#propinquity — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #propinquity, aggregated by home.social.

Reda Sadki @[email protected] · 2026-01-21 · 11:00 UTC
The future of hybrid engagement: accelerated action to tackle global threats

How can we use the new physics of digital connections to save lives? What is the future of hybrid engagement?
The ultimate test of any digital architecture is whether it can deliver results in the real world. In the context of global health, the challenge is bridging the “know-do gap.” This is the chasm between high-level strategies written in Geneva or Seattle and the messy reality of a health clinic in a conflict zone. Traditional capacity-building often relies on the “transmission” of knowledge from experts to novices. This approach assumes that a lack of knowledge is the primary barrier to action. However, evidence suggests the binding constraint is often a lack of social scaffolding. Without the trust and shared context that physical presence historically provided, knowledge fails to travel. The Geneva Learning Foundation has developed an implementation engine that solves this not by building better courses, but by reconstructing the sociology of connection. This engine operates through a “Full Learning Cycle” that integrates three patterns: mobilization, analysis, and action. Each phase is designed to engineer specific psychological effects—social presence, swift trust, and digital accompaniment—that distance usually destroys.
Mobilization: validating social presence
The cycle begins with programs like “Teach to Reach,” which mobilize thousands of practitioners to share their own tacit knowledge. In the first article of this series, we explored how remote partners often feel like abstract entities rather than real people. Teach to Reach counters this “illusion of non-existence” by validating the lived experience of the frontline worker. When a nurse in rural Nigeria shares a story of overcoming vaccine hesitancy, she is no longer a name in a database; she becomes a sentient peer. This act of sharing creates the “social presence” required for trust. It signals that the practitioner is an “insider”—a creator of knowledge rather than just a recipient of aid. This manufactures the status and recognition that was previously available only to those who could travel to global conferences.
Analysis: engineering high-bandwidth interaction
The second phase, the “Peer Learning Exercise,” guides participants through a structured analysis of a complex problem. This phase addresses the loss of “propinquity,” or physical nearness. In a physical workshop, trust is built through the high-bandwidth exchange of ideas. To replicate this digitally, the Foundation uses “recursive feedback” loops. Participants do not just consume content; they must review and critique the work of their peers using structured rubrics. This forces a “mutual directionality” where participants engage deeply with another human’s cognition. By struggling through a problem together, they generate the “swift trust” essential for collaboration. The digital platform becomes a virtual hallway, facilitating the deep, interpersonal “bumps” that move relationships from transactional to transformational.
Action: from surveillance to accompaniment
Finally, and most crucially, the “Impact Accelerator” supports continuous action in the professional’s daily work. This phase operationalizes the shift from “remote management” to “digital accompaniment”. Traditional remote management creates distance through surveillance, asking “Have you done the work?”. The Accelerator inverts this. Participants set weekly goals and report back to their peers, creating a rhythm of high-frequency, low-stakes contact. This mimics the psychological closeness of a mentor walking alongside a partner. It keeps the relationship in a “simmering” state of readiness, providing the “electronic propinquity” that sustains motivation over time. The reporting mechanism is not about bureaucratic compliance; it is about professional solidarity.
The metrics of connection
The results of this architecture are quantifiable. A comparative study from January 2020 demonstrated that participants in this structured peer support model were seven times more likely to report credible implementation of their plans compared to a control group. Furthermore, this model delivers capacity building at approximately 90 percent lower cost than conventional face-to-face technical assistance. By removing the reliance on travel and per diems, the model selects for intrinsic motivation. It identifies the “positive outliers” who are genuinely committed to their mission. This architecture democratizes the “insider” status, allowing a health worker in a remote district to access the social validation and professional network previously reserved for the elite. By shifting from surveillance to solidarity, we build a more resilient system of global cooperation. The future of hybrid engagement lies in creating this “Hybrid Intimacy,” where digital tools are used to forge bonds as real and at least as effective as those formed in the physical world.
