#mention — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #mention, aggregated by home.social.
-
Sans surprise, Sarkozy a soutenu son fiston vendredi lors de sa venue à Menton pour sa tournée littéraire. Loulou, parachuté à la conquête de la ville, lors des prochaines municipales, est arrivé côte à côte avec papa à la librairie locale qui accueillait l'évènement. Plusieurs centaines de fans ont fait la queue pour se faire dédicacer le "journal d'un prisonnier", qui décrit les 20 jours de détention de l'ex-président
#Politique #Sarkozy #Municipales #Mention #Fayard #Bollore #Elections
-
Sans surprise, Sarkozy a soutenu son fiston vendredi lors de sa venue à Menton pour sa tournée littéraire. Loulou, parachuté à la conquête de la ville, lors des prochaines municipales, est arrivé côte à côte avec papa à la librairie locale qui accueillait l'évènement. Plusieurs centaines de fans ont fait la queue pour se faire dédicacer le "journal d'un prisonnier", qui décrit les 20 jours de détention de l'ex-président
#Politique #Sarkozy #Municipales #Mention #Fayard #Bollore #Elections
-
Sans surprise, Sarkozy a soutenu son fiston vendredi lors de sa venue à Menton pour sa tournée littéraire. Loulou, parachuté à la conquête de la ville, lors des prochaines municipales, est arrivé côte à côte avec papa à la librairie locale qui accueillait l'évènement. Plusieurs centaines de fans ont fait la queue pour se faire dédicacer le "journal d'un prisonnier", qui décrit les 20 jours de détention de l'ex-président
#Politique #Sarkozy #Municipales #Mention #Fayard #Bollore #Elections
-
Sans surprise, Sarkozy a soutenu son fiston vendredi lors de sa venue à Menton pour sa tournée littéraire. Loulou, parachuté à la conquête de la ville, lors des prochaines municipales, est arrivé côte à côte avec papa à la librairie locale qui accueillait l'évènement. Plusieurs centaines de fans ont fait la queue pour se faire dédicacer le "journal d'un prisonnier", qui décrit les 20 jours de détention de l'ex-président
#Politique #Sarkozy #Municipales #Mention #Fayard #Bollore #Elections
-
Sans surprise, Sarkozy a soutenu son fiston vendredi lors de sa venue à Menton pour sa tournée littéraire. Loulou, parachuté à la conquête de la ville, lors des prochaines municipales, est arrivé côte à côte avec papa à la librairie locale qui accueillait l'évènement. Plusieurs centaines de fans ont fait la queue pour se faire dédicacer le "journal d'un prisonnier", qui décrit les 20 jours de détention de l'ex-président
#Politique #Sarkozy #Municipales #Mention #Fayard #Bollore #Elections
-
Bookmarking capjamesg’ indieWeb Create Day project of page validators: Validate Everything (https://jamesg.blog/validate-everything)
Validate Everything (https://l.prry.uk/mentions/validate-everything) 29 Nov, 2025 by Lee Perry (https://l.prry.uk) -
🔖 Learn Eleventy (https://learn-eleventy.pages.dev) by Andy Bell and maintained by uncenter.
Learn Eleventy (https://l.prry.uk/mentions/learn-eleventy) 28 Nov, 2025 by Lee Perry (https://l.prry.uk) -
Not for the feint hearted, but really enjoyed Dave MacLeod's Liked: "Free solo: King Bee Direct (https://www.davemacleod.com/blog/kingbee)" on Creag Dubh, Newtonmore, from my feed reader this morning.
Free solo: King Bee Direct (https://l.prry.uk/mentions/2025-11-25-like) 22 Nov, 2025 by Lee Perry (https://l.prry.uk)
-
50 Cent Thrilled by Taylor Swift Mention in New Album The Life of a Showgirl
#50Cent #Mention #newalbum #TaylorSwift
https://blazetrends.com/50-cent-thrilled-by-taylor-swift-mention-in-new-album-the-life-of-a-showgirl/?fsp_sid=138159 -
🔄 Mise à jour de la page Internet « Campagne de Dons 2025 » avec de nouveaux commentaires et la mention de tous·tes les généreux·ses donateurs·trices.
🙏 Un immense Merci à elles·eux qui nous permettent de continuer notre action pour une culture accessible à toutes et tous !
