#relativistic — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #relativistic, aggregated by home.social.
-
1/n Notes on #UAP Discussions : Many of us never expected UAP to enter into consideration in work on #QuantumGravity because you'd basically be run out of town. Things changed somewhat when weight of evidence came down in favor of there being physically real vehicles involved. It isn't #SciFi anymore.
Still, many don't understand why
#QuantumMechanics and #Relativistic #Physics are important here. The concepts are challenging, even for grad students.
Einstein unified time and space and... -
1/n Notes on #UAP Discussions : Many of us never expected UAP to enter into consideration in work on #QuantumGravity because you'd basically be run out of town. Things changed somewhat when weight of evidence came down in favor of there being physically real vehicles involved. It isn't #SciFi anymore.
Still, many don't understand why
#QuantumMechanics and #Relativistic #Physics are important here. The concepts are challenging, even for grad students.
Einstein unified time and space and... -
1/n Notes on #UAP Discussions : Many of us never expected UAP to enter into consideration in work on #QuantumGravity because you'd basically be run out of town. Things changed somewhat when weight of evidence came down in favor of there being physically real vehicles involved. It isn't #SciFi anymore.
Still, many don't understand why
#QuantumMechanics and #Relativistic #Physics are important here. The concepts are challenging, even for grad students.
Einstein unified time and space and... -
1/n Notes on #UAP Discussions : Many of us never expected UAP to enter into consideration in work on #QuantumGravity because you'd basically be run out of town. Things changed somewhat when weight of evidence came down in favor of there being physically real vehicles involved. It isn't #SciFi anymore.
Still, many don't understand why
#QuantumMechanics and #Relativistic #Physics are important here. The concepts are challenging, even for grad students.
Einstein unified time and space and... -
1/n Notes on #UAP Discussions : Many of us never expected UAP to enter into consideration in work on #QuantumGravity because you'd basically be run out of town. Things changed somewhat when weight of evidence came down in favor of there being physically real vehicles involved. It isn't #SciFi anymore.
Still, many don't understand why
#QuantumMechanics and #Relativistic #Physics are important here. The concepts are challenging, even for grad students.
Einstein unified time and space and... -
The plot in question:
It's a figure I made for my #thesis that shows the #relativistic emissivity pattern of an #accretion disc illumed by an off-axis hot X-ray corona around a spinning #blackhole
The radial axis is logarithmic (up to 100 rg). The corona is located at 10 rg on the right. Labels are logarithms of emissivity.
The curvature of spacetime is lensing the photons from the corona onto the innermost regions, and causes the spiral-like deformation from the frame-dragging effect.
-
SciTech Chronicles. . . . . . . . .Mar 21st, 2025
#MRI #amnesia #hippocampus #engrams #sustainable, low-carbon #waste #Portland #TGF #relativistic #electrons #positrons #safety-critical #confidence-sharing #dyad #spatiotemporal #biodegradable #gene #promoter #D-LDH
-
Brain twizzler for today continuing down the #angular #momentum rabbit hole.
So what's big and round and spins re-he-heally fast?
How about particles in the #LHC.
Also note that E= MC² is an approximation and the actual equation considers #relativistic speed for #mass.
So.. the question today is.. does the LHC at full power slow the rotation of the Earth because of angular momentum.
Yup.. that's a good one.
-
#Physicist Fay Dowker & #science #historian David Kaiser give a brief two-minute explanation contrasting the #Newtonian classical view of Time with the #Einsteinian modern or #relativistic view of Time. Nicely illustrated & articulated, not touching on contemporary #quantum Time.
🔗 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-ZtaG7OqO8 03 Aug 2015
🔗 https://Wikipedia.org/wiki/Fay_Dowker
🔗 https://Wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kaiser_(physicist)#Community #TimeTravel #Research #Newton #Einstein #SpaceTime #KrononautMoon
-
#Physicist Fay Dowker & #science #historian David Kaiser give a brief two-minute explanation contrasting the #Newtonian classical view of Time with the #Einsteinian modern or #relativistic view of Time. Nicely illustrated & articulated, not touching on contemporary #quantum Time.
🔗 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-ZtaG7OqO8 03 Aug 2015
🔗 https://Wikipedia.org/wiki/Fay_Dowker
🔗 https://Wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kaiser_(physicist)#Community #TimeTravel #Research #Newton #Einstein #SpaceTime #KrononautMoon
-
#Physicist Fay Dowker & #science #historian David Kaiser give a brief two-minute explanation contrasting the #Newtonian classical view of Time with the #Einsteinian modern or #relativistic view of Time. Nicely illustrated & articulated, not touching on contemporary #quantum Time.
