#semeiotic — Public Fediverse posts

Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 5
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2024/01/26/survey-of-semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-5/

C.S. Peirce defines “logic” as “formal semiotic”, using “formal” to distinguish the role of logic as a normative science, over and above the descriptive study of signs and their role in wider fields of play. Understanding logic as Peirce understands it thus requires a companion study of semiotics, semiosis, and sign relations.

What follows is a Survey of blog and wiki resources on the theory of signs, variously known as “semeiotic” or “semiotics”, and the actions referred to as “semiosis” which transform signs among themselves in relation to their objects, all as based on C.S. Peirce's concept of triadic sign relations.

Please follow the above link for the full set of resources.
Articles and blog series on the core ideas are linked below.

Elements —

• Semeiotic ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Semeiotic )

• Sign Relations ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Sign_relation )

Sources —

C.S. Peirce • On the Definition of Logic
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/01/c-s-peirce-on-the-definition-of-logic/

C.S. Peirce • Logic as Semiotic
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/04/c-s-peirce-logic-as-semiotic/

C.S. Peirce • Objective Logic
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/03/09/c-s-peirce-objective-logic/

Blog Series —

• Semeiotic ( https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2008/07/30/semeiotic/ )

#Peirce #Logic #LogicAsSemiotics #Semeiotic #Semiotics #Semiosis
#RelationTheory #InterpretiveFrameworks #ObjectiveFrameworks
#SystemsOfInterpretation #SignRelations #TriadicRelations

Survey of Semiotics, Semiosis, Sign Relations • 4
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2023/04/05/survey-of-semiotics-semiosis-sign-relations-4/

C.S. Peirce defines “logic” as “formal semiotic”, using “formal” to distinguish the role of logic as a normative science, over and above the more descriptive study of signs in the wild and their antics at large. Understanding logic as Peirce understood it therefore requires a companion study of semiotics, semiosis, and sign relations.

This is a Survey of blog and wiki resources on the theory of signs, also known as “semeiotic” or “semiotics”, and the actions referred to as “semiosis” which transform signs among themselves in relation to their objects, all as based on C.S. Peirce's concept of triadic sign relations.

Please follow the above link for the full set of resources.
Articles and blog series on the core ideas are linked below.

Elements —

• Semeiotic ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Semeiotic )

• Sign Relations ( https://oeis.org/wiki/Sign_relation )

Sources —

C.S. Peirce • On the Definition of Logic
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/01/c-s-peirce-on-the-definition-of-logic/

C.S. Peirce • Logic as Semiotic
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/06/04/c-s-peirce-logic-as-semiotic/

C.S. Peirce • Objective Logic
• https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2012/03/09/c-s-peirce-objective-logic/

Blog Series —

• Semeiotic ( https://inquiryintoinquiry.com/2008/07/30/semeiotic/ )

#Peirce #Logic #LogicAsSemiotics #Semeiotic #Semiotics #Semiosis
#RelationTheory #InterpretiveFrameworks #ObjectiveFrameworks
#SystemsOfInterpretation #SignRelations #TriadicRelations

@ceperez

I'll always be talking about Peircean semiotics here.

Up until 15 or 20 years ago folks observed the distinction between #Peirce's #Semiotics or #Semeiotic(s) and #Saussure's #Semiology, but then some European schools decided the latter term was not sexy enough and they switched. More confusion than fusion ensued. Today we have as much pop semiotics as pop psychology, which is a good when it draws people into the fold but less good when it leaves the field spindled and mutilated.