home.social

#bookerprize — Public Fediverse posts

Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #bookerprize, aggregated by home.social.

fetched live
  1. The Booker Prize has been around since 1969, and now we know the six books that have made the shortlist for the 2026 #BookerPrize!

    #booknews #bookblog 📚 #bookstodon

  2. The Booker Prize has been around since 1969, and now we know the six books that have made the shortlist for the 2026 #BookerPrize!

    #booknews #bookblog 📚 #bookstodon

  3. The Booker Prize has been around since 1969, and now we know the six books that have made the shortlist for the 2026 #BookerPrize!

    #booknews #bookblog 📚 #bookstodon

  4. The Booker Prize has been around since 1969, and now we know the six books that have made the shortlist for the 2026 #BookerPrize!

    #booknews #bookblog 📚 #bookstodon

  5. The Booker Prize has been around since 1969, and now we know the six books that have made the shortlist for the 2026 #BookerPrize!

    #booknews #bookblog 📚 #bookstodon

  6. ‘From Hilarious to the Discomfiting:’ The U.K.’s Booker Prize Announces the 2026 Shortlist

    Featuring novels from dystopian fiction to contemporary realism, from campus satire to historical fiction, the Booker Prize shortlist offers a collection of books that illustrate the shape of our humanity. 
    The post ‘From Hilarious to the Discomfiting:’ The U.K.’s Booker Prize Announces the 2026 Shortlist appeared first on Publishing Perspectives.
    publishingperspectives.com/202

    #Awards #BookerPrize #DouglasStuart #ElizabethStrout #LukeKennard

  7. ‘From Hilarious to the Discomfiting:’ The U.K.’s Booker Prize Announces the 2026 Shortlist

    Featuring novels from dystopian fiction to contemporary realism, from campus satire to historical fiction, the Booker Prize shortlist offers a collection of books that illustrate the shape of our humanity. 
    The post ‘From Hilarious to the Discomfiting:’ The U.K.’s Booker Prize Announces the 2026 Shortlist appeared first on Publishing Perspectives.
    publishingperspectives.com/202

    #Awards #BookerPrize #DouglasStuart #ElizabethStrout #LukeKennard

  8. ‘From Hilarious to the Discomfiting:’ The U.K.’s Booker Prize Announces the 2026 Shortlist

    Featuring novels from dystopian fiction to contemporary realism, from campus satire to historical fiction, the Booker Prize shortlist offers a collection of books that illustrate the shape of our humanity. 
    The post ‘From Hilarious to the Discomfiting:’ The U.K.’s Booker Prize Announces the 2026 Shortlist appeared first on Publishing Perspectives.
    publishingperspectives.com/202

    #Awards #BookerPrize #DouglasStuart #ElizabethStrout #LukeKennard

  9. ‘From Hilarious to the Discomfiting:’ The U.K.’s Booker Prize Announces the 2026 Shortlist

    Featuring novels from dystopian fiction to contemporary realism, from campus satire to historical fiction, the Booker Prize shortlist offers a collection of books that illustrate the shape of our humanity. 
    The post ‘From Hilarious to the Discomfiting:’ The U.K.’s Booker Prize Announces the 2026 Shortlist appeared first on Publishing Perspectives.
    publishingperspectives.com/202

    #Awards #BookerPrize #DouglasStuart #ElizabethStrout #LukeKennard

  10. Booker prize 2026: ask our books team anything about this year’s contenders
    By Guardian moderators (now); Justine Jordan, Charlotte Northedge and Liese Spencer (from 1pm)

    This year’s shortlist for the Booker prize was announced last night. Our books editors will be logging on at 1pm to discuss this year’s nominees, from previous winners Marlon James and Douglas Stuart to debut novelist Rebecca Perry. Post your questions or discussion points now

    theguardian.com/books/live/202

    #Books #Bookerprize #Culture #Awardsandprizes #Fiction #TheGuardian #Guardianmoderators #JustineJordan #CharlotteNorthedge #LieseSpencerfrom1pm

  11. Booker prize 2026: ask our books team anything about this year’s contenders
    By Guardian moderators (now); Justine Jordan, Charlotte Northedge and Liese Spencer (from 1pm)