🔗 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-ZtaG7OqO8 03 Aug 2015
🔗 https://Wikipedia.org/wiki/Fay_Dowker
🔗 https://Wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kaiser_(physicist)#Community #TimeTravel #Research #Newton #Einstein #SpaceTime #KrononautMoon
-
#Physicist Fay Dowker & #science #historian David Kaiser give a brief two-minute explanation contrasting the #Newtonian classical view of Time with the #Einsteinian modern or #relativistic view of Time. Nicely illustrated & articulated, not touching on contemporary #quantum Time.
🔗 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-ZtaG7OqO8 03 Aug 2015
🔗 https://Wikipedia.org/wiki/Fay_Dowker
🔗 https://Wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kaiser_(physicist)#Community #TimeTravel #Research #Newton #Einstein #SpaceTime #KrononautMoon
-
#Physicist Fay Dowker & #science #historian David Kaiser give a brief two-minute explanation contrasting the #Newtonian classical view of Time with the #Einsteinian modern or #relativistic view of Time. Nicely illustrated & articulated, not touching on contemporary #quantum Time.
🔗 https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=U-ZtaG7OqO8 03 Aug 2015
🔗 https://Wikipedia.org/wiki/Fay_Dowker
🔗 https://Wikipedia.org/wiki/David_Kaiser_(physicist)#Community #TimeTravel #Research #Newton #Einstein #SpaceTime #KrononautMoon
-
Right - so 2 basic ways to look at it:
Each specialty branch comes up with their own perspectives, priorities/hierarchies, and jargon. With few exceptions, they stay in their own lanes and do not mix outside their field/subfield. Their writings are stand-alone, rarely intended to connect back to the greater human knowledge base. They'll tell you exactly what "wet" or "sound" is, based entirely on their tiny-desk world-view.
The other way would be a general model of vibration, perhaps based on quantitative info rather than qualitative. It would incorporate all modes of vibratory phenomena, regardless of mediums, velocities, or other characteristics that were fleshed out by some subfield as critical for their particular context & definitions.
Frequency (Hz) actually would be a good quantitative baseline for this, if it hadn't been exorcised from #quantum mechanics.
The "old QM", as espoused by the founders and historic supporters for the split in Physics, used a semi-classical approach that was later abandoned. Later, Pi was added to E = hf as convenience for some aspects, but frequency generally falls away when you work with quantum states ala Schrödinger. #Time is just an input to QM, and is the #Newtonian, absolute kind. The concepts of frequency & wavelength seem to get in the way of the probabilistic formalism.
IMO, the #probabilistic formalism then gets in the way of a #relativistic completion to quantum theory being developed, though in reality, there is no limit to the imaginative supplemental mathematic epicycles that can be added while still spitting out the same expected answers.
-
Right - so 2 basic ways to look at it:
Each specialty branch comes up with their own perspectives, priorities/hierarchies, and jargon. With few exceptions, they stay in their own lanes and do not mix outside their field/subfield. Their writings are stand-alone, rarely intended to connect back to the greater human knowledge base. They'll tell you exactly what "wet" or "sound" is, based entirely on their tiny-desk world-view.
The other way would be a general model of vibration, perhaps based on quantitative info rather than qualitative. It would incorporate all modes of vibratory phenomena, regardless of mediums, velocities, or other characteristics that were fleshed out by some subfield as critical for their particular context & definitions.
Frequency (Hz) actually would be a good quantitative baseline for this, if it hadn't been exorcised from #quantum mechanics.
The "old QM", as espoused by the founders and historic supporters for the split in Physics, used a semi-classical approach that was later abandoned. Later, Pi was added to E = hf as convenience for some aspects, but frequency generally falls away when you work with quantum states ala Schrödinger. #Time is just an input to QM, and is the #Newtonian, absolute kind. The concepts of frequency & wavelength seem to get in the way of the probabilistic formalism.
IMO, the #probabilistic formalism then gets in the way of a #relativistic completion to quantum theory being developed, though in reality, there is no limit to the imaginative supplemental mathematic epicycles that can be added while still spitting out the same expected answers.
-
Right - so 2 basic ways to look at it:
Each specialty branch comes up with their own perspectives, priorities/hierarchies, and jargon. With few exceptions, they stay in their own lanes and do not mix outside their field/subfield. Their writings are stand-alone, rarely intended to connect back to the greater human knowledge base. They'll tell you exactly what "wet" or "sound" is, based entirely on their tiny-desk world-view.
