#climatemythrebuttals — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #climatemythrebuttals, aggregated by home.social.
-
Geologist and gifted wordsmith John Mason has worked in concert with astrophysicist Ken Rice and our indispensable volunteer Bärbel Winkler to produce --71-- (seventy one!) updates to our inventory of #ClimateMythRebuttals, a year and half of continuous effort.
We're taking a little break from our weekly publication schedule of updated #ClimateMisinformation debunkings.
Deep bow and sweeping doff of the hat to our team. Thank You! 🙂
Paraphrasing, "we'll be back."
-
Geologist and gifted wordsmith John Mason has worked in concert with astrophysicist Ken Rice and our indispensable volunteer Bärbel Winkler to produce --71-- (seventy one!) updates to our inventory of #ClimateMythRebuttals, a year and half of continuous effort.
We're taking a little break from our weekly publication schedule of updated #ClimateMisinformation debunkings.
Deep bow and sweeping doff of the hat to our team. Thank You! 🙂
Paraphrasing, "we'll be back."
-
Geologist and gifted wordsmith John Mason has worked in concert with astrophysicist Ken Rice and our indispensable volunteer Bärbel Winkler to produce --71-- (seventy one!) updates to our inventory of #ClimateMythRebuttals, a year and half of continuous effort.
We're taking a little break from our weekly publication schedule of updated #ClimateMisinformation debunkings.
Deep bow and sweeping doff of the hat to our team. Thank You! 🙂
Paraphrasing, "we'll be back."
-
Geologist and gifted wordsmith John Mason has worked in concert with astrophysicist Ken Rice and our indispensable volunteer Bärbel Winkler to produce --71-- (seventy one!) updates to our inventory of #ClimateMythRebuttals, a year and half of continuous effort.
We're taking a little break from our weekly publication schedule of updated #ClimateMisinformation debunkings.
Deep bow and sweeping doff of the hat to our team. Thank You! 🙂
Paraphrasing, "we'll be back."
-
Geologist and gifted wordsmith John Mason has worked in concert with astrophysicist Ken Rice and our indispensable volunteer Bärbel Winkler to produce --71-- (seventy one!) updates to our inventory of #ClimateMythRebuttals, a year and half of continuous effort.
We're taking a little break from our weekly publication schedule of updated #ClimateMisinformation debunkings.
Deep bow and sweeping doff of the hat to our team. Thank You! 🙂
Paraphrasing, "we'll be back."
-
Here's the latest fruit of our collaboration with #GigaFact, a nonprofit providing general disinformation correction services to newsrooms in the United States.
These treatments are made to be easy drop-ins for news journals, which leads to tricky and interesting writing: compress a concept that may be complex to 150 words. Our specialist writer works with a GigaFact generalist to produce an intelligible synopsis that is layout-friendly.
-
Here's the latest fruit of our collaboration with #GigaFact, a nonprofit providing general disinformation correction services to newsrooms in the United States.
These treatments are made to be easy drop-ins for news journals, which leads to tricky and interesting writing: compress a concept that may be complex to 150 words. Our specialist writer works with a GigaFact generalist to produce an intelligible synopsis that is layout-friendly.
-
Here's the latest fruit of our collaboration with #GigaFact, a nonprofit providing general disinformation correction services to newsrooms in the United States.
These treatments are made to be easy drop-ins for news journals, which leads to tricky and interesting writing: compress a concept that may be complex to 150 words. Our specialist writer works with a GigaFact generalist to produce an intelligible synopsis that is layout-friendly.
-
Here's the latest fruit of our collaboration with #GigaFact, a nonprofit providing general disinformation correction services to newsrooms in the United States.
These treatments are made to be easy drop-ins for news journals, which leads to tricky and interesting writing: compress a concept that may be complex to 150 words. Our specialist writer works with a GigaFact generalist to produce an intelligible synopsis that is layout-friendly.
