#amoralmodel — Public Fediverse posts
Live and recent posts from across the Fediverse tagged #amoralmodel, aggregated by home.social.
-
DATE: September 8, 2026 at 10:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: People with narcissistic traits generate more original and malicious ideas for revenge, study finds
People who have previously used their imagination to harm others or who possess highly narcissistic traits tend to generate more original and malicious ideas for revenge. These findings indicate that past actions and personality shape how individuals apply their problem-solving skills during interpersonal conflicts. The research was published in The Journal of Intelligence.
Creativity is typically viewed as a positive force in society, driving art, science, and innovation. But creativity also has a dark side, known as malevolent creativity. This involves the application of original ideas to purposely harm, deceive, or manipulate others. It is essentially creative problem-solving with malicious intent, evident in everything from everyday pranks to complex criminal activities.
To understand why some people use their imagination for harm, psychologists often refer to a framework called the AMORAL model. This model suggests that dark creativity results from a combination of personal traits, such as a natural propensity for creativity or certain personality types, and environmental factors, such as a provoking situation.
Among personality types, the dark triad traits are particularly relevant. These include psychopathy (a lack of empathy and high impulsivity), Machiavellianism (a tendency to be strategic and manipulative), and narcissism (a sense of grandiosity, egocentrism, and a strong need for admiration). People high in narcissism tend to be especially reactive to social slights or threats to their ego. A 2021 meta-analysis found that among these dark traits, narcissism has the most consistent relationship with self-reported general creativity.
“Society generally views creativity as a good thing, but some people use their creativity to harm others,” Natalie Ceballos, a professor of psychology at Texas State University, told PsyPost. “I’m interested in the individual and environmental factors that might influence someone to steer their creativity toward antisocial ends.”
The current research, conducted by Ceballos alongside cognitive neuroscientist Carmen E. Westerberg and pre-med student Ruby N. Sweet, aimed to untangle how a person’s history of malicious behavior influences their current ability to devise revenge plots, above and beyond their everyday problem-solving skills and personality.
“We aimed to determine what factors are most relevant for understanding when creative people may use their skills for nefarious purposes,” Ceballos said. “Studies have shown that the dark triad personality traits predict malevolently creative ideology, but how other factors like history of creative malevolence or reaction to acute provocation might interact with dark triad traits is an area that requires further research.”
The research team recruited 248 undergraduate students for an online survey. The participants were predominantly young women, with an average age of 20. First, the students answered questions about their demographics and rated their own potential for everyday creative problem-solving on a simple five-point scale.
Next, participants completed a questionnaire assessing their past malevolent creativity. They rated how often they had engaged in behaviors like fabricating lies to simplify a problem, thinking up ways to take revenge, or playing tricks on others. They also completed a standard personality test to measure their levels of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism.
To measure malicious ideation in real time, the researchers used a task built around a hypothetical conflict. Participants read a vignette in which a neighbor asked for help with apartment renovations and promised to pay them. In the scenario, the participant does the work, but the neighbor later denies that any agreement took place and refuses to pay. The participants were instructed to type out as many original ideas as possible to get back at the neighbor.
“Some of the participants’ ideas were malevolent but not very creative, like simply physically assaulting the neighbor,” Ceballos noted. “Other ideas, like seeding the neighbor’s lawn with invasive plants, were more original and showed an appreciation for the long game.”
After generating their ideas, the students rated how provoked they would feel if the situation happened in real life. Two independent raters then evaluated the participants’ responses. They calculated a fluency index, which was the total number of malicious ideas generated. They also calculated a malevolence index, counting ideas that were rated as at least slightly harmful, and a composite score, which only counted ideas that were both harmful and highly original.
The researchers found that different personal factors predicted different types of creative output. A participant’s self-perception of their everyday problem-solving skills predicted their fluency index. People who viewed themselves as good at solving regular problems came up with a larger quantity of revenge ideas, regardless of how original or harmful those ideas actually were.
When it came to the quality of the revenge ideas, personality and past behavior played a larger role. High levels of narcissism and a history of past malevolent behavior predicted both the malevolence index and the overall composite score. This means that individuals who were highly narcissistic or who had a habit of playing tricks and seeking revenge in the past generated ideas that were more harmful and more unique.