The other way would be a general model of vibration, perhaps based on quantitative info rather than qualitative. It would incorporate all modes of vibratory phenomena, regardless of mediums, velocities, or other characteristics that were fleshed out by some subfield as critical for their particular context & definitions.
Frequency (Hz) actually would be a good quantitative baseline for this, if it hadn't been exorcised from #quantum mechanics.
The "old QM", as espoused by the founders and historic supporters for the split in Physics, used a semi-classical approach that was later abandoned. Later, Pi was added to E = hf as convenience for some aspects, but frequency generally falls away when you work with quantum states ala Schrödinger. #Time is just an input to QM, and is the #Newtonian, absolute kind. The concepts of frequency & wavelength seem to get in the way of the probabilistic formalism.
IMO, the #probabilistic formalism then gets in the way of a #relativistic completion to quantum theory being developed, though in reality, there is no limit to the imaginative supplemental mathematic epicycles that can be added while still spitting out the same expected answers.
-
Right - so 2 basic ways to look at it:
Each specialty branch comes up with their own perspectives, priorities/hierarchies, and jargon. With few exceptions, they stay in their own lanes and do not mix outside their field/subfield. Their writings are stand-alone, rarely intended to connect back to the greater human knowledge base. They'll tell you exactly what "wet" or "sound" is, based entirely on their tiny-desk world-view.
The other way would be a general model of vibration, perhaps based on quantitative info rather than qualitative. It would incorporate all modes of vibratory phenomena, regardless of mediums, velocities, or other characteristics that were fleshed out by some subfield as critical for their particular context & definitions.
Frequency (Hz) actually would be a good quantitative baseline for this, if it hadn't been exorcised from #quantum mechanics.
The "old QM", as espoused by the founders and historic supporters for the split in Physics, used a semi-classical approach that was later abandoned. Later, Pi was added to E = hf as convenience for some aspects, but frequency generally falls away when you work with quantum states ala Schrödinger. #Time is just an input to QM, and is the #Newtonian, absolute kind. The concepts of frequency & wavelength seem to get in the way of the probabilistic formalism.
IMO, the #probabilistic formalism then gets in the way of a #relativistic completion to quantum theory being developed, though in reality, there is no limit to the imaginative supplemental mathematic epicycles that can be added while still spitting out the same expected answers.
-
Right - so 2 basic ways to look at it:
Each specialty branch comes up with their own perspectives, priorities/hierarchies, and jargon. With few exceptions, they stay in their own lanes and do not mix outside their field/subfield. Their writings are stand-alone, rarely intended to connect back to the greater human knowledge base. They'll tell you exactly what "wet" or "sound" is, based entirely on their tiny-desk world-view.
The other way would be a general model of vibration, perhaps based on quantitative info rather than qualitative. It would incorporate all modes of vibratory phenomena, regardless of mediums, velocities, or other characteristics that were fleshed out by some subfield as critical for their particular context & definitions.
Frequency (Hz) actually would be a good quantitative baseline for this, if it hadn't been exorcised from #quantum mechanics.
The "old QM", as espoused by the founders and historic supporters for the split in Physics, used a semi-classical approach that was later abandoned. Later, Pi was added to E = hf as convenience for some aspects, but frequency generally falls away when you work with quantum states ala Schrödinger. #Time is just an input to QM, and is the #Newtonian, absolute kind. The concepts of frequency & wavelength seem to get in the way of the probabilistic formalism.
IMO, the #probabilistic formalism then gets in the way of a #relativistic completion to quantum theory being developed, though in reality, there is no limit to the imaginative supplemental mathematic epicycles that can be added while still spitting out the same expected answers.
-
Ultra-intense, #relativistic rotating charged #particle rings compressed toward zero radius create Leidenfrost-like #Unruh layers of #Casimir tunnels of negative #energy. #Quantum and #classical realms are merely different #spacetime phase states. The "liquid" spacetime state corresponds to classical realm, the "condensed" spacetime state corresponds to quantum realm and the "vapor" spacetime state corresponds to Unruh layers which "insulate" coherent quantum properties from the classical realm.
-
"Warping Spacetime through #Physics & #Engineering. Ultra-intense #Relativistic vortex flows of charge compressed toward zero radius create #Unruh layers of #Spacetime phase-transition & #Casimir tunnels of #NegativeEnergy." -
@PrometheusWarpX👉http://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2306.06133
👉http://youtube.com/live/95i9m5B2NFY?feature=share#WarpReactor #WarpCore #FusionEnergy #WarpDrive #Wormhole #Physics #Engineering #PulsedPower #QuantumGravity #Relativity #Accelerator #SpaceTime #Gravity #PlasmaPhysics #UFO #StarTrek #StarWars