👉 https://www.lebateauivre.info/nous-voulons-continuer-a-partager-avec-le-public/
🏷️ #MiseÀJour #mention #commentaires #donateurs #donatrices #campagne #association #culture #SpectacleVivant #dons
-
For those of you using @pixelfed together with #buffer for automatic posting:
How do you mention other users? I tried with @[email protected] but the linking was not working.So you have to edit your post and link the correct one.
Question for @dansup - will the user get a notification if i link an account in an edit? Or only if the account appears in the original post but not with the edit?
-
Colts’ Bernhard Raimann receives an ‘honorable mention’ in ESPN’s annual NFL survey among top OTs
While Indianapolis Colts’ 4th-year offensive tackle Bernhard Raimann didn’t crack the top ten among players at his position…
#NFL #IndianapolisColts #Indianapolis #Colts #among #an #analysis #annual #Bernhard #blue #espn #Football #front-page #honorable #in #indianapolis-colts-news #mention #ots #Raimann #receives #s #stampede #survey #top
https://www.rawchili.com/nfl/205042/ -
a wine from the Mediterranean, from the Via Augusta, from a grandmother who wants to farm and from a grandson who says there’s no way he’ll ever hear of it. https://www.diningandcooking.com/2159245/a-wine-from-the-mediterranean-from-the-via-augusta-from-a-grandmother-who-wants-to-farm-and-from-a-grandson-who-says-theres-no-way-hell-ever-hear-of-it-2/ #And #Augusta #even #farm #from #grandmother #grandson #HE #it #ll #Mediterranean #MediterraneanWine #mention #no #s #Says #the #there #to #via #wants #way #who #Wine
-
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦 This would require three things, however.
One, any Fediverse server software would have to be capable of altering comments from any Fediverse software. Don't think that posts, comments etc. aren't formatted the same everywhere. They aren't.
For example, Mastodon would have to know and understand that it would have to remove@[email protected]from Misskey, Sharkey, CherryPick, Iceshrimp etc. notes,@[url=https://mas.to/users/osma]Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦[/url]from Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte comments and an invisible shadow mention from (streams) and Forte comments, too.
Two, anyone in the Fediverse would have to always have full and unlimited permission to alter everyone else's content without their consent. This is particularly crucial in the cases of Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte with their highly advanced and fine-grained permissions systems that don't even cover having your content altered by others.
Three, edits on any Fediverse software must always be federated to absolutely everywhere and anywhere in the Fediverse, no exceptions, regardless of software. AFAIK, there is Fediverse server software that still doesn't understand edits at all, and that will either ignore received edits or understand them as and treat them like new posts.
It's very similar to the wish for being able to edit alt-texts into other people's posts which seems to pretty much always come from people who think that the Fediverse is only Mastodon, or at least that everything in the Fediverse is like Mastodon plus one or two extra features.
And let's be honest: If you give especially Mastodon users the ability to alter other people's posts, they will want to alter other people's posts in lots of other ways. Like, delete summaries on Friendica/Hubzilla/(streams)/Forte posts because they're "abuse of the CW field" from a "Fediverse = Mastodon" point of view. Remove all hashtags but four, regardless of these hashtags triggering the automated, individual, reader-side content warnings that have existed in the Friendica family since five and a half years before Mastodon was first published. Cutting "long posts" (= everything over 500 characters) down to a maximum of 500 characters because "the Fediverse was invented by Eugen Rochko for only microblogging". Even removing any and all mentions of the Fediverse beyond Mastodon. Removing text formatting because "it has no place in a Twitter alternative". Or removing all contents from posts or comments altogether.
Of course, the very same Mastodon users will completely flip their shit if a Friendica user comes and copies their 20-post threads into one long post, deletes the contents of the 19 follow-ups afterwards and replaces the content warning in the abstract field (= their CW field) with an actual abstract, just to fit it into a Fediverse culture that's way older than Mastodon itself.
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #NotOnlyMastodon #FediverseIsNotMastodon #MastodonIsNotTheFediverse #Misskey #Sharkey #CherryPick #Iceshrimp #Friendica #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #AltText #AltTextMeta #CWAltTextMeta #Permission #Permissions -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦 This would require three things, however.
One, any Fediverse server software would have to be capable of altering comments from any Fediverse software. Don't think that posts, comments etc. aren't formatted the same everywhere. They aren't.
For example, Mastodon would have to know and understand that it would have to remove@[email protected]from Misskey, Sharkey, CherryPick, Iceshrimp etc. notes,@[url=https://mas.to/users/osma]Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦[/url]from Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte comments and an invisible shadow mention from (streams) and Forte comments, too.