-
Here's the latest fruit of our collaboration with #GigaFact, a nonprofit providing general disinformation correction services to newsrooms in the United States.
These treatments are made to be easy drop-ins for news journals, which leads to tricky and interesting writing: compress a concept that may be complex to 150 words. Our specialist writer works with a GigaFact generalist to produce an intelligible synopsis that is layout-friendly.
-
With the passage of time and the general terms of service of the universe as expressed in physics, #ClimateDenier howlers tend to become more ridiculous as they age.
Especially, wiggles in graphs lead to wishful thinking.
2010: "JAXA shows that we have more ice than any time on this date for the past 8 years."
The problem of trends remains unresolved in the denier playbook.
We've revised our treatment of this confusion. Opinions? Let us know!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/Has-Arctic-sea-ice-recovered.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
With the passage of time and the general terms of service of the universe as expressed in physics, #ClimateDenier howlers tend to become more ridiculous as they age.
Especially, wiggles in graphs lead to wishful thinking.
2010: "JAXA shows that we have more ice than any time on this date for the past 8 years."
The problem of trends remains unresolved in the denier playbook.
We've revised our treatment of this confusion. Opinions? Let us know!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/Has-Arctic-sea-ice-recovered.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
With the passage of time and the general terms of service of the universe as expressed in physics, #ClimateDenier howlers tend to become more ridiculous as they age.
Especially, wiggles in graphs lead to wishful thinking.
2010: "JAXA shows that we have more ice than any time on this date for the past 8 years."
The problem of trends remains unresolved in the denier playbook.
We've revised our treatment of this confusion. Opinions? Let us know!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/Has-Arctic-sea-ice-recovered.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
With the passage of time and the general terms of service of the universe as expressed in physics, #ClimateDenier howlers tend to become more ridiculous as they age.
Especially, wiggles in graphs lead to wishful thinking.
2010: "JAXA shows that we have more ice than any time on this date for the past 8 years."
The problem of trends remains unresolved in the denier playbook.
We've revised our treatment of this confusion. Opinions? Let us know!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/Has-Arctic-sea-ice-recovered.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
With the passage of time and the general terms of service of the universe as expressed in physics, #ClimateDenier howlers tend to become more ridiculous as they age.
Especially, wiggles in graphs lead to wishful thinking.
2010: "JAXA shows that we have more ice than any time on this date for the past 8 years."
The problem of trends remains unresolved in the denier playbook.
We've revised our treatment of this confusion. Opinions? Let us know!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/Has-Arctic-sea-ice-recovered.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
Our just-published Venus rundown was the 50th revision of our staple climate myth rebuttals in scarcely a year.
This wholesale attack was a mere mote in our eye in November of 2022. Are we proud? Well, John Mason, Ken Rice & Bärbel Winkler should be blushing. 50 methodical do-overs in such a short period is no mean feat.
John Mason points out in this commemorative post: climate denier arguments have not aged well over the past decade.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/50-rebuttals.html?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
Our just-published Venus rundown was the 50th revision of our staple climate myth rebuttals in scarcely a year.
This wholesale attack was a mere mote in our eye in November of 2022. Are we proud? Well, John Mason, Ken Rice & Bärbel Winkler should be blushing. 50 methodical do-overs in such a short period is no mean feat.
John Mason points out in this commemorative post: climate denier arguments have not aged well over the past decade.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/50-rebuttals.html?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
Our just-published Venus rundown was the 50th revision of our staple climate myth rebuttals in scarcely a year.
This wholesale attack was a mere mote in our eye in November of 2022. Are we proud? Well, John Mason, Ken Rice & Bärbel Winkler should be blushing. 50 methodical do-overs in such a short period is no mean feat.
John Mason points out in this commemorative post: climate denier arguments have not aged well over the past decade.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/50-rebuttals.html?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
Our just-published Venus rundown was the 50th revision of our staple climate myth rebuttals in scarcely a year.
