https://pypi.org/project/pypi-attestations/
> [!IMPORTANT] This library is an implementation detail within the reference implementation of PEP 740. Most users should not need to interact with it directly; see the PyPI documentation for full details.
But that just takes us back to the bunch of specifications! If we dig some more, we find the API needed to get the "provenance" file we need:
https://docs.pypi.org/api/integrity/
Well, that's cool, but what can we do about it? Well, let's skip the half an hour I've wasted trying to do anything about it. Long story short, the only thing you can do is have pypi-attestations fetch both the distribution file and the provenance data *straight from the server*, and verify it directly. So you need an extra tool, and the tool is 100% online.
Or at least I guess so, because it's all full of "experimental" and the documentation is as bad as it could get. Well, filed a bug anyway, hopefully I'll learn more:
-
Zagadka na #PyPI: jeden z poniższych projektów używa "zaufanego procesu publikacji" (czyli podpisów elektronicznych #SigStore), a drugi nie. Jesteście w stanie odgadnąć który, i w jaki sposób można to stwierdzić? I owszem, jest to widoczne od razu na pierwszej stronie, nie trzeba nigdzie głębiej wchodzić.
https://pypi.org/project/ansible-keyring/
https://pypi.org/project/sampleproject/Proszę dawać CW na odpowiedzi, żeby nie psuć innym zabawy. A jeżeli nie potraficie odgadnąć, nie szkodzi — to jeden z najgorszych pomysłów na #interfejs, jakie widziałem.
-
Zagadka na #PyPI: jeden z poniższych projektów używa "zaufanego procesu publikacji" (czyli podpisów elektronicznych #SigStore), a drugi nie. Jesteście w stanie odgadnąć który, i w jaki sposób można to stwierdzić? I owszem, jest to widoczne od razu na pierwszej stronie, nie trzeba nigdzie głębiej wchodzić.
https://pypi.org/project/ansible-keyring/
https://pypi.org/project/sampleproject/Proszę dawać CW na odpowiedzi, żeby nie psuć innym zabawy. A jeżeli nie potraficie odgadnąć, nie szkodzi — to jeden z najgorszych pomysłów na #interfejs, jakie widziałem.
-
A #PyPI riddle: one of the following projects is using trusted publishing (i.e. #SigStore signatures) and the other isn't. Can you tell which one does, and how can you tell? And yes, it's visible immediately on the top project page, you don't have to click anything.
https://pypi.org/project/ansible-keyring/
https://pypi.org/project/sampleproject/Please CW your answers not to spoil. And if you can't, don't worry — this is one of the most horrible #UI ideas I've ever seen.
-
Agreed @todd_a_jacobs.
To head off anticipated objections "but PEP 761 doesn't *mandate* using #GitHub or #Google": Technically true, but there's no open implementation #Python is willing to rely on today.
PEP 761 steps *backward* from open technology (though imperfect) to a closed platform (even more imperfect).
If #SigStore were a good idea, it should not have replaced existing open implementations until it also has reliable open implementations. If that's infeasible, why switch to it?
-
I’m *trying* to like #Python again, but PEP-761 requires #sigstore. #OpenPGP key management has issues, but this requires trusting #openidconnect from #Google & #Microsoft. Plus there’s a stated design goal of supporting automated signatures from private keys held by #GitHub.
Easier? Probably. Safer? Probably not. Security is about trust and the required certificate authorities haven’t earned mine over the past 20 years. As always, YMMV.
-
🚀 Sigstore is making waves in software security! 22 contributors, a 289% increase in commits since 2023, and 62K+ unique GitHub projects signed using Sigstore. 📥 Download the OpenSSF Annual Report to learn more: https://hubs.la/Q0318XDQ0 #Sigstore #OSS #SecurityInnovation
-
🚀 Sigstore is making waves in software security! 22 contributors, a 289% increase in commits since 2023, and 62K+ unique GitHub projects signed using Sigstore. 📥 Download the OpenSSF Annual Report to learn more: https://hubs.la/Q0318XDQ0 #Sigstore #OSS #SecurityInnovation
-
#SigStore rzekomo: ma wiele klientów i jest łatwe w użyciu.
Rzeczywistość:
#Cosign domyślnie używa (starego?) formatu podpisu, którego najwyraźnej klient Pythonowy w ogóle nie obsługuje. Trzeba podawać `--new-bundle-format`, żeby dostać podpisy zgodne z innymi klientami.
Przy weryfikacji też trzeba podawać `--new-format`. W przeciwnym wypadku, otrzymamy zupełnie niejasny komunikat:
Error: bundle does not contain cert for verification, please provide public key
No i oczywiście znaleźć jakiekolwiek informacje jest kosmicznie trudno. Odkryłem, jak to się robi tylko dlatego, że kojarzyłem, że kiedyś na forum Pythona był na ten temat wątek, i ktoś rzucił przykładem, jak weryfikować wydania CPythona za pomocą tego wynalazku.