Two, anyone in the Fediverse would have to always have full and unlimited permission to alter everyone else's content without their consent. This is particularly crucial in the cases of Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte with their highly advanced and fine-grained permissions systems that don't even cover having your content altered by others.
Three, edits on any Fediverse software must always be federated to absolutely everywhere and anywhere in the Fediverse, no exceptions, regardless of software. AFAIK, there is Fediverse server software that still doesn't understand edits at all, and that will either ignore received edits or understand them as and treat them like new posts.
It's very similar to the wish for being able to edit alt-texts into other people's posts which seems to pretty much always come from people who think that the Fediverse is only Mastodon, or at least that everything in the Fediverse is like Mastodon plus one or two extra features.
And let's be honest: If you give especially Mastodon users the ability to alter other people's posts, they will want to alter other people's posts in lots of other ways. Like, delete summaries on Friendica/Hubzilla/(streams)/Forte posts because they're "abuse of the CW field" from a "Fediverse = Mastodon" point of view. Remove all hashtags but four, regardless of these hashtags triggering the automated, individual, reader-side content warnings that have existed in the Friendica family since five and a half years before Mastodon was first published. Cutting "long posts" (= everything over 500 characters) down to a maximum of 500 characters because "the Fediverse was invented by Eugen Rochko for only microblogging". Even removing any and all mentions of the Fediverse beyond Mastodon. Removing text formatting because "it has no place in a Twitter alternative". Or removing all contents from posts or comments altogether.
Of course, the very same Mastodon users will completely flip their shit if a Friendica user comes and copies their 20-post threads into one long post, deletes the contents of the 19 follow-ups afterwards and replaces the content warning in the abstract field (= their CW field) with an actual abstract, just to fit it into a Fediverse culture that's way older than Mastodon itself.
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #NotOnlyMastodon #FediverseIsNotMastodon #MastodonIsNotTheFediverse #Misskey #Sharkey #CherryPick #Iceshrimp #Friendica #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #AltText #AltTextMeta #CWAltTextMeta #Permission #Permissions -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦 This would require three things, however.
One, any Fediverse server software would have to be capable of altering comments from any Fediverse software. Don't think that posts, comments etc. aren't formatted the same everywhere. They aren't.
For example, Mastodon would have to know and understand that it would have to remove@[email protected]from Misskey, Sharkey, CherryPick, Iceshrimp etc. notes,@[url=https://mas.to/users/osma]Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦[/url]from Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte comments and an invisible shadow mention from (streams) and Forte comments, too.
Two, anyone in the Fediverse would have to always have full and unlimited permission to alter everyone else's content without their consent. This is particularly crucial in the cases of Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte with their highly advanced and fine-grained permissions systems that don't even cover having your content altered by others.
Three, edits on any Fediverse software must always be federated to absolutely everywhere and anywhere in the Fediverse, no exceptions, regardless of software. AFAIK, there is Fediverse server software that still doesn't understand edits at all, and that will either ignore received edits or understand them as and treat them like new posts.
It's very similar to the wish for being able to edit alt-texts into other people's posts which seems to pretty much always come from people who think that the Fediverse is only Mastodon, or at least that everything in the Fediverse is like Mastodon plus one or two extra features.
And let's be honest: If you give especially Mastodon users the ability to alter other people's posts, they will want to alter other people's posts in lots of other ways. Like, delete summaries on Friendica/Hubzilla/(streams)/Forte posts because they're "abuse of the CW field" from a "Fediverse = Mastodon" point of view. Remove all hashtags but four, regardless of these hashtags triggering the automated, individual, reader-side content warnings that have existed in the Friendica family since five and a half years before Mastodon was first published. Cutting "long posts" (= everything over 500 characters) down to a maximum of 500 characters because "the Fediverse was invented by Eugen Rochko for only microblogging". Even removing any and all mentions of the Fediverse beyond Mastodon. Removing text formatting because "it has no place in a Twitter alternative". Or removing all contents from posts or comments altogether.
Of course, the very same Mastodon users will completely flip their shit if a Friendica user comes and copies their 20-post threads into one long post, deletes the contents of the 19 follow-ups afterwards and replaces the content warning in the abstract field (= their CW field) with an actual abstract, just to fit it into a Fediverse culture that's way older than Mastodon itself.
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #NotOnlyMastodon #FediverseIsNotMastodon #MastodonIsNotTheFediverse #Misskey #Sharkey #CherryPick #Iceshrimp #Friendica #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #AltText #AltTextMeta #CWAltTextMeta #Permission #Permissions -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦 This would require three things, however.