This wholesale attack was a mere mote in our eye in November of 2022. Are we proud? Well, John Mason, Ken Rice & Bärbel Winkler should be blushing. 50 methodical do-overs in such a short period is no mean feat.
John Mason points out in this commemorative post: climate denier arguments have not aged well over the past decade.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/50-rebuttals.html?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
Our just-published Venus rundown was the 50th revision of our staple climate myth rebuttals in scarcely a year.
This wholesale attack was a mere mote in our eye in November of 2022. Are we proud? Well, John Mason, Ken Rice & Bärbel Winkler should be blushing. 50 methodical do-overs in such a short period is no mean feat.
John Mason points out in this commemorative post: climate denier arguments have not aged well over the past decade.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/50-rebuttals.html?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
Challenging for an at-a-glance treatment: "Do high levels of CO2 in the past contradict the warming effect of CO2?"
Even so, our stalwart CRR ("Chief Rebuttal Revisor") John Mason tackles and hopefully tames (?) a climate myth that exerts itself more than the lazy or expediently appealing slop we typically see.
How did John do? Does the new treatment spool out without glitches? Let us know via the embedded form in the freshly revised article!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-higher-in-past-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
Challenging for an at-a-glance treatment: "Do high levels of CO2 in the past contradict the warming effect of CO2?"
Even so, our stalwart CRR ("Chief Rebuttal Revisor") John Mason tackles and hopefully tames (?) a climate myth that exerts itself more than the lazy or expediently appealing slop we typically see.
How did John do? Does the new treatment spool out without glitches? Let us know via the embedded form in the freshly revised article!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-higher-in-past-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
Challenging for an at-a-glance treatment: "Do high levels of CO2 in the past contradict the warming effect of CO2?"
Even so, our stalwart CRR ("Chief Rebuttal Revisor") John Mason tackles and hopefully tames (?) a climate myth that exerts itself more than the lazy or expediently appealing slop we typically see.
How did John do? Does the new treatment spool out without glitches? Let us know via the embedded form in the freshly revised article!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-higher-in-past-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
Challenging for an at-a-glance treatment: "Do high levels of CO2 in the past contradict the warming effect of CO2?"
Even so, our stalwart CRR ("Chief Rebuttal Revisor") John Mason tackles and hopefully tames (?) a climate myth that exerts itself more than the lazy or expediently appealing slop we typically see.
How did John do? Does the new treatment spool out without glitches? Let us know via the embedded form in the freshly revised article!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-higher-in-past-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
Challenging for an at-a-glance treatment: "Do high levels of CO2 in the past contradict the warming effect of CO2?"
Even so, our stalwart CRR ("Chief Rebuttal Revisor") John Mason tackles and hopefully tames (?) a climate myth that exerts itself more than the lazy or expediently appealing slop we typically see.
How did John do? Does the new treatment spool out without glitches? Let us know via the embedded form in the freshly revised article!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-higher-in-past-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
"Mauna Loa is a volcano and it doesn’t seem to me that a volcano is the best place to be taking CO2 measurements"
One would think, eh? An appealingly simple argument and a living example of "Brandolini's Law," which describes the inherently asymmetric nature of correcting bullshit.
In keeping with Brandolini, our newly revised at-a-glance rebuttal necessarily expends more words to explain how CO2 measurements are accurate. Critiques invited!
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-measurements-uncertainty-basic.htm
-
"Mauna Loa is a volcano and it doesn’t seem to me that a volcano is the best place to be taking CO2 measurements"
One would think, eh? An appealingly simple argument and a living example of "Brandolini's Law," which describes the inherently asymmetric nature of correcting bullshit.
In keeping with Brandolini, our newly revised at-a-glance rebuttal necessarily expends more words to explain how CO2 measurements are accurate. Critiques invited!
