#lkqvgm — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #lkqvgm, aggregated by home.social.
-
#LKQvGM, damages phase:
Sanction Bids In LKQ, GM Paten... -
#LKQvGM, damages phase:
Sanction Bids In LKQ, GM Paten... -
#LKQvGM, damages phase:
Sanction Bids In LKQ, GM Paten... -
And of course the partnership doesn't answer all the interesting questions, like: "What if this firm wanted to get a design patent?" #LKQvGM
-
On first skim, this decision might be most notable for its discussion of #LKQvGM:
-
Here is the patented design and three references identified by these defendants. They argue that the claim is both anticipated and obvious. I'm not seeing anticipation there. Obviousness, maybe, depending on how the court applies #LKQvGM.
-
The PTAB will not conduct an inter partes review of this GoPro design patent: www.scribd.com/document/847... The challenger argued that the design (for a camera) was obvious in light of various references. The PTAB disagreed, applying the new Federal Circuit framework set forth in #LKQvGM.
-
This could be an interesting early test of the impact of #LKQvGM:
-
This could be an interesting early test of the impact of #LKQvGM:
-
This could be an interesting early test of the impact of #LKQvGM:
-
-
-
-
-
This is a new Kate Spade handbag. If someone wanted to challenge the design as obvious:
1) Would (or should) a real-life stop sign qualify as a proper primary reference, post-LKQ?
2) Assuming it would be, what kinds of record-supported evidence might the challenger use to "bridge the gap" between that reference and the final design here? E.g., where do you get "and make it glitter"? The thick white border? The tented shape. Etc.
-
This is a new Kate Spade handbag. If someone wanted to challenge the design as obvious:
1) Would (or should) a real-life stop sign qualify as a proper primary reference, post-LKQ?
2) Assuming it would be, what kinds of record-supported evidence might the challenger use to "bridge the gap" between that reference and the final design here? E.g., where do you get "and make it glitter"? The thick white border? The tented shape. Etc.
-
This is a new Kate Spade handbag. If someone wanted to challenge the design as obvious:
1) Would (or should) a real-life stop sign qualify as a proper primary reference, post-LKQ?
2) Assuming it would be, what kinds of record-supported evidence might the challenger use to "bridge the gap" between that reference and the final design here? E.g., where do you get "and make it glitter"? The thick white border? The tented shape. Etc.
-
This is a new Kate Spade handbag. If someone wanted to challenge the design as obvious:
1) Would (or should) a real-life stop sign qualify as a proper primary reference, post-LKQ?
2) Assuming it would be, what kinds of record-supported evidence might the challenger use to "bridge the gap" between that reference and the final design here? E.g., where do you get "and make it glitter"? The thick white border? The tented shape. Etc.
-
Please join us at Chicago-Kent on Tuesday, September 3 for a panel discussion on the obviousness standard in design patent law, led by Chicago-Kent law professors.
Please RSVP here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScLaM4H_uZwUg-f0-AQTZ0CKunsmhZ9h9N3a3J0yuRT71dQkA/viewform?usp=sf_link
-
Please join us at Chicago-Kent on Tuesday, September 3 for a panel discussion on the obviousness standard in design patent law, led by Chicago-Kent law professors.
Please RSVP here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScLaM4H_uZwUg-f0-AQTZ0CKunsmhZ9h9N3a3J0yuRT71dQkA/viewform?usp=sf_link
-
Please join us at Chicago-Kent on Tuesday, September 3 for a panel discussion on the obviousness standard in design patent law, led by Chicago-Kent law professors.
Please RSVP here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScLaM4H_uZwUg-f0-AQTZ0CKunsmhZ9h9N3a3J0yuRT71dQkA/viewform?usp=sf_link
-
Please join us at Chicago-Kent on Tuesday, September 3 for a panel discussion on the obviousness standard in design patent law, led by Chicago-Kent law professors.
Please RSVP here: https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLScLaM4H_uZwUg-f0-AQTZ0CKunsmhZ9h9N3a3J0yuRT71dQkA/viewform?usp=sf_link
-
Get excited: Our 2024-2025 (free) patent casebook supplement is here! https://patentlawcasebook.com/
Featuring, among other things, an all-new edit of #LKQvGM:
-
Get excited: Our 2024-2025 (free) patent casebook supplement is here! https://patentlawcasebook.com/
Featuring, among other things, an all-new edit of #LKQvGM:
-
Get excited: Our 2024-2025 (free) patent casebook supplement is here! https://patentlawcasebook.com/
Featuring, among other things, an all-new edit of #LKQvGM:
-
Get excited: Our 2024-2025 (free) patent casebook supplement is here! https://patentlawcasebook.com/
Featuring, among other things, an all-new edit of #LKQvGM:
-
My favorite thing about #LKQvGM is that it's a fantastic example of "how close is too close" in design patent law: http://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/21-2348.OPINION.5-21-2024_2321050.pdf
Neither of these references were close enough to anticipate (thus, if they had come later, would not have been close enough to infringe):
-
My favorite thing about #LKQvGM is that it's a fantastic example of "how close is too close" in design patent law: http://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/21-2348.OPINION.5-21-2024_2321050.pdf
Neither of these references were close enough to anticipate (thus, if they had come later, would not have been close enough to infringe):
-
My favorite thing about #LKQvGM is that it's a fantastic example of "how close is too close" in design patent law: http://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/21-2348.OPINION.5-21-2024_2321050.pdf
Neither of these references were close enough to anticipate (thus, if they had come later, would not have been close enough to infringe):
-
My favorite thing about #LKQvGM is that it's a fantastic example of "how close is too close" in design patent law: http://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/21-2348.OPINION.5-21-2024_2321050.pdf
Neither of these references were close enough to anticipate (thus, if they had come later, would not have been close enough to infringe):
-
Save the date: We'll be doing a panel on #LKQvGM on-site at the Conviser Law Center from 12-1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 3, 2024. Hope you can join us!