One, any Fediverse server software would have to be capable of altering comments from any Fediverse software. Don't think that posts, comments etc. aren't formatted the same everywhere. They aren't.
For example, Mastodon would have to know and understand that it would have to remove@[email protected]from Misskey, Sharkey, CherryPick, Iceshrimp etc. notes,@[url=https://mas.to/users/osma]Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦[/url]from Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte comments and an invisible shadow mention from (streams) and Forte comments, too.
Two, anyone in the Fediverse would have to always have full and unlimited permission to alter everyone else's content without their consent. This is particularly crucial in the cases of Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte with their highly advanced and fine-grained permissions systems that don't even cover having your content altered by others.
Three, edits on any Fediverse software must always be federated to absolutely everywhere and anywhere in the Fediverse, no exceptions, regardless of software. AFAIK, there is Fediverse server software that still doesn't understand edits at all, and that will either ignore received edits or understand them as and treat them like new posts.
It's very similar to the wish for being able to edit alt-texts into other people's posts which seems to pretty much always come from people who think that the Fediverse is only Mastodon, or at least that everything in the Fediverse is like Mastodon plus one or two extra features.
And let's be honest: If you give especially Mastodon users the ability to alter other people's posts, they will want to alter other people's posts in lots of other ways. Like, delete summaries on Friendica/Hubzilla/(streams)/Forte posts because they're "abuse of the CW field" from a "Fediverse = Mastodon" point of view. Remove all hashtags but four, regardless of these hashtags triggering the automated, individual, reader-side content warnings that have existed in the Friendica family since five and a half years before Mastodon was first published. Cutting "long posts" (= everything over 500 characters) down to a maximum of 500 characters because "the Fediverse was invented by Eugen Rochko for only microblogging". Even removing any and all mentions of the Fediverse beyond Mastodon. Removing text formatting because "it has no place in a Twitter alternative". Or removing all contents from posts or comments altogether.
Of course, the very same Mastodon users will completely flip their shit if a Friendica user comes and copies their 20-post threads into one long post, deletes the contents of the 19 follow-ups afterwards and replaces the content warning in the abstract field (= their CW field) with an actual abstract, just to fit it into a Fediverse culture that's way older than Mastodon itself.
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #NotOnlyMastodon #FediverseIsNotMastodon #MastodonIsNotTheFediverse #Misskey #Sharkey #CherryPick #Iceshrimp #Friendica #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #AltText #AltTextMeta #CWAltTextMeta #Permission #Permissions -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦 This would require three things, however.
One, any Fediverse server software would have to be capable of altering comments from any Fediverse software. Don't think that posts, comments etc. aren't formatted the same everywhere. They aren't.
For example, Mastodon would have to know and understand that it would have to remove@[email protected]from Misskey, Sharkey, CherryPick, Iceshrimp etc. notes,@[url=https://mas.to/users/osma]Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦[/url]from Friendica, Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte comments and an invisible shadow mention from (streams) and Forte comments, too.
Two, anyone in the Fediverse would have to always have full and unlimited permission to alter everyone else's content without their consent. This is particularly crucial in the cases of Hubzilla, (streams) and Forte with their highly advanced and fine-grained permissions systems that don't even cover having your content altered by others.
Three, edits on any Fediverse software must always be federated to absolutely everywhere and anywhere in the Fediverse, no exceptions, regardless of software. AFAIK, there is Fediverse server software that still doesn't understand edits at all, and that will either ignore received edits or understand them as and treat them like new posts.
It's very similar to the wish for being able to edit alt-texts into other people's posts which seems to pretty much always come from people who think that the Fediverse is only Mastodon, or at least that everything in the Fediverse is like Mastodon plus one or two extra features.
And let's be honest: If you give especially Mastodon users the ability to alter other people's posts, they will want to alter other people's posts in lots of other ways. Like, delete summaries on Friendica/Hubzilla/(streams)/Forte posts because they're "abuse of the CW field" from a "Fediverse = Mastodon" point of view. Remove all hashtags but four, regardless of these hashtags triggering the automated, individual, reader-side content warnings that have existed in the Friendica family since five and a half years before Mastodon was first published. Cutting "long posts" (= everything over 500 characters) down to a maximum of 500 characters because "the Fediverse was invented by Eugen Rochko for only microblogging". Even removing any and all mentions of the Fediverse beyond Mastodon. Removing text formatting because "it has no place in a Twitter alternative". Or removing all contents from posts or comments altogether.