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-measurements-uncertainty-basic.htm
-
"Mauna Loa is a volcano and it doesn’t seem to me that a volcano is the best place to be taking CO2 measurements"
One would think, eh? An appealingly simple argument and a living example of "Brandolini's Law," which describes the inherently asymmetric nature of correcting bullshit.
In keeping with Brandolini, our newly revised at-a-glance rebuttal necessarily expends more words to explain how CO2 measurements are accurate. Critiques invited!
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-measurements-uncertainty-basic.htm
-
"Mauna Loa is a volcano and it doesn’t seem to me that a volcano is the best place to be taking CO2 measurements"
One would think, eh? An appealingly simple argument and a living example of "Brandolini's Law," which describes the inherently asymmetric nature of correcting bullshit.
In keeping with Brandolini, our newly revised at-a-glance rebuttal necessarily expends more words to explain how CO2 measurements are accurate. Critiques invited!
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-measurements-uncertainty-basic.htm
-
"Mauna Loa is a volcano and it doesn’t seem to me that a volcano is the best place to be taking CO2 measurements"
One would think, eh? An appealingly simple argument and a living example of "Brandolini's Law," which describes the inherently asymmetric nature of correcting bullshit.
In keeping with Brandolini, our newly revised at-a-glance rebuttal necessarily expends more words to explain how CO2 measurements are accurate. Critiques invited!
https://skepticalscience.com/co2-measurements-uncertainty-basic.htm
-
"Climate scientists are only in it for the money."
A wry joke for climate scientists! But most of us are not personally familiar with the arduous process of accounting for other peoples' (small) money. Between imagination and psychological projection, "they're living the high life" might be believable.
We've freshened our explanation about this. What do you think? Critiques invited via a form embedded in the article. Drop by and let us know!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-scientists-in-it-for-the-money-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&yutm-term=sks -
"Climate scientists are only in it for the money."
A wry joke for climate scientists! But most of us are not personally familiar with the arduous process of accounting for other peoples' (small) money. Between imagination and psychological projection, "they're living the high life" might be believable.
We've freshened our explanation about this. What do you think? Critiques invited via a form embedded in the article. Drop by and let us know!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-scientists-in-it-for-the-money-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&yutm-term=sks -
"Climate scientists are only in it for the money."
A wry joke for climate scientists! But most of us are not personally familiar with the arduous process of accounting for other peoples' (small) money. Between imagination and psychological projection, "they're living the high life" might be believable.
We've freshened our explanation about this. What do you think? Critiques invited via a form embedded in the article. Drop by and let us know!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-scientists-in-it-for-the-money-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&yutm-term=sks -
"Climate scientists are only in it for the money."
A wry joke for climate scientists! But most of us are not personally familiar with the arduous process of accounting for other peoples' (small) money. Between imagination and psychological projection, "they're living the high life" might be believable.
We've freshened our explanation about this. What do you think? Critiques invited via a form embedded in the article. Drop by and let us know!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-scientists-in-it-for-the-money-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&yutm-term=sks -
"Climate scientists are only in it for the money."
A wry joke for climate scientists! But most of us are not personally familiar with the arduous process of accounting for other peoples' (small) money. Between imagination and psychological projection, "they're living the high life" might be believable.
We've freshened our explanation about this. What do you think? Critiques invited via a form embedded in the article. Drop by and let us know!
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/climate-scientists-in-it-for-the-money-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&yutm-term=sks -
"The oceans, land and atmosphere exchange CO2 continuously so the additional load by humans is incredibly small."
Shoddy rhetoric ignoring the concept of balance, and how balance is maintained. Earth systems run a carbon cycle with limited short-term capacity for buffering excess CO2, so "a little" CO2 will create big problems.
We've updated our rebuttal for "Human CO2 is a tiny % of CO2 emissions." What do you think? Read and let us know.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
"The oceans, land and atmosphere exchange CO2 continuously so the additional load by humans is incredibly small."
