#impliedconsent — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #impliedconsent, aggregated by home.social.
-
You might be surprised to know that one does not have the right to speak with an attorney prior to answering this question (in many jurisdictions), and insistence on speaking with one constitutes a refusal to submit which imposes the civil consequences.
[Image: State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213 (1999)]
-
You might be surprised to know that one does not have the right to speak with an attorney prior to answering this question (in many jurisdictions), and insistence on speaking with one constitutes a refusal to submit which imposes the civil consequences.
[Image: State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213 (1999)]
-
You might be surprised to know that one does not have the right to speak with an attorney prior to answering this question (in many jurisdictions), and insistence on speaking with one constitutes a refusal to submit which imposes the civil consequences.
[Image: State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213 (1999)]
-
You might be surprised to know that one does not have the right to speak with an attorney prior to answering this question (in many jurisdictions), and insistence on speaking with one constitutes a refusal to submit which imposes the civil consequences.
[Image: State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213 (1999)]
-
You might be surprised to know that one does not have the right to speak with an attorney prior to answering this question (in many jurisdictions), and insistence on speaking with one constitutes a refusal to submit which imposes the civil consequences.
[Image: State v. Reitter, 227 Wis. 2d 213 (1999)]
-
We drill into people's heads that they should request to speak to an attorney and refuse to answer questions if detained by law enforcement, and yet one of the most common interactions (OWI/Drunk Driving investigations) often involves a question from officers without that right and that carries significant civil and evidentiary consequences:
"Will you submit to an evidentiary chemical test for intoxication?"
-
We drill into people's heads that they should request to speak to an attorney and refuse to answer questions if detained by law enforcement, and yet one of the most common interactions (OWI/Drunk Driving investigations) often involves a question from officers without that right and that carries significant civil and evidentiary consequences:
"Will you submit to an evidentiary chemical test for intoxication?"
-
We drill into people's heads that they should request to speak to an attorney and refuse to answer questions if detained by law enforcement, and yet one of the most common interactions (OWI/Drunk Driving investigations) often involves a question from officers without that right and that carries significant civil and evidentiary consequences:
"Will you submit to an evidentiary chemical test for intoxication?"
-
We drill into people's heads that they should request to speak to an attorney and refuse to answer questions if detained by law enforcement, and yet one of the most common interactions (OWI/Drunk Driving investigations) often involves a question from officers without that right and that carries significant civil and evidentiary consequences:
"Will you submit to an evidentiary chemical test for intoxication?"
-
We drill into people's heads that they should request to speak to an attorney and refuse to answer questions if detained by law enforcement, and yet one of the most common interactions (OWI/Drunk Driving investigations) often involves a question from officers without that right and that carries significant civil and evidentiary consequences:
"Will you submit to an evidentiary chemical test for intoxication?"