Of course, the very same Mastodon users will completely flip their shit if a Friendica user comes and copies their 20-post threads into one long post, deletes the contents of the 19 follow-ups afterwards and replaces the content warning in the abstract field (= their CW field) with an actual abstract, just to fit it into a Fediverse culture that's way older than Mastodon itself.
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #NotOnlyMastodon #FediverseIsNotMastodon #MastodonIsNotTheFediverse #Misskey #Sharkey #CherryPick #Iceshrimp #Friendica #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #AltText #AltTextMeta #CWAltTextMeta #Permission #Permissions -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦 Sounds like Phanpy fixes what Mastodon doesn't even acknowledge as an issue.
But your comment kind of demonstrates to me how not even Hubzilla supports "shadow mentions" (because it didn't need them when it was made, seeing as it supports enclosed threaded conversations): I wasn't notified about your comment, I only saw it as an unread message.
I guess I would have been notified, had I participated in this thread from one of my (streams) channels. (streams) and Forte are more geared towards a Fediverse that doesn't support threaded conversations all over, one that's dominated by Mastodon and mostly used for Twitter-style minimalist microblogging.
Ideally from a Mastodon POV, these "shadow mentions" should include everyone in the current branch of the thread. Ideally from a threaded conversations POV, they should go as far as mentioning all participants in the whole thread. But that kind of "black magic" would scare quite a few Mastodon users out of their minds unfortunately.
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #Conversations #ThreadedConversations #PhanpySocial -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦 Sounds like Phanpy fixes what Mastodon doesn't even acknowledge as an issue.
But your comment kind of demonstrates to me how not even Hubzilla supports "shadow mentions" (because it didn't need them when it was made, seeing as it supports enclosed threaded conversations): I wasn't notified about your comment, I only saw it as an unread message.
I guess I would have been notified, had I participated in this thread from one of my (streams) channels. (streams) and Forte are more geared towards a Fediverse that doesn't support threaded conversations all over, one that's dominated by Mastodon and mostly used for Twitter-style minimalist microblogging.
Ideally from a Mastodon POV, these "shadow mentions" should include everyone in the current branch of the thread. Ideally from a threaded conversations POV, they should go as far as mentioning all participants in the whole thread. But that kind of "black magic" would scare quite a few Mastodon users out of their minds unfortunately.
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #Conversations #ThreadedConversations #PhanpySocial -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦 Sounds like Phanpy fixes what Mastodon doesn't even acknowledge as an issue.
But your comment kind of demonstrates to me how not even Hubzilla supports "shadow mentions" (because it didn't need them when it was made, seeing as it supports enclosed threaded conversations): I wasn't notified about your comment, I only saw it as an unread message.
I guess I would have been notified, had I participated in this thread from one of my (streams) channels. (streams) and Forte are more geared towards a Fediverse that doesn't support threaded conversations all over, one that's dominated by Mastodon and mostly used for Twitter-style minimalist microblogging.
Ideally from a Mastodon POV, these "shadow mentions" should include everyone in the current branch of the thread. Ideally from a threaded conversations POV, they should go as far as mentioning all participants in the whole thread. But that kind of "black magic" would scare quite a few Mastodon users out of their minds unfortunately.
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #Conversations #ThreadedConversations #PhanpySocial -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦 Sounds like Phanpy fixes what Mastodon doesn't even acknowledge as an issue.
But your comment kind of demonstrates to me how not even Hubzilla supports "shadow mentions" (because it didn't need them when it was made, seeing as it supports enclosed threaded conversations): I wasn't notified about your comment, I only saw it as an unread message.
I guess I would have been notified, had I participated in this thread from one of my (streams) channels. (streams) and Forte are more geared towards a Fediverse that doesn't support threaded conversations all over, one that's dominated by Mastodon and mostly used for Twitter-style minimalist microblogging.
Ideally from a Mastodon POV, these "shadow mentions" should include everyone in the current branch of the thread. Ideally from a threaded conversations POV, they should go as far as mentioning all participants in the whole thread. But that kind of "black magic" would scare quite a few Mastodon users out of their minds unfortunately.
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #Conversations #ThreadedConversations #PhanpySocial -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦 Sounds like Phanpy fixes what Mastodon doesn't even acknowledge as an issue.
But your comment kind of demonstrates to me how not even Hubzilla supports "shadow mentions" (because it didn't need them when it was made, seeing as it supports enclosed threaded conversations): I wasn't notified about your comment, I only saw it as an unread message.