Shoddy rhetoric ignoring the concept of balance, and how balance is maintained. Earth systems run a carbon cycle with limited short-term capacity for buffering excess CO2, so "a little" CO2 will create big problems.
We've updated our rebuttal for "Human CO2 is a tiny % of CO2 emissions." What do you think? Read and let us know.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
"The oceans, land and atmosphere exchange CO2 continuously so the additional load by humans is incredibly small."
Shoddy rhetoric ignoring the concept of balance, and how balance is maintained. Earth systems run a carbon cycle with limited short-term capacity for buffering excess CO2, so "a little" CO2 will create big problems.
We've updated our rebuttal for "Human CO2 is a tiny % of CO2 emissions." What do you think? Read and let us know.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
"The oceans, land and atmosphere exchange CO2 continuously so the additional load by humans is incredibly small."
Shoddy rhetoric ignoring the concept of balance, and how balance is maintained. Earth systems run a carbon cycle with limited short-term capacity for buffering excess CO2, so "a little" CO2 will create big problems.
We've updated our rebuttal for "Human CO2 is a tiny % of CO2 emissions." What do you think? Read and let us know.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
"The oceans, land and atmosphere exchange CO2 continuously so the additional load by humans is incredibly small."
Shoddy rhetoric ignoring the concept of balance, and how balance is maintained. Earth systems run a carbon cycle with limited short-term capacity for buffering excess CO2, so "a little" CO2 will create big problems.
We've updated our rebuttal for "Human CO2 is a tiny % of CO2 emissions." What do you think? Read and let us know.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/human-co2-smaller-than-natural-emissions-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
We collect stats on usage of our collection of climate myth rebuttals. Arrivals overwhelmingly come via search, so they're a proxy measure of prominent climate BS in the wild.
Today at #14 for the seven-day average and in a familiar spot: "Volcanoes emit more CO2 than humans."
We've just revised this rebuttal and would like feedback. There's a form available for this; follow the link if you'd like to give 'er a read and then offer critique.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/volcanoes-and-global-warming-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
We collect stats on usage of our collection of climate myth rebuttals. Arrivals overwhelmingly come via search, so they're a proxy measure of prominent climate BS in the wild.
Today at #14 for the seven-day average and in a familiar spot: "Volcanoes emit more CO2 than humans."
We've just revised this rebuttal and would like feedback. There's a form available for this; follow the link if you'd like to give 'er a read and then offer critique.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/volcanoes-and-global-warming-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
We collect stats on usage of our collection of climate myth rebuttals. Arrivals overwhelmingly come via search, so they're a proxy measure of prominent climate BS in the wild.
Today at #14 for the seven-day average and in a familiar spot: "Volcanoes emit more CO2 than humans."
We've just revised this rebuttal and would like feedback. There's a form available for this; follow the link if you'd like to give 'er a read and then offer critique.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/volcanoes-and-global-warming-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
We collect stats on usage of our collection of climate myth rebuttals. Arrivals overwhelmingly come via search, so they're a proxy measure of prominent climate BS in the wild.
Today at #14 for the seven-day average and in a familiar spot: "Volcanoes emit more CO2 than humans."
We've just revised this rebuttal and would like feedback. There's a form available for this; follow the link if you'd like to give 'er a read and then offer critique.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/volcanoes-and-global-warming-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks -
We collect stats on usage of our collection of climate myth rebuttals. Arrivals overwhelmingly come via search, so they're a proxy measure of prominent climate BS in the wild.
Today at #14 for the seven-day average and in a familiar spot: "Volcanoes emit more CO2 than humans."
We've just revised this rebuttal and would like feedback. There's a form available for this; follow the link if you'd like to give 'er a read and then offer critique.
#ClimateMythRebuttals
https://skepticalscience.com/volcanoes-and-global-warming-basic.htm?utm-source=mastodon&utm-campaign=socialnetworks&utm-term=sks