-
#SigStore claim: it has multiple clients and it's easy to use.
Reality:
#Cosign defaults to using a bundle format that doesn't seem to be supported by SigStore-python at all. You have to explicitly pass `--new-bundle-format` to create compatible signatures.
You also have to explicitly pass `--new-format` when verifying. Otherwise, Cosign will give you a completely confusing message:
Error: bundle does not contain cert for verification, please provide public key
And of course it's quite hard to find any information on this. I've realized it only because I recalled a SigStore-related thread on discuss.python.org, and a single example of using Cosign to verify CPython signatures was given there.
-
#Sigstore creator, #Chainguard CEO, #OpenSSF TAC member and Season 1 guest Dan Lorenc returns to the #ITOps Query podcast to discuss the year in #opensource and #cybersecurity. Topics range from #softwaresupplychain management, hardening #containerimages and #SBOMs in limbo to #openproduct companies and business models, including his own company's shift in focus this year. Plus: a look ahead to #SecOps and #AI in 2025. #yearinreview #2024yearinreview
-
We have Sigstore `cosign` tool in Debian's NEW queue! Please help test #sigstore #cosign https://lists.debian.org/debian-go/2024/12/msg00005.html
-
Yeah, but then you'd run your own closed instance that wouldn’t be trusted by others and you’re back to square one of identifying which key is trusted. The system works best if everyone trusts Google, Microsoft and Github. I guess you can run your own instance in a closed corporate setting (like a custom CA) but it wouldn’t give any benefits for the wider ecosystem.
That’s how I see it, happy to be corrected by someone more intimately associated with sigstore.
-
Wondering whether users of #cosign (by #sigstore) and #slsa (slsa-verifier) would have opinions on how to best make use of these verification tools when downloading binaries for use in container images?
I started a StackOverflow discussion here with more details, since I'm new to playing around with these toolchains:
-
Signed container images with buildah, podman and cosign via GitHub Actions: https://tim.siosm.fr/blog/2023/12/20/signed-container-images/
Explaining how I signed the Toolbx and Distrobox container images (https://github.com/toolbx-images/images) and the ones in my personal namespace on Quay.io (https://github.com/travier/quay-containerfiles) using cosign.
-
Securing CICD pipelines with StackRox and Sigstore https://www.opensourcerers.org/2023/10/09/securing-cicd-pipelines-with-stackrox-and-sigstore/
#cosign #sigstore #tekton #Kubernetes #cicd -
Have a sneak preview of apt-sigstore - which glues together Sigstore rekor logging and "apt-get update" in Trisquel GNU/Linux and the rest of the apt eco-system. #trisquel #gnu #sigstore #rekor https://gitlab.com/debdistutils/apt-sigstore
-
Je commence par un talk sur #SLSA, #Sigstore et #Kyverno, présenté par Mohamed Abdennebi (Sfeir).
J'ai beaucoup aimé ce talk parce que ça m'a donné *enfin* un bon exposé sur la théorie (les différentes briques à mettre en œuvre pour monter une défense contre les attaques de type "software supply chain") mais aussi la pratique, avec des workflows GitHub Actions et des policy Kyverno pouvant servir de base pour ses propres projets.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cWpC96J05gI&list=PLmZ3gFl2Aqt8KydeXjUFbzjkTn4RtHcX1&index=6
-
Excellent article demonstrating how to integrate #TUF and @[email protected] with a private deployment of @[email protected]. Love seeing more examples to illustrate how to create a #sigstore deployment of your own! #sigstore #kyverno #security https://flxw.de/tuf-kyverno-and-custom-sigstore
-
Free software signing service now available from Sigstore https://www.fosslife.org/sigstore-announces-general-availability-software-signing-service #Sigstore #SoftwareDevelopment #security #tools #OpenSource #FOSS #Fulcio #Cosign #Rekor #DigitalSigning #verification
-
Free software signing service now available from Sigstore https://www.fosslife.org/sigstore-announces-general-availability-software-signing-service #Sigstore #SoftwareDevelopment #security #tools #OpenSource #FOSS #Fulcio #Cosign #Rekor #DigitalSigning #verification
-
Free software signing service now available from Sigstore https://www.fosslife.org/sigstore-announces-general-availability-software-signing-service #Sigstore #SoftwareDevelopment #security #tools #OpenSource #FOSS #Fulcio #Cosign #Rekor #DigitalSigning #verification
-
heise-Angebot: Continuous Lifecycle und ContainerConf 2022: Workshops zu Kubernetes und GitOps
Sieben Workshops zu CI/CD, GitOps sowie Konfiguration und Sicherheit in Kubernetes runden das Programm der Continuous Lifecycle und ContainerConf 2022 ab.
Continuous Lifecycle und ContainerConf 2022: Workshops zu Kubernetes und GitOps -
#Gitsign – #Keyless Git commit signing with #Sigstore
Overview and Guidance
https://blog.sigstore.dev/introducing-gitsign-9fd3f1b682aa