I guess I would have been notified, had I participated in this thread from one of my (streams) channels. (streams) and Forte are more geared towards a Fediverse that doesn't support threaded conversations all over, one that's dominated by Mastodon and mostly used for Twitter-style minimalist microblogging.
Ideally from a Mastodon POV, these "shadow mentions" should include everyone in the current branch of the thread. Ideally from a threaded conversations POV, they should go as far as mentioning all participants in the whole thread. But that kind of "black magic" would scare quite a few Mastodon users out of their minds unfortunately.
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #Conversations #ThreadedConversations #PhanpySocial -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦
from misplacing mentions at start of the reply body text (when a perfectly good mention field exists in the protocol)
Does anything except (streams) and Forte actually make use of these "shadow mentions"? AFAIK, Mastodon accepts them, but it can't create them. Due to its total lack of support for threaded conversations, you have visibal mentions eating away your precious character count in order for even only those in your branch of the thread to receive your comment.
That's also why I often have to mention loads of people manually in 100% Mastodon threads: Hubzilla does support threaded conversations, but I think it doesn't support shadow mentions because it has never needed them itself, and it's too old to be designed for a Mastodon-dominated Fediverse.to inability to remember the readers' position in their (reverse chron and random) timeline.
Maybe it'd also help to move away from Twitter-style doom-scrolling single-message piecemeal timelines as the only option available and towards the same Facebook-style stream with whole threads at once and an unread messages counter with a list of unread messages that takes you directly to each thread with unread messages in it? The kind that Friendica has had for a decade and a half now, and that all its descendants have inherited?
CC: @Tim Chambers
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #Friendica #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #Conversations #ThreadedConversations -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦
from misplacing mentions at start of the reply body text (when a perfectly good mention field exists in the protocol)
Does anything except (streams) and Forte actually make use of these "shadow mentions"? AFAIK, Mastodon accepts them, but it can't create them. Due to its total lack of support for threaded conversations, you have visibal mentions eating away your precious character count in order for even only those in your branch of the thread to receive your comment.
That's also why I often have to mention loads of people manually in 100% Mastodon threads: Hubzilla does support threaded conversations, but I think it doesn't support shadow mentions because it has never needed them itself, and it's too old to be designed for a Mastodon-dominated Fediverse.to inability to remember the readers' position in their (reverse chron and random) timeline.
Maybe it'd also help to move away from Twitter-style doom-scrolling single-message piecemeal timelines as the only option available and towards the same Facebook-style stream with whole threads at once and an unread messages counter with a list of unread messages that takes you directly to each thread with unread messages in it? The kind that Friendica has had for a decade and a half now, and that all its descendants have inherited?
CC: @Tim Chambers
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #Friendica #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #Conversations #ThreadedConversations -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦
from misplacing mentions at start of the reply body text (when a perfectly good mention field exists in the protocol)
Does anything except (streams) and Forte actually make use of these "shadow mentions"? AFAIK, Mastodon accepts them, but it can't create them. Due to its total lack of support for threaded conversations, you have visibal mentions eating away your precious character count in order for even only those in your branch of the thread to receive your comment.
That's also why I often have to mention loads of people manually in 100% Mastodon threads: Hubzilla does support threaded conversations, but I think it doesn't support shadow mentions because it has never needed them itself, and it's too old to be designed for a Mastodon-dominated Fediverse.to inability to remember the readers' position in their (reverse chron and random) timeline.
Maybe it'd also help to move away from Twitter-style doom-scrolling single-message piecemeal timelines as the only option available and towards the same Facebook-style stream with whole threads at once and an unread messages counter with a list of unread messages that takes you directly to each thread with unread messages in it? The kind that Friendica has had for a decade and a half now, and that all its descendants have inherited?
CC: @Tim Chambers
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #Friendica #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #Conversations #ThreadedConversations -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦
from misplacing mentions at start of the reply body text (when a perfectly good mention field exists in the protocol)
Does anything except (streams) and Forte actually make use of these "shadow mentions"? AFAIK, Mastodon accepts them, but it can't create them. Due to its total lack of support for threaded conversations, you have visibal mentions eating away your precious character count in order for even only those in your branch of the thread to receive your comment.
That's also why I often have to mention loads of people manually in 100% Mastodon threads: Hubzilla does support threaded conversations, but I think it doesn't support shadow mentions because it has never needed them itself, and it's too old to be designed for a Mastodon-dominated Fediverse.to inability to remember the readers' position in their (reverse chron and random) timeline.
