home.social

#scholarlymigration — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #scholarlymigration, aggregated by home.social.

  1. Based on 30M+ Scopus papers from 19M+ authors (1996–2020), for the first time, we have global subnational estimates of scholarly migration - covering both internal & international flows:

    :doi: doi.org/10.1073/pnas.242452112

    Key insight: Internal migration is more common, but international mobility is far more unequal. Even global magnets like the US have losing regions.

    🌍 Explore the interactive data here: scholarlymigration.org/

    #ScholarlyMigration #ScienceMobility #BrainDrain #ResearchPolicy

  2. Based on 30M+ Scopus papers from 19M+ authors (1996–2020), for the first time, we have global subnational estimates of scholarly migration - covering both internal & international flows:

    :doi: doi.org/10.1073/pnas.242452112

    Key insight: Internal migration is more common, but international mobility is far more unequal. Even global magnets like the US have losing regions.

    🌍 Explore the interactive data here: scholarlymigration.org/

    #ScholarlyMigration #ScienceMobility #BrainDrain #ResearchPolicy

  3. Based on 30M+ Scopus papers from 19M+ authors (1996–2020), for the first time, we have global subnational estimates of scholarly migration - covering both internal & international flows:

    :doi: doi.org/10.1073/pnas.242452112

    Key insight: Internal migration is more common, but international mobility is far more unequal. Even global magnets like the US have losing regions.

    🌍 Explore the interactive data here: scholarlymigration.org/

    #ScholarlyMigration #ScienceMobility #BrainDrain #ResearchPolicy

  4. Based on 30M+ Scopus papers from 19M+ authors (1996–2020), for the first time, we have global subnational estimates of scholarly migration - covering both internal & international flows:

    :doi: doi.org/10.1073/pnas.242452112

    Key insight: Internal migration is more common, but international mobility is far more unequal. Even global magnets like the US have losing regions.

    🌍 Explore the interactive data here: scholarlymigration.org/

    #ScholarlyMigration #ScienceMobility #BrainDrain #ResearchPolicy

  5. Based on 30M+ Scopus papers from 19M+ authors (1996–2020), for the first time, we have global subnational estimates of scholarly migration - covering both internal & international flows:

    :doi: doi.org/10.1073/pnas.242452112

    Key insight: Internal migration is more common, but international mobility is far more unequal. Even global magnets like the US have losing regions.

    🌍 Explore the interactive data here: scholarlymigration.org/

    #ScholarlyMigration #ScienceMobility #BrainDrain #ResearchPolicy