    This year’s shortlist for the Booker prize was announced last night. Our books editors will be logging on at 1pm to discuss this year’s nominees, from previous winners Marlon James and Douglas Stuart to debut novelist Rebecca Perry. Post your questions or discussion points now

    theguardian.com/books/live/202

    #Books #Bookerprize #Culture #Awardsandprizes #Fiction #TheGuardian #Guardianmoderators #JustineJordan #CharlotteNorthedge #LieseSpencerfrom1pm

  12. Booker prize 2026: ask our books team anything about this year’s contenders
    By Guardian moderators (now); Justine Jordan, Charlotte Northedge and Liese Spencer (from 1pm)

    This year’s shortlist for the Booker prize was announced last night. Our books editors will be logging on at 1pm to discuss this year’s nominees, from previous winners Marlon James and Douglas Stuart to debut novelist Rebecca Perry. Post your questions or discussion points now

    theguardian.com/books/live/202

    #Books #Bookerprize #Culture #Awardsandprizes #Fiction #TheGuardian #Guardianmoderators #JustineJordan #CharlotteNorthedge #LieseSpencerfrom1pm

  13. Booker prize 2026: ask our books team anything about this year’s contenders
    By Guardian moderators (now); Justine Jordan, Charlotte Northedge and Liese Spencer (from 1pm)

    This year’s shortlist for the Booker prize was announced last night. Our books editors will be logging on at 1pm to discuss this year’s nominees, from previous winners Marlon James and Douglas Stuart to debut novelist Rebecca Perry. Post your questions or discussion points now

    theguardian.com/books/live/202

    #Books #Bookerprize #Culture #Awardsandprizes #Fiction #TheGuardian #Guardianmoderators #JustineJordan #CharlotteNorthedge #LieseSpencerfrom1pm

  14. The Booker Prize shortlist is out and of the longlisted three I’ve read so far, the one I didn’t enjoy isn’t on it. The two I gave five stars to _are_ shortlisted.

    So if you’re interested, I can recommend starting with Black Bag by Luke Kennard and May We Feed The King by Rebecca Perry.

    #BookerPrize #books

  15. The Booker Prize shortlist is out and of the longlisted three I’ve read so far, the one I didn’t enjoy isn’t on it. The two I gave five stars to _are_ shortlisted.

    So if you’re interested, I can recommend starting with Black Bag by Luke Kennard and May We Feed The King by Rebecca Perry.

    #BookerPrize #books

  16. The Booker Prize shortlist is out and of the longlisted three I’ve read so far, the one I didn’t enjoy isn’t on it. The two I gave five stars to _are_ shortlisted.

    So if you’re interested, I can recommend starting with Black Bag by Luke Kennard and May We Feed The King by Rebecca Perry.

    #BookerPrize #books

  17. The Booker Prize shortlist is out and of the longlisted three I’ve read so far, the one I didn’t enjoy isn’t on it. The two I gave five stars to _are_ shortlisted.

    So if you’re interested, I can recommend starting with Black Bag by Luke Kennard and May We Feed The King by Rebecca Perry.

    #BookerPrize #books

  18. The Booker Prize shortlist is out and of the longlisted three I’ve read so far, the one I didn’t enjoy isn’t on it. The two I gave five stars to _are_ shortlisted.

    So if you’re interested, I can recommend starting with Black Bag by Luke Kennard and May We Feed The King by Rebecca Perry.

    #BookerPrize #books

  19. Previous winners Marlon James and Douglas Stuart shortlisted for Booker prize
    By Ella Creamer

    The two authors are in the running for the £50,000 award alongside a Pulitzer winner, a science fiction legend, a comic writer and a debut novelist

    theguardian.com/books/2026/sep

    #Books #Bookerprize #Awardsandprizes #Culture #Fiction #MarlonJames #ElizabethStrout #TheGuardian #EllaCreamer

  20. Previous winners Marlon James and Douglas Stuart shortlisted for Booker prize
    By Ella Creamer

    The two authors are in the running for the £50,000 award alongside a Pulitzer winner, a science fiction legend, a comic writer and a debut novelist

    theguardian.com/books/2026/sep

    #Books #Bookerprize #Awardsandprizes #Culture #Fiction #MarlonJames #ElizabethStrout #TheGuardian #EllaCreamer