A new peer learning programme for those leading change across distance
Distance is no longer a barrier to partnership. It is the condition for a new kind of “augmented reality” where collaboration can be more inclusive and effective than in the physical world. The Geneva Learning Foundation’s Certificate peer learning programme in Artificial Intelligence includes a tactical primer to master the essentials of digital, remote work and partnering with both humans and machines as co-workers. The primer serves as the stepping stone to a broader strategic transformation, where you will learn to build communities of action that scale expertise and deliver results faster. By rejecting the “digital dualism” that treats online interaction as a deficit, you will turn the necessity of working apart into a decisive organizational advantage. Get The Geneva Learning Foundation’s AI framework now. You will then receive the invitation to join the primer on the essentials of partnering and work in the Age of AI.
References
- Lampel, J. and Meyer, A.D. (2008) ‘Field-Configuring Events as Structuring Mechanisms: How Conferences, Ceremonies, and Trade Shows Constitute New Technologies, Industries, and Markets’, Journal of Management Studies, 45(6), pp. 1025–1035. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00797.x
- Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
- Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner, D.E. (1999) ‘Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams’, Organization Science, 10(6), pp. 791–815. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791
- Jones I, Sadki R, Brooks A, Gasse F, Mbuh C, Zha M, et al. IA2030 Movement Year 1 report. Consultative engagement through a digitally enabled peer learning platform. The Geneva Learning Foundation; 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7119648.
- Sadki, R., 2024. How can we reliably spread evidence-based practices at the speed and scale modern health challenges demand? https://doi.org/10.59350/cqxmj-3bd96.
- Sadki, R., 2025. What is The Geneva Learning Foundation’s Impact Accelerator?https://doi.org/10.59350/redasadki.21161.
- Sadki, R., 2025. PFA Accelerator: across Europe, practitioners learn from each other to strengthen support to children affected by the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine. https://doi.org/10.59350/redasadki.21155.
- Watkins, K.E., Bhattarai, A., 2019. Analysis of the Impact Accelerator Launch Pad Individual Acceleration Reports in July 2019. University of Georgia at Athens, Athens, United States.
About the installation
The Signal Between Us © The Geneva Learning Foundation 2026. This installation stages two opposing forms held apart yet bound by a dense, vibrating core. The white masses suggest distinct spaces, faces, or systems, while the suspended central structure pulses like a shared frequency, translating distance into connection. Fragmented, uneven, and charged with tension, it evokes the work of hybrid engagement: aligning what is separate without erasing difference. The piece suggests that action does not arise from uniformity, but from the ability to synchronize across divides, where meaning, trust, and momentum are carried through the signals we learn to sustain together. #digitalArchitecture #FullLearningCycle #globalThreats #hybridEngagement #propinquity #remoteWork #socialPresence #SocialPresenceTheory #TeachToReach #TheGenevaLearningFoundation
#thegenevalearningfoundation #teachtoreach #socialpresencetheory #socialpresence #remotework #propinquity
Reda Sadki @[email protected] · 2026-01-21 · 11:00 UTC
The future of hybrid engagement: accelerated action to tackle global threats

How can we use the new physics of digital connections to save lives? What is the future of hybrid engagement?
The ultimate test of any digital architecture is whether it can deliver results in the real world. In the context of global health, the challenge is bridging the “know-do gap.” This is the chasm between high-level strategies written in Geneva or Seattle and the messy reality of a health clinic in a conflict zone. Traditional capacity-building often relies on the “transmission” of knowledge from experts to novices. This approach assumes that a lack of knowledge is the primary barrier to action. However, evidence suggests the binding constraint is often a lack of social scaffolding. Without the trust and shared context that physical presence historically provided, knowledge fails to travel. The Geneva Learning Foundation has developed an implementation engine that solves this not by building better courses, but by reconstructing the sociology of connection. This engine operates through a “Full Learning Cycle” that integrates three patterns: mobilization, analysis, and action. Each phase is designed to engineer specific psychological effects—social presence, swift trust, and digital accompaniment—that distance usually destroys.
