#realmode — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #realmode, aggregated by home.social.
-
The actual message is not, strictly speaking, an error. It just means that you're bootstrapping the non-EFI way, and your machine's firmware does not adhere to a convention (I believe from DOS+Windows 95 and the 1990s) for marking "not an MBR virus and safe" firmware add-on disc device I/O handlers.
It's unlikely that F000:F0BF is actually unsafe, as that's in (notional) ROM.
This message is very likely a red herring.
-
The actual message is not, strictly speaking, an error. It just means that you're bootstrapping the non-EFI way, and your machine's firmware does not adhere to a convention (I believe from DOS+Windows 95 and the 1990s) for marking "not an MBR virus and safe" firmware add-on disc device I/O handlers.
It's unlikely that F000:F0BF is actually unsafe, as that's in (notional) ROM.
This message is very likely a red herring.
-
The actual message is not, strictly speaking, an error. It just means that you're bootstrapping the non-EFI way, and your machine's firmware does not adhere to a convention (I believe from DOS+Windows 95 and the 1990s) for marking "not an MBR virus and safe" firmware add-on disc device I/O handlers.
It's unlikely that F000:F0BF is actually unsafe, as that's in (notional) ROM.
This message is very likely a red herring.
-
The actual message is not, strictly speaking, an error. It just means that you're bootstrapping the non-EFI way, and your machine's firmware does not adhere to a convention (I believe from DOS+Windows 95 and the 1990s) for marking "not an MBR virus and safe" firmware add-on disc device I/O handlers.
It's unlikely that F000:F0BF is actually unsafe, as that's in (notional) ROM.
This message is very likely a red herring.
-
The actual message is not, strictly speaking, an error. It just means that you're bootstrapping the non-EFI way, and your machine's firmware does not adhere to a convention (I believe from DOS+Windows 95 and the 1990s) for marking "not an MBR virus and safe" firmware add-on disc device I/O handlers.
It's unlikely that F000:F0BF is actually unsafe, as that's in (notional) ROM.
This message is very likely a red herring.
-
The odd thing is that the linear address does not match the segmented address.
It's likely not the true cause of your problems, though; but the mis-match might be symptomatic.
#RealMode #80386 #IA32 #BootLoaders
-
The odd thing is that the linear address does not match the segmented address.
It's likely not the true cause of your problems, though; but the mis-match might be symptomatic.
#RealMode #80386 #IA32 #BootLoaders
-
The odd thing is that the linear address does not match the segmented address.
It's likely not the true cause of your problems, though; but the mis-match might be symptomatic.
#RealMode #80386 #IA32 #BootLoaders
-
The odd thing is that the linear address does not match the segmented address.
It's likely not the true cause of your problems, though; but the mis-match might be symptomatic.
#RealMode #80386 #IA32 #BootLoaders
-
The odd thing is that the linear address does not match the segmented address.
It's likely not the true cause of your problems, though; but the mis-match might be symptomatic.
#RealMode #80386 #IA32 #BootLoaders