  21. Previous winners Marlon James and Douglas Stuart shortlisted for Booker prize
    By Ella Creamer

    The two authors are in the running for the £50,000 award alongside a Pulitzer winner, a science fiction legend, a comic writer and a debut novelist

    theguardian.com/books/2026/sep

    #Books #Bookerprize #Awardsandprizes #Culture #Fiction #MarlonJames #ElizabethStrout #TheGuardian #EllaCreamer

  22. Previous winners Marlon James and Douglas Stuart shortlisted for Booker prize
    By Ella Creamer

    The two authors are in the running for the £50,000 award alongside a Pulitzer winner, a science fiction legend, a comic writer and a debut novelist

    theguardian.com/books/2026/sep

    #Books #Bookerprize #Awardsandprizes #Culture #Fiction #MarlonJames #ElizabethStrout #TheGuardian #EllaCreamer

  23. Previous winners Marlon James and Douglas Stuart shortlisted for Booker prize
    By Ella Creamer

    The two authors are in the running for the £50,000 award alongside a Pulitzer winner, a science fiction legend, a comic writer and a debut novelist

    theguardian.com/books/2026/sep

    #Books #Bookerprize #Awardsandprizes #Culture #Fiction #MarlonJames #ElizabethStrout #TheGuardian #EllaCreamer

  24. A nice bit of prose, describing life in a fictional orbital space station. I never before imagined how that must be, the change from terrestrial days and nights.

    From "Orbital" by Samantha Harvey, winner of the Booker Prize 2024.

    #bookstodon #whatToRead #BookerPrizeWinners #bookerPrize

  25. A nice bit of prose, describing life in a fictional orbital space station. I never before imagined how that must be, the change from terrestrial days and nights.

    From "Orbital" by Samantha Harvey, winner of the Booker Prize 2024.

    #bookstodon #whatToRead #BookerPrizeWinners #bookerPrize

  26. A nice bit of prose, describing life in a fictional orbital space station. I never before imagined how that must be, the change from terrestrial days and nights.

    From "Orbital" by Samantha Harvey, winner of the Booker Prize 2024.

    #bookstodon #whatToRead #BookerPrizeWinners #bookerPrize

  27. A nice bit of prose, describing life in a fictional orbital space station. I never before imagined how that must be, the change from terrestrial days and nights.

    From "Orbital" by Samantha Harvey, winner of the Booker Prize 2024.

    #bookstodon #whatToRead #BookerPrizeWinners #bookerPrize

  28. A nice bit of prose, describing life in a fictional orbital space station. I never before imagined how that must be, the change from terrestrial days and nights.

    From "Orbital" by Samantha Harvey, winner of the Booker Prize 2024.

    #bookstodon #whatToRead #BookerPrizeWinners #bookerPrize

  29. 📘 "Helen of Nowhere" by Makenna Goodman

    I saw this book on the Booker Prize longlist for this year. Usually I'm not that interested in reading the list (I'm more invested in the International Booker), but I enjoy following along with some reviewers. What got me curious about this title were its negative reviews. I haven't seen a single positive one in my feeds. Yet I couldn't get a grasp on why it appeared to be so disliked. Ironically there was a lot of vague critique about it being vague.

    A wave of negative reviews like that, despite the book being highly regarded by a prize, that just draws me in. So I decided to give it a go.

    This book is simultaneously difficult and easy to summarize. A disgraced professor, divorcing from his wife, plans to escape the city and goes to a house viewing in the countryside. That's it (but it's not).

    The man's point of view slightly reminded me of the first story in Tony Tulathimutte's "Rejection", about a 'nice guy'. The more he speaks, the more you realize what went wrong in his career and why. He really isn't a pleasant person, nor are some of the few other characters in this story.

    This book is monologue heavy, but I found it easy to read. I flew through the pages. The points of view we get are from people in privileged positions, sad about how they've been victimized, underappreciated, taken advantage of, or misunderstood. How could this happen to them, they who know so much better than anyone? It's equally frustrating and humorous.

    A lot of topics pass by, such as identity politics, hierarchy in academia, gender dynamics, city versus countryside, and how things like 'living off the land' and 'simple living' get idealized, and how class is wrapped up in it all. Lots to chew on and laugh about.

    About halfway through the novel something unexpected happened. Wait, we're going the kooky route? Indeed we did. What made me happy is that the book totally committed and had a great last chapter. I think it was the only ending that would've fit this well.

