home.social

#goalies — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #goalies, aggregated by home.social.

  1. @jimlil @olliethewobbly @hnom That’s one of the arguments for goalies 6.5+ height. One, they may be able to see over the players in front of them. Two, with their height and width they fill up most of the net.
    I started watching hockey when only a handful wore masks, and padding was (relative to today’s gear) inconsequential.

    #goalies #hnom

  2. @jimlil @olliethewobbly @hnom That’s one of the arguments for goalies 6.5+ height. One, they may be able to see over the players in front of them. Two, with their height and width they fill up most of the net.
    I started watching hockey when only a handful wore masks, and padding was (relative to today’s gear) inconsequential.

    #goalies #hnom

  3. @jimlil @olliethewobbly @hnom That’s one of the arguments for goalies 6.5+ height. One, they may be able to see over the players in front of them. Two, with their height and width they fill up most of the net.
    I started watching hockey when only a handful wore masks, and padding was (relative to today’s gear) inconsequential.

    #goalies #hnom

  4. @jimlil @olliethewobbly @hnom That’s one of the arguments for goalies 6.5+ height. One, they may be able to see over the players in front of them. Two, with their height and width they fill up most of the net.
    I started watching hockey when only a handful wore masks, and padding was (relative to today’s gear) inconsequential.

    #goalies #hnom

  5. @jimlil @olliethewobbly @hnom That’s one of the arguments for goalies 6.5+ height. One, they may be able to see over the players in front of them. Two, with their height and width they fill up most of the net.
    I started watching hockey when only a handful wore masks, and padding was (relative to today’s gear) inconsequential.

    #goalies #hnom