Interestingly, past malevolent behavior contributed to the generation of harmful and original ideas independently of everyday problem-solving skills and narcissistic traits. While feeling provoked by the scenario correlated with generating darker ideas, the level of provocation did not uniquely predict the task outcomes once past behavior and personality were factored into the statistical models. Psychopathy and Machiavellianism also did not emerge as unique predictors in the final analyses.
“We were a bit surprised that provocation level didn’t have a larger effect on malevolent creativity,” Ceballos said. “In our study, it appears that past behaviors and personality traits were more closely tied to malevolently creative ideation.”
The findings align with research covered by PsyPost in 2023, which found that dark personality traits and a history of malicious actions relate to generating novel ways to harm others. They also fit with a 2021 study covered by PsyPost indicating that narcissism helps explain variations in malevolent creativity, though the new study specifically measured idea generation in real time rather than just relying on general behavioral tendencies.
As with all research, there are a few things to keep in mind. The study relied on a cross-sectional design, meaning the data was collected at a single point in time. Because of this, the researchers cannot determine cause and effect. It is not possible to say that past malicious behavior directly causes a person to generate better revenge ideas today, only that the two are associated.
The participant pool also consisted mostly of female college students in the United States. The results might not generalize to older adults, men, or people from different cultural backgrounds, especially since dark personality traits often vary across age and gender. Additionally, the study relied on self-reports for past bad behavior, which can be skewed if participants want to present themselves in a positive light.
The measure for everyday creativity was also based on a single question, which might not capture the full scope of a person’s creative abilities.
“What leads a person to use their creative abilities to harm others? I think the take-home message is that a complex mixture of personality, lived experiences, and current circumstances all come together to create a perfect storm of malevolent creativity,” Ceballos explained. “Our study included only a small subset of the factors that might contribute to malevolent creativity. A lot of open questions remain for future work, but our results suggest that it’s not a simple explanation.”
For instance, future studies could track people over time to see if a habit of malicious creativity builds on itself through positive reinforcement, eventually creating an automatic cognitive strategy for dealing with conflict.
“My collaborators and I have backgrounds in neuroscience, so our natural next step involves the exploration of potential neurophysiological correlates of malevolent creativity,” Ceballos said. “We’re particularly interested in how different kinds of acute and chronic stress, and even factors like sleep quality, might influence malevolent creativity and which therapeutic strategies might help to reduce negative outcomes.”
The study, “Self-Reports of Past Malevolent Behavior and Narcissism as Predictors of Malevolent Creativity on a Real-World Ideation Task,” was authored by Natalie A. Ceballos, Ruby N. Sweet, and Carmen E. Westerberg.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #MalevolentCreativity #Narcissism #DarkTriad #RevengeIdeas #CreativeProblemSolving #PsychologyResearch #AMORALModel #DarkPersonalityTraits #MalevolentBehavior #IdeationTask
-
DATE: September 8, 2026 at 10:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: People with narcissistic traits generate more original and malicious ideas for revenge, study finds
People who have previously used their imagination to harm others or who possess highly narcissistic traits tend to generate more original and malicious ideas for revenge. These findings indicate that past actions and personality shape how individuals apply their problem-solving skills during interpersonal conflicts. The research was published in The Journal of Intelligence.
Creativity is typically viewed as a positive force in society, driving art, science, and innovation. But creativity also has a dark side, known as malevolent creativity. This involves the application of original ideas to purposely harm, deceive, or manipulate others. It is essentially creative problem-solving with malicious intent, evident in everything from everyday pranks to complex criminal activities.
To understand why some people use their imagination for harm, psychologists often refer to a framework called the AMORAL model. This model suggests that dark creativity results from a combination of personal traits, such as a natural propensity for creativity or certain personality types, and environmental factors, such as a provoking situation.
Among personality types, the dark triad traits are particularly relevant. These include psychopathy (a lack of empathy and high impulsivity), Machiavellianism (a tendency to be strategic and manipulative), and narcissism (a sense of grandiosity, egocentrism, and a strong need for admiration). People high in narcissism tend to be especially reactive to social slights or threats to their ego. A 2021 meta-analysis found that among these dark traits, narcissism has the most consistent relationship with self-reported general creativity.
“Society generally views creativity as a good thing, but some people use their creativity to harm others,” Natalie Ceballos, a professor of psychology at Texas State University, told PsyPost. “I’m interested in the individual and environmental factors that might influence someone to steer their creativity toward antisocial ends.”