-
Save the date: We'll be doing a panel on #LKQvGM on-site at the Conviser Law Center from 12-1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 3, 2024. Hope you can join us!
-
Save the date: We'll be doing a panel on #LKQvGM on-site at the Conviser Law Center from 12-1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 3, 2024. Hope you can join us!
-
Save the date: We'll be doing a panel on #LKQvGM on-site at the Conviser Law Center from 12-1:30 p.m. on Tuesday, September 3, 2024. Hope you can join us!
-
One thing I like about the decision in #LKQvGM is that it provides a good example of "how close is too close" in design patent law.
The court says these products are not close enough to anticipate. That means they would not, if later, be close enough to infringe.
http://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/21-2348.OPINION.5-21-2024_2321050.pdf
-
One thing I like about the decision in #LKQvGM is that it provides a good example of "how close is too close" in design patent law.
The court says these products are not close enough to anticipate. That means they would not, if later, be close enough to infringe.
http://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/21-2348.OPINION.5-21-2024_2321050.pdf
-
One thing I like about the decision in #LKQvGM is that it provides a good example of "how close is too close" in design patent law.
The court says these products are not close enough to anticipate. That means they would not, if later, be close enough to infringe.
http://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/21-2348.OPINION.5-21-2024_2321050.pdf
-
One thing I like about the decision in #LKQvGM is that it provides a good example of "how close is too close" in design patent law.
The court says these products are not close enough to anticipate. That means they would not, if later, be close enough to infringe.
http://cafc.uscourts.gov/opinions-orders/21-2348.OPINION.5-21-2024_2321050.pdf
-
We are reconvening our all-star panel to discuss the decision in #LKQvGM. Please join us next Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at noon Eastern via Zoom.
More details and the (free) registration link here:
https://events.suffolk.edu/event/design-patents-after-the-en-banc-decision-in-lkq-v-gm
-
We are reconvening our all-star panel to discuss the decision in #LKQvGM. Please join us next Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at noon Eastern via Zoom.
More details and the (free) registration link here:
https://events.suffolk.edu/event/design-patents-after-the-en-banc-decision-in-lkq-v-gm
-
We are reconvening our all-star panel to discuss the decision in #LKQvGM. Please join us next Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at noon Eastern via Zoom.
More details and the (free) registration link here:
https://events.suffolk.edu/event/design-patents-after-the-en-banc-decision-in-lkq-v-gm
-
We are reconvening our all-star panel to discuss the decision in #LKQvGM. Please join us next Tuesday, June 4, 2024 at noon Eastern via Zoom.
More details and the (free) registration link here:
https://events.suffolk.edu/event/design-patents-after-the-en-banc-decision-in-lkq-v-gm
-
Thinking about the use of the passive voice in this passage from #LKQvGM:
-
Thinking about the use of the passive voice in this passage from #LKQvGM:
-
Thinking about the use of the passive voice in this passage from #LKQvGM:
-
Thinking about the use of the passive voice in this passage from #LKQvGM:
-
Bloomberg Law on #LKQvGM, featuring some quotes from yours truly:
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/new-design-patent-test-creates-uncertainty-over-whats-obvious
-
Bloomberg Law on #LKQvGM, featuring some quotes from yours truly:
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/new-design-patent-test-creates-uncertainty-over-whats-obvious
-
Bloomberg Law on #LKQvGM, featuring some quotes from yours truly:
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/new-design-patent-test-creates-uncertainty-over-whats-obvious
-
Bloomberg Law on #LKQvGM, featuring some quotes from yours truly:
https://news.bloomberglaw.com/ip-law/new-design-patent-test-creates-uncertainty-over-whats-obvious
-
10) One interesting question that remains is:
LKQ x CurviSil = ???
In other words, how does/should the fact that design patents protect applied designs (not designs per se) affect the scope of § 103 prior art, if at all?
-
10) One interesting question that remains is:
LKQ x CurviSil = ???
In other words, how does/should the fact that design patents protect applied designs (not designs per se) affect the scope of § 103 prior art, if at all?
-
10) One interesting question that remains is:
LKQ x CurviSil = ???
In other words, how does/should the fact that design patents protect applied designs (not designs per se) affect the scope of § 103 prior art, if at all?
-
10) One interesting question that remains is:
LKQ x CurviSil = ???
In other words, how does/should the fact that design patents protect applied designs (not designs per se) affect the scope of § 103 prior art, if at all?
-
-