Mobilization: validating social presence
The cycle begins with programs like “Teach to Reach,” which mobilize thousands of practitioners to share their own tacit knowledge. In the first article of this series, we explored how remote partners often feel like abstract entities rather than real people. Teach to Reach counters this “illusion of non-existence” by validating the lived experience of the frontline worker. When a nurse in rural Nigeria shares a story of overcoming vaccine hesitancy, she is no longer a name in a database; she becomes a sentient peer. This act of sharing creates the “social presence” required for trust. It signals that the practitioner is an “insider”—a creator of knowledge rather than just a recipient of aid. This manufactures the status and recognition that was previously available only to those who could travel to global conferences.
Analysis: engineering high-bandwidth interaction
The second phase, the “Peer Learning Exercise,” guides participants through a structured analysis of a complex problem. This phase addresses the loss of “propinquity,” or physical nearness. In a physical workshop, trust is built through the high-bandwidth exchange of ideas. To replicate this digitally, the Foundation uses “recursive feedback” loops. Participants do not just consume content; they must review and critique the work of their peers using structured rubrics. This forces a “mutual directionality” where participants engage deeply with another human’s cognition. By struggling through a problem together, they generate the “swift trust” essential for collaboration. The digital platform becomes a virtual hallway, facilitating the deep, interpersonal “bumps” that move relationships from transactional to transformational.
Action: from surveillance to accompaniment
Finally, and most crucially, the “Impact Accelerator” supports continuous action in the professional’s daily work. This phase operationalizes the shift from “remote management” to “digital accompaniment”. Traditional remote management creates distance through surveillance, asking “Have you done the work?”. The Accelerator inverts this. Participants set weekly goals and report back to their peers, creating a rhythm of high-frequency, low-stakes contact. This mimics the psychological closeness of a mentor walking alongside a partner. It keeps the relationship in a “simmering” state of readiness, providing the “electronic propinquity” that sustains motivation over time. The reporting mechanism is not about bureaucratic compliance; it is about professional solidarity.
The metrics of connection
The results of this architecture are quantifiable. A comparative study from January 2020 demonstrated that participants in this structured peer support model were seven times more likely to report credible implementation of their plans compared to a control group. Furthermore, this model delivers capacity building at approximately 90 percent lower cost than conventional face-to-face technical assistance. By removing the reliance on travel and per diems, the model selects for intrinsic motivation. It identifies the “positive outliers” who are genuinely committed to their mission. This architecture democratizes the “insider” status, allowing a health worker in a remote district to access the social validation and professional network previously reserved for the elite. By shifting from surveillance to solidarity, we build a more resilient system of global cooperation. The future of hybrid engagement lies in creating this “Hybrid Intimacy,” where digital tools are used to forge bonds as real and at least as effective as those formed in the physical world.
A new peer learning programme for those leading change across distance
Distance is no longer a barrier to partnership. It is the condition for a new kind of “augmented reality” where collaboration can be more inclusive and effective than in the physical world. The Geneva Learning Foundation’s Certificate peer learning programme in Artificial Intelligence includes a tactical primer to master the essentials of digital, remote work and partnering with both humans and machines as co-workers. The primer serves as the stepping stone to a broader strategic transformation, where you will learn to build communities of action that scale expertise and deliver results faster. By rejecting the “digital dualism” that treats online interaction as a deficit, you will turn the necessity of working apart into a decisive organizational advantage. Get The Geneva Learning Foundation’s AI framework now. You will then receive the invitation to join the primer on the essentials of partnering and work in the Age of AI.
References
- Lampel, J. and Meyer, A.D. (2008) ‘Field-Configuring Events as Structuring Mechanisms: How Conferences, Ceremonies, and Trade Shows Constitute New Technologies, Industries, and Markets’, Journal of Management Studies, 45(6), pp. 1025–1035. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6486.2008.00797.x
- Lave, J. and Wenger, E. (1991) Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511815355
- Jarvenpaa, S.L. and Leidner, D.E. (1999) ‘Communication and Trust in Global Virtual Teams’, Organization Science, 10(6), pp. 791–815. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1287/orsc.10.6.791
- Jones I, Sadki R, Brooks A, Gasse F, Mbuh C, Zha M, et al. IA2030 Movement Year 1 report. Consultative engagement through a digitally enabled peer learning platform. The Geneva Learning Foundation; 2022. Available from: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7119648.