The current research, conducted by Ceballos alongside cognitive neuroscientist Carmen E. Westerberg and pre-med student Ruby N. Sweet, aimed to untangle how a person’s history of malicious behavior influences their current ability to devise revenge plots, above and beyond their everyday problem-solving skills and personality.
“We aimed to determine what factors are most relevant for understanding when creative people may use their skills for nefarious purposes,” Ceballos said. “Studies have shown that the dark triad personality traits predict malevolently creative ideology, but how other factors like history of creative malevolence or reaction to acute provocation might interact with dark triad traits is an area that requires further research.”
The research team recruited 248 undergraduate students for an online survey. The participants were predominantly young women, with an average age of 20. First, the students answered questions about their demographics and rated their own potential for everyday creative problem-solving on a simple five-point scale.
Next, participants completed a questionnaire assessing their past malevolent creativity. They rated how often they had engaged in behaviors like fabricating lies to simplify a problem, thinking up ways to take revenge, or playing tricks on others. They also completed a standard personality test to measure their levels of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism.
To measure malicious ideation in real time, the researchers used a task built around a hypothetical conflict. Participants read a vignette in which a neighbor asked for help with apartment renovations and promised to pay them. In the scenario, the participant does the work, but the neighbor later denies that any agreement took place and refuses to pay. The participants were instructed to type out as many original ideas as possible to get back at the neighbor.
“Some of the participants’ ideas were malevolent but not very creative, like simply physically assaulting the neighbor,” Ceballos noted. “Other ideas, like seeding the neighbor’s lawn with invasive plants, were more original and showed an appreciation for the long game.”
After generating their ideas, the students rated how provoked they would feel if the situation happened in real life. Two independent raters then evaluated the participants’ responses. They calculated a fluency index, which was the total number of malicious ideas generated. They also calculated a malevolence index, counting ideas that were rated as at least slightly harmful, and a composite score, which only counted ideas that were both harmful and highly original.
The researchers found that different personal factors predicted different types of creative output. A participant’s self-perception of their everyday problem-solving skills predicted their fluency index. People who viewed themselves as good at solving regular problems came up with a larger quantity of revenge ideas, regardless of how original or harmful those ideas actually were.
When it came to the quality of the revenge ideas, personality and past behavior played a larger role. High levels of narcissism and a history of past malevolent behavior predicted both the malevolence index and the overall composite score. This means that individuals who were highly narcissistic or who had a habit of playing tricks and seeking revenge in the past generated ideas that were more harmful and more unique.
Interestingly, past malevolent behavior contributed to the generation of harmful and original ideas independently of everyday problem-solving skills and narcissistic traits. While feeling provoked by the scenario correlated with generating darker ideas, the level of provocation did not uniquely predict the task outcomes once past behavior and personality were factored into the statistical models. Psychopathy and Machiavellianism also did not emerge as unique predictors in the final analyses.
“We were a bit surprised that provocation level didn’t have a larger effect on malevolent creativity,” Ceballos said. “In our study, it appears that past behaviors and personality traits were more closely tied to malevolently creative ideation.”
The findings align with research covered by PsyPost in 2023, which found that dark personality traits and a history of malicious actions relate to generating novel ways to harm others. They also fit with a 2021 study covered by PsyPost indicating that narcissism helps explain variations in malevolent creativity, though the new study specifically measured idea generation in real time rather than just relying on general behavioral tendencies.
As with all research, there are a few things to keep in mind. The study relied on a cross-sectional design, meaning the data was collected at a single point in time. Because of this, the researchers cannot determine cause and effect. It is not possible to say that past malicious behavior directly causes a person to generate better revenge ideas today, only that the two are associated.
The participant pool also consisted mostly of female college students in the United States. The results might not generalize to older adults, men, or people from different cultural backgrounds, especially since dark personality traits often vary across age and gender. Additionally, the study relied on self-reports for past bad behavior, which can be skewed if participants want to present themselves in a positive light.
The measure for everyday creativity was also based on a single question, which might not capture the full scope of a person’s creative abilities.
“What leads a person to use their creative abilities to harm others? I think the take-home message is that a complex mixture of personality, lived experiences, and current circumstances all come together to create a perfect storm of malevolent creativity,” Ceballos explained. “Our study included only a small subset of the factors that might contribute to malevolent creativity. A lot of open questions remain for future work, but our results suggest that it’s not a simple explanation.”