    Overall, I'm glad I read it. It was a short and fun read, with enough depth and a creative ending. It's certainly not one of my favorites of the year, but to me, its low ratings are quite harsh. I think it does require focus when reading and maybe some familiarity with the societal topics it brought up (it goes a little meta in a way), so it might not be the easiest read for some. But I do see why the Booker judges put it on the list. An interesting pick.

    #AmReading #BookerPrize

  30. 📘 "Helen of Nowhere" by Makenna Goodman

    I saw this book on the Booker Prize longlist for this year. Usually I'm not that interested in reading the list (I'm more invested in the International Booker), but I enjoy following along with some reviewers. What got me curious about this title were its negative reviews. I haven't seen a single positive one in my feeds. Yet I couldn't get a grasp on why it appeared to be so disliked. Ironically there was a lot of vague critique about it being vague.

    A wave of negative reviews like that, despite the book being highly regarded by a prize, that just draws me in. So I decided to give it a go.

    This book is simultaneously difficult and easy to summarize. A disgraced professor, divorcing from his wife, plans to escape the city and goes to a house viewing in the countryside. That's it (but it's not).

    The man's point of view slightly reminded me of the first story in Tony Tulathimutte's "Rejection", about a 'nice guy'. The more he speaks, the more you realize what went wrong in his career and why. He really isn't a pleasant person, nor are some of the few other characters in this story.

    This book is monologue heavy, but I found it easy to read. I flew through the pages. The points of view we get are from people in privileged positions, sad about how they've been victimized, underappreciated, taken advantage of, or misunderstood. How could this happen to them, they who know so much better than anyone? It's equally frustrating and humorous.

    A lot of topics pass by, such as identity politics, hierarchy in academia, gender dynamics, city versus countryside, and how things like 'living off the land' and 'simple living' get idealized, and how class is wrapped up in it all. Lots to chew on and laugh about.

    About halfway through the novel something unexpected happened. Wait, we're going the kooky route? Indeed we did. What made me happy is that the book totally committed and had a great last chapter. I think it was the only ending that would've fit this well.

    Overall, I'm glad I read it. It was a short and fun read, with enough depth and a creative ending. It's certainly not one of my favorites of the year, but to me, its low ratings are quite harsh. I think it does require focus when reading and maybe some familiarity with the societal topics it brought up (it goes a little meta in a way), so it might not be the easiest read for some. But I do see why the Booker judges put it on the list. An interesting pick.

    #AmReading #BookerPrize

  31. 📘 "Helen of Nowhere" by Makenna Goodman

    I saw this book on the Booker Prize longlist for this year. Usually I'm not that interested in reading the list (I'm more invested in the International Booker), but I enjoy following along with some reviewers. What got me curious about this title were its negative reviews. I haven't seen a single positive one in my feeds. Yet I couldn't get a grasp on why it appeared to be so disliked. Ironically there was a lot of vague critique about it being vague.

    A wave of negative reviews like that, despite the book being highly regarded by a prize, that just draws me in. So I decided to give it a go.

    This book is simultaneously difficult and easy to summarize. A disgraced professor, divorcing from his wife, plans to escape the city and goes to a house viewing in the countryside. That's it (but it's not).

    The man's point of view slightly reminded me of the first story in Tony Tulathimutte's "Rejection", about a 'nice guy'. The more he speaks, the more you realize what went wrong in his career and why. He really isn't a pleasant person, nor are some of the few other characters in this story.

    This book is monologue heavy, but I found it easy to read. I flew through the pages. The points of view we get are from people in privileged positions, sad about how they've been victimized, underappreciated, taken advantage of, or misunderstood. How could this happen to them, they who know so much better than anyone? It's equally frustrating and humorous.

    A lot of topics pass by, such as identity politics, hierarchy in academia, gender dynamics, city versus countryside, and how things like 'living off the land' and 'simple living' get idealized, and how class is wrapped up in it all. Lots to chew on and laugh about.

    About halfway through the novel something unexpected happened. Wait, we're going the kooky route? Indeed we did. What made me happy is that the book totally committed and had a great last chapter. I think it was the only ending that would've fit this well.

    Overall, I'm glad I read it. It was a short and fun read, with enough depth and a creative ending. It's certainly not one of my favorites of the year, but to me, its low ratings are quite harsh. I think it does require focus when reading and maybe some familiarity with the societal topics it brought up (it goes a little meta in a way), so it might not be the easiest read for some. But I do see why the Booker judges put it on the list. An interesting pick.