Maybe it'd also help to move away from Twitter-style doom-scrolling single-message piecemeal timelines as the only option available and towards the same Facebook-style stream with whole threads at once and an unread messages counter with a list of unread messages that takes you directly to each thread with unread messages in it? The kind that Friendica has had for a decade and a half now, and that all its descendants have inherited?
CC: @Tim Chambers
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #Friendica #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #Conversations #ThreadedConversations -
@Osma A 🇫🇮🇺🇦
from misplacing mentions at start of the reply body text (when a perfectly good mention field exists in the protocol)
Does anything except (streams) and Forte actually make use of these "shadow mentions"? AFAIK, Mastodon accepts them, but it can't create them. Due to its total lack of support for threaded conversations, you have visibal mentions eating away your precious character count in order for even only those in your branch of the thread to receive your comment.
That's also why I often have to mention loads of people manually in 100% Mastodon threads: Hubzilla does support threaded conversations, but I think it doesn't support shadow mentions because it has never needed them itself, and it's too old to be designed for a Mastodon-dominated Fediverse.to inability to remember the readers' position in their (reverse chron and random) timeline.
Maybe it'd also help to move away from Twitter-style doom-scrolling single-message piecemeal timelines as the only option available and towards the same Facebook-style stream with whole threads at once and an unread messages counter with a list of unread messages that takes you directly to each thread with unread messages in it? The kind that Friendica has had for a decade and a half now, and that all its descendants have inherited?
CC: @Tim Chambers
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #Friendica #Hubzilla #Streams #(streams) #Forte #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag #Conversations #ThreadedConversations -
#Whoops... #IForgot to #Mention: #TheSandman...
We won't #MissThat from our old #NetflixSub; because, #Reasons, and because we #FixedIT...
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️🧙 | 🍪🦹:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🦹🍪
-
Wenn ich mir eine neue Funktion für das #Fediverse wünschen dürfte, dann wäre das ein #Filter für mehr als xx #mentions und #hashtags …
-
#NotNews24 | #UnbreaklingShadowBanNotNews... Did #Someone #Mention #ShadowBan(s)...
#VMST performed a #ShadowBan; #Lied about #IT to its #PayingSubscribers, and then #Lost over 50% of its #ActiveMembers...
#Wyrd...
#IT's a #FunnyOldPlace is #Mastodon...
#IT was #True then; #IT's #StillTrue™️...
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️🧙 | ☕️🍪:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🍪☕
-
-
-
#NotNews24 | #UnbreaklingShadowBanNotNews... Did #Someone #Mention #ShadowBan(s)...
#VMST performed a #ShadowBan; #Lied about #IT to its #PayingSubscribers, and then #Lost around 50% of its #ActiveMembers...
#Wyrd...
#IT's a #FunnyOldPlace is #Mastodon...
#IT was #True then; #IT's #StillTrue™️...
#AlsoAvailable in #PlumAndRusty
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️🧙 | ☕️🍪:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🍪☕
-
#NotNews24 | #UnbreaklingShadowBanNotNews... Did #Someone #Mention #ShadowBan(s)...
#VMST performed a #ShadowBan; #Lied about #IT to its #PayingSubscribers, and then #Lost around 50% of its #ActiveMembers...
#Wyrd...
#IT's a #FunnyOldPlace is #Mastodon...
#IT was #True then; #IT's #StillTrue™️...
#AlsoAvailable in #PlumAndRusty
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️🧙 | ☕️🍪:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🍪☕
-
#NotNews24 | #UnbreaklingShadowBanNotNews... Did #Someone #Mention #ShadowBan(s)...
#VMST performed a #ShadowBan; #Lied about #IT to its #PayingSubscribers, and then #Lost around 50% of its #ActiveMembers...
#Wyrd...
#IT's a #FunnyOldPlace is #Mastodon...
#IT was #True then; #IT's #StillTrue™️...
#AlsoAvailable in #PlumAndRusty
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️🧙 | ☕️🍪:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🍪☕
-
#NotNews24 | #UnbreaklingShadowBanNotNews... Did #Someone #Mention #ShadowBan(s)...
#VMST performed a #ShadowBan; #Lied about #IT to its #PayingSubscribers, and then #Lost around 50% of its #ActiveMembers...
#Wyrd...
#IT's a #FunnyOldPlace is #Mastodon...
#IT was #True then; #IT's #StillTrue™️...
