#dalwaalislamyya — Public Fediverse posts

Finally got around to reading Tarrant's #greatreplacement manifesto that has been so heavily censored

"I want you in my sights. I want your neck under my boot."-Brenton Tarrant

Perhaps he wasn't referring to me, specifically
- maybe I'm the wrong kind of marxist. But given his propensity to win at any cost, the lines will be blurry even in that case. So the feeling is mutual tbh.

Brenton Tarrant wants to increase birthrates at all costs. I cannot abide by his being willing to sacrifice me for that purpose, among other things. I will choose to sacrifice myself for my own cause, kthx

Tarrant tried very hard to reduce everything to support this - and to his credit he's willing to give up the little bit of political baggage that *is* going to cause problems for him (taxes as theft - non-white empires who are willing to levy taxes are going to *steamroll* any ethnostate following him to the letter even in the absence of nuclear weapons which thankfully he didn't think worthy of mention). But that's a political point of disagreement and evidence in practice could swing thing either way. Maybe a no-tax ethnostate would work fantastically. Colour me skeptical. Even #dalwaalislamyya, supported by expats though it was, had some taxes.

There's basically 4 gaping holes in his manifesto

1) The australian aborigines / new zealand equivalent and, generally, anti-colonialist forces elsewhere.

2) Nuclear weapons. I don't think he has any concept of how easily and quickly his cherished 760-980 million could be exterminated and how precarious the situation is right now

3)
> the egalitarian nation [sic] is a myth

and yet

He rages against it in principle. Even if it did exist, he would destroy it. Even if there was a working marketplace of ideas, he would tear it down. Even if there were a free library, a testament even to his white culture...he would burn it and everything within it. It's pretty clear he has lost sight of the possibility of
a egalitarian solution and this suggests the kind of mistake you make when you have a static view of the world with only one rate available to you - birthrates. When change is difficult to understand so changes themselves become salient features of the world. There is a way out that doesn't involve everyone just fucking killing and raping eachother and most of us are living it. It's counterintuitive but once you see it you can't unsee it. Sadly he doesn't seem to.
See: #betterangelsofournature

louder for the followers in the back:

SPARE THE GODDAMN LIBRARIES YOU BARBARIAN CUCK

4)

> at all costs

This is by far the most dangerous part of the whole manifesto.

It's self-defeating - once you embrace this type of thinking you start doing things like 'kill the child in order to save her'. And sure, there's some situations where that's justified.
But there are costs which should not be paid.

There are horrors that shouldn't exist, period, and which we should strive to prevent no matter who we are. And he is willing to summon them.

He thinks we won't remember who he is. And maybe he's right. For him, personally he's right. But we *will* remember those who win using his words. And we will remember what terrible things they did, like we who remember the muslim rape gangs, what happened to the zimbabwe economy when the printers went brrr, and the holocaust.

I think though that the one thing I take away from this manifesto more than anything is that - moderates are always the first up against the wall, and the close enemy is always the most hated[1]. I am starting to see this sort of thing as the close enemy to those who have reacted most strongly against it - ie the censors, the liberals, the major media, the corpolitical. They aren't as different as they might portray themselves, to the monsters this man is trying to unleash on the world.

[1] #betterangelsofournature i think