For instance, future studies could track people over time to see if a habit of malicious creativity builds on itself through positive reinforcement, eventually creating an automatic cognitive strategy for dealing with conflict.
“My collaborators and I have backgrounds in neuroscience, so our natural next step involves the exploration of potential neurophysiological correlates of malevolent creativity,” Ceballos said. “We’re particularly interested in how different kinds of acute and chronic stress, and even factors like sleep quality, might influence malevolent creativity and which therapeutic strategies might help to reduce negative outcomes.”
The study, “Self-Reports of Past Malevolent Behavior and Narcissism as Predictors of Malevolent Creativity on a Real-World Ideation Task,” was authored by Natalie A. Ceballos, Ruby N. Sweet, and Carmen E. Westerberg.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #MalevolentCreativity #Narcissism #DarkTriad #RevengeIdeas #CreativeProblemSolving #PsychologyResearch #AMORALModel #DarkPersonalityTraits #MalevolentBehavior #IdeationTask
-
DATE: September 8, 2026 at 10:00AM
SOURCE: PSYPOST.ORG** Research quality varies widely from fantastic to small exploratory studies. Please check research methods when conclusions are very important to you. **
-------------------------------------------------TITLE: People with narcissistic traits generate more original and malicious ideas for revenge, study finds
People who have previously used their imagination to harm others or who possess highly narcissistic traits tend to generate more original and malicious ideas for revenge. These findings indicate that past actions and personality shape how individuals apply their problem-solving skills during interpersonal conflicts. The research was published in The Journal of Intelligence.
Creativity is typically viewed as a positive force in society, driving art, science, and innovation. But creativity also has a dark side, known as malevolent creativity. This involves the application of original ideas to purposely harm, deceive, or manipulate others. It is essentially creative problem-solving with malicious intent, evident in everything from everyday pranks to complex criminal activities.
To understand why some people use their imagination for harm, psychologists often refer to a framework called the AMORAL model. This model suggests that dark creativity results from a combination of personal traits, such as a natural propensity for creativity or certain personality types, and environmental factors, such as a provoking situation.
Among personality types, the dark triad traits are particularly relevant. These include psychopathy (a lack of empathy and high impulsivity), Machiavellianism (a tendency to be strategic and manipulative), and narcissism (a sense of grandiosity, egocentrism, and a strong need for admiration). People high in narcissism tend to be especially reactive to social slights or threats to their ego. A 2021 meta-analysis found that among these dark traits, narcissism has the most consistent relationship with self-reported general creativity.
“Society generally views creativity as a good thing, but some people use their creativity to harm others,” Natalie Ceballos, a professor of psychology at Texas State University, told PsyPost. “I’m interested in the individual and environmental factors that might influence someone to steer their creativity toward antisocial ends.”
The current research, conducted by Ceballos alongside cognitive neuroscientist Carmen E. Westerberg and pre-med student Ruby N. Sweet, aimed to untangle how a person’s history of malicious behavior influences their current ability to devise revenge plots, above and beyond their everyday problem-solving skills and personality.
“We aimed to determine what factors are most relevant for understanding when creative people may use their skills for nefarious purposes,” Ceballos said. “Studies have shown that the dark triad personality traits predict malevolently creative ideology, but how other factors like history of creative malevolence or reaction to acute provocation might interact with dark triad traits is an area that requires further research.”
The research team recruited 248 undergraduate students for an online survey. The participants were predominantly young women, with an average age of 20. First, the students answered questions about their demographics and rated their own potential for everyday creative problem-solving on a simple five-point scale.
Next, participants completed a questionnaire assessing their past malevolent creativity. They rated how often they had engaged in behaviors like fabricating lies to simplify a problem, thinking up ways to take revenge, or playing tricks on others. They also completed a standard personality test to measure their levels of narcissism, psychopathy, and Machiavellianism.
To measure malicious ideation in real time, the researchers used a task built around a hypothetical conflict. Participants read a vignette in which a neighbor asked for help with apartment renovations and promised to pay them. In the scenario, the participant does the work, but the neighbor later denies that any agreement took place and refuses to pay. The participants were instructed to type out as many original ideas as possible to get back at the neighbor.