#AlsoAvailable in #PlumAndRusty
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️🧙 | ☕️🍪:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🍪☕
-
#NotNews24 | #UnbreaklingShadowBanNotNews... Did #Someone #Mention #ShadowBan(s)...
#VMST performed a #ShadowBan; #Lied about #IT to its #PayingSubscribers, and then #Lost around 50% of its #ActiveMembers...
#Wyrd...
#IT's a #FunnyOldPlace is #Mastodon...
#IT was #True then; #IT's #StillTrue™️...
#AlsoAvailable in #PlumAndRusty
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️🧙 | ☕️🍪:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🍪☕
-
#Ooops...
#CJ got #ToDo: #TheJackal...
🧙🏛️🤖:wolfparty:🤖🏛️🧙 | 🍫🎠🦹🦄🦹🎠🍫
#DJKrush and #RonnyJordan: The Jackal (The Illest Mix)
-
Massacre de Thiaroye et la mention «Mort pour la France»
Depuis quelques jours, nous assistons à une tempête médiatique suite à l’octroi de la #mention «Mort pour la France» pour six ex-prisonniers de guerre assassinés à #Thiaroye par l’armée française. Un décryptage me paraît indispensable.
✒️ Par Armelle MABON | En accès libre › https://blogs.mediapart.fr/armelle-mabon/blog/010824/massacre-de-thiaroye-et-la-mention-mort-pour-la-france?at_medium=rs-cm&at_campaign=mastodon&at_account=mediapartblogs
-
Massacre de Thiaroye et la mention «Mort pour la France»
Depuis quelques jours, nous assistons à une tempête médiatique suite à l’octroi de la #mention «Mort pour la France» pour six ex-prisonniers de guerre assassinés à #Thiaroye par l’armée française. Un décryptage me paraît indispensable.
✒️ Par Armelle MABON | En accès libre › https://blogs.mediapart.fr/armelle-mabon/blog/010824/massacre-de-thiaroye-et-la-mention-mort-pour-la-france?at_medium=rs-cm&at_campaign=mastodon&at_account=mediapartblogs
-
I feel like geocaching should be implemented with web mentions
#geocaching #webmentions #indieweb #geocache #webmention #cache #web #mention #webDev #smallweb #posse
-
You can't enforce either of them Fediverse-wide.
Friendica has had "excluded + long name" (@Laxystem) firmly hard-coded for 14 years now, almost 6 years longer than Mastodon has been around, and its descendants Hubzilla and (streams) have the same mention style hard-coded, too.
Mastodon and its forks have "included + short name" (@laxla) hard-coded.
Misskey and the Forkeys have "included + short name + domain" (@[email protected]) hard-coded.
An acquaintance of mine, himself on Mastodon, actually asked me to turn these freaky-looking long-name mentions off and switch back to Mastodon-style short-name mentions. I had to explain to him that I'm not on Mastodon, Hubzilla isn't Mastodon, Hubzilla has never been Mastodon, and on Hubzilla, mentions with long names and excluding the @ are hard-coded with no way to change them.
#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Mention #Mentions #MentionTag -
#Whoops... I also #Forgot to #Mention: #AliceInBorderland...
We won't #MissThat from our old #NetflixSub; because, #Reasons, and because we #FixedIT as well...
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️:🧙 | 🍪🦹:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🦹🍪
-
#Whoops... I also #Forgot to #Mention: #AliceInBorderland...
We won't #MissThat from our old #NetflixSub; because, #Reasons, and because we #FixedIT as well...
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️:🧙 | 🍪🦹:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🦹🍪
-
#Whoops... #IForgot to #Mention: #TheSandman...
We won't #MissThat from our old #NetflixSub; because, #Reasons, and because we #FixedIT...
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️🧙 | 🍪🦹:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🦹🍪
-
#Whoops... #IForgot to #Mention: #TheSandman...
We won't #MissThat from our old #NetflixSub; because, #Reasons, and because we #FixedIT...
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️🧙 | 🍪🦹:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🦹🍪
-
#Whoops... #IForgot to #Mention: #TheSandman...
We won't #MissThat from our old #NetflixSub; because, #Reasons, and because we #FixedIT...
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️🧙 | 🍪🦹:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🦹🍪
-
#Whoops... #IForgot to #Mention: #TheSandman...
We won't #MissThat from our old #NetflixSub; because, #Reasons, and because we #FixedIT...
🧙⚔️🤖:wolfparty:🤖⚔️🧙 | 🍪🦹:fediverse:🦄:fediverse:🦹🍪