- Sadki, R., 2024. How can we reliably spread evidence-based practices at the speed and scale modern health challenges demand? https://doi.org/10.59350/cqxmj-3bd96.
- Sadki, R., 2025. What is The Geneva Learning Foundation’s Impact Accelerator?https://doi.org/10.59350/redasadki.21161.
- Sadki, R., 2025. PFA Accelerator: across Europe, practitioners learn from each other to strengthen support to children affected by the humanitarian crisis in Ukraine. https://doi.org/10.59350/redasadki.21155.
- Watkins, K.E., Bhattarai, A., 2019. Analysis of the Impact Accelerator Launch Pad Individual Acceleration Reports in July 2019. University of Georgia at Athens, Athens, United States.
About the installation
The Signal Between Us © The Geneva Learning Foundation 2026. This installation stages two opposing forms held apart yet bound by a dense, vibrating core. The white masses suggest distinct spaces, faces, or systems, while the suspended central structure pulses like a shared frequency, translating distance into connection. Fragmented, uneven, and charged with tension, it evokes the work of hybrid engagement: aligning what is separate without erasing difference. The piece suggests that action does not arise from uniformity, but from the ability to synchronize across divides, where meaning, trust, and momentum are carried through the signals we learn to sustain together. #digitalArchitecture #FullLearningCycle #globalThreats #hybridEngagement #propinquity #remoteWork #socialPresence #SocialPresenceTheory #TeachToReach #TheGenevaLearningFoundation
#digitalarchitecture #fulllearningcycle #globalthreats #hybridengagement #propinquity #remotework
Reda Sadki @[email protected] · 2026-01-20 · 07:42 UTC
Digital propinquity: how to engineer serendipity and build connection in remote teams

We cannot teleport physical proximity, but we can replicate its psychological effects in remote teams. This has everything to do with propinquity.
If the physical world provided connection by accident, the digital world requires connection by design.
The most critical loss in the shift to remote work is “propinquity,” a fancy word for physical nearness.
In the 1950s, psychologists discovered that the single best predictor of whether two people would become friends was how close their apartments were to each other.
In the professional world, this is the “hallway track” at a conference.
It is inefficient, but it is highly effective because it facilitates passive, frequent interactions.
You bump into someone at the coffee station.
You exchange a nod.
You accumulate data points about them that transform a transactional contact into a human relationship.
In a remote setting, propinquity does not happen by accident.
There is no digital equivalent of bumping into a donor at the water cooler unless someone deliberately builds it.
This requires a pivot to “Digital Propinquity.”
At The Geneva Learning Foundation, A Swiss non-profit that works globally, we have found that a sense of nearness can be cultivated digitally if we align the right factors.
In our work with health professionals globally, we utilize a concept called “structured serendipity”.
For example, one simple and surprisingly effective method we use is the “Randomized Coffee Trial”, or just “remote coffee”.
In this model, participants opt-in to be randomly paired with a stranger from the network for a short conversation based on a non-work prompt.
This mechanism builds “weak ties,” the casual connections that sociologists know are essential for innovation.
We have also found that we can change how we facilitate dialogue and connections between people and organizations online.
Traditional remote management is often rooted in a culture of surveillance.
It focuses on reporting and asks “Have you done the work?”.
This erodes trust, turning connection into suspicion.
Instead, we implement what we call “digital accompaniment”.
Derived from physical-world experiences of working side-by-side with a shared purpose, this model uses technology to provide sustained, high-touch presence.
The use of technology results in losing some of the signals we are most familiar with, grounded in our experience of the physical world.
We also gain new signals from defying distance to include those who might otherwise never meet.
The challenge is learning to listen to these signals, and how to respond to them.
That is core to our model for facilitation.
We use digital channels that are already part of people’s lives to ask: “How are you navigating this challenge?”.
This initiates and then sustains dialogue on local challenges.
Challenges in very different locations turn out to be remarkably similar.
This approach prioritizes psychological proximity over supervision, no matter how supportive the latter may be intended to be.
By establishing what we call Accompaniment Pods mediated by Foundation-supported facilitators, such networks can provide the psychological closeness usually found in face-to-face mentorship.