“Some of the participants’ ideas were malevolent but not very creative, like simply physically assaulting the neighbor,” Ceballos noted. “Other ideas, like seeding the neighbor’s lawn with invasive plants, were more original and showed an appreciation for the long game.”
After generating their ideas, the students rated how provoked they would feel if the situation happened in real life. Two independent raters then evaluated the participants’ responses. They calculated a fluency index, which was the total number of malicious ideas generated. They also calculated a malevolence index, counting ideas that were rated as at least slightly harmful, and a composite score, which only counted ideas that were both harmful and highly original.
The researchers found that different personal factors predicted different types of creative output. A participant’s self-perception of their everyday problem-solving skills predicted their fluency index. People who viewed themselves as good at solving regular problems came up with a larger quantity of revenge ideas, regardless of how original or harmful those ideas actually were.
When it came to the quality of the revenge ideas, personality and past behavior played a larger role. High levels of narcissism and a history of past malevolent behavior predicted both the malevolence index and the overall composite score. This means that individuals who were highly narcissistic or who had a habit of playing tricks and seeking revenge in the past generated ideas that were more harmful and more unique.
Interestingly, past malevolent behavior contributed to the generation of harmful and original ideas independently of everyday problem-solving skills and narcissistic traits. While feeling provoked by the scenario correlated with generating darker ideas, the level of provocation did not uniquely predict the task outcomes once past behavior and personality were factored into the statistical models. Psychopathy and Machiavellianism also did not emerge as unique predictors in the final analyses.
“We were a bit surprised that provocation level didn’t have a larger effect on malevolent creativity,” Ceballos said. “In our study, it appears that past behaviors and personality traits were more closely tied to malevolently creative ideation.”
The findings align with research covered by PsyPost in 2023, which found that dark personality traits and a history of malicious actions relate to generating novel ways to harm others. They also fit with a 2021 study covered by PsyPost indicating that narcissism helps explain variations in malevolent creativity, though the new study specifically measured idea generation in real time rather than just relying on general behavioral tendencies.
As with all research, there are a few things to keep in mind. The study relied on a cross-sectional design, meaning the data was collected at a single point in time. Because of this, the researchers cannot determine cause and effect. It is not possible to say that past malicious behavior directly causes a person to generate better revenge ideas today, only that the two are associated.
The participant pool also consisted mostly of female college students in the United States. The results might not generalize to older adults, men, or people from different cultural backgrounds, especially since dark personality traits often vary across age and gender. Additionally, the study relied on self-reports for past bad behavior, which can be skewed if participants want to present themselves in a positive light.
The measure for everyday creativity was also based on a single question, which might not capture the full scope of a person’s creative abilities.
“What leads a person to use their creative abilities to harm others? I think the take-home message is that a complex mixture of personality, lived experiences, and current circumstances all come together to create a perfect storm of malevolent creativity,” Ceballos explained. “Our study included only a small subset of the factors that might contribute to malevolent creativity. A lot of open questions remain for future work, but our results suggest that it’s not a simple explanation.”
For instance, future studies could track people over time to see if a habit of malicious creativity builds on itself through positive reinforcement, eventually creating an automatic cognitive strategy for dealing with conflict.
“My collaborators and I have backgrounds in neuroscience, so our natural next step involves the exploration of potential neurophysiological correlates of malevolent creativity,” Ceballos said. “We’re particularly interested in how different kinds of acute and chronic stress, and even factors like sleep quality, might influence malevolent creativity and which therapeutic strategies might help to reduce negative outcomes.”
The study, “Self-Reports of Past Malevolent Behavior and Narcissism as Predictors of Malevolent Creativity on a Real-World Ideation Task,” was authored by Natalie A. Ceballos, Ruby N. Sweet, and Carmen E. Westerberg.
-------------------------------------------------
Private, vetted email list for mental health professionals: https://www.clinicians-exchange.org
Unofficial Psychology Today Xitter to toot feed at Psych Today Unofficial Bot @PTUnofficialBot
-------------------------------------------------
#psychology #counseling #socialwork #psychotherapy @psychotherapist @psychotherapists @psychology @socialpsych @socialwork @psychiatry #mentalhealth #psychiatry #healthcare #depression #psychotherapist #MalevolentCreativity #Narcissism #DarkTriad #RevengeIdeas #CreativeProblemSolving #PsychologyResearch #AMORALModel #DarkPersonalityTraits #MalevolentBehavior #IdeationTask