    #AmReading #BookerPrize

  32. 📘 "Helen of Nowhere" by Makenna Goodman

    I saw this book on the Booker Prize longlist for this year. Usually I'm not that interested in reading the list (I'm more invested in the International Booker), but I enjoy following along with some reviewers. What got me curious about this title were its negative reviews. I haven't seen a single positive one in my feeds. Yet I couldn't get a grasp on why it appeared to be so disliked. Ironically there was a lot of vague critique about it being vague.

    A wave of negative reviews like that, despite the book being highly regarded by a prize, that just draws me in. So I decided to give it a go.

    This book is simultaneously difficult and easy to summarize. A disgraced professor, divorcing from his wife, plans to escape the city and goes to a house viewing in the countryside. That's it (but it's not).

    The man's point of view slightly reminded me of the first story in Tony Tulathimutte's "Rejection", about a 'nice guy'. The more he speaks, the more you realize what went wrong in his career and why. He really isn't a pleasant person, nor are some of the few other characters in this story.

    This book is monologue heavy, but I found it easy to read. I flew through the pages. The points of view we get are from people in privileged positions, sad about how they've been victimized, underappreciated, taken advantage of, or misunderstood. How could this happen to them, they who know so much better than anyone? It's equally frustrating and humorous.

    A lot of topics pass by, such as identity politics, hierarchy in academia, gender dynamics, city versus countryside, and how things like 'living off the land' and 'simple living' get idealized, and how class is wrapped up in it all. Lots to chew on and laugh about.

    About halfway through the novel something unexpected happened. Wait, we're going the kooky route? Indeed we did. What made me happy is that the book totally committed and had a great last chapter. I think it was the only ending that would've fit this well.

    Overall, I'm glad I read it. It was a short and fun read, with enough depth and a creative ending. It's certainly not one of my favorites of the year, but to me, its low ratings are quite harsh. I think it does require focus when reading and maybe some familiarity with the societal topics it brought up (it goes a little meta in a way), so it might not be the easiest read for some. But I do see why the Booker judges put it on the list. An interesting pick.

    #AmReading #BookerPrize

  33. 📘 "Helen of Nowhere" by Makenna Goodman

    I saw this book on the Booker Prize longlist for this year. Usually I'm not that interested in reading the list (I'm more invested in the International Booker), but I enjoy following along with some reviewers. What got me curious about this title were its negative reviews. I haven't seen a single positive one in my feeds. Yet I couldn't get a grasp on why it appeared to be so disliked. Ironically there was a lot of vague critique about it being vague.

    A wave of negative reviews like that, despite the book being highly regarded by a prize, that just draws me in. So I decided to give it a go.

    This book is simultaneously difficult and easy to summarize. A disgraced professor, divorcing from his wife, plans to escape the city and goes to a house viewing in the countryside. That's it (but it's not).

    The man's point of view slightly reminded me of the first story in Tony Tulathimutte's "Rejection", about a 'nice guy'. The more he speaks, the more you realize what went wrong in his career and why. He really isn't a pleasant person, nor are some of the few other characters in this story.

    This book is monologue heavy, but I found it easy to read. I flew through the pages. The points of view we get are from people in privileged positions, sad about how they've been victimized, underappreciated, taken advantage of, or misunderstood. How could this happen to them, they who know so much better than anyone? It's equally frustrating and humorous.

    A lot of topics pass by, such as identity politics, hierarchy in academia, gender dynamics, city versus countryside, and how things like 'living off the land' and 'simple living' get idealized, and how class is wrapped up in it all. Lots to chew on and laugh about.

    About halfway through the novel something unexpected happened. Wait, we're going the kooky route? Indeed we did. What made me happy is that the book totally committed and had a great last chapter. I think it was the only ending that would've fit this well.

    Overall, I'm glad I read it. It was a short and fun read, with enough depth and a creative ending. It's certainly not one of my favorites of the year, but to me, its low ratings are quite harsh. I think it does require focus when reading and maybe some familiarity with the societal topics it brought up (it goes a little meta in a way), so it might not be the easiest read for some. But I do see why the Booker judges put it on the list. An interesting pick.

    #AmReading #BookerPrize