The facilitator acts as a sensor for the network, for example to detect early signs of distress before a participant disengages.
By treating the digital space as a distinct social architecture with its own ‘physics’, we have been able to reconstruct a new kind of intimacy or kinship that distance negates.
A new peer learning programme for those leading change across distance
Distance is no longer a barrier to partnership. It is the condition for a new kind of “augmented reality” where collaboration can be more inclusive and effective than in the physical world. The Geneva Learning Foundation’s Certificate peer learning programme in Artificial Intelligence includes a tactical primer to master the essentials of digital, remote work and partnering with both humans and machines as co-workers. The primer serves as the stepping stone to a broader strategic transformation, where you will learn to build communities of action that scale expertise and deliver results faster. By rejecting the “digital dualism” that treats online interaction as a deficit, you will turn the necessity of working apart into a decisive organizational advantage. Get The Geneva Learning Foundation’s AI framework now. You will then receive the invitation to join the primer on the essentials of partnering and work in the Age of AI.
References
- Allen, T.J. (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Festinger, L., Schachter, S. and Back, K. (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Granovetter, M.S. (1973) ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), pp. 1360–1380. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
- Korzenny, F. (1978) ‘A Theory of Electronic Propinquity: Mediated Communication in Organizations’, Communication Research, 5(1), pp. 3–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027800500101
- Sadki, R., 2023. Digital bridges cannot cross analog gates. https://doi.org/10.59350/srvap-txc24
- Soto, M., 2013. Institutionalising Serendipity via Productive Coffee Breaks. Nesta. URL https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/institutionalising-serendipity-productive-coffee-breaks (accessed 2.8.18).
- Watkins, K.E., Sadki, R., Kim, K., Suh, B., 2019. Changing Learning Paradigms in a Global Health Agency, in: Evidence-Based Initiatives for Organizational Change and Development. IGI Global, pp. 693–703. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6155-2.ch050
About the image
Near, Without Touch © The Geneva Learning Foundation 2025. This installation arranges a series of carved forms in deliberate proximity, each distinct yet subtly responsive to the others. The surfaces twist and lean as if drawn together by an unseen force, suggesting closeness that is sensed rather than physically realized. Made from the same living material but shaped along different trajectories, the figures evoke how connection can emerge through alignment, attention, and shared orientation rather than direct contact. The work reflects on proximity as something that can be engineered and cultivated, reminding us that nearness is not only a matter of distance, but of how carefully space is shaped to allow encounters to happen.
#AccompanimentPods #connectivism #digitalAccompaniment #networks #physicalPresence #propinquity #remoteTeams
#remoteteams #propinquity #physicalpresence #networks #digitalaccompaniment #connectivism
Reda Sadki @[email protected] · 2026-01-20 · 07:42 UTC
Digital propinquity: how to engineer serendipity and build connection in remote teams

We cannot teleport physical proximity, but we can replicate its psychological effects in remote teams. This has everything to do with propinquity.
If the physical world provided connection by accident, the digital world requires connection by design.
The most critical loss in the shift to remote work is “propinquity,” a fancy word for physical nearness.
In the 1950s, psychologists discovered that the single best predictor of whether two people would become friends was how close their apartments were to each other.
In the professional world, this is the “hallway track” at a conference.
It is inefficient, but it is highly effective because it facilitates passive, frequent interactions.
You bump into someone at the coffee station.
You exchange a nod.
You accumulate data points about them that transform a transactional contact into a human relationship.
In a remote setting, propinquity does not happen by accident.
There is no digital equivalent of bumping into a donor at the water cooler unless someone deliberately builds it.
This requires a pivot to “Digital Propinquity.”
At The Geneva Learning Foundation, A Swiss non-profit that works globally, we have found that a sense of nearness can be cultivated digitally if we align the right factors.
In our work with health professionals globally, we utilize a concept called “structured serendipity”.
For example, one simple and surprisingly effective method we use is the “Randomized Coffee Trial”, or just “remote coffee”.
In this model, participants opt-in to be randomly paired with a stranger from the network for a short conversation based on a non-work prompt.
This mechanism builds “weak ties,” the casual connections that sociologists know are essential for innovation.
We have also found that we can change how we facilitate dialogue and connections between people and organizations online.
Traditional remote management is often rooted in a culture of surveillance.
It focuses on reporting and asks “Have you done the work?”.
This erodes trust, turning connection into suspicion.
Instead, we implement what we call “digital accompaniment”.
Derived from physical-world experiences of working side-by-side with a shared purpose, this model uses technology to provide sustained, high-touch presence.
The use of technology results in losing some of the signals we are most familiar with, grounded in our experience of the physical world.
We also gain new signals from defying distance to include those who might otherwise never meet.
The challenge is learning to listen to these signals, and how to respond to them.
That is core to our model for facilitation.
We use digital channels that are already part of people’s lives to ask: “How are you navigating this challenge?”.
This initiates and then sustains dialogue on local challenges.
Challenges in very different locations turn out to be remarkably similar.
This approach prioritizes psychological proximity over supervision, no matter how supportive the latter may be intended to be.
By establishing what we call Accompaniment Pods mediated by Foundation-supported facilitators, such networks can provide the psychological closeness usually found in face-to-face mentorship.
The facilitator acts as a sensor for the network, for example to detect early signs of distress before a participant disengages.
By treating the digital space as a distinct social architecture with its own ‘physics’, we have been able to reconstruct a new kind of intimacy or kinship that distance negates.
A new peer learning programme for those leading change across distance
Distance is no longer a barrier to partnership. It is the condition for a new kind of “augmented reality” where collaboration can be more inclusive and effective than in the physical world. The Geneva Learning Foundation’s Certificate peer learning programme in Artificial Intelligence includes a tactical primer to master the essentials of digital, remote work and partnering with both humans and machines as co-workers. The primer serves as the stepping stone to a broader strategic transformation, where you will learn to build communities of action that scale expertise and deliver results faster. By rejecting the “digital dualism” that treats online interaction as a deficit, you will turn the necessity of working apart into a decisive organizational advantage. Get The Geneva Learning Foundation’s AI framework now. You will then receive the invitation to join the primer on the essentials of partnering and work in the Age of AI.
References
- Allen, T.J. (1977) Managing the Flow of Technology: Technology Transfer and the Dissemination of Technological Information within the R&D Organization. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
- Festinger, L., Schachter, S. and Back, K. (1950) Social Pressures in Informal Groups: A Study of Human Factors in Housing. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
- Granovetter, M.S. (1973) ‘The Strength of Weak Ties’, American Journal of Sociology, 78(6), pp. 1360–1380. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1086/225469
- Korzenny, F. (1978) ‘A Theory of Electronic Propinquity: Mediated Communication in Organizations’, Communication Research, 5(1), pp. 3–24. Available at: https://doi.org/10.1177/009365027800500101
- Sadki, R., 2023. Digital bridges cannot cross analog gates. https://doi.org/10.59350/srvap-txc24
- Soto, M., 2013. Institutionalising Serendipity via Productive Coffee Breaks. Nesta. URL https://www.nesta.org.uk/blog/institutionalising-serendipity-productive-coffee-breaks (accessed 2.8.18).
- Watkins, K.E., Sadki, R., Kim, K., Suh, B., 2019. Changing Learning Paradigms in a Global Health Agency, in: Evidence-Based Initiatives for Organizational Change and Development. IGI Global, pp. 693–703. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-6155-2.ch050
About the image
Near, Without Touch © The Geneva Learning Foundation 2025. This installation arranges a series of carved forms in deliberate proximity, each distinct yet subtly responsive to the others. The surfaces twist and lean as if drawn together by an unseen force, suggesting closeness that is sensed rather than physically realized. Made from the same living material but shaped along different trajectories, the figures evoke how connection can emerge through alignment, attention, and shared orientation rather than direct contact. The work reflects on proximity as something that can be engineered and cultivated, reminding us that nearness is not only a matter of distance, but of how carefully space is shaped to allow encounters to happen.
#AccompanimentPods #connectivism #digitalAccompaniment #networks #physicalPresence #propinquity #remoteTeams
#accompanimentpods #connectivism #digitalaccompaniment #networks #